3 days ago
Can agencies claim immunity from NM Civil Rights Act? Judges get new guidelines
Jun. 2—SANTA FE — New Mexico's Supreme Court on Monday drew new boundaries for a 2021 law that allows individuals to file lawsuits in state court against government agencies for alleged civil rights violations.
The unanimous ruling by the state's highest court in a lawsuit involving the New Mexico Racing Commission establishes that agencies can be immune from legal liability for certain disciplinary actions they take. But whether "judicial immunity" can be claimed must be decided by a judge, based on the facts of a specific case.
"Judicial immunity protects individuals and governmental entities from liability when functioning as an 'arm of the court' or, in other words, when performing a function that is integral to a judicial or quasi-judicial proceeding," Justice Briana Zamora wrote in the court's opinion.
The Supreme Court's ruling comes four years after Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham signed into law the state Civil Rights Act, a measure that was prompted by protests against racism and police misconduct following the 2020 death of George Floyd. Going forward, the ruling could provide more clarity for future New Mexico cases filed under the law, though the political winds that prompted its passage have waned.
The legislation was opposed at the time of its approval by New Mexico cities and counties, along with some law enforcement officials, who expressed concern it could expose taxpayers to expensive settlements and lead to higher insurance costs.
Prior to lawmakers approving the 2021 law, lawsuits alleging civil rights violations in New Mexico could only be filed in federal court, not in state court.
Specifically, the new state law was intended to largely eliminate a different kind of legal immunity — the qualified immunity that law enforcement officers can claim in cases involving possible misconduct.
The case at the heart of the Supreme Court ruling involves Brad Bolen, a licensed horse trainer from Texas who was fined $500 after a New Mexico Racing Commission disciplinary panel investigated his argument with a racing steward.
Bolen appealed the fine and also filed a lawsuit against the New Mexico Gaming Commission, claiming his constitutional free speech rights had been violated.
The gaming commission's initial request to have the lawsuit dismissed on the grounds of judicial immunity was rejected by a state judge in Albuquerque. But the judge's ruling was then overturned by the state Court of Appeals, setting the stage for the Supreme Court to weigh in.
While the Supreme Court largely sided with the Court of Appeals, it opted not to decide the merits of the case in question.
Instead, the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the District Judge Joshua Allison, with guidance that he consider the underlying claims by weighing six factors to determine whether judicial immunity should be applied.
Those six factors, including the nature of the disciplinary proceeding and the need to protect decision-makers from harassment or intimidation, were adopted from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling on judicial immunity.
The exact number of lawsuits filed under New Mexico's Civil Rights Act in the four years since it was enacted was not immediately available Monday, said a spokesman with the Administrative Office of the Courts.
In large part, that's because such cases are lumped with other types of complaints in the judiciary's case-filing system.
