logo
#

Latest news with #ChatGPT.

OpenAI's GPT-5: India may become our largest market, says CEO Sam Altman
OpenAI's GPT-5: India may become our largest market, says CEO Sam Altman

Time of India

time4 days ago

  • Business
  • Time of India

OpenAI's GPT-5: India may become our largest market, says CEO Sam Altman

Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills India, currently OpenAI 's second-largest market, could soon become its largest globally, CEO Sam Altman said on Wednesday as the company unveiled its next-generation model, GPT-5 , which will be available free to all India as an "incredibly fast-growing" market, Altman noted the remarkable pace at which Indian citizens and businesses are adopting Artificial Intelligence (AI)."India is our second-largest market in the world after the US, and it may well become our largest market. It's incredibly fast-growing, but what users are doing with AI, what citizens of India are doing with AI, is really quite remarkable."We're especially focused on bringing products to India, working with local partners to make AI work great for India and make it more affordable for people across the country."We've been paying a lot of attention here given the rate of growth and I am excited to come for a visit in September," Altman said during a media on Thursday announced the launch of GPT-5, describing it as its "best model yet for coding and agentic tasks"."We're releasing GPT-5 in three sizes in the API -- gpt-5, gpt-5-mini, and gpt-5-nano -- to give developers more flexibility to trade off performance, cost, and latency. While GPT-5 in ChatGPT is a system of reasoning, non-reasoning, and router models, GPT-5 in the API platform is the reasoning model that powers maximum performance in ChatGPT."Notably, GPT-5 with minimal reasoning is a different model than the non-reasoning model in ChatGPT, and is better tuned for developers. The non-reasoning model used in ChatGPT is available as gpt-5-chat-latest," OpenAI said in a new model is a major upgrade over its predecessor, GPT-4, and represents a "pretty significant step" toward Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), Altman said."GPT-5 is really the first time that I think one of our mainline models has felt like you can ask a legitimate expert, like a PhD-level expert, anything... We wanted to simplify it and make it accessible. We wanted to make it available in our free tier for the first time," he Turley, head of ChatGPT, added that the new model significantly improves understanding across more than 12 Indian languages "GPT-5 significantly improves multilingual understanding across over 12 Indian languages, including regional languages. So that's really exciting because as Sam mentioned, India is a priority market for us," Turley rollout of GPT-5 began on August 7 for free, Plus, and Pro users, with Enterprise and Education users gaining access a week later.

"ChatGPT is not a diary, therapist, lawyer, or friend": LinkedIn user warns against oversharing everything with AI
"ChatGPT is not a diary, therapist, lawyer, or friend": LinkedIn user warns against oversharing everything with AI

Economic Times

time03-08-2025

  • Business
  • Economic Times

"ChatGPT is not a diary, therapist, lawyer, or friend": LinkedIn user warns against oversharing everything with AI

