22-04-2025
‘Does Maharashtra govt want to encourage law-abiders or lawbreakers?': Bombay HC orders demolition of illegal construction at Andheri
The Bombay High Court, while expressing displeasure over inaction by authorities against illegal construction in Andheri (East) despite several complaints made for the last four years, questioned whether the Maharashtra government wanted to continue to encourage the law-abiders or the lawbreakers.
A Bench of Justices Ajey S Gadkari and Kamal R Khata on April 17 directed strict disciplinary action against responsible officers of Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) and said that it was an example of civic body's failure to prevent and remove unauthorised constructions.
The court also ordered to demolish the illegal construction at an open space next to Lotus Apartment and opposite Lok Bharti building at Marol, Andheri (East) within two weeks, based on a plea filed in 2023, by an individual, Asif Fazal Khan, who stated that a member of Manav Seva Dham Charitable Trust had noticed the illegal construction.
The Trust had filed a complaint before the BMC first in March 2021 and another in May 2022 to take action against the illegal activity. However, it failed to give any response or take action.
Advocate Mahesh Rajpopat who appeared for the petitioner submitted that the illegal structure was being visited by anti-social elements, causing trouble to occupants of adjoining residential premises.
The HC in April last year had directed the BMC to inspect the site and take appropriate action.
The court noted that BMC, in its affidavit regarding the erring officer, claimed that the staff of the municipal wards concerned were on other duties due to the Ganpati festival and subsequently during Assembly elections last year, which caused the officer 'to lose track of the matter'. The affidavit said that the error by the officer was inadvertent and not a willful non-compliance with the HC order.
The HC noted that illegal constructions on larger vacant lands 'develop into slums which consist of both dwelling and commercial units and on smaller ones into commercial establishments.
'Outstandingly, this case not only reveals but vindicates the common belief about the unholy nexus amongst all concerned,' the HC said
'We are exasperated by not only the inaction of the BMC and all the above officers but what exemplifies this case is the complete lack of courtesy to the citizen by a Public Authority, noncommunication, and stoic silence. A reading of the Petition itself evokes annoyance. What emotional trauma citizens go through patiently, is what we set aside for now – though a matter of great concern,' the HC remarked.
It observed, 'one needs to have the courage and wherewithal not only to take up these issues against the law-breakers, who in some cases may also be anti-social elements but to continue following up the same till it meets with its logical conclusion, against all odds.'
'Does the State want to continue to encourage the law abiders or the law breakers is a question that the State Government needs to answer. At this point, we find it otherwise,' the Bench pointed out.
The Bench said the state government 'must sensitise these thoroughly insensitive persons in charge of the public authorities.
It went on to note, 'They are the ones who are solely responsible for the mushrooming illegalities and utter lawlessness. A lax attitude of the State Government in this regard would only lead law-abiding citizens to draw an inference that persons abetting the lawbreakers/persons indulging in illegalities, enjoy the benefits of these illicit gains from these illegalities conducted by anti-social elements who care a tuppence for the law.'
The HC also directed the BMC Commissioner to take appropriate action against erring officers responsible for permitting the construction and continuance of illegal structures after holding enquiry against them.
