Latest news with #CaliforniaCodeofRegulations
Yahoo
a day ago
- General
- Yahoo
New ‘state-of-the-art' classrooms, playground ready at Franklin School
Teachers at Franklin Elementary School in Yuba City are jazzed about the four new classrooms that are now ready on the school's campus. Two of the new rooms are for kindergarteners, and the other two rooms are for transitional kindergarteners. Superintendent and principal Lisa Shelton said the spaces are very nice, and that Meehleis Modular Buildings Inc. did an amazing job with them. 'They are just state of the art,' Shelton said. The new connected rooms feature noticeably spacious classrooms, a peaked ceiling, red accents, bathrooms, connected workrooms and windows that face a walnut orchard that neighbors the school. Sharon Carothers, a TK teacher at Franklin Elementary School, said the orchard belongs to her family; her cousin inherited it. For Carothers, the school itself is family. 'My mom and dad went to school here,' Carothers said.'I went to school here. My kids went to school here. This is family.' Creating a family-friendly atmosphere, the school had a ribbon-cutting event on Tuesday where folks could check out the new classrooms; the classrooms were completed in May. Students at the school watched as the classrooms came together, and Project Manager Matt Meehleis said that that was the most rewarding part of it all. Beyond the new classrooms, this construction project, which began around August, also involved the addition of a new playground for the youngest students at the school and enhanced parking. The total cost of the project was around five million. For this project, they were able to secure a $4 million grant from the Office of Public School Construction. The Franklin Elementary School District also contributed approximately one million dollars to the project. Shelton spoke on the need for this project. 'We just were short (on) rooms,' Shelton said. 'We're adding another TK classroom and we did not have the available space, and the space we had was not code compliant. So this allowed us to have rooms that are compliant for TK and K.' This project was guided by Title 5 and its requirements. Title 5 of the California Code of Regulations includes provisions that govern the design, construction and functionality of school facilities in California. Because of this project, the school now has more space for TK students to enter the school, as the school went from having one TK classroom to two TK classrooms. Carothers thinks that TK gives the students a good boost for kindergarten. 'My goal isn't to teach them the academics of kindergarten, but to get them to be a student,' Carothers said. She tells the parents that the academics are a bonus. 'So they will learn their sounds and their letters, count to 100, those are all the things that we work on to learn to be a student. So they'll repeat those things in kindergarten, but it just gets them ready, and it's familiar,' Carothers said. 'They're not scared that first day like they are (in) the first day of TK.'
Associated Press
21-05-2025
- Politics
- Associated Press
Deemed Wild and Dangerous – But Fish & Game Can't Produce a Single Document or Respond to Our Records Request
LA MESA, Calif., May 21, 2025 (SEND2PRESS NEWSWIRE) — On February 12, 2025, a formal Public Records Act (PRA) request was submitted to the California Fish and Game Commission seeking documentation to justify the classification of domestic ferrets as 'not normally domesticated in California' by The request specifically asked for any scientific studies, internal memos, environmental risk assessments, or correspondence used to uphold the ongoing prohibition of domestic ferrets under Title 14, Section 671 of the California Code of Regulations. As of today – more than 90 days later – no responsive records have been produced. We acknowledge and appreciate the professional efforts of Executive Director Melissa Miller-Henson and her staff, particularly Cynthia McKeith, who confirmed receipt of our request and committed to transparency. This is not a failure of staff, who were given an impossible task: to produce evidence that likely doesn't exist. 'We're not angry with the staff. In fact, we feel for them. Melissa Miller-Henson inherited a legacy of bureaucratic neglect. We're sorry she got stuck with this,' said Pat Wright, who submitted the request. 