Latest news with #Canada-related


CBC
17-03-2025
- Politics
- CBC
Trump's next target? Canada's go-to think-tank in Washington
After Canadian steel, aluminum, potash, energy and possibly cars, U.S. President Donald Trump may have a new target: Canada-related scholarship. A top think-tank that studies Canada-U.S. relations now finds itself under threat in an executive order signed by the president last Friday. Trump ordered a number of institutions gutted — eliminated to the greatest extent possible, reduced to their minimum legal functions. That list includes the organization that oversees Voice of America, and, of particular relevance to Canada, the Wilson Center, which has institutes focused on Canada, Mexico, China and Russia. Its Canada Institute is a longstanding destination of choice for Canadian newsmakers visiting Washington: It offers a venue for news conferences, and discussions, just over a block from the White House. Prime ministers, premiers, opposition politicians and civil servants have spoken at the Wilson Center's Canada Institute. It has also provided fellowships, including to the late Alberta premier Jim Prentice while he was working on his book about energy policy. "This is definitely a shock to the system," said Laura Dawson, a Canada-U.S. trade expert who once led the institute. "It's the only Canada-U.S. think-tank in the world. There's nothing else like it." The organization is now scrambling to assess the implications of Trump's order; it must report on its plans to the White House by the end of this week. It's not entirely clear what this means. Trump's order calls on the organizations to reduce their activities to functions enshrined in law. Dawson says that could mean as little as maintaining its small museum, safeguarding some of Woodrow Wilson's presidential papers, and organizing 20 fellowships per year across the entire organization. But the original 1968 law that created the centre doesn't mention its various institutes. In addition, the organization gets access to several floors in a federal building, plus almost one-third of its funding, $15 million USD, comes from the federal government. The head of the Wilson Center released a letter Monday saying his team was crafting plans to comply with the order. Call for donations Mark Green, a former Republican congressman, is now president of the bipartisan think-tank, succeeding a Democrat. He says the statute allows the Wilson Center to accept donations from individuals and institutions, and that donations are more important than ever. Green called the outpouring of support following Trump's announcement gratifying. "When Congress passed the Woodrow Wilson Memorial Act of 1968, it gave us a special charter and mandate to symbolize and strengthen 'the fruitful relation between the world of learning and the world of public affairs,'" he wrote in a letter to supporters. "As many of you have said in your outreach to us, that work — of scholarship-driven analysis and programming — has never been more important." Dawson called it stunning that a country like Canada, so closely connected to the U.S., has only one think-tank with a full-time operation studying the bilateral relationship, and that it might now disappear. "Canada is really at a loss in its ability to get its voice heard in Washington," she said. "The Canada Institute wasn't a lobbying organization. It it didn't pick sides and it didn't pick favourites. It just provided a venue, and a space in for Canadians and Americans to talk to each other."
Yahoo
11-03-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Opinion - Make Canada boring again
Almost 40 years ago, New York Times foreign affairs columnist Flora Lewis wrote a piece titled 'Worthwhile Canadian Initiative.' Upon seeing it, the New Republic's Michael Kinsley challenged his readers to come up with a more boring headline. And although many have tried, it has been hard to top. 'Worthwhile Canadian Initiative' has become a long-running joke, periodically resurrected by journalists in need of ideas. It may have stuck because of an underlying truth: The issues on the U.S.-Canada agenda do not excite Washington's foreign policy elite. Normally, nothing Canada-related could compete for attention with crises such as those in Ukraine or Gaza. But President Trump seems determined to break the association of Canada with boredom by wreaking havoc upon one of the world's most positive bilateral relationships. He started out by sneering at Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as the mere 'governor' of what should be the 51st state, showing contempt for Canada's very existence as an independent country. That view parallels Vladimir Putin's stance on Ukraine. Trump has now gone from words to deeds, imposing 25 percent tariffs against imports from Canada (although the the date of actual implantation has now slipped until April 2), as well as placing tariffs on China and Mexico. Even if one disagrees wholly with Trump's approach to China, one must accept that it is a competitor for which America must design an effective strategy. And relations with Mexico have always been complex, with tough problems such as immigration and narcotics for which it has always been hard to find solutions. But Canada? It seems that Trump, the habitual disruptor, is creating a crisis for its own sake. Any serious economist, and indeed anyone who passed Econ 101 in college, can tell you the likely effects of his tariffs — sticker shock at the car dealer, the lumber yard and the supermarket, followed by lines at the unemployment office. But although economic consequences will be felt soon