Latest news with #BharatiyaNyanaSanhita
The Hindu
14-05-2025
- The Hindu
Two killed in separate accidents in Udupi
Two persons died in separate accidents in Udupi district on Tuesday. Koraga, 77, a resident of Kavraadi village in Kundapur taluk, died after the motorcycle he was riding hit head-on another motorcycle near Amparu on the Amparu-Kundapura road. The police said Koraga was returning after visiting the house of his son in Nellikatte. Around 11 a.m., his motorcycle was hit by another motorcycle being driven by one Pavan. Injured Koraga and Pavan were taken to a private hospital in Kundapura. Koraga was shifted to another private hospital in Udupi, where he succumbed around 1.30 p.m. Shankarnarayana Police registered a case for offences under sections 281 and 106 of Bharatiya Nyana Sanhita. In another accident, Ramesh, 81, a resident of Udupi, died after the scooter he was riding hit a motorcycle near Berandottu Cross in Nitte village of Karkala taluk on Tuesday afternoon. The police said Ramesh lost control over his scooter and it moved to the extreme right of the road where it hit the approaching motorcycle that one Shreyan Padival, also a resident of Udupi, was riding. The injured Ramesh and Padival were brought to a private hospital in Karkala, where Ramesh succumbed. The Karkala rural police have registered a case against deceased Ramesh under sections 281, 125(a) and 106 of BNS.
The Hindu
12-05-2025
- The Hindu
Nanthancode case sheds light on family dynamics and mental health
The Nanthancode case has brought renewed attention to the complex dynamics of dysfunctional families and the society's role in preventing such crimes. The case also throws a sharp light on the prevalent misconceptions surrounding mental illness within the context of criminal justice. While the convict, Cadell Jeansen Raja, initially attempted to explain his horrific actions by claiming experimentation with 'astral projection', a spiritual belief in the separation of consciousness from the body, the investigators swiftly debunked this as a deliberate attempt to mislead the probe. Ultimately, the investigative team concluded that deep-seated resentment and loneliness fuelled Cadell's rage. He harboured frustration stemming from feeling like an underachiever within his family. Special Public Prosecutor Dileep Sathyan shed light on the family's detached lifestyle. 'The family led a socially reclusive lifestyle and lacked bonding among themselves,' he says. Revealing the extent of their isolation, he added that the family members often communicated via mobile phone chats even within the confines of their home, even for mundane matters like having meals. 'Cadell was also driven by intense hatred for his father, whose excessive alcoholism after retirement led him to vent his frustration on his son,' the advocate said. Noted psychiatrist and the Head of the Department of Psychiatry in Government Medical College, Kollam, G. Mohan Roy, who had evaluated Cadell's mental health at various stages of the investigation, believes the verdict will provide crucial clarity to the ongoing debate surrounding mental health and its legal implications in criminal cases. Referring to Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code (or Section 22 of Bharatiya Nyana Sanhita), which pertains to the defence of insanity, Dr Roy clarifies that legal immunity applies only if the individual, at the time of the crime, was incapable of understanding the nature of their actions or distinguishing right from wrong due to an unsound mind. 'However, in Cadell's case, there was substantial proof to show that his actions were indeed premeditated. Besides, he actively attempted to conceal his crime,' he pointed out. He also expressed concern about the role of popular media, especially cinema, in perpetuating misunderstandings about the link between mental illness and criminal behaviour. 'We frequently see villains, and sometimes even heroes, in movies claiming that they cannot be punished due to mental illness. However, such portrayals are far removed from reality,' Dr. Roy said, stressing that the notion that people with mental disorders automatically receive exemption from punishment is both unscientific and misleading.