'But after 35 years of petitions being ignored or quietly denied without justification, we're done being silent.' The request asked for documents dating back to 1931, when the original mustelid regulation was enacted. The public has a right to know: was the ferret ban ever based on actual evidence, or has it simply persisted unchallenged? In the absence of records, this silence speaks volumes. The California Fish and Game Commission owes the public more than a stall – it owes an explanation. We remain committed to transparency, due process, and accountability in our campaign to legalize domestic ferrets in California. All responses, or lack thereof, will be documented publicly. For more information or to follow the ongoing effort, visit: MULTIMEDIA: Image link for media: Image caption: While the months fly by, we're still waiting for answers. Our Public Records Act request to the California Fish and Game Commission has gone unanswered—just like the last 35 years of silence. MEDIA ONLY CONTACT: Pat Wright [email protected] (619) 303-0645 NEWS SOURCE: Legalize Ferrets Keywords: Pets and Veterinary, ferret legalization, California Fish and Game Commission, ferret ban, domestic ferrets, ferret public records request, CPRA request, animal classification, Title 14 Section 671, mustela putorius furo, California wildlife laws, transparency in government, ferret advocacy, LA MESA, Calif. This press release was issued on behalf of the news source (Legalize Ferrets) who is solely responsibile for its accuracy, by Send2Press® Newswire. Information is believed accurate but not guaranteed. Story ID: S2P126354 APNF0325A To view the original version, visit: © 2025 Send2Press® Newswire, a press release distribution service, Calif., USA. RIGHTS GRANTED FOR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY ANY LEGITIMATE MEDIA OUTLET - SUCH AS NEWSPAPER, BROADCAST OR TRADE PERIODICAL. MAY NOT BE USED ON ANY NON-MEDIA WEBSITE PROMOTING PR OR MARKETING SERVICES OR CONTENT DEVELOPMENT. Disclaimer: This press release content was not created by nor issued by the Associated Press (AP). Content below is unrelated to this news story.
Fox News
18-04-2025
- Politics
- Fox News
Most California residents oppose trans inclusion in girls and women's sports: survey
A new bipartisan survey by the Public Policy Institute of California found the majority of California residents oppose biological male trans athletes competing in women's sports. That figure included more than 70% of the state's school parents. "Most Californians support requiring transgender athletes to compete on teams matching the sex they were assigned at birth," the poll stated. "Solid majorities of adults (65%) and likely voters (64%) support requiring that transgender athletes compete on teams that match the sex they were assigned at birth, not the gender they identify with. An overwhelming majority of public school parents (71%) support such a requirement." California Gov. Gavin Newsom admitted trans athletes competing in girls sports is "deeply unfair" during an episode of his podcast last month but defended allowing it out of empathy for the transgender population. The state was one of the first to defy President Donald Trump's "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports" executive order when he signed it Feb. 5. The California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) said it will continue to follow the state's law that allows athletes to participate as whichever gender they identify as, a spokesperson told Fox News Digital. "The CIF provides students with the opportunity to belong, connect, and compete in education-based experiences in compliance with California law [Education Code section 221.5. (f)] which permits students to participate in school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, consistent with the student's gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the student's records," a CIF statement said. A law, AB 1266, has been in effect since 2014 and gives California students at scholastic and collegiate levels the right to "participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil's records." California Code of Regulations section 4910(k) defines gender as "a person's actual sex or perceived sex and includes a person's perceived identity, appearance or behavior, whether or not that identity, appearance, or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with a person's sex at birth." CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APPCIF Bylaw 300.D. mirrors the Education Code, stating, "All students should have the opportunity to participate in CIF activities in a manner that is consistent with their gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on a student's records." On April 1, the state assembly and its Democratic majority struck down two bills that would have amended the laws to only allow student-athletes to compete based on their biological sex. U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon served a warning to Newsom to comply with Trump's order barring transgender athletes from competing in women's sports. The warning and investigation come after California made itself the first "sanctuary" state in the nation for transgender minors and has engaged in a multi-year battle with school districts over their notification policies. "Allowing participation in sex-separated activities based on 'gender identity' places schools at risk of Title IX violations and loss of federal funding. As Governor, you have a duty to inform California school districts of this risk," McMahon wrote in the letter. "As Secretary of Education, I am officially asking you to inform this Department whether you will remind schools in California to comply with federal law by protecting sex-separated spaces and activities. I am also officially asking you to publicly assure parents that California teachers will not facilitate the fantasy of 'gender transitions' for their children." Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Yahoo
