Latest news with #Brexiteers'
New European
19-05-2025
- Business
- New European
It's taken a Remainer to fix the Brexiteers' mess
With his long-trailed Brexit 'reset' on Monday, Keir Starmer sought to settle a long-term trading relationship with, but outside of, the European Union, which wouldn't need revisiting on a near-constant basis. Almost nine years after the UK narrowly voted to leave the EU, a strange political reality has emerged – and it is that Remainers are the only politicians taking Brexit seriously. For the sake of saving what remains of British exports, especially in food and drink, that meant coming to a long-term agreement on food safety checks at the border – which were not only leading to long queues, but also making exports near impossible for fresh meat and fish (the difficulties of exporting fishing catches have, funnily enough, been missing from Brexiteers' fish discourse). The UK similarly needed some certainty on accessing the EU's energy market, and working out in future how the UK could interconnect with it in turn – for the short-term, so the UK has certainty on how it can import electricity when we need it, but with the longer-term ambition of exporting energy when we have enough green generation in place. Inexplicably, energy cooperation – which is essential to the UK's future economic growth – has attracted barely a tenth of the column inches as has fishing, an industry which employs fewer full-time fishers than there are tattooists in the UK, but any long-term EU deal needed to explore these questions. Similarly, Starmer has at least laid the groundwork for defence and security cooperation, including exports of British defence products to the EU as it rearms, alongside youth mobility (which polls extraordinarily well, even among Brexiteers) and other issues. None of this is on terms that are as good as, let alone better than, the deal that the UK got as part of the EU – but a liveable deal has been reached that allows the UK to focus on other things and normalise relationships with our 27 nearest neighbours. Brexit can never be said to 'work', as even with this deal the UK economy will grow much more slowly than if we had not left, but Starmer and Labour have at least made the effort to make Brexit workable, to make it something the country can live with – and have given businesses certainty as to what the rules will be, if only for the next few rules, as the Tories and Reform have pledged to reverse them. In theory, this should have Remainers furiously up in arms – it is the kind of plodding compromise deal that makes reversing Brexit less likely, because settled new arrangements have been made. Brexiteers should be celebrating it, given they have had almost a decade to come up with something better, and have consistently failed. Had Rishi Sunak, a Brexiteer, somehow won last year's election, his deal would likely have looked almost identical to this one. Instead, inevitably, Brexiteers didn't even wait for the deal to be signed before they screamed betrayal. They did much the same when the government came to a trade agreement with the US last week and completed a deal with India – exactly the kind of Brexit freedom they supposedly campaigned for. The Brexit movement has become less a political ideology as a toddler's tantrum: they have no idea what they want, knowing only that it's not this. Remainers, despite accusations to the contrary, have generally been much more willing to compromise with reality than the Brexit diehards – most have accepted that a formal movement to rejoin the EU is likely decades away, and the best that can be hoped for was normalising trade relations and trying to get back to working constructively with the world's largest trading bloc. Many sensible people who voted Leave and came to regret it feel much the same. This is a particularly Starmerish deal. It is pragmatic, it has been got through dint of sustained hard work, and it is something almost no-one could truly love. It's the stuff of compromise, politics as the art of the possible – the German sociolgist Max Weber's 'slow boring of hard boards' in action. It is a mark of how flat-footed No 10 is politically that the Starmer of this week, heralding his new deal on the world stage and its role in letting Britain play its part internationally sounds like an entirely different PM to the one who spent last week engaging in relentless anti-immigration rhetoric. The groundwork was not laid, the messaging wasn't there, and there is probably no political win to be had here – Labour would have to be very optimistic to expect a poll bounce as a result of the UK-EU deal. It does, though, play to Starmer's strengths – adding to his credibility as someone who can get things done on the world stage. What needs to happen next is that the questions about Brexit and deals with Europe should flip. UK farmers and fishers can export now. Soon, young people should be able to live and work in Europe again. Erasmus is back on the cards. There is some certainty, which might even let businesses invest in the UK again. If Nigel Farage or Kemi Badenoch want the UK to go through the painful process of reopening all of this again, they should be forced to explain why – it is no longer enough to say 'not this'. Renegotiating all of this will cost time and money. They should explain what they would change, and how, or else be ignored. Farage will surely think he can capitalise on calling this deal, like everything before it, yet another Brexit betrayal. But played right, this deal could contain the seeds of his eventual downfall.
