09-02-2025
Boncher's proposal for lobbying against unfunded mandates gains no support
Jordan Mayor Pete Ewals knew the votes weren't there for Councilmember Thom Boncher's proposal to write a collective letter in opposition to the state handing down requirements for which it doesn't pay.
Government officials like to call the requirements 'unfunded mandates,' and they are a regular topic of whining and complaining at city halls and county boardrooms throughout the state.
This month, Boncher proposed that the city of Jordan list the unfunded mandates it opposes and forward a letter to each of state Rep. Mark Buesgens, state Sen. Claire Robling and Minnesota Gov. Mark Dayton.
The councilmember wrote letters addressing the lack of funding for pay equity implementation and reporting, development and permit fees reports, flood plain management, forfeiture of unclaimed utility deposits, purchasing American-made equipment and uniforms, tobacco compliance checks, predatory offender registration and tracking, firearms permit acquisition, and fine distribution for enforcement of state laws.
'The state of Minnesota has a history of well-run, responsible government. That reputation is, in our opinion, being tarnished by the drive to mandate actions, while pushing costs down the government chain,' the letter stated.
It asks for the state to fully fund or eliminate the mandates it has imposed.
The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), an organization of which Jordan is a member, also opposes many of the listed items, with the exception of three additional suggestions Police Chief Bob Malz made when asked.
'I appreciate the effort,' Councilmember Joe Thill said of Boncher's letters. 'I would've picked some different ones.'
Thill said he supports LMC's position on the subject.
Councilmember Mike Shaw said LMC is doing the lobbying for the city.
'They draft a letter,' Councilmember Tanya Velishek agreed.
LMC also details its stances for the legislators, she added.
'The League is a strong voice at the legislature,' City Administrator Ed Shukle said. 'They represent all cities in the state.'
Boncher offered to hand over his draft letter to the city staff and ask staff to incorporate any additions offered by councilmembers.
'We have a voice, and we have an obligation to use it,' Boncher said.
Ewals suggested that the council try to agree about which unfunded mandates are the most important to repeal.
'When you send a letter, it has a big impact,' he said.
Velishek said that since each councilmember has a different opinion, separate letters could be sent.
A letter from the council would be 'reinforcing what's already there' – a redundancy, Shukle said.
'Are we going to put a sock in this?' Boncher asked. '(If so) this group will no longer have the right to talk about unfunded mandates.'
Ewals saw the writing on the wall, and didn't ask for a motion or second on the matter.
'I don't think anyone wants to change their minds,' he said, 'so we can just move on.'