17-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Have a Money-Making Business Idea? The 3 Best (and 3 Worst) States for Success
Being your own boss, following your dreams, having a flexible schedule and being financially independent are just a few of the many reasons to start your own business. Find Out: Read Next: If you're thinking of becoming an entrepreneur, choosing the state to register your company in is an important decision. Where you start your business can have a big impact on your chances for success. If you're looking for a great place to register your new company, you'll want to take a look at these three states. At first glance, Wyoming might not seem like a great place to start a business, but it offers several important perks for those launching an LLC. Many online businesses can take advantage of the benefits because you don't need to live in Wyoming to register an LLC there. One major benefit is that Wyoming allows LLCs registered in the state to remain private and doesn't require business owners to list their names in public records. This anonymity protects you from unwanted attention, creditors and personal attacks from online communities. Learn More: Saving money on taxes means more revenue for your business, and South Dakota is a great place for this. It uses pass-through taxation, which means companies don't file tax returns because the revenue passes down to the owners, investors and shareholders of a company. Because only individuals pay their company's taxes, they aren't taxed twice. Traditional corporations that don't use pass-through taxation would need to pay taxes on their profits, and then individuals must pay taxes on their earnings as well. Starting a business usually requires a lot of funding, and there isn't a better place to get it than Utah. The State Small Business Credit Initiative (SSBCI) recently provided Utah's small business community with $23 million in U.S. Treasury funding. Adding to Utah's reputation as an excellent place to start a business is the fact that banks distributed $846.1 million in loans to Utah businesses with $1 million or less in 2022. Many factors can make a state a bad place for a startup, and these three states show what those are. When it comes to the worst states for starting a business, you can't overlook California. Between 2019 and mid-2024, over 200 businesses relocated from California to other states. This is more than double the number for New York, which has the second-most relocations. The number of regulations California has continued to impose is a big reason for this. The California Code of Regulations has over 400,000 restrictions as of 2023. Illinois is an expensive state to start a business in because of its high corporate tax rate. It is one of four states that levies a corporate income tax rate of 9% or above, coming in at 9.5%. With a tax rate this high, businesses end up with reduced profit margins and are less attractive to investors. The lack of capital can limit companies in hiring new employees or raising salaries. Out of all of the states, Washington has the lowest rate of business survival, with 75.12% of businesses surviving one year and only 42.75% lasting more than five years. One reason for this may stem from how expensive it is to pay employees. The statewide minimum wage in Washington is $16.28 per hour, which is the highest in the nation. More From GOBankingRates Mark Cuban: Trump's Tariffs Will Affect This Class of People the Most4 Affordable Car Brands You Won't Regret Buying in 2025How To Get the Most Value From Your Costco Membership in 20257 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on Have a Money-Making Business Idea? The 3 Best (and 3 Worst) States for Success Sign in to access your portfolio
Fox News
08-02-2025
- Politics
- Fox News
California residents protest, threaten lawsuits over state's refusal to follow Trump's trans athletes ban
