Latest news with #BPA
Wales Online
3 days ago
- Wales Online
Drivers warned over blue badge 'misuse' as authorities vow it 'cannot continue'
Drivers warned over blue badge 'misuse' as authorities vow it 'cannot continue' The British Parking Association has said "we cannot continue to ignore this issue" after figures show blue badge misuse and fraud has soared by more than 1,000% since 2016 Alarming new figures have highlighted the widespread misuse of blue badges across UK roads, with parking authorities describing the "level of blue badge misuse and fraud" as "shocking" and emphasising that "we cannot continue to ignore this issue". The British Parking Association (BPA) has unveiled data showing a dramatic rise in blue badge misuse, which has escalated by more than 1,000% since 2016. The RAC has noted a 400% increase in the theft of blue badges in London from 2014 to 2023. The BPA reports that fraudulent practices include the theft of badges, as well as the creation and online sale of counterfeit badges. Instances of individuals using badges issued to deceased persons have been documented by Birmingham Live. There's also a worrying pattern emerging of individuals 'borrowing Grandma's badge' to take advantage of free and convenient parking spots, reports Wales Online. The BPA is advocating for local councils to receive enhanced powers and resources to tackle this growing problem effectively. To get our free daily briefing on the most pressing national issues, subscribe to the Wales Matters newsletter here. Alison Tooze, chief engagement and policy officer at the BPA, said: "The statistics around the level of blue badge misuse and fraud are shocking. "We cannot continue to ignore this issue, particularly when those affected are among the most vulnerable members of our community." The public is being reminded about the critical need for accessible parking spaces for legitimate blue badge holders. Tooze said: "Badge holders rely on accessible parking to carry out their day-to-day activities and for many it is a vital part of living an independent life. "Perpetrators of blue badge misuse and fraud deprive genuine badge holders of this right to freedom, whilst costing ordinary taxpayers millions every year. This must stop." Gabriel Hambleton from Gold Label Car Care, highlighted the repercussions of blue badge misuse, saying: "Misuse of a blue badge can have serious consequences. Article continues below "Lending the badge to someone else, using it after it has expired, or failing to return a badge that is no longer needed can lead to its withdrawal and a fine of up to £1,000. "This helps protect the integrity of the scheme and ensures support goes to those who genuinely need it."
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Health
- Yahoo
Harmful chemicals often migrate into tinned food – here's how to avoid eating them
A friend to the busy, tired and indisposed, a staple of university life, and the cornerstone of any survival kit or camping setup. We are talking, of course, about cans, a way to preserve various types of food and drink while also keeping their nutritients and flavour intact. This method of preservation has been in our food system for decades, with one of its many virtues being that these metal containers can spend years in our pantries before going bad. This has traditionally led people to see cans as a safe way of preserving food. However, to ensure their safety we need to more deeply understand the possible chemical interactions between containers and food. Unless you notice damage or rust on canned goods, you can generally rest assured that what's inside is safe. Many people steer clear of dented tins, and rightly so, as dents can cause small perforations that are not always visible to the naked eye. This can allow bacteria to get in, potentially contaminating the food inside. However, food safety issues caused by the components of the tins themselves have often been overlooked, or at least not sufficiently addressed. This includes, for instance, potentially increased exposure to hazardous substances from dressing a salad with the oil from canned tuna. But what substances are we talking about? And above all, what risks are we potentially exposing ourselves to? Metal cans usually contain polymeric linings that act as a barrier between the food and the metal. This coating prevents corrosion of the can, and prevents alterations in the food's flavour, texture or quality. However, some of the tin's components may still reach the food through a process called migration. This can affect the quality of the product and, in some cases, poses a potential risk to the consumer's health, either by ingesting significant quantities, or through cumulative exposure over the course of their lifetime. In the FoodChemPack research group, at the University of Santiago de Compostela's Faculty of Pharmacy, we study the coatings of metal cans, both for beverages and canned food. This work is done as part of several projects (MIGRAEXPO, MIGRACOATING, BACFood4Expo and ACHED), in collaboration with the Spanish Agency for Food Safety and Nutrition (AESAN). In our work, we have detected many coatings that contained epoxy resins derived from bisphenol A diglycidyl ether (BADGE), which is synthesised from epichlorohydrin and bisphenol A (BPA), a known endocrine disruptor. These chemicals interfere with the hormonal system, contributing to the development of metabolic diseases such as diabetes or obesity, and can also, among other adverse effects, affect the reproductive system. This hazardous compound was banned for use in baby bottles in 2011, and over many years European authorities reduced the maximum amount to which the general population should be exposed. Early this year, the European Commission completely banned the use of BPA and its derivatives in food contact materials. Leer más: In the beverages studied (alcoholic beverages, energy drinks, soft drinks and mineral water), the