27-01-2025
Readers appear split on Oshkosh Area School District's $197.8M facilities referendum
OSHKOSH – For the most part, the community doesn't appear to be in favor of the school district's referendum.
Several Northwestern readers are diametrically opposed to the Oshkosh Area School District seeking $197.8 million to fund the second phase of a four-phase facilities plan that includes the construction of a new middle school at the Jacob Shapiro Elementary School site.
Those against the referendum cite the district's mishandling of the South Park situation and a fear of increased property taxes, even though Superintendent Bryan Davis has continually uttered the words 'zero-dollar tax increase.'
There are some referendum supporters who contend that facilities like South Park Middle School are no longer ADA compliant and the diverse needs of students are no longer being met at aging buildings.
What we do know for certain is that if this reader callout is anything to go by, then Oshkosh is in for one interesting election April 1.
Here's what our readers had to say:
I understand why people are upset about this referendum and the circumstances surrounding its planning. But if you are thinking of voting 'No' as a protest vote, I urge you to think beyond Election Day.
First, the referendum is not at fault. Second, the reasons for the referendum are valid and necessary. Third, at some point in time, this school will need to be built, and every year of delay will just cost us more money.
A 'No' vote will only hurt us.
I will be voting against this.
At 71 years old, with the recent huge increases in property taxes, water and sewer bills, wheel tax, etc., in addition to the enormous cost of living increases due to inflation the past four years I simply cannot afford to pay for anything more.
So, I will be voting "No"!
I don't like it at all!!!
It's a waste of taxpayers' money.
My four kids NEVER went to Oshkosh public schools because of what is taught in the government schools. Until that changes, I'm TOTALLY against this outrageous cost to taxpayers.
I think the schools are reaching the point of no return. South Park is not set up for today's standards or the needs of the future. Being ADA compliant is a huge deal since OASD has a diversity of students.
Having all of 3K and 4K in one building would be helpful. Ending contacts with out-of-district buildings and making it easier for the staff to keep track of all of the students. Teachers having more resources at hand in one building as well.
Traeger needs a kindergarten wing. It was an oversight not to have one in the first place. Two classrooms on one side while one classroom is on the other side of the building. Plus, it needs more bathroom space.
A/C is important in all schools. The days get hot, and the kids get crabby.
More news: Baksteen Valken, Oshkosh's LEGO team, is headed back to the American Robotics Competition
I am very much against it. The citizens of Oshkosh just funded two new schools in the past few years.
It is like the OASD think they have a blank check now, so they are tossing every imaginable item in a referendum hoping something will stick. I don't buy it.
Prices have not receded since the super high inflation, and Oshkosh just increased the property taxes on a number of residents and businesses.
Now, OASD thinks the time is right for asking more from the people of the city. The timing is bad. I will vote against it.
I am in support of the referendum if the school board keeps its promise that it will not raise property taxes. Property taxes this year were absolutely out of control.
Oh, hell no!!! They screwed up and bought properties without getting zoning checked and now want us to pay for their screw up ... NO, NO, NO.
I must vote "No" to any school referendum being pushed through without due diligence regarding the Shapiro site and methane concerns.
They have already wasted $1.2 million on the last plan because, although they should have, they didn't have the necessary information about the zoning.
I believe they rushed this new plan just to get it on the ballot. Telling voters not to worry about the methane concern is not an acceptable response. So "No" for me.
More news: Oshkosh raises storm and sewer water utility rates; residents to face $3-$5 bill increases
I am all for the referendum as an unfortunate necessity.
The Republican Legislature of this state needs to do their job and release the budget surplus to PUBLIC schools and other needs for the people! End the public funding of private charter schools and spend public tax dollars on public programs and needs!
I have kids in the OASD and I see firsthand the degraded facilities and safety hazards present. How can kids learn in a dilapidated and uncomfortable environment? No AC, musty classrooms, non-accessible classrooms, and open-concept classrooms are all barriers for our young learners.
If public schools were funded properly, maybe there wouldn't be such an influx of needed referendums in our state.
Using public tax money for funding private and unregulated schools should be nonexistent. If someone wants to send their child to a private and/or religious school, I am all for it, but not at the cost of even a single cent of taxpayer money.
Unfortunately for the citizens of Oshkosh, the school board is composed of people who have a pie-in-the-sky want list. There is no regard for the amount of taxes or the burden that is placed upon homeowners.
There are many people who own homes and live on a meager income, which is often only Social Security. What are they to do about this outlandish want list?
More people are taking advantage of the availability to switch to private schools and taking their tax dollars with them. The citizens of Oshkosh just got hit with a very hefty home tax averaging about $600.
As a lifelong citizen of Oshkosh, I feel this referendum is not affordable. Vote "No" on this referendum.
First, I think all monetary considerations by any city/county board should be held in November when a larger group of people vote and a better idea of their wishes would be determined.
Half the monies used to build the new middle school would have been enough to renovate Merrill School. Merrill was built with quality craftsmanship and could have been saved. Oshkosh doesn't seem to have a vision of saving our history.
And, I also think that this particular vote is going to put a lot of Oshkosh citizens in a financial bind. This economy has been hard on people and the school board seems to think we all have deep pockets.
We've all had to "tighten our belts" and the board should take this into consideration. They may be responsible for giving Oshkosh good schools, but they are also responsible for giving the Oshkosh community what it can afford.
Contact Justin Marville at jmarville@
This article originally appeared on Oshkosh Northwestern: Oshkosh schools facilities referendum gets split response from readers
