Latest news with #AlexWellerstein
Daily Mail
13 hours ago
- Politics
- Daily Mail
Chilling list reveals which US cities would be first targets hit in WWIII
As the US continues to call for peace in the Middle East after bombing Iran 's nuclear sites, there are still fears the situation could push the world closer to all-out war. Iran's nuclear-powered allies, China and Russia, have two of the largest arsenals on the planet, which means any world war could have devastating consequences for the US. In 2019, Russian state television even listed a number of targets across America that would be targeted in a nuclear strike, according to Reuters. Since then, world policy experts, investigative journalists, and even financial analysts have warned about what could possibly happen if there was a third world war. While famous and strategically vital cities like New York and Washington DC top the list of likely targets in a nuclear attack, several other targets that could be in the crosshairs may surprise the everyday American. From Shreveport, Louisiana to Ogden, Utah, many remote locations throughout the country could come under missile attack because of the hidden importance to national security. Alex Wellerstein, a nuclear historian and professor at Stevens Institute of Technology, told the Daily Mail: 'If the adversary is Russia and their goal is to disable US retaliation, command centers and ICBM sites will be hit first. If the attacker is a rogue actor, symbolic or densely populated areas might be targeted instead.' These 15 sites are the likeliest targets because of population density, air distance to a strategic military facility, emergency preparedness, and ease of evacuation. Honolulu, Hawaii Honolulu may seem like a peaceful tropical escape, but it's actually one of the most at-risk nuclear targets in the country. The island is home to several major military installations, including Pearl Harbor and Hickam Air Force Base. With around 350,429 residents in 2025, the island's population remains densely packed. Since it's surrounded by the Pacific Ocean and 2,500 miles from California, escaping the island quickly would be nearly impossible. Shreveport, Louisiana This Louisiana metro area is often overlooked, but it's home to one of the most powerful nuclear airbases in the US. Barksdale Air Force Base hosts B-52 bombers capable of delivering nuclear strikes globally. With a 2025 population of around 172,033, Shreveport's proximity to this base (less than six miles) makes the threat of civilian casualties very high. Ogden-Clearfield, Utah Ogden and Clearfield are two cities tucked along Utah's Wasatch Front, near one of America's most important military bases: Hill Air Force Base. It supports the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center. Their combined population is over 121,717 in 2025. Despite its mountain views and suburban vibe, this region is a direct line of fire in any strategic nuclear attack. Evacuation would be difficult because of its mountainous surroundings and a limited number of main roads. Highways could quickly become jammed. In 2023, experts predicted that a nuclear bomb detonated here would cause 87,140 deaths. Cheyenne, Wyoming Cheyenne is a small city with massive strategic value. It hosts the Francis E Warren Air Force Base, a key command center for US nuclear missile operations. Though its 2025 population is just 66,000, the city's decades-long role in America's missile defense makes it a high-priority target. Evacuations here are complicated because of the surrounding mountains and sparse transportation options. Rural areas would struggle to move large numbers of people quickly. Despite its size, Cheyenne would likely be one of the first cities hit in a nuclear war. Great Falls, Montana Great Falls might not seem like a big deal, but it's only a few miles from Malmstrom Air Force Base. This base controls hundreds of nuclear missile silos that could be used in a world war. Despite a modest 2025 population of just 60,422, it's still one of the most strategically important US cities. Evacuation is also difficult in Montana. Long distances between major population centers, cold weather, and a limited road network make emergency slow and dangerous. Colorado Springs, Colorado Nestled at the foot of the Rockies, Colorado Springs is home to the North American Aerospace Defense Command (NORAD) and several other key military facilities. These include Peterson Space Force Base and military satellite operations. NORAD is the military command responsible for defending the airspace over the US and Canada. With a population nearing 492,528 in 2025, Colorado Springs is a major city with global military importance. The mountainous terrain makes evacuation extremely difficult. Shelters for civilians are reportedly sparse, with limited exits out of town causing traffic jams. Omaha, Nebraska Omaha isn't just a Midwestern city, it's the nerve center of US nuclear command. Just south of the city lies Offutt Air Force Base, a top-level command site. In 2025, about 486,051 people live in Omaha. It played a key role during the Cold War and remains essential to America's nuclear operations. Winter weather and flat plains make evacuation tricky. Roads can become impassable and shelters are limited. Albuquerque, New Mexico Albuquerque may be known for its desert scenery, but it's also home to Kirtland Air Force Base. This site holds one of the largest stockpiles of nuclear weapons in the US arsenal. With a population of 557,198 in 2025, the city is a vital hub for nuclear storage and logistics. The desert environment and sprawling layout make