06-05-2025
Banxso Liquidation Case Kicks off in Western Cape High Court
Live coverage of the Banxso liquidation case unfolds in the Western Cape High Court, as investor Carol Margret Wentzel challenges the trading platform's practices amid allegations of fraud.
Image: IOL / Ron AI
The liquidation application against trading platform Banxso, brought by investor Carol Margret Wentzel, commenced on Monday in the Western Cape High Court before Judge Le Grange.
Judge Le Grange, who appeared well-versed in the extensive case documentation, immediately delved into critical aspects of the proceedings. Early into the hearing, he raised questions about a website established by liquidators to gather support for the application. Advocate Van Rooyen, representing Wentzel, had mentioned the site collected approximately 2,000 responses potentially representing hundreds of millions of rands in claims.
The Judge expressed concern about the practice of soliciting support for specific liquidators before claims were properly lodged, questioning whether this constituted inappropriate touting. He further inquired why experienced investors would need such assistance if the allegations of fraud were legitimate.
When discussing the rejection of a settlement offer, Judge Le Grange questioned why Wentzel would decline an offer of full security paid into Banxso's lawyers' trust account in favour of liquidation proceedings that might yield significantly less compensation.
Van Rooyen argued that the Consumer Protection Act established that companies paying referral fees constituted a Ponzi scheme, suggesting that if Banxso paid referral fees and bonuses to client accounts, it implied the use of client funds as the only explanation. This assertion appeared to generate some confusion in the courtroom with no one expecting him to raise the trading business potentially being a Ponzi scheme as an argument in the matter.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The proceedings took an interesting turn when one of Banxso's counsels, Advocate Prinsloo, applied to strike certain evidence from the record. Prinsloo argued that the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) had improperly complied with a subpoena issued by the applicant's attorneys, Mostert and Bosman, which demanded all documentation and transcripts related to the Banxso investigation. The defence contended that such subpoenas were inappropriate for motion court proceedings.
Judge Le Grange questioned the timing of this application, noting that if the information was already available, removing it now might disadvantage the applicant's case. The FSCA responded that they had complied with a valid subpoena and had not colluded with the applicants or liquidators.