migration of these bisphenol A-derived compounds was found to be low. However, in canned foods, especially those with a high fat content, we observed higher levels of migration. Concentrations of another compound called cyclo-di-BADGE were higher in cans of tuna containing tomato, marinade or oil than plain tuna. Unlike BPA this compound is not yet regulated, mainly due to a lack of toxicological information. Based on this finding, we do not consider it good practice to reuse the liquids from cans – to dress pasta or salads, for instance – as this could increase exposure to these substances. In addition, it has been observed that heating food directly in the can – something normally done in specific contexts such as camping – can increase the migration of these compounds. This is because heat accelerates the transfer of substances from the lining into the food, which can increase health risks. In recent studies we have found that the bioaccessibility of these substances – meaning the amount that can be absorbed by the body – increases significantly when they are ingested with fatty foods. To reach this conclusion, we simulated the way our digestive systems process these compounds. We used the in vitro gastrointestinal digestion protocol INFOGEST which, among other things, simulates the composition of saliva and gastrointestinal fluids, the duration of each phase, temperature and body pH values. This showed us how different population groups are exposed differently to these substances, mainly depending on the basal pH of the stomach. This is normally around 1.5 in adults, but less acidic in children and elderly people. In most cases, the amounts detected were within the limits established by the European Commission. However, it is important to consider possible exposure through various routes and cumulative exposure over a lifetime. After all, a person may be in contact with the same substance through different means – not only through water or food, but also through other routes such as respiratory or absorption through the skin. This can increase the total exposure to the substance in the body. Even at low levels, exposure over prolonged periods can have negative effects, especially among the most vulnerable. These current findings, as well as those yet to come, will allow people to make informed decisions and take precautions. This applies both to how we use of this type of packaging, for instance not heating cans directly over fire when camping, and how we consume the contents, such as not using oil from tins to dress salads. These relatively small steps can contribute to a safer, healthier diet in the long run. Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en The Conversation, un sitio de noticias sin fines de lucro dedicado a compartir ideas de expertos académicos. Lee mas: The EU has banned BPAs: here's what you need to know about this common, toxic compound How does toothpaste affect the good bacteria in your mouth? PFAS are toxic 'forever chemicals' that linger in our air, water, soil and bodies – here's how to keep them out of your drinking water Lara Pazos Soto receives funding from the Xunta de Galicia. Antía Lestido Cardama no recibe salario, ni ejerce labores de consultoría, ni posee acciones, ni recibe financiación de ninguna compañía u organización que pueda obtener beneficio de este artículo, y ha declarado carecer de vínculos relevantes más allá del cargo académico citado.
Time of India
5 days ago
- Health
- Time of India
Plastic vs. glass vs. can: Which cold drink packaging is better and why
In today's world of convenience and environmental concern, the type of packaging used for cold drinks can have a significant impact on health, taste, and the planet. Consumers often face the choice between plastic bottles, glass bottles, and aluminium cans, each with its own set of advantages and drawbacks. Whether you're reaching for a soda on a hot day or stocking up for a party, understanding the differences among these materials can help you make smarter, more informed decisions for yourself and the environment. Difference of taste and quality in cold drink packaging When it comes to taste, packaging can make a real difference. Glass is considered the gold standard—it is chemically inert and does not react with or absorb flavours. This gives beverages in glass bottles the cleanest and most consistent taste. In contrast, plastic bottles made from PET (polyethylene terephthalate) are slightly permeable to gas and may allow carbonation to escape over time, leading to a flat taste. Cans are lined to prevent flavour leaching, but some consumers still detect a faint metallic aftertaste. In blind taste tests, drinks from glass bottles routinely score higher than those from plastic or cans. For example, a beverage flavour study found participants consistently ranked glass-packaged drinks as tasting fresher and more appealing. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo Carbonation retention is also best in glass and aluminium, while plastic can lose fizz within weeks. Comparison based on health and safety parameters Glass is the safest packaging from a health standpoint. It leaches no chemicals and is completely non-reactive. Aluminium cans, although lined with protective coatings, have raised health concerns in the past because many linings contained bisphenol A (BPA), a chemical linked to hormone disruption. While most cans today use BPA-free linings, some replacements may still raise health questions. Plastic bottles also pose health risks if reused or exposed to heat. Though PET bottles are BPA-free, they may still leach microplastics or endocrine-disrupting compounds under certain conditions. Recent research detected thousands of microscopic plastic particles in bottled water, raising questions about long-term effects. Environmental impact of different cold drink packaging In terms of carbon footprint, aluminium cans and PET bottles typically