evacuating a slow process. It's infrastructure also has difficulties with sudden mass exits. Houston, Texas Houston isn't just a big city, it's vital. With 2.3 million people in 2025, it's the US energy capital and sits just miles from a nuclear power plant. Its oil refineries, shipping ports, and economic weight make it a high-priority target for enemy nations. Any hit here would ripple across the country. Evacuating the region would be a nightmare. Roads are often congested even on regular days, and hurricane flooding is a regular concern in the summer months. Seattle, Washington Seattle's 767,060 residents are boxed in by mountains and water, living near Naval Base Kitsap, a submarine nuclear hub, with limited exits in a crisis This Washington metro area is home to more than 767,060 people and is near Naval Base Kitsap, a major US submarine and nuclear weapons base. Seattle is also a global tech hub and major seaport, adding to its importance. The local geography also works against Americans trying to evacuate. Surrounded by mountains and waterways, there are only a few exits on land. Los Angeles, California Home to 3.7 million and critical industries, LA faces near-impossible evacuation with jammed freeways and limited shelter options in a large-scale emergency Los Angeles now has a population topping 3.7 million, making it America's second-largest metropolitan area. It's also home to major ports, tech, media, and defense industry sites. Its vast size and economic importance make it a clear target. Evacuating Los Angeles could be a near impossible task. Freeways are chronically jammed, and the city's public transportation would be strained by a full-scale emergency. San Francisco, California This Bay Area city has 842,000 residents in 2025. It's also a major tech center and port zone with global connections. However, San Francisco is also geographically boxed in by water and mountains, making a quick exit very difficult. Bridges would clog quickly, and there are few other routes out of town on land. Chicago, Illinois Chicago is America's third-largest city with nearly 2.7 million living the city and approximately 9.6 million people in its great metro area. It's surrounded by four nuclear power plants and is a national transportation hub. It might not seem obvious, but Chicago's economic role and infrastructure make it a high-risk location. Lake Michigan, a dense urban center, and aging roadways could make escape routes unreliable. Washington, DC With about 684,394 residents in 2025 in its greater metropolitan area, the US capital is the political heart of America. It's home to the White House, Congress, and the Pentagon. As the seat of government and military command, DC would be a top target in any nuclear conflict. There's no question Washington would be a target in any global conflict, large or small. New York City America's most populous metro area, with 7.9 million people in 2025, may also be its most symbolic. It's home to Wall Street, the United Nations, and key media outlets. A strike here would be both devastating and highly visible. It's the kind of target meant to send a global message. It's the most obvious and expected target on the list, potentially crippling the nation's economy as well as kill millions in a nuclear strike.
Daily Mirror
3 days ago
- Science
- Daily Mirror
Grim interactive tracker shows how safe you'll be if nuclear bomb hits
WARNING: DISTRESSING CONTENT. As fears over the potential threat of nuclear warfare continue to escalate, the Mirror takes a look at what such a catastrophic outcome might look like, using a disturbing online tracker A grim tracker illustrates exactly how safe or unsafe you'll be in the event of a nuclear attack, making for a sobering visual reminder of the horrors of this type of warfare. Designed by science and nuclear technology historian Alex Wellerstein, NUKEMAP allows you to see the impact an atomic weapon could have on your local area. The results are difficult to forget. You can select a location from anywhere on the planet, from Philadelphia to Beijing. This includes historical sites such as Nagasaki, Japan, where 74,000 people lost their lives in the summer of 1945, when a plutonium implosion-type nuclear weapon was detonated by the US. For the purposes of this article, I dragged the location to Canary Wharf, the location of the Mirror offices. I then selected the type of weapon used, selecting from the available presets. With a range of choices that cannot help but spark a shudder, you can pick from warheads such as 'Tsar Bomba', the largest USSR bomb tested at 100 Mt. Again, or 'Little Boy' (15Kt), the atomic bomb that decimated the Japanese city of Hiroshima, wiping out 140,000 citizens. You can also choose between two types of blast. The first category is 'surface' bombs, which detonate on or close to the ground, creating a larger crater and more localised damage, but with a smaller blast radius. The second is 'airburst' bombs, which detonate in the air and, with a wide blast radius, are designed to cause maximum damage to infrastructure. For this purpose, I initially opted for the airburst category, which is arguably the more likely choice for an aggressor targeting an urban area. I start off with the largest Pakistani weapon ever tested (45 kt). The simulation showed a fatality estimate of 70,820 and an injury estimate of 435,320. Horrifyingly, this was far from the most catastrophic blast. I then moved on to the TN 80/81, the largest current warhead in the French arsenal, at 300kt. This time, the death toll sat at a chilling 353,280, with an estimated 1,306,250 injuries. Finally, I