30-01-2025
Fiber Hub Research Center to Explore Microfibers' Eco Impact, Skeptics Aside
While we know (and have known) that microfibers are bad, we're still fine-tuning the parameters to grade just how bad.
It's one of the reasons why the Microfibre Consortium (TMC) is leading research in North East England exploring textile microfiber's extent and environmental impact. In collaboration with Northumbria University, the multi-stakeholder initiative has unveiled the research hub housing that exploration, hoping to assist the next generation of designers and their future material—ideally non-shedding—innovations.
More from Sourcing Journal
When the Cure Turns to Poison: Renting Jeans Not So Green, French Researchers Find
Fiber Fragmentation Scale Measuring Microplastics Developed in Edinburgh
Achieving Socially Fair Decarbonization in Fashion Supply Chains
'Recent research has shown that the clothes we wear are shedding microfibers throughout their entire lifespan, from textile manufacture through to everyday wear,' the collaborators said in a statement. 'Even microfibers from fabrics considered 'natural,' such as cotton, can have a negative impact on the environment, as manufacturing processes introduce chemical dyes and finishes to the fabric so that it is no longer in its natural state.'
The Fiber-fragmentation and Environmental Research (FiBER) Hub is on the business school's Newcastle campus. The collaboratively created center plans to expand on existing industry knowledge of microfibers by testing a myriad of materials in various environments to measure fiber loss and its subsequent environmental impact.
'The Fiber Hub features state-of-the-art equipment which will allow researchers to understand exactly what and how much fiber a fabric sheds at each stage of its lifespan,' Northumbria said. This will complement existing research primarily focused on microfibers shed during laundry.
'The Fiber Hub collaboration enables TMC to draw on the interdisciplinary skills and technical capabilities of Northumbria and the Impact+ team to expand our knowledge offering to our signatory community,' said Dr. Kelly Sheridan, CEO of TMC and associate professor at Northumbria. 'Through this collaboration, the TMC research team will provide direction to relevant research informed by industry needs, to go beyond what is possible today and create robust, wide ranging and comprehensive lifespan data on fiber fragmentation.'
The hub was set up as part of the Impact+ Network, a multidisciplinary cohort launched in 2023—supported by brands like Asos and funded by UK government(ish) bodies like the UKRI—to challenge how the fashion and textile sector currently measures and assesses environmental impact.
'This strategic partnership reflects the core aim of the Impact+ Network by focusing on microfibers as an overlooked and unmeasured environmental pollutant,' said Northumbria's Dr. Alana James, principal investigator for the project. 'Interdisciplinary collaboration with design and environmental science will enable our research to reduce fiber shedding at the root cause, whilst implementing these insights directly within an industry setting.'
Not everyone is convinced the consortium has the credibility to do such complementary work.
In a report published by the Bremen Cotton Exchange the self-described raw material 'competence center' compiled microplastic research by analyst Veronica Bates Kassatly and statistician Dr. Terry Townsend to explore the effect of micro- and nanoplastics on human health.
In doing so, the duo discovered a conflict of interest.
'The sources tapped by both the French and EU PEFs to evaluate microfiber impact are not scientific organizations, but entities created and funded by vested interests,' Bremen said in a statement. 'The conflicts of interest stemming from the involvement of stakeholders deeply tied to the production of plastic apparel undermine the scientific foundations of environmental legislation and impede the effective management of long-term environmental challenges.'
For context, plastic microfibers are categorized differently than other microfibers, which must be made clear in life cycle assessments (LCAs) standard and the European Union's Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) method.
Thus, non-NGOs should be excluded from making such designations for the potential of both scientific and political conflict; which is curious, per the paper, as the TMC is a private company limited by guarantee without share capital, per 2018 incorporation filings.
'Examination of recent filings shows that since inception, the company has averaged 4-6 employees and no fixed assets. TMC has neither the staff nor the facilities to be a research institute,' reads the report, which clarified that none of the opinions expressed are those of the authors or the financiers.
It also goes on to say the TMC lacks credibility for not having published any peer-reviewed research of its own and calls attention to the consortium's signatories—specifically their tax brackets.
'On what grounds TMC is qualified to act as one of only two sources to inform the microfiber complement of what is intended to be an obligatory environmental footprint label applicable to all apparel and textiles sold in France is unclear and raises questions about scientific rigor,' the paper reads, suggesting the TMC work under the belief fiber issues are solved with fiber solutions, and chemistry issues are solved with chemistry solutions. 'If TMC is convinced that functionalizations pose a serious toxicity threat to which nobody is paying sufficient attention, we would agree.'
Sheridan was quick to retort, introducing the Fiber Hub as an exhibit.
'[Fiber Hub] brings multidisciplinary academics from forensic science, design, environmental sciences and big data, all under one roof, and will boost the evidence available to all partners who are involved in achieving the aims of The Microfibre 2030 Commitment,' she wrote in a statement penned earlier today. 'Overall, this suggests that neither the size of an organization, nor its legal set up, influence its ability to coordinate and direct scientific work.'