outperform single-use glass bottles. Glass production is energy-intensive and glass bottles are heavy, increasing transportation emissions. However, both glass and aluminium are infinitely recyclable, and recycling can drastically reduce their environmental cost. Plastic is lightweight and cheap to produce, but often ends up in landfills or as litter due to low global recycling rates. PET bottles are recyclable but must be collected and processed properly. Meanwhile, aluminium has one of the highest recycling rates globally and uses 95% less energy to recycle than to produce new. A key factor is reuse. Glass bottles can be washed and reused 20–30 times, making them a sustainable choice in deposit-return systems. In countries like Germany, glass bottle reuse systems achieve nearly 98% return rates, which offsets the higher energy cost of glass production. Legal regulations and court cases related to cold drink packaging Legal regulations and court cases across the globe Packaging safety has prompted government action worldwide. The European Union has banned BPA in all food-contact materials, including can linings and plastic bottles. Canada attempted to classify plastics as toxic under environmental law, though the move was challenged in court. In the US, BPA is banned in baby bottles, but remains permitted in other containers, though some states require labelling. Plastic bans are expanding, with countries limiting single-use items like straws, bags, and certain types of bottles. Meanwhile, some beverage companies face lawsuits over misleading packaging claims, especially about recyclability. No major court cases have targeted packaging formats directly, but legal pressure is growing. Cost and convenience Plastic bottles are the cheapest to produce, making them the dominant choice for mass-market beverages. PET is inexpensive and bottles are lightweight, reducing shipping costs. Aluminium is more costly than plastic but still efficient to produce and transport. Glass is the most expensive option due to high energy use and fragility in shipping. Retail prices often reflect these costs, with plastic bottles typically a few cents cheaper than equivalent cans or glass bottles. However, deposit-return systems can offset initial costs, especially when glass or cans are returned for refunds. For consumers, the practical difference is minimal unless they are buying in bulk or considering environmental impacts. Final verdict: which is best? Each packaging format has unique strengths: Glass offers the best taste and safety, and is ideal in reuse systems. Cans balance recyclability and freshness, with low environmental impact when recycled. Plastic bottles are convenient and cheap but carry more health and environmental concerns if not handled properly. For the eco-conscious, cans or refillable glass are top picks. For the health-conscious, glass is safest. For budget-focused or on-the-go consumers, plastic still serves a purpose—especially if recycled properly. Ultimately, the best choice depends on what you value most: taste, health, environment, or cost. Whichever you choose, proper disposal and recycling play a huge role. Making informed decisions helps not only your well-being but the planet's future as well. One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
USA Today
27-05-2025
- Business
- USA Today
ArtResin Celebrates a Decade of Innovation, Safety, and Creativity in the Art World
Carrollton, Texas – Dallas, TX – May 2025 – ArtResin, a globally recognized brand that redefined epoxy resin for the creative industry, proudly marks its 10-year anniversary. Since its launch in March 2015, ArtResin has grown into a leading name in artist-grade resin, celebrated for its crystal-clear finish, non-toxic formulation, and dedication to empowering artists across the globe. The brand was born out of a need for a safer alternative to harsh, industrial-grade epoxy resins that were ill-suited for artistic use. From the very beginning, ArtResin set itself apart by focusing on safety, ease of use, and artistic excellence. Its formula—free from volatile organic compounds (VOCs), low-odor, food-safe, and featuring a simple 1:1 mixing ratio—paved the way for a new category of artist-specific resin products. It was tested by third-party labs to ensure it met the highest safety standards before being introduced to the public. Following its debut, ArtResin quickly gained traction in the art world. Within months, it was available not only through its official websites in North America but also on major e-commerce platforms such as Amazon. By late 2015, ArtResin was already stocked in physical art supply stores across the continent. Its reach continued to expand in 2016 with distribution in Europe and Australia, as well as the release of complementary products such as the Propane Torch Head, ResinTint, and bulk packaging options. ArtResin's growth has been consistently marked by innovation and rigorous product testing. In 2016, the resin passed BPA extraction testing. In the years that followed, it was officially designated food safe (once cured) after passing migration testing, met California's Proposition 65 requirements, and passed skin and eye irritation tests—reinforcing the brand's commitment to artist safety and trust. These certifications reflect ArtResin's core belief that artists deserve materials that are as reliable and health-conscious as they are high-performing. The launch of new products has further diversified ArtResin's offerings. In 2020, the company introduced Alcohol Ink and Ink Sinker, expanding its reach into fluid art. Two years later, ArtResin launched Industrial Clear, a 2:1 formula designed for heavy-duty applications requiring greater strength and durability. These product developments have allowed ArtResin to support an even broader range of creative professionals, from painters and mixed media artists to commercial fabricators and designers. ArtResin's 10-year milestone