chose the preset for the formidable "Castle Bravo", the largest US bomb tested at 15 Mt. This time, I chose the 'surface' option, with the simulated advising that this setting wouldn't be suitable for this setting. It's not a comfortable way to think. Again, there was a sharp escalation, with a shocking 2,397,310 fatalities and 2,738,190 injuries. Back in 2021, Hiroshima survivor Chieko Kiriake warned that advancements in nuclear technology mean a contemporary attack would be even more dangerous. Testifying on behalf of Hiroshima Speaks Out, Chieko, now 95, warned: "Current nuclear weapons are hundreds of times more powerful than the bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. If war broke out and nuclear weapons were ever used, the Earth would be destroyed. It is important that each of us continues to try to push the seeds of war deeper down the corridors so that war will not happen." This follows US attacks on three nuclear sites in Iran, sparking concerns over the potential for escalating nuclear conflict among global superpowers. Iran 's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, has now warned there will be "everlasting consequences" following US President Donald Trump's assertion that "great American Warriors" had conducted a "very successful attack" on the sites of Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. Taking to social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, Mr Araghchi said: "Each and every member of the UN must be alarmed over this extremely dangerous, lawless and criminal behaviour. In accordance with the UN Charter and its provisions allowing a legitimate response in self-defence, Iran reserves all options to defend its sovereignty, interests, and people." British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has also issued a statement on the matter: "Iran's nuclear programme is a grave threat to international security. Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon, and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat. "The situation in the Middle East remains volatile, and stability in the region is a priority. We call on Iran to return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis."
Irish Daily Mirror
6 days ago
- Politics
- Irish Daily Mirror
Ireland nuclear bomb map shows potential catastrophic damage amid WW3 fears
The prospect of World War Three is a deeply unsettling thought, but with escalating attacks between Iran and Israel this week - and Iran's growing alliance with China and Russia - the world feels closer to a global conflict than it has in years. The conflict between Israel and Iran has intensified dramatically over the past week. Israel launched extensive airstrikes on Iranian military sites and Iran retaliated with missile strikes targeting Israeli cities. Iran has warned that any US intervention could trigger an "all-out war," while US President Donald Trump has demanded Iran's "unconditional surrender" and called for an increased US military presence in the region. In recent years, Iran has strengthened its ties with China and Russia, creating a powerful alliance that challenges the existing international order and could dramatically shift global power dynamics. Amid escalating tensions, fears of nuclear conflict have resurfaced, with experts warning that any wider escalation involving Iran, Israel and their powerful allies could dangerously increase the risk of nuclear weapons being used. This has left some people asking the ultimate hypothetical - what could happen if a nuclear bomb hit Ireland? The Irish Government has an emergency operation – called the National Plan for Nuclear and Radiological Emergency Exposures – in place to deal with any such incident. It sets out steps for a national response to such a crisis, and the subsequent transition to a managed existing exposure situation. Now, an alarming interactive map shows how much of Ireland could be destroyed if a nuclear bomb hit. Users can check the potential impact of a nuke being detonated in their area, including the number of fatalities and injuries it could cause. The website NUKEMAP was created by Alex Wellerstein, a historian of nuclear weapons, in a bid to "help people visualise nuclear weapons and get a sense of the scale of the bombs". He explained: "We live in a world where nuclear weapons issues are on the front pages of our newspapers on a regular basis, yet most people still have a very bad sense of what an exploding nuclear weapon can actually do." The map allows you to choose from a wide range of nuclear weapons already produced, tested or used. We used the Topol (SS-25), which is currently in Russian arsenal, to see what would happen if it hit various locations around Ireland. The warhead is 800 kiloton and can deliver a payload of 1,000 kg to a range of 11,000 km. If this nuclear bomb were to land in Dublin city centre, it could kill an estimated 330,150 people and injure a further 481,860 according to the NUKEMAP. People within an 18.4km radius would be impacted, including some living in neighbouring counties Meath, Kildare and Wicklow. The people most impacted would be those living within 0.97 km of the blast, who would be in the 'fireball radius'. The map explains anything inside the fireball is effectively vaporized. Those living within 6.53km of the bomb would see 'moderate damage'. Areas included here include Dundrum, the Phoenix Park and Ballymun. This is described as: "Most residential buildings collapse, injuries are universal, fatalities are widespread. The chances of a fire starting in commercial and residential damage are high, and buildings so