ChatGPT users are being warned to think twice before typing anything personal into the chatbot. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently confirmed that interactions with ChatGPT aren't protected by confidentiality laws. Conversations you assume are private may be stored, reviewed, and even presented in court — no matter how sensitive, emotional or casual they seem.'If you go talk to ChatGPT about your most sensitive stuff and then there's like a lawsuit or whatever, we could be required to produce that, and I think that's very screwed up,' Altman said in an interview on the This Past Weekend podcast. He added, 'We should have, like, the same concept of privacy for your conversations with AI that we do with a therapist or whatever.'But as of now, that legal framework doesn't explained, 'Right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's legal privilege for it. There's confidentiality. We haven't figured that out yet for ChatGPT.'This sharp warning is echoed by Shreya Jaiswal, a Chartered Accountant and founder of Fawkes Solutions, who posted her concerns on LinkedIn. Her message was blunt and alarming. 'ChatGPT can land you in jail. No, seriously. Not even joking,' she to Jaiswal, Altman's own words spell out the legal dangers. 'Sam Altman – the CEO of OpenAI, literally said that anything you type into ChatGPT can be used as evidence in court. Not just now, even months or years later, if needed. There's no privacy, no protection, nothing, unlike talking to a real lawyer or therapist who is sworn to client confidentiality.'She laid out a few scenarios that, while hypothetical, are disturbingly someone types: 'I cheated on my partner and I feel guilty, is it me or the stars that are misaligned?' Jaiswal pointed out how this could resurface in a family court battle. 'Boom. You're in court 2 years later fighting an alimony or custody battle. That chat shows up. And your 'private guilt trip' just became public proof.' Even seemingly harmless curiosity can be risky. 'How do I save taxes using all the loopholes in the Income Tax Act?' or 'How can I use bank loans to become rich like Vijay Mallya?' could be interpreted as intent during a future audit or legal probe. 'During a tax audit or loan default, this could easily be used as evidence of intent even if you never actually did anything wrong,' she warned. In another example, she highlighted workplace risk. 'I'm thinking of quitting and starting my own company. How can I use my current company to learn for my startup?' This, she argued, could be used against you in a lawsuit for breach of contract or intellectual property theft. 'You don't even need to have done anything. The fact that you thought about it is enough.'Jaiswal expressed concern that people have become too casual, even intimate, with AI tools. 'We've all gotten way too comfortable with AI. People are treating ChatGPT like a diary. Like a best friend. Like a therapist. Like a co-founder.''But it's none of those. It's not on your side, it's not protecting you. And legally, it doesn't owe you anything.'She closed her post with a simple piece of advice: 'Let me make this simple – if you wouldn't say it in front of a judge, don't type it into ChatGPT.'And her final thought was one that many might relate to: 'I'm honestly scared. Not because I have used ChatGPT for something I shouldn't have. But because we've moved too fast, and asked too few questions, and continue to do so in the world of AI.'These concerns aren't just theory. In a 2024 bankruptcy case in the United States, a lawyer submitted a legal brief that cited fake court cases generated by ChatGPT. The judge imposed a fine of $5,500 and ordered the lawyer to attend an AI ethics session. — slow_developer (@slow_developer) Similar disciplinary actions were taken against lawyers in Utah and Alabama who relied on fabricated AI-generated incidents have underscored a critical truth: AI cannot replace verified legal research or professional advice. It can mislead, misrepresent, or completely fabricate information — what researchers call "AI hallucinations".Altman also flagged a worrying trend among younger users. Speaking at a Federal Reserve conference, he said, 'There are young people who say, 'I can't make any decision in my life without telling ChatGPT everything that's going on. It knows me. I'm going to do whatever it says.' That feels really bad to me.'He's concerned that blind faith in AI could be eroding people's ability to think critically. While ChatGPT is programmed to provide helpful answers, Altman stressed it lacks context, responsibility, and real emotional advice is straightforward, and it applies to everyone: Don't use ChatGPT to confess anything sensitive, illegal or personal Never treat it as a lawyer, therapist, or financial advisor Verify any factual claims independently Use AI to brainstorm, not to confess And most importantly, don't say anything to a chatbot that you wouldn't be comfortable seeing in court While OpenAI claims that user chats are reviewed for safety and model training, Altman admitted that conversations may be retained if required by law. Even if you delete a conversation, legal demands can override those actions. With ongoing lawsuits, including one from The New York Times, OpenAI may soon have to store conversations indefinitely. For those looking for more privacy, Altman suggested considering open-source models that can run offline, like GPT4All by Nomic AI or Ollama. But he stressed that what's needed most is a clear legal framework.'I think we will certainly need a legal or a policy framework for AI,' he then, treat your chats with caution. Because what you type could follow you — even years later.

Sam Altman warns ChatGPT is not your therapist and your secrets aren't legally private
Sam Altman warns ChatGPT is not your therapist and your secrets aren't legally private

India Today

time26-07-2025

  • Business
  • India Today

Sam Altman warns ChatGPT is not your therapist and your secrets aren't legally private