The California Interscholastic Federation (CIF)'s refusal to comply with President Donald Trump's executive order banning trans athletes from girls' and women's sports has prompted outrage within the state. On Friday, residents gathered in Long Beach, California, to protest outside of a CIF federated board meeting. The protesters then spoke at the board meeting, pleading with the CIF officials to follow the president's order. Protesters even threatened civil lawsuits against the CIF and state in case they continue to refuse compliance with Trump. Currently, there is one lawsuit against the CIF and the state's attorney general, Rob Bonta, over a situation at Martin Luther King High School involving a trans athlete on the girls' cross-country team. "There will be more lawsuits to follow if the CIF does not follow federal law," said Julianne Fleischer, a Legal Counsel at Advocates for Faith & Freedom, at the event. "I want CIF to know that it is important you follow federal law or you will be held accountable for failing to enforce federal law throughout the school districts … with more lawsuits they're going to spend significant funds on litigation." Trump's executive order states that any school receiving federal funding that allows biological males to compete in the girls' or women's category will lose that federal funding. According to USA Facts, California public schools receive about $16.8 billion per year, which is 13.9% or one in every seven dollars of public school funding, which is well above the national average. Many of the protesters there made it a point to warn the state of the consequences of losing that federal funding. A California school district employee showed up at the protest to plead with the CIF to follow Trump's order. Sonja Shaw, Chino Valley Unified School Board President, spoke from her perspective as a mother and became visibly emotional when she scolded the CIF for its decision, calling it "shameful." "Whoever is in CIF at the top level putting out those woke weird toolkit on telling boys about how to compete against girls, if you're a part of that, you're disgusting, and you need to step out of here," Shaw said. In California, a law called AB 1266 has been in effect since 2014, giving California students at the scholastic and collegiate levels the right to "participate in sex-segregated school programs and activities, including athletic teams and competitions, and use facilities consistent with his or her gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on the pupil's records." California Code of Regulations section 4910(k) defines gender as, "A person's actual sex or perceived sex includes a person's perceived identity, appearance or behavior, whether or not that identity, appearance, or behavior is different from that traditionally associated with a person's sex at birth."CIF Bylaw 300.D. mirrors the Education Code, stating, "All students should have the opportunity to participate in CIF activities in a manner that is consistent with their gender identity, irrespective of the gender listed on a student's records." These laws and the subsequent enabling of trans athletes to compete with girls and women in the state have resulted in multiple controversies over the issue in the last year alone. At Martin Luther King High School, the father of a girl who lost her varsity spot to the trans cross-country athlete previously told Fox News Digital that his daughter and other girls at the school had been told that "transgenders have more rights than cisgender[s]" by school administrators when they protested the athlete's participation. That father, longtime firefighter Ryan Starling, showed up at the protests and board meeting on Friday and shared his daughter's story. "We're asking you guys today to be bold and be brave and stand up for our girls," Starling said. Starling also suggested that the CIF set up a category specifically for trans athletes, to avoid exclusion. "How about you make an open category? Start protecting our girls immediately so that everybody can still compete, but that everybody has their place," Starling said. Starling's family is a plaintiff in the current lawsuit against CIF and Bonta. The suit challenges AB 1266, which allows transgender athletes to compete against girls and women, claiming it is a Title IX violation. "Plaintiffs seek a federal ruling that AB 1266 violates Title IX as well as a decision holding the District accountable for violating their First Amendment rights. They demand injunctive relief to stop schools from forcing biological girls to compete with and against males, a judgment affirming sex-based protections in athletics and compensation for damages caused by these discriminatory policies," an Advocates for Faith & Freedom spokesperson said. The issue of trans athletes competing with girls and women has caused other controversies within the state in recent months. Stone Ridge Christian High School's girls' volleyball team was scheduled to face San Francisco Waldorf in the Northern California Division 6 tournament but forfeited in an announcement just before the match over the presence of a trans athlete on the team. A transgender volleyball player was booed and harassed at an Oct. 12 match between Notre Dame Belmont in Belmont, California, and Half Moon Bay High School, according to ABC 7. Half Moon Bay rostered the transgender athlete. California State Assembly member Kate Sanchez announced on Jan. 7 that she is introducing a bill to ban trans athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports. Sanchez will propose the Protect Girls' Sports Act to the state legislature. Currently, 25 states have similar laws in effect. Follow Fox News Digital's sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