damaged are at high risk of spreading fire". Anyone within 11.1km of the explosion - like Blanchardstown, Dublin Airport and Tallaght - would be in the 'thermal radiation radius'. This would see: "Third degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin, and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves. They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation". The last areas that would be damaged are within 18.4km of the blast and would see 'light damage'. This includes the likes of Lucan and Malahide, as well as parts of Meath, Kildare and Wicklow. The map explains: "At a around 1 psi overpressure, glass windows can be expected to break. This can cause many injuries in a surrounding population who comes to a window after seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion (which travels faster than the pressure wave). Often used as a benchmark for light damage in cities." If this nuclear bomb were to land in Cork city centre, it could kill an estimated 109,170 people and injure a further 95,730, according to the NUKEMAP. People within an 18.4km radius would be impacted, meaning it would reach as far as Crosshaven, Watergrasshill and Cobh. Those living within 6.53km of the bomb - which includes Cork Airport and Glanmire - would see 'moderate damage'. This is described as: "Most residential buildings collapse, injuries are universal, fatalities are widespread. The chances of a fire starting in commercial and residential damage are high, and buildings so damaged are at high risk of spreading fire." Anyone within 11.1km of the explosion - such as Passage West, Carrigaline, Blarney and Ballincollig - would be in the 'thermal radiation radius'. This would see: "Third degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin, and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves. They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation." The last areas that would be damaged are within 18.4km of the blast and would see 'light damage'. The map explains: "At a around 1 psi overpressure, glass windows can be expected to break. This can cause many injuries in a surrounding population who comes to a window after seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion (which travels faster than the pressure wave). Often used as a benchmark for light damage in cities." If this nuclear bomb were to land in Galway city centre, it is estimated that it could kill 48,510 people and injure 36,400 more, according to the NUKEMAP. People within an 18.4km radius would be impacted, including those living near the border in Clare. Those living between 6.53km of the bomb - which includes Salthill and the Atlantic Technological University - would see 'moderate damage'. This is described as: "Most residential buildings collapse, injuries are universal, fatalities are widespread. The chances of a fire starting in commercial and residential damage are high, and buildings so damaged are at high risk of spreading fire." Anyone within 11.1km of the explosion - such as Claregalway and Oranmore - would be in the 'thermal radiation radius'. This would see: "Third degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin, and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves. They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation." The last areas that would be damaged are within 18.4km of the blast and would see 'light damage'. This goes almost as far as Athenry. The map explains: "At a around 1 psi overpressure, glass windows can be expected to break. This can cause many injuries in a surrounding population who comes to a window after seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion (which travels faster than the pressure wave). Often used as a benchmark for light damage in cities." If this nuclear bomb were to land in Belfast city centre, it could kill an estimated 182,440 people and injure a further 231,100, according to the NUKEMAP. People within an 18.4km radius would be impacted, with it reaching as far as Bangor, Carrickfergus and Lisburn. Those living between 6.53km of the bomb - such as Balmoral, the Upper Falls and Springfield - would see 'moderate damage'. This is described as: "Most residential buildings collapse, injuries are universal, fatalities are widespread. The chances of a fire starting in commercial and residential damage are high, and buildings so damaged are at high risk of spreading fire." Anyone within 11.1km of the explosion - including Holywood, Dundonald and Carryduff - would be in the 'thermal radiation radius'. This would see: "Third degree burns extend throughout the layers of skin, and are often painless because they destroy the pain nerves. They can cause severe scarring or disablement, and can require amputation." The last areas that would be damaged are within 18.4km of the blast and would see 'light damage'. This include Carrickfergus, Bangor and Hillsborough. The map explains: "At a around 1 psi overpressure, glass windows can be expected to break. This can cause many injuries in a surrounding population who comes to a window after seeing the flash of a nuclear explosion (which travels faster than the pressure wave). Often used as a benchmark for light damage in cities." You can try the map for yourself here. The only two times nuclear weapons have been dropped on inhabited areas was in 1945, when the US detonated two nuclear weapons over the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As many as 220,000 people were killed in the atrocity. However, over 2,000 nuclear tests have been conducted globally since then, primarily for research and military demonstration purposes.
