Latest news with #AmitSahni
New Indian Express
09-05-2025
- Politics
- New Indian Express
36 HC judges for 60 posts, PIL warns of judicial crisis
NEW DELHI: A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been filed in the Delhi High Court highlighting the alarming 40 per cent vacancy in the court's sanctioned judicial strength, calling for immediate steps to address the crisis and prevent further erosion of justice delivery. Filed by practising lawyer Amit Sahni on Thursday, the plea states that while the Delhi High Court is sanctioned to have 60 judges, 45 permanent and 15 additional, it is currently functioning with only 36 judges. The shortfall, according to the petition, is the result of recent retirements, inter-court transfers and the lack of timely appointments despite the binding constitutional process and Memorandum of Procedure (MoP). 'Several Judges, including Justice Rekha Palli and Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, have retired recently. Justice Yashwant Varma, Justice C.D. Singh, and Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma have been transferred to other High Courts. Further, two more retirements are expected in the coming months, which will reduce the strength to merely 34 judges—further exacerbating pendency and judicial delays,' as per plea. This acute shortage, the petition contends, has delayed the adjudication of critical matters including bail pleas, writ petitions, appeals, and commercial plea said that the burden on the existing judges has increased considerably, and the backlog of cases continues to rise. The PIL further argues that judicial delays hurt economically weaker and marginalised sections the most, as they lack the resources to endure protracted legal battles or seek redressal elsewhere. It also asserts that judicial vacancies should not be viewed merely as an administrative concern, but as a serious issue of fundamental rights and institutional trust. Calling the situation untenable, the plea urges the court to treat the filling of vacancies as a matter of top constitutional priority, especially given the Delhi High Court's stature as a key constitutional court.t.
India Gazette
08-05-2025
- Politics
- India Gazette
PIL seeks urgent judge appointments in Delhi HC to ensure timely justice
New Delhi [India], May 8 (ANI): On Thursday, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed in the Delhi High Court, urging immediate judicial intervention to address the severe and persistent shortage of judges, which has hampered the efficient delivery of justice. Plea moved by Practising lawyer Amit Sahni, stated that as per sanctioned strength, the Delhi High Court should have 60 judges (45 permanent and 15 additional). However, it is currently functioning with only 36 judges, reflecting a vacancy rate of 40%. This serious shortfall has arisen due to retirements, recent inter-court transfers, and inaction in appointing judges despite the constitutional mandate and existing Memorandum of Procedure (MoP) requiring appointments to be initiated well before vacancies arise. It further stated that several judges, including Justice Rekha Palli and Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta, have retired recently. Justice Yashwant Varma, Justice C.D. Singh, and Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma have been transferred to other High Courts. Further, two more retirements are expected in the coming months, which will reduce the strength to merely 34 judges. The continued shortage of judges has led to alarming pendency of cases, excessive workload on sitting judges, delays in disposal of critical matters such as writs, bail applications, appeals, and commercial disputes, thereby directly affecting citizens' rights and public trust in the judiciary, plea stated. Delays in adjudication due to judicial vacancies disproportionately affect the economically weaker and marginalised sections of society, who cannot afford prolonged litigation or access alternate forums of redressal. This is not merely an issue of administrative efficiency but one of fundamental rights, institutional integrity, and public trust in the judicial system. Judicial vacancies in a court of national and constitutional significance such as the Delhi High Court must be treated as a matter of utmost priority, the plea read. (ANI)
