2 days ago
Kerala HC extends interim stay on Lakshadweep language order
Kochi: Kerala high court has extended its earlier order deferring the implementation of an office order issued by Lakshadweep administration, which sought to remove Arabic and Mahl languages from the school curriculum in the Union Territory, until the disposal of the petition challenging it.
Observing that there was no material to show the office order was issued following any study or stakeholder consultation, the court emphasised the deep cultural significance of language and cautioned that changes could have serious ramifications.
The bench comprising Chief Justice Nitin Jamdar and Justice Basant Balaji was hearing a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by P I Ajas Akber, a resident of Kalpeni Island, challenging the office order dated May 14, issued by the director of education, Union Territory of Lakshadweep.
The order pertained to the implementation of the three-language formula (TLF) from Class I, excluding Mahl and Arabic as optional subjects.
Upon reviewing the facts, the court found no material to show that the policy was framed in light of the islands' specific conditions, or to explain how the decision was made and what its implications might be, particularly considering the departure from a long-standing policy in place for 70 years.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Canadian Residents Are Now Eligible for a New Financial Program
Canada Today
Undo
It also noted that the directive had been issued merely as an office order — a mechanism ordinarily used for routine administrative matters, not for decisions with a fundamental impact on local conditions.
Accordingly, the court directed that the existing position with respect to CBSE and non-CBSE schools in Lakshadweep shall continue.
Additionally, the court clarified that the Union Territory is free to study local conditions within the framework of prevailing education policies and to engage all stakeholders through a meaningful process of consultation, not merely as a formality. If such studies and consultations are undertaken, the respondents may seek appropriate orders, the court said.