Miami Herald
17-06-2025
- Politics
- Miami Herald
Nuclear Bomb Map Shows Impact of US Weapons on Iran
A nuclear bomb map created using a simulation tool shows the devastating impact of a hypothetical U.S. nuclear strike on major Iranian cities amid an escalating crisis between Iran and Israel. Using maps created by Alex Wellerstein, a professor and historian of nuclear technology, Newsweek assessed what the impact would be if a B-83, the largest weapon currently in the U.S. arsenal, was used to strike the capital city of Tehran, the populous urban centers of Mashhad and Isfahan, and the holy city of Qom. The fireball radius indicated on the maps (inner yellow circle), represents everything that would be vaporized by intense heat rising to millions of degrees F. The more moderate blast damage radius (inner grey circle) would destroy residential buildings and probably cause widespread fires. The third thermal radius circle would cause third-degree burns extended throughout the layers of skin, and the fourth light blast damage radius would cause glass windows to break, with the potential for many injuries. While there is no indication that the U.S. is considering a nuclear strike on Iran, President Donald Trump has ignited tensions by warning that Washington will not allow Iran to develop atomic weapons. He wrote on Truth Social on Monday: "Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!" Trump added: "Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign. What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again." His warning followed a sharp escalation in hostilities between Israel and Iran. Last week, Israel launched a barrage of airstrikes against Iran targeting the country's military and intelligence leadership, along with critical nuclear sites and scientists. Scores have been killed and wounded on both sides as a result of the conflict. Israel launched surprise airstrikes on Iran on Friday, saying the assault was necessary to prevent its adversary from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iran has long denied Israel's repeated accusation that it seeks nuclear weapons. Trump may have named the wrong city in his evacuation warning on Monday, given that the Fordow nuclear facility-a nuclear enrichment plant buried under a mountain-is located near to the ancient religious city of Qom, not Tehran. A targeted full-scale strike on the facility could have catastrophic consequences for the 1.2 million residents of Qom. Newsweek has contacted the Pentagon and Iran's Foreign Ministry via email for comment. In Tehran, an estimated 2,546,150 people would die and 3,772,020 would suffer injuries. In any given 24-hour period in the city, there are on average 9,461,407 people in the light (1 psi) blast range of the simulated detonation. In Mashhad, an estimated 1,296,770 people would die and 1,131,380 would suffer injuries. In any given 24-hour period, there are on average 3,013,896 people in the light (1 psi) blast range of the simulated detonation. In Isfahan, an estimated 791,080 people would die and 1,003,820 would suffer injuries. In any given 24-hour period, there are on average 2,596,335 people in the light (1 psi) blast range of the simulated detonation. In Qom, an estimated 684,230 people would die and 339,670 would suffer injuries. In any given 24-hour period, there are on average 1,124,552 people in the light (1 psi) blast range of the simulated detonation. Newsweek looked at the results of an airburst attack, more likely to be used in a strike on a city than a surface attack, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. Trump has denied that he left the G7 summit early on Monday to work on an Israel-Iran ceasefire, but said he may send either Vice President JD Vance or U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with Iran. Related Articles China Touts Weapons Capabilities As Iran's Defenses CollapseDavid Hogg Says Dems Backing Iran War Should Be PrimariedSatellite Images Show Israeli Damage at Key Iran Missile BaseIran Warns U.S. of "Painful Responses" Over Israel's Attacks 2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Newsweek
17-06-2025
- Politics
- Newsweek
Nuclear Bomb Map Shows Impact of US Weapons on Iran
