Latest news with #2018WorldJuniorTeam
Globe and Mail
4 days ago
- Politics
- Globe and Mail
London police detective told accused in Hockey Canada trial he had no plans to charge him in 2018
The now-retired London police sergeant who lead the initial investigation into an alleged sexual assault by members of Canada's 2018 world junior hockey team began his interview with one of the accused players by saying that he did not believe he had grounds to lay charges for a sexual assault. Retired police sergeant Stephen Newton was called as a Crown witness after the morning break on Tuesday at the players' criminal trial in a London, Ont. Shortly after Mr. Newton entered the witness box, Crown attorney Meaghan Cunningham told the court she would be playing video of Mr. Newton's interview with accused player Michael McLeod. The interview was held in November, 2018. Mr. Newton began by saying: 'It was reported to me as a sexual assault, okay? And I just wanted to be clear to you, I've done some investigating to- to the best I could to this point and I don't feel I have identified the necessary grounds for charges of a sexual assault. I don't feel that I've gotten to a point that I, I know that a sexual assault, uh, technicality occurred, okay?' He goes on to say that he has no plans to arrest or charge Mr. McLeod at this point. Mr. McLeod is one of five members of the 2018 world junior team who are accused of sexually assaulting a woman at the Delta Armouries hotel in London, Ont. in the early morning hours of June 19, 2018. Court has heard that the complainant, who is known publicly as E.M., first spoke to Mr. Newton about the incident on June 22, and then again on June 26. Mr. Newton, who is appearing in court remotely, told Ms. Cunningham that he made efforts to speak to members of the 2018 world junior roster right away, but he never tried to contact the players directly. Instead he reached out to Hockey Canada and then dealt with their lawyers. In the 2018 interview, Mr. McLeod tells Mr. Newton about two short videos court has seen that were shot in the room on the night in question, in which E.M. says she is 'okay with this' and that everything is 'consensual.' 'I made sure I didn't get any of her, like – naked or anything. I just tried to get her face in it,' he said. 'I was kind of like worried something like this might happen so I took that first video. Just made sure that she was okay with it.' Mr. McLeod went on to say it was a 'weird situation.' He then appears to say he wasn't 'expecting' all 'the guys' to come in the room, which seems to contradict evidence presented it court that Mr. McLeod invited his team to the room to engage in sexual activity. Court only saw about 20 minutes of Mr. McLeod's interview video before the lunch break. Text message Crown says is crucial to Hockey Canada sex-assault case ruled inadmissible Tuesday also marked the end of former junior player Brett Howden's testimony. Mr. Howden, who currently plays in the NHL for the Vegas Golden Knights, spent six days testifying at the trial of his former world junior teammates. He is not accused of any wrongdoing but was in the hotel room on the night in question. The NHL player's testimony was complicated by apparent memory issues. On Monday, defence lawyer Megan Savard, who is representing Mr. Hart, asked Mr. Howden whether injuries he has suffered in his professional hockey career could have impacted his memory. Specifically, Ms. Savard brought up a traumatic head injury Mr. Howden suffered in March, 2022, during an NHL game, in which she said he was rendered unconscious for about nine minutes on the ice. 'Have you noticed that since you suffered your head injury that you've had more trouble remembering things than you did before?' she asked. Mr. Howden said it wasn't something he had thought much about before the trial: 'I've never really had to remember- try to remember so many little details like this before. And it's definitely gotten a lot harder over time.'
New York Times
10-05-2025
- Sport
- New York Times
At Hockey Canada trial, E.M. faces questions over timeline, alcohol consumption
LONDON, Ont. — On a fifth straight day of combative cross-examination, E.M. — the complainant in the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial — was challenged on her account of what transpired during a night of drinking and dancing at Jack's bar in London, Ont., before she said she was sexually assaulted by members of the 2018 Canadian World Junior team. Advertisement In a series of tense exchanges on Friday, Daniel Brown — attorney for Alex Formenton — showed the jury previously unseen surveillance video of the night of June 18, 2018. Frame by frame, Brown outlined how the footage contrasted with the timeline of events that E.M. shared with police in interviews days after the alleged incident. 'Your truth, it changes. That's the problem,' Brown said during one exchange with E.M. 'My truth hasn't changed,' E.M. replied. Formenton, Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube and Cal Foote are facing sexual assault charges stemming from the alleged incident while players were in town for a Hockey Canada event celebrating their 2018 World Junior championship. All five players pleaded not guilty to charges when arraigned in Ontario Superior Court. E.M. has testified that after a night of drinking and dancing at Jack's Bar, she went to a hotel with McLeod and engaged in consensual sex. Afterward, she said, men showed up in the hotel room without her consent and that she was scared. E.M. said that she was asked to lay down on a bedsheet on the floor, and did so because she felt she had no choice. Over the next couple of hours, she said she was coaxed into sexual acts, was laughed at, slapped and spit on. When she tried to leave, several times, E.M. says she was pressured by the men to remain. On Friday, Brown questioned statements E.M. made to police in 2018, in which she said she only purchased a couple of drinks for herself that night. Surveillance video showed E.M. buying and consuming drinks at the bar. She has previously testified that McLeod and others she met at the bar were buying her drinks throughout the night. 