South Wales Guardian
13-05-2025
- Politics
- South Wales Guardian
Starmer ‘completely rejects' claims he echoed Enoch Powell in migration speech
The Prime Minister has faced backlash for the language he used in the speech setting out plans to crack down on legal migration into the UK on Monday. Sir Keir warned the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers' if migration controls were not tightened. Critics, including backbench Labour MPs, have raised concerns about the language, with some comparing it to a similar passage from Mr Powell's infamous 1968 'rivers of blood' speech. Sir Keir's official spokesman robustly defended the Prime Minister's words and brushed aside the similarity. 'We completely reject that comparison,' he told reporters. Asked if the Prime Minister was not worried about his language, the spokesman said: 'Absolutely, the Prime Minister rejects those comparisons and absolutely stands behind the argument he was making that migrants make a massive contribution to our country, but migration needs to be controlled.' Asked to confirm the Prime Minister stood by his comments that the UK did risk becoming an island of strangers without action on immigration, the spokesman replied: 'Yes.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper had earlier insisted Sir Keir's speech was 'completely different' from that of Mr Powell. In his 1968 speech, the then-senior Tory said white British people could find themselves 'strangers in their own country' as a result of migration. Mr Powell was sacked from the Conservative frontbench as a result of making the speech and it outraged his senior colleagues at the time. Asked about the comparison, Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't think it's right to make those comparisons. It's completely different. 'And the Prime Minister said yesterday, I think almost in the same breath… talked about the diverse country that we are, and that being part of our strength.' Asked if Sir Keir's speech-writers had been aware of the similarity in language, the Home Secretary replied: 'I don't know.' Ms Cooper had earlier suggested to BBC Breakfast that the Prime Minister values the contribution of migrants to the UK. She said: 'I think part of the point that he (Sir Keir) is making is that we have to recognise people have come to the UK through generations to do really important jobs in our NHS, founding our biggest businesses, doing some of the most difficult jobs, but it's because that's important the system has to be controlled and managed, and it just hasn't been.' Elsewhere, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick claimed the UK 'already' is an island of strangers in some places. 'Aggressive levels of mass migration have made us more divided,' he told Times Radio. Sir Sadiq Khan, the Labour Mayor of London, said he would not have used the phrase 'island of strangers', but declined to criticise the Prime Minister's announcement on immigration. He told LBC he thought the Prime Minister was referring to 'promises made by Brexiteers' and recent high levels of migration, and not 'that contribution we make to this multicultural capital city and country'. Asked how he felt when he heard Sir Keir's language, he said: 'I read the White Paper and I understand the context of the White Paper, and those aren't words that I would use.' Eluned Morgan, the Labour First Minister of Wales, also refused to echo Sir Keir's comments. At First Minister's Questions, she told the Senedd: 'I'm not going to use divisive language when it comes to immigration, that's not the value we have in Welsh Labour. We are committed to ensuring that we do our best to provide a care service in Wales. 'That will be more difficult if it is not possible to hire people from abroad.' In the Commons, the Prime Minister's announcement on Monday drew criticism from across the political spectrum. Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who lost the Labour whip last year, was chief among those who accused Sir Keir of 'reflecting the language' of Mr Powell's infamous speech. Labour backbencher Olivia Blake (Sheffield Hallam) suggested the phrase could 'risk legitimising the same far-right violence we saw in last year's summer riots'. Richard Burgon, Labour MP for Leeds East and secretary of the left-wing Socialist Campaign Group parliamentary caucus, told LBC the remarks were 'an act of political desperation' and called on the Prime Minister to apologise. Nigel Farage, whose Reform UK party has focused heavily on immigration in its campaigns, said the Government 'will not do what it takes to control our borders'. The proposals also sparked concern from employers, particularly in the care sector, following the announcement that care worker visas will be scrapped.