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A nuclear bomb map created using a simulation tool shows the devastating impact of a hypothetical U.S. nuclear strike on major Iranian cities amid an escalating crisis between Iran and Israel. Using maps created by Alex Wellerstein, a professor and historian of nuclear technology, Newsweek assessed what the impact would be if a B-83, the largest weapon currently in the U.S. arsenal, was used to strike the capital city of Tehran, the populous urban centers of Mashhad and Isfahan, and the holy city of Qom. The fireball radius indicated on the maps (inner yellow circle), represents everything that would be vaporized by intense heat rising to millions of degrees F. The more moderate blast damage radius (inner grey circle) would destroy residential buildings and probably cause widespread fires. The third thermal radius circle would cause third-degree burns extended throughout the layers of skin, and the fourth light blast damage radius would cause glass windows to break, with the potential for many injuries. While there is no indication that the U.S. is considering a nuclear strike on Iran, President Donald Trump has ignited tensions by warning that Washington will not allow Iran to develop atomic weapons. He wrote on Truth Social on Monday: "Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!" Trump added: "Iran should have signed the 'deal' I told them to sign. What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again." His warning followed a sharp escalation in hostilities between Israel and Iran. Last week, Israel launched a barrage of airstrikes against Iran targeting the country's military and intelligence leadership, along with critical nuclear sites and scientists. Scores have been killed and wounded on both sides as a result of the conflict. Israel launched surprise airstrikes on Iran on Friday, saying the assault was necessary to prevent its adversary from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iran has long denied Israel's repeated accusation that it seeks nuclear weapons. Trump may have named the wrong city in his evacuation warning on Monday, given that the Fordow nuclear facility—a nuclear enrichment plant buried under a mountain—is located near to the ancient religious city of Qom, not Tehran. A targeted full-scale strike on the facility could have catastrophic consequences for the 1.2 million residents of Qom. Newsweek has contacted the Pentagon and Iran's Foreign Ministry via email for comment. Tehran, Iran A map showing the impact of an attack on Tehran, Iran. Newsweek used maps produced by Alex Wellerstein to assess what the impact would be if the U.S. attacked with a B-83. A map showing the impact of an attack on Tehran, Iran. Newsweek used maps produced by Alex Wellerstein to assess what the impact would be if the U.S. attacked with a B-83. NUKEMAP In Tehran, an estimated 2,546,150 people would die and 3,772,020 would suffer injuries. In any given 24-hour period in the city, there are on average 9,461,407 people in the light (1 psi) blast range of the simulated detonation. Mashhad, Iran A map showing the impact of an attack on Mashhad, Iran. Newsweek used maps produced by Alex Wellerstein to assess what the impact would be if the U.S. attacked with a B-83. A map showing the impact of an attack on Mashhad, Iran. Newsweek used maps produced by Alex Wellerstein to assess what the impact would be if the U.S. attacked with a B-83. NUKEMAP In Mashhad, an estimated 1,296,770 people would die and 1,131,380 would suffer injuries. In any given 24-hour period, there are on average 3,013,896 people in the light (1 psi) blast range of the simulated detonation. Isfahan, Iran A map showing the impact of an attack on Isfahan, Iran. Newsweek used maps produced by Alex Wellerstein to assess what the impact would be if the U.S. attacked with a B-83. A map showing the impact of an attack on Isfahan, Iran. Newsweek used maps produced by Alex Wellerstein to assess what the impact would be if the U.S. attacked with a B-83. NUKEMAP In Isfahan, an estimated 791,080 people would die and 1,003,820 would suffer injuries. In any given 24-hour period, there are on average 2,596,335 people in the light (1 psi) blast range of the simulated detonation. Qom, Iran A map showing the impact of an attack on Qom, Iran. Newsweek used maps produced by Alex Wellerstein to assess what the impact would be if the U.S. attacked with a B-83. A map showing the impact of an attack on Qom, Iran. Newsweek used maps produced by Alex Wellerstein to assess what the impact would be if the U.S. attacked with a B-83. NUKEMAP In Qom, an estimated 684,230 people would die and 339,670 would suffer injuries. In any given 24-hour period, there are on average 1,124,552 people in the light (1 psi) blast range of the simulated detonation. Methods Newsweek looked at the results of an airburst attack, more likely to be used in a strike on a city than a surface attack, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists. What Happens Next Trump has denied that he left the G7 summit early on Monday to work on an Israel-Iran ceasefire, but said he may send either Vice President JD Vance or U.S. Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with Iran.