enough, even more damaging will be the effects on the good will between our two peoples which, while perhaps 'boring,' has been the bedrock of our security relationship. Canadians have fought beside Americans from the beaches of Normandy to the mountains of Afghanistan. Our two countries jointly patrol the skies above our shared continent. Canada has usually been on our side at the U.N. and in other forums, not because it wants to curry favor with us, but because it shares our values of democracy and free markets and mostly sees the world the same way we do. It seems unthinkable that Trump would want to foment long-term distrust on the part of our Canadian neighbors in his search for an illusory economic advantage, but that is precisely what he is doing. So we can expect when the time comes, as it inevitably will, that America wants Canadian support on matters of importance to us, the answer we hear will be 'no.' On the wall of the atrium of the U.S. embassy in Ottawa are carved words spoken by President John F. Kennedy when he visited Canada in 1961: 'Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. Necessity has made us allies.' But given the direction Trump is taking us, we may need to chisel those words off the wall. Perhaps we should replace them with ones written by Canadian singer Joni Mitchell: 'Don't it always seem to go, that you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone?' Richard M. Sanders is a global fellow of the Canada Institute at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and a senior fellow at the Center for the National Interest. A former senior foreign service officer, he served as chargé d'affaires and deputy chief of mission at the U.S. embassy in Ottawa from 2013 to 2016. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


The Hill
11-03-2025
- Business
- The Hill
Make Canada boring again
Almost 40 years ago, New York Times foreign affairs columnist Flora Lewis wrote a piece titled 'Worthwhile Canadian Initiative.' Upon seeing it, the New Republic's Michael Kinsley challenged his readers to come up with a more boring headline. And although many have tried, it has been hard to top. 'Worthwhile Canadian Initiative' has become a long-running joke, periodically resurrected by journalists in need of ideas. It may have stuck because of an underlying truth: The issues on the U.S.-Canada agenda do not excite Washington's foreign policy elite. Normally, nothing Canada-related could compete for attention with crises such as those in Ukraine or Gaza. But President Trump seems determined to break the association of Canada with boredom by wreaking havoc upon one of the world's most positive bilateral relationships. He started out by sneering at Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as the mere 'governor' of what should be the 51st state, showing contempt for Canada's very existence as an independent country. That view parallels Vladimir Putin's stance on Ukraine. Trump has now gone from words to deeds, imposing 25 percent tariffs against imports from Canada (although the the date of actual implantation has now slipped until April 2), as well as placing tariffs on China and Mexico. Even if one disagrees wholly with Trump's approach to China, one must accept that it is a competitor for which America must design an effective strategy. And relations with Mexico have always been complex, with tough problems such as immigration and narcotics for which it has always been hard to find solutions. But Canada? It seems that Trump, the habitual disruptor, is creating a crisis for its own sake. Any serious economist, and indeed anyone who passed Econ 101 in college, can tell you the likely effects of his tariffs — sticker shock at the car dealer, the lumber yard and the supermarket, followed by lines at the unemployment office. But although economic consequences will be felt soon enough, even more damaging will be the effects on the good will between our two peoples which, while perhaps 'boring,' has been the bedrock of our security relationship. Canadians have fought beside Americans from the beaches of Normandy to the mountains of Afghanistan. Our two countries jointly patrol the skies above our shared continent. Canada has usually been on our side at the U.N. and in other forums, not because it wants to curry favor with us, but because it shares our values of democracy and free markets and mostly sees the world the same way we do. It seems unthinkable that Trump would want to foment long-term distrust on the part of our Canadian neighbors in his search for an illusory economic advantage, but that is precisely what he is doing. So we can expect when the time comes, as it inevitably will, that America wants Canadian support on matters of importance to us, the answer we hear will be 'no.' On the wall of the atrium of the U.S. embassy in Ottawa are carved words spoken by President John F. Kennedy when he visited Canada in 1961: 'Geography has made us neighbors. History has made us friends. Economics has made us partners. Necessity has made us allies.' But given the direction Trump is taking us, we may need to chisel those words off the wall. Perhaps we should replace them with ones written by Canadian singer Joni Mitchell: 'Don't it always seem to go, that you don't know what you've got 'til it's gone?' Richard M. Sanders is a global fellow of the Canada Institute at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars and a senior fellow at the Center for the National Interest. A former senior foreign service officer, he served as chargé d'affaires and deputy chief of mission at the U.S. embassy in Ottawa from 2013 to 2016.