Rhyl Journal
13-05-2025
- Politics
- Rhyl Journal
Starmer ‘completely rejects' claims he echoed Enoch Powell in migration speech
The Prime Minister has faced backlash for the language he used in the speech setting out plans to crack down on legal migration into the UK on Monday. Sir Keir warned the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers' if migration controls were not tightened. Critics, including backbench Labour MPs, have raised concerns about the language, with some comparing it to a similar passage from Mr Powell's infamous 1968 'rivers of blood' speech. Sir Keir's official spokesman robustly defended the Prime Minister's words and brushed aside the similarity. 'We completely reject that comparison,' he told reporters. Asked if the Prime Minister was not worried about his language, the spokesman said: 'Absolutely, the Prime Minister rejects those comparisons and absolutely stands behind the argument he was making that migrants make a massive contribution to our country, but migration needs to be controlled.' Asked to confirm the Prime Minister stood by his comments that the UK did risk becoming an island of strangers without action on immigration, the spokesman replied: 'Yes.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper had earlier insisted Sir Keir's speech was 'completely different' from that of Mr Powell. In his 1968 speech, the then-senior Tory said white British people could find themselves 'strangers in their own country' as a result of migration. Mr Powell was sacked from the Conservative frontbench as a result of making the speech and it outraged his senior colleagues at the time. Asked about the comparison, Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't think it's right to make those comparisons. It's completely different. 'And the Prime Minister said yesterday, I think almost in the same breath… talked about the diverse country that we are, and that being part of our strength.' Asked if Sir Keir's speech-writers had been aware of the similarity in language, the Home Secretary replied: 'I don't know.' Ms Cooper had earlier suggested to BBC Breakfast that the Prime Minister values the contribution of migrants to the UK. She said: 'I think part of the point that he (Sir Keir) is making is that we have to recognise people have come to the UK through generations to do really important jobs in our NHS, founding our biggest businesses, doing some of the most difficult jobs, but it's because that's important the system has to be controlled and managed, and it just hasn't been.' Elsewhere, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick claimed the UK 'already' is an island of strangers in some places. 'Aggressive levels of mass migration have made us more divided,' he told Times Radio. Sir Sadiq Khan, the Labour Mayor of London, said he would not have used the phrase 'island of strangers', but declined to criticise the Prime Minister's announcement on immigration. He told LBC he thought the Prime Minister was referring to 'promises made by Brexiteers' and recent high levels of migration, and not 'that contribution we make to this multicultural capital city and country'. Asked how he felt when he heard Sir Keir's language, he said: 'I read the White Paper and I understand the context of the White Paper, and those aren't words that I would use.' In the Commons, the Prime Minister's announcement on Monday drew criticism from across the political spectrum. Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who lost the Labour whip last year, was chief among those who accused Sir Keir of 'reflecting the language' of Mr Powell's infamous speech. Labour backbencher Olivia Blake (Sheffield Hallam) suggested the phrase could 'risk legitimising the same far-right violence we saw in last year's summer riots'. Nigel Farage, whose Reform UK party has focused heavily on immigration in its campaigns, said the Government 'will not do what it takes to control our borders'. The proposals also sparked concern from employers, particularly in the care sector, following the announcement that care worker visas will be scrapped.
South Wales Argus
13-05-2025
- Politics
- South Wales Argus
Starmer ‘completely rejects' claims he echoed Enoch Powell in migration speech
The Prime Minister has faced backlash for the language he used in the speech setting out plans to crack down on legal migration into the UK on Monday. Sir Keir warned the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers' if migration controls were not tightened. Critics, including backbench Labour MPs, have raised concerns about the language, with some comparing it to a similar passage from Mr Powell's infamous 1968 'rivers of blood' speech. Sir Keir's official spokesman robustly defended the Prime Minister's words and brushed aside the similarity. 'We completely reject that comparison,' he told reporters. Asked if the Prime Minister was not worried about his language, the spokesman said: 'Absolutely, the Prime Minister rejects those comparisons and absolutely stands behind the argument he was making that migrants make a massive contribution to our country, but migration needs to be controlled.' Asked to confirm the Prime Minister stood by his comments that the UK did risk becoming an island of strangers without action on immigration, the spokesman replied: 'Yes.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper had earlier insisted Sir Keir's speech was 'completely different' from that of Mr Powell. In his 1968 speech, the then-senior Tory said white British people could find themselves 'strangers in their own country' as a result of migration. Mr Powell was sacked from the Conservative frontbench as a result of making the speech and it outraged his senior colleagues at the time. Robert Jenrick said mass migration has led to the becoming divided (Lucy North/PA) Asked about the comparison, Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't think it's right to make those comparisons. It's completely different. 'And the Prime Minister said yesterday, I think almost in the same breath… talked about the diverse country that we are, and that being part of our strength.' Asked if Sir Keir's speech-writers had been aware of the similarity in language, the Home Secretary replied: 'I don't know.' Ms Cooper had earlier suggested to BBC Breakfast that the Prime Minister values the contribution of migrants to the UK. She said: 'I think part of the point that he (Sir Keir) is making is that we have to recognise people have come to the UK through generations to do really important jobs in our NHS, founding our biggest businesses, doing some of the most difficult jobs, but it's because that's important the system has to be controlled and managed, and it just hasn't been.' Elsewhere, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick claimed the UK 'already' is an island of strangers in some places. 'Aggressive levels of mass migration have made us more divided,' he told Times Radio. Sir Sadiq Khan, the Labour Mayor of London, said he would not have used the phrase 'island of strangers', but declined to criticise the Prime Minister's announcement on immigration. He told LBC he thought the Prime Minister was referring to 'promises made by Brexiteers' and recent high levels of migration, and not 'that contribution we make to this multicultural capital city and country'. Asked how he felt when he heard Sir Keir's language, he said: 'I read the White Paper and I understand the context of the White Paper, and those aren't words that I would use.' In the Commons, the Prime Minister's announcement on Monday drew criticism from across the political spectrum. Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who lost the Labour whip last year, was chief among those who accused Sir Keir of 'reflecting the language' of Mr Powell's infamous speech. Labour backbencher Olivia Blake (Sheffield Hallam) suggested the phrase could 'risk legitimising the same far-right violence we saw in last year's summer riots'. Nigel Farage, whose Reform UK party has focused heavily on immigration in its campaigns, said the Government 'will not do what it takes to control our borders'. The proposals also sparked concern from employers, particularly in the care sector, following the announcement that care worker visas will be scrapped.