'It's not on surveillance, but that doesn't mean it didn't happen,' E.M. said. Brown also suggested that E.M. consumed less alcohol than she has claimed because of the smaller drink sizes served at Jack's on the discounted 'dollar-beer night.' He presented the jury with a small plastic shot glass obtained from Jack's Bar, used for 'Jägerbombs,' which he said held only half an ounce of liquid. Advertisement 'If you thought you had up to eight Jägerbombs that night, what you're really saying is you had the equivalent of four shots of alcohol, correct?' Brown said. Brown later showed footage of another player, Brett Howden, dancing with E.M. near her friends for several minutes. Howden, who now plays for the Vegas Golden Knights, does not face any criminal charges. Brown asked E.M. if she was attracted to Howden. She said did not know who she was dancing with, and described being drunk and having blurry vision at the time. The clip showed them dancing closely, with Howden pressing his face close to her neck as they danced. They appeared to be holding hands. The video then showed E.M. leaving the dancefloor with Howden. Another clip showed them move to a back bar, where E.M. remained and Howden left. Howden approached McLeod, in a clip from another camera, before they both returned to the bar where E.M. can be seen typing on her phone. It was close to midnight. In her statement to police in June 2018, E.M. said that Howden passed her to McLeod on the dancefloor, and then they went to the bar where he bought her a drink. On the video, E.M. was shown purchasing a drink for McLeod. When Brown asked E.M. why she was attracted to McLeod, noting that she'd said she had blurry vision at the time, E.M. said that she liked that he was taller than her, but couldn't recall all the details. 'As long as it's a tall guy, you'll go home with him?' Brown asked. 'No, that's not what I said,' she said. Throughout Friday's cross-examination, E.M. seemed to grow frustrated by Brown's questioning of her account of the specific order of events. 'Sorry I got a few details wrong when I was really drunk,' she said. Brown later revealed a Facebook Messenger conversation between E.M. and the friend she went to the bar with that night. The messages showed her friend's attempts to locate her shortly after midnight — just after E.M. met McLeod. Advertisement E.M. has testified that she did not recall texting anyone while she was at the bar. In one text, E.M.'s friend — whom she had recently met at work — asks where she is: 'Let me know if you want me to get u from the guy!!' 'Haha ok than youuu!! (sic),' E.M. replied. 'I'm ok for now but i'll let you know for sure' 'I'll come back soon!' E.M. said she didn't recall the conversation because she was drunk and with McLeod. Her friend sent her several messages and called once, but E.M. didn't respond. Around 12:15 a.m., E.M.'s friends approached her on the dancefloor and offered her a ride home, Brown said. She declined the ride and remained with McLeod. Brown also showed a video of E.M. speaking with a bouncer — around 1:18 a.m — whom she knew from high school, at the back of the bar, near an emergency exit, for several minutes. (She was also seen on video speaking with him earlier, shortly after she arrived at the bar.) As they chatted, E.M. appeared to brace herself against a wall while they spoke, which E.M. noted was a sign of her intoxication. At the same time, a cellphone video showed McLeod dancing with a group of his friends on the dancefloor. Brown suggested that this showed that E.M. had the opportunity to leave McLeod. By that point, E.M. said, she was OK leaving the bar with McLeod. Brown also questioned E.M. as to why she hadn't told police about the conversations at the bar with her friend, who might have been able to speak to her level of inebriation. He suggested she didn't mention him because he would be unhelpful to her testimony that she was drunk and uncomfortable with the players at the bar. E.M. said she didn't recall speaking with the bouncer at the bar, because she was drunk. She also said when she spoke to police she'd been focused on what happened after the bar, and her friend didn't have any information about that. She said she was concerned about her privacy and didn't want anyone she knew to be made aware of what had happened. Advertisement The next messages between E.M. and her friend weren't exchanged until 9 a.m. the next morning — June 19, 2018 — when her friend messaged E.M. to see if she made it home OK. It seemed like E.M. was 'having a blast with those guys,' her friend messaged. 'Haha ya they were funny,' E.M. responded. Brown asked E.M. why she hadn't told her friend what had allegedly happened at the hotel. 'What do you want me to say, something horrible just happened to me and I'm going to tell this kind-of-a-stranger what just went down?' E.M. said. 'I was really embarrassed. I felt so much shame. I was just messaging her as if nothing was wrong. I was coping.' 'Shame and embarrassment at the choices you made,' Brown said, before signaling that he was done with his questions for the day. 'Thank you, honor…' Brown started. But E.M. interrupted forcefully. 'No, I'd like to finish,' she said. 'I made the choice to dance with him and drink at the bar. I did not make the choice to have them do what they did back at the hotel.' 'We'll get to that on Monday,' Brown said. The cross-examination continues next week. (E.M. depicted in a courtroom sketch during her on-screen testimony in the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial by Alexandra Newbould / The Canadian Press via AP)
