Latest news with #Bentong
Malay Mail
17-05-2025
- Automotive
- Malay Mail
No EV charger? No problem, say Proton subsidiary and users as smarter systems ease urban, rural charging fears
BENTONG, May 17 — For many people considering a switch from a petrol-powered car to an electric vehicle (EV), the biggest deterrent is range anxiety or the fear of running out of power before reaching their destination or finding a charging station. Proton New Energy Technology Sdn Bhd (Pro-Net) chief brand officer Salawati Mohd Yusoff said concerns about travel distance are common among individuals not yet familiar with driving EVs, especially since the technology is still new in the local market. However, she said, today's EVs come with the latest software capable of helping drivers plan their journeys more efficiently, thereby reducing the risk of running out of battery mid-trip. Pro-Net, a fully-owned subsidiary of Proton, was established to spearhead sales and distributorship of smart vehicles in Malaysia. 'For example, our company's Proton 7 comes with technology that can tell you how much power and kilowatts, as well as how far the vehicle can still go – whether it can reach the destination or needs charging. For this model, the WLTP (Worldwide Harmonised Light Vehicles Test Procedure) range is between 345 km and 410 km. 'For instance, if someone wants to travel to Ipoh (Perak), when they enter the destination in the system, it will inform whether the car can make it or not (to the destination). If it can't, it will show how many kilometres short and suggest the nearest charging station along the route. From there, users can plan and charge at an available location,' she said when met by Bernama during The Real eMAS Drive at Tiarasa Escapes here recently, an event organised by Pro-Net. Salawati said using an EV can be likened to using a smartphone, where users need to charge it after a certain period of use to avoid running out of power. She also said although most EV charging stations are concentrated in urban areas like Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Penang and Johor Bahru, it is not a problem for people living in rural areas to use the vehicle as customers can charge it at home. 'Generally, 80 percent of EV buyers are from urban areas and 20 percent – or maybe slightly less than 20 percent – are from outskirts, but actually, they can still use it in rural areas. It just requires a little bit of understanding about where the charger is and how to reach it. The Proton 7 comes with technology that can tell you how much power and kilowatts, as well as how far the vehicle can still go – whether it can reach the destination or needs charging. — Bernama pic 'There are hundreds of chargers all over Malaysia even on the east coast in Kelantan and Terengganu. Home charging is also possible for those living in landed properties, whether in urban or non-urban areas,' she added, noting that EV maintenance costs are lower compared to internal combustion engine (ICE) cars. EV user Rosmah Idayu Abu Samah, 48, said although she lives in a condominium and, hence, not able to have her own charger at home, she still believes her decision to switch to an EV about a year ago was the right one. 'There's no problem living in a non-landed home and using an EV. For me, I usually charge my car for about 30 minutes at a charging station near my house ... sufficient for me to commute between Damansara and Shah Alam for about four days. It's also more economical than using petrol, costing only about RM30 per charge. 'Another thing is that your driving style affects energy usage too. If you drive more aggressively, it uses more power. For me, EVs are not meant for fast driving but for consistent, steady driving without rushing,' said Rosmah Idayu, who has driven her EV to Desaru, Johor, and Penang without any issue. — Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
12-05-2025
- Politics
- Free Malaysia Today
Trial of Pahang govt's libel suit against ex-MP starts tomorrow
The Pahang government is suing former Bentong MP Wong Tack over statements published on Facebook on Dec 28, 2020 and Jan 30, 2021. PETALING JAYA : The High Court in Bentong is scheduled to hear over four days from tomorrow a libel suit brought by the Pahang government against a former MP for allegedly making defamatory statements about logging activities in the state. Lawyer R Kengadharan, representing former Bentong MP Wong Tack, said five witnesses will testify for the state government before Justice Roslan Mat Nor. 'Another five witnesses, including Wong, will take the stand for the defendant,' he told FMT. Kengadharan said he would raise a legal point that the state government cannot sue his client for defamation as it is not an individual with a reputation to protect. The recently appointed counsel said the pleadings in the case, comprising the Pahang government's statement of claim, Wong's defence, and the state's reply, were filed three years ago. The state government is seeking an apology and RM1 million in damages from Wong, a one-term MP who stood for election on a Pakatan Harapan ticket in 2018. It said Wong, an environmentalist, had posted videos and made statements on Facebook on Dec 28, 2020 and Jan 30, 2021, which, when read together, were defamatory of the state authorities. The state government said Wong's statements implied that it had allowed uncontrollable logging in rainfall areas within the state that had led to massive floods. It said the statements also alleged that the state government was involved in logging and illegal exploitation of forest land. It further alleged that the former MP's statements had suggested that the state had acted irresponsibly and that it did not care for the welfare of the people of Pahang. The state government also claimed that Wong had implied it was lying and oppressing its people by allowing widespread logging activities in Pahang's forests. It said Wong's statements had subjected the state government to public criticism and damaged its reputation. Wong, who was unsuccessful in his defence of the Bentong seat at the 15th general election in November 2022, is relying on the defence of justification and fair comment.