Leader Live
13-05-2025
- Politics
- Leader Live
Starmer ‘completely rejects' claims he echoed Enoch Powell in migration speech
The Prime Minister has faced backlash for the language he used in the speech setting out plans to crack down on legal migration into the UK on Monday. Sir Keir warned the UK risked becoming an 'island of strangers' if migration controls were not tightened. Critics, including backbench Labour MPs, have raised concerns about the language, with some comparing it to a similar passage from Mr Powell's infamous 1968 'rivers of blood' speech. Sir Keir's official spokesman robustly defended the Prime Minister's words and brushed aside the similarity. 'We completely reject that comparison,' he told reporters. Asked if the Prime Minister was not worried about his language, the spokesman said: 'Absolutely, the Prime Minister rejects those comparisons and absolutely stands behind the argument he was making that migrants make a massive contribution to our country, but migration needs to be controlled.' Asked to confirm the Prime Minister stood by his comments that the UK did risk becoming an island of strangers without action on immigration, the spokesman replied: 'Yes.' Home Secretary Yvette Cooper had earlier insisted Sir Keir's speech was 'completely different' from that of Mr Powell. In his 1968 speech, the then-senior Tory said white British people could find themselves 'strangers in their own country' as a result of migration. Mr Powell was sacked from the Conservative frontbench as a result of making the speech and it outraged his senior colleagues at the time. Asked about the comparison, Ms Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: 'I don't think it's right to make those comparisons. It's completely different. 'And the Prime Minister said yesterday, I think almost in the same breath… talked about the diverse country that we are, and that being part of our strength.' Asked if Sir Keir's speech-writers had been aware of the similarity in language, the Home Secretary replied: 'I don't know.' Ms Cooper had earlier suggested to BBC Breakfast that the Prime Minister values the contribution of migrants to the UK. She said: 'I think part of the point that he (Sir Keir) is making is that we have to recognise people have come to the UK through generations to do really important jobs in our NHS, founding our biggest businesses, doing some of the most difficult jobs, but it's because that's important the system has to be controlled and managed, and it just hasn't been.' Elsewhere, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick claimed the UK 'already' is an island of strangers in some places. 'Aggressive levels of mass migration have made us more divided,' he told Times Radio. Sir Sadiq Khan, the Labour Mayor of London, said he would not have used the phrase 'island of strangers', but declined to criticise the Prime Minister's announcement on immigration. He told LBC he thought the Prime Minister was referring to 'promises made by Brexiteers' and recent high levels of migration, and not 'that contribution we make to this multicultural capital city and country'. Asked how he felt when he heard Sir Keir's language, he said: 'I read the White Paper and I understand the context of the White Paper, and those aren't words that I would use.' In the Commons, the Prime Minister's announcement on Monday drew criticism from across the political spectrum. Former shadow chancellor John McDonnell, who lost the Labour whip last year, was chief among those who accused Sir Keir of 'reflecting the language' of Mr Powell's infamous speech. Labour backbencher Olivia Blake (Sheffield Hallam) suggested the phrase could 'risk legitimising the same far-right violence we saw in last year's summer riots'. Nigel Farage, whose Reform UK party has focused heavily on immigration in its campaigns, said the Government 'will not do what it takes to control our borders'. The proposals also sparked concern from employers, particularly in the care sector, following the announcement that care worker visas will be scrapped.