is not only a celebration of its origin story—it represents a continued commitment to product safety, quality, and support for the global artist community. From the outset, the company's mission has remained clear: to provide a safe, easy-to-use resin that empowers artists to create confidently. That founding vision continues to guide the brand today, as ArtResin evolves to meet the growing needs of makers around the world. The company's success is also built on its dedication to customer education and community building. ArtResin has published hundreds of videos, blogs, and tutorials, offering hands-on guidance to both new and experienced resin users. The monthly 'ArtResin Winner' program highlights inspiring work from real customers and gifts selected artists with free product—a tradition that's remained popular since 2015. Across platforms, ArtResin has nurtured a global network of creators, encouraging collaboration, learning, and inspiration. Looking ahead, ArtResin plans to expand its international presence and continue developing new, environmentally responsible materials. With increasing demand for high-performance, non-toxic art supplies, the company sees the next decade as an opportunity to lead the resin market in both innovation and sustainability. As ArtResin celebrates a decade of safe, artist-driven solutions, the brand remains focused on its core mission: supporting creators with products they can trust. Whether customers have been using ArtResin for ten years or are just discovering it now, the company invites everyone to join in marking this milestone—and to look forward to what's next. For more information about ArtResin's products and its 10-year journey, visit About ArtResin: Founded in 2015, ArtResin is a leading manufacturer of artist-grade epoxy resin known for its safe, easy-to-use, crystal-clear formula. Designed specifically for creative professionals, ArtResin is trusted by artists worldwide for its uncompromising quality and commitment to innovation.
Daily Mirror
27-05-2025
- Health
- Daily Mirror
Doctor says toxic household items 'must be thrown away', and you have all three
The common household objects are used every day by millions of people but are packed with dangerous chemicals A doctor has named what he says are the three most toxic household items that 'must be thrown away immediately'. Dr Saurabh Sethi, a gastroenterologist, has urged people to take action as soon as possible. First on the list from Dr Sethi is scented candles. He said: 'These contain phthalates, which are known to disrupt hormone levels,and cause respiratory issues. 'Opt for unscented or natural candles made from soy or beeswax.' Dr Sethi lists plastic cutting boards as being a danger. He says: 'These can degrade over time, releasing microplastics into your food, which can accumulate in the body. Switch to a wooden one to minimise risk.' And last on the list? Scratched or chipped non-stick pans. Dr Sethi explains: 'These contain PFAs, which have been linked to high blood pressure, cholesterol and reproductive issues. 'Damaged pans can release these particles into your food. So make sure to either replace these pans as soon as they are scratched or chipped. Or replace those with safer alternatives, such as stainless steel or cast iron.' Phthalates (pronounced thal-ates) are a group of chemical compounds commonly used to make plastics — especially polyvinyl chloride (PVC) — more flexible, durable, and harder to break. They are often referred to as plasticizers. In addition to plastics, phthalates are also found in personal care products, household items, medical devices, and even food packaging. Phthalates are endocrine disruptors, meaning they can interfere with hormone systems in the body. They can mimic or block hormones like estrogen and testosterone, leading to: Altered reproductive development Reduced sperm count and quality Early puberty in girls Hormone-related cancers (potentially) Some phthalates, like DEHP and DBP, have been linked to: Birth defects Miscarriages Developmental delays in children Testicular toxicity in animals Exposure through inhalation (like from scented products) may cause: Asthma and allergy symptoms Potential immune system effects in children Animal studies suggest some phthalates may promote tumour development. DEHP is classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans by some health agencies. Microplastics are tiny plastic particles often invisible to the naked eye — and they are considered unhealthy for both environmental and human health reasons. Microplastics can carry toxic chemicals, either from the plastic itself or absorbed from the environment. These include: Phthalates and Bisphenol A (BPA) – endocrine disruptors Heavy metals – like lead or cadmium Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) – like PCBs or DDT These chemicals may interfere with: Hormonal balance Reproductive health Neurological development Immune function PFAS stands for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances — a large group of human-made chemicals (over 10,000 types) used since the 1940s to make products resistant to water, oil, heat, and stains. They're sometimes called "forever chemicals" because they don't break down easily in the environment or the human body. PFAS are used in a wide variety of products, including: Non-stick cookware (e.g., Teflon) Waterproof and stain-resistant fabrics (e.g., Gore-Tex, Scotchgard) Fast food wrappers, microwave popcorn bags Cosmetics (especially long-wear or waterproof types) Firefighting foams Carpets, upholstery, and paints PFAs have been linked to: Interference with thyroid function Developmental delays in infants and children Disruption of reproductive hormones Increased risk of kidney and testicular cancer Elevated cholesterol levels Liver damage Suppressed immune function Reduced response to vaccinations (especially in children) Low birth weight Pre-eclampsia Fertility issues
