Latest news with #Breyer
Nikkei Asia
an hour ago
- Politics
- Nikkei Asia
Judge temporarily bars Trump from deploying National Guard in LA
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) -- A U.S. judge on Thursday temporarily barred President Donald Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, finding that the Guard was unlawfully mobilized by Trump. In a major blow to the Trump administration, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on Friday. Breyer said the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of "rebellion." Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterizing the protests as a rebellion.
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Politics
- Daily Maverick
Judge temporarily bars Trump from deploying National Guard troops in Los Angeles
In a major blow to the Trump administration, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who sued to restrict its activity. Breyer's order will take effect at noon on said the protests in Los Angeles fall far short of 'rebellion.' Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterizing the protests as a rebellion. 'The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion,' Breyer wrote. The Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order. The Pentagon did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the ruling. Trump summoned military troops to Los Angeles to support a civilian police operation over the objection of Newsom, an extraordinary and rarely used measure. The ruling came hours after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to 'liberate' Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarization generated by Trump's approach to immigration enforcement and use of presidential power. Trump summoned first the National Guard, then the Marines, to help federal police forces guard federal buildings from protesters and to protect federal immigration agents as they pick up suspected violators. Trump has defended his decision, saying if he had not done so the city would be in flames. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence and restricted to a few city blocks. California also requested that Breyer bar troops from participating in arrests or patrolling communities, as well as to limit the military to protecting federal buildings and personnel. But the judge said it was too soon to rule on that question because it was not clear whether the military was actually engaging in law enforcement activities. The Trump administration denied that the National Guard was participating in law enforcement. Some 700 U.S. Marines will be on the streets of the city by Thursday or Friday, the military has said, to support up to 4,000 National Guard troops. Breyer did not order any immediate change to Trump's deployment of U.S. Marines, over whom Trump has more direct authority as commander-in-chief. But Breyer wrote that the Trump administration's 'use of the National Guard and the Marines comes into conflict with California's police power' and that 'restraining the President's use of military force in Los Angeles is in the public interest.' In his ruling, Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters and depriving the state of California of the ability to use the Guard for other purposes, such as fighting fires and drug smuggling. Breyer noted that Trump's deployment threatened other states as well by upsetting the balance of power between federal and state governments. Newsom said at a press conference he expected the ruling to stand on appeal. Trump, Newsom said, 'is not a monarch, he is not a king and he should stop acting like one.' (Reporting by Brad Brooks, Sandra Stojanovic, Omar Younis, Jane Ross and Arafat Barbakh in Los Angeles, Luc Cohen and Dietrich Knauth in New York, and Idrees Ali in Washington; Additional reporting by Costas Pitas, Christian Martinez, Ryan Jones, Ted Hesson, Abhirup Roy and Alexia Garamfalvi; Writing by Daniel Trotta and James Oliphant; Editing by Saad Sayeed, Ross Colvin, Mary Milliken, Nick Zieminski, Diane Craft and Edwina Gibbs)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Federal judge orders Trump to return control of California National Guard to Newsom
A federal judge has ruled that President Donald Trump acted illegally when he seized control of California's National Guard during ICE-related riots in Los Angeles. U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer issued the decision Thursday, siding with Governor Gavin Newsom and ordering Trump to return control of the Guard to the state "forthwith.""His actions were illegal—both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution," Breyer wrote. "He must therefore return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith.""Federalism is not optional," the ruling states. "Even the president cannot legislate by fiat."Judge Mulls Trump's Authority Over National Guard, Warns Us Is Not 'King George' Monarchy Recent anti-ICE protests have led to riots, looting, and clashes with federal agents in Los Angeles. Trump issued a proclamation invoking federal authority, but Breyer rejected the justification, calling it constitutionally hollow. In his order, U.S. District Judge Charles R. Breyer granted the plaintiffs' request for a temporary restraining order and took immediate action to halt federal control of the California National Guard."Defendants are temporarily ENJOINED from deploying members of the California National Guard in Los Angeles," the ruling states. "Defendants are DIRECTED to return control of the California National Guard to Governor Newsom."Trump Tells Judge He Does Not Need Newsom's Permission To Crack Down On Rioters, Deploy National Guard The court stayed the order until noon on June 13, 2025, giving the defendants a narrow window to comply. Plaintiffs were also ordered to post a nominal bond of $100 within 24 hours. Looking ahead, Judge Breyer scheduled a hearing to determine whether the temporary restraining order should become a preliminary Attorney General Rob Bonta praised the ruling Thursday night, calling it "an important step forward in protecting our communities and our rights while we continue to make our case in court." Read On The Fox News App "The Trump administration had no right to federalize 4,000 California National Guard troops without authorization from Governor Newsom," Bonta said. "Trump's actions were illegal, trampled on our state sovereignty, escalated tension on the ground, and promoted rather than quelled unrest." Bonta also stressed that the situation in Los Angeles did not justify a military response. "We aren't in the throes of a rebellion. We are not under threat of an invasion. Nothing is preventing the federal government from enforcing federal law," he said. He cited support from top retired military officials. "Just yesterday, a group of former secretaries of the Army and Navy and retired four-star admirals and generals joined together to publicly support our lawsuit," Bonta noted. They warned against unlawful domestic deployments that "threaten core national security and disaster relief missions." "The truth is, the president is looking for any pretense to place military forces on American streets to intimidate and quiet those who disagree with him. It's not just immoral—it's dangerous, and it's illegal," Bonta said."We'd rather we have a president who follows the law and complies with the Constitution," he said. "It's not a good thing for the great United States of America to have a president, the most powerful elected official on the face of the Earth, to violate the law so frequently, to have such contempt for the U.S. Constitution and the rule of law." "The court's order is unprecedented and puts our brave federal officials in danger. The district court has no authority to usurp the President's authority as Commander in Chief. The President exercised his lawful authority to mobilize the National Guard to protect federal buildings and personnel in Gavin Newsom's lawless Los Angeles. The Trump Administration will immediately appeal this abuse of power and looks forward to ultimate victory on the issue," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly article source: Federal judge orders Trump to return control of California National Guard to Newsom
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- Politics
- RTÉ News
Trump can keep National Guard deployed to Los Angeles for now
A US appeals court allowed President Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilisation. The 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Trump, but it does leave command of the Guard with the president for now. Earlier, San Francisco-based US District Judge Charles Breyer found that Mr Trump's deployment of the Guard was unlawful. Mr Breyer had ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom, who had brought the case. It was a brief victory for Mr Newsom, as Mr Breyer's order was paused a short time later. The three-judge panel that paused the ruling consisted of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. The panel said it would hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the merits of Mr Breyer's order. The appeals court decision stands to leave in place the dynamic of weeklong street demonstrations that have been concentrated in downtown Los Angeles, largely at a federal detention center where National Guard troops have stood watch. The Guard had also accompanied Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents on operations. In his ruling, Mr Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters- a contention made by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, among others -and depriving the state of the ability to use the Guard for other purposes. That ruling came hours after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to "liberate" Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic US Senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarization generated by Mr Trump's hardline approach to immigration enforcement and expansive use of presidential power. Mr Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Between the rulings, Mr Newsom said the National Guard would be redeployed to its previous tasks, including border security, preparing for wildfires and countering drug smuggling. But the Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order, calling Mr Breyer's ruling "an extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief." Mr Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterising the protests in Los Angeles as a "rebellion," but Mr Breyer said in a temporary restraining order that the protests fell far short of that legal standard. "The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Mr Breyer wrote. Mr Trump has said if he had not ordered in the National Guard the city would be in flames. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence and restricted to a few city blocks. Mr Trump summoned the National Guard on Saturday, then the US Marines on Monday, to help federal police forces guard federal buildings from protesters and to protect federal immigration agents as they picked up suspected violators.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Politics
- Time of India
Trump can keep National Guard deployed to Los Angeles for now, appeals court rules
A U.S. appeals court on Thursday allowed President Donald Trump to maintain his deployment of National Guard troops in Los Angeles amid protests over stepped-up immigration enforcement, temporarily pausing a lower court ruling that blocked the mobilization. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ' decision does not mean that the court will ultimately agree with Trump, but it does leave command of the Guard with the president for now. Earlier on Thursday, San Francisco-based U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer found that Trump's deployment of the Guard was unlawful. Breyer had ordered the National Guard to return to the control of California Governor Gavin Newsom , who had brought the case. It was a brief victory for Newsom, as Breyer's order was paused a short time later. The three-judge panel that paused the ruling consisted of two judges appointed by Trump in his first term and one judge who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden . The panel said it would hold a hearing on Tuesday to consider the merits of Breyer's order. Live Events The appeals court decision stands to leave in place the dynamic of weeklong street demonstrations that have been concentrated in downtown Los Angeles, largely at a federal detention center where National Guard troops have stood watch. The Guard had also accompanied Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents on operations. In his ruling, Breyer wrote that the presence of the troops in the city was itself inflaming tensions with protesters - a contention made by Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, among others -and depriving the state of the ability to use the Guard for other purposes. That ruling came hours after Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem pledged to "liberate" Los Angeles at a press conference that was dramatically interrupted when federal agents dragged Democratic U.S. Senator Alex Padilla out of the room, forced him to the ground and handcuffed him. The court battle and press conference scuffle underscored the political polarization generated by Trump's hardline approach to immigration enforcement and expansive use of presidential power. Trump is carrying out a campaign promise to deport immigrants, employing forceful tactics consistent with the norm-breaking political style that got him elected twice. Between the rulings, Newsom said the National Guard would be redeployed to its previous tasks, including border security, preparing for wildfires and countering drug smuggling. But the Trump administration immediately appealed the judge's order, calling Breyer's ruling "an extraordinary intrusion on the President's constitutional authority as Commander in Chief." Trump justified the deployment of troops by characterizing the protests in Los Angeles as a "rebellion," but Breyer said in a temporary restraining order that the protests fell far short of that legal standard. "The Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants' argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion," Breyer wrote. Trump has said if he had not ordered in the National Guard the city would be in flames. The protests so far have been mostly peaceful, punctuated by incidents of violence and restricted to a few city blocks. Trump summoned the National Guard on Saturday, then the U.S. Marines on Monday, to help federal police forces guard federal buildings from protesters and to protect federal immigration agents as they picked up suspected violators.