If you've been spilling your heart out to ChatGPT, you might want to pause for a moment, or at least think carefully about what you're typing. OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman has recently admitted that, for now, AI chats don't enjoy the same confidentiality as a conversation with a doctor, lawyer or therapist. Appearing on comedian Theo Von's podcast This Past Weekend, Altman revealed that the AI industry simply hasn't caught up when it comes to protecting deeply personal conversations with users. And that could have consequences if those chats end up in talk about the most personal details in their lives to ChatGPT,' Altman confessed. 'People use it, young people, especially, use it as a therapist, a life coach; having these relationship problems and [asking] 'what should I do?' And right now, if you talk to a therapist or a lawyer or a doctor about those problems, there's legal privilege for it. There's doctor-patient confidentiality, there's legal confidentiality, whatever. And we haven't figured that out yet for when you talk to ChatGPT.'Altman warned that, as things stand, user conversations with ChatGPT could be disclosed if a court orders it. 'This could create a privacy concern for users in the case of a lawsuit,' he said, explaining that OpenAI would currently be legally obliged to produce those records. 'I think that's very screwed up. I think we should have the same concept of privacy for your conversations with AI that we do with a therapist or whatever — and no one had to think about that even a year ago,' he grey areasThe candid remarks come as OpenAI finds itself in the middle of a high-profile court battle with The New York Times. In June, the newspaper and other plaintiffs sought a court order demanding that OpenAI retain all user conversations, even deleted ones, indefinitely, as part of an ongoing copyright has described the request as 'an overreach' and confirmed it is appealing, arguing that allowing courts to dictate data storage would open the floodgates to future demands from law enforcement and legal OpenAI says deleted chats from ChatGPT Free, Plus and Pro accounts are removed from its systems within 30 days unless they need to be kept 'for legal or security reasons.'Unlike encrypted messaging apps such as WhatsApp, OpenAI's staff can access conversations. This is partly so that they can fine-tune the models and also keep an eye out for level of access has become a sticking point for some would-be users, particularly in a world where digital privacy is under increasing scrutiny. For instance, following the Supreme Court's overturning of Roe v. Wade in the US, millions of women moved away from unencrypted period-tracking apps towards safer alternatives such as Apple Not yetadvertisementAltman's warning might hit home for those who use ChatGPT as a sounding board for their emotional ups and downs. Without a legal framework, AI simply doesn't yet offer the same protection that a professional human counsellor does.'I think it makes sense to really want the privacy clarity before you use [ChatGPT] a lot, like the legal clarity,' Altman told Von, who admitted that he avoids using the chatbot much for exactly that while ChatGPT might feel like a non-judgemental friend, the legal system doesn't see it that way, at least, not yet.- EndsMust Watch

OpenAI negotiates with Microsoft for new funding
OpenAI negotiates with Microsoft for new funding

Kuwait Times

time26-05-2025

  • Business
  • Kuwait Times

OpenAI negotiates with Microsoft for new funding

TOULOUSE: Screens displaying the logo of DeepSeek, a Chinese artificial intelligence company that develops open-source large language models and the logo of OpenAI's artificial intelligence chatbot ChatGPT.-- AFP WASHINGTON: OpenAI and Microsoft are rewriting the terms of their multibillion-dollar partnership in a high-stakes negotiation designed to allow the ChatGPT maker to launch a future IPO, while protecting the software giant's access to cutting-edge AI models, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. A critical issue is how much equity in OpenAI's new for-profit business Microsoft will receive in exchange for the more than $13 billion it has invested in the company to date, the report said. It said Microsoft is offering to give up some of its equity stake in exchange for access to new technology developed beyond the 2030 cutoff. They are also revising the terms of a wider contract, first drafted when Microsoft initially invested $1 billion into OpenAI in 2019, the report said. OpenAI and Microsoft did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. OpenAI has told investors it will share a smaller fraction of revenue with its largest backer as it moves ahead with restructuring, The Information reported last week. In January, Microsoft changed some terms of a deal with OpenAI after entering a joint venture with Oracle and Japan's SoftBank Group to build up to $500 billion of new artificial intelligence data centers in the United States. –Reuters

Google could use AI to extend search monopoly, DOJ says as trial begins
Google could use AI to extend search monopoly, DOJ says as trial begins

Ammon

time22-04-2025

  • Business
  • Ammon

Google could use AI to extend search monopoly, DOJ says as trial begins

Ammon News - Alphabet's Google needs strong measures imposed on it to prevent it from using its artificial intelligence products to extend its dominance in online search, a U.S. Department of Justice attorney said as a trial in the historic antitrust case began on outcome of the case could fundamentally reshape the internet by unseating Google as the go-to portal for information Justice Department is seeking an order that would require Google to sell its Chrome browser and take other measures to end what a judge found was its monopoly in online search. Prosecutors have compared the lawsuit to past cases that resulted in the break up of AT&T and Standard is the "time to tell Google and all other monopolists who are out there listening, and they are listening, that there are consequences when you break the antitrust laws," DOJ attorney David Dahlquist said during his opening DOJ and a broad coalition of state attorneys general are pressing for remedies they believe will restore competition even as search evolves to overlap with generative AI products such as ChatGPT."This court's remedy should be forward-looking and not ignore what is on the horizon," Dahlquist search monopoly helps improve its AI products, which are also a way to lead users to its search engine, he has agreed to pay Samsung ( opens new tab monthly to install Google's Gemini AI app on devices such as smartphones, a deal that can be extended into 2028, according to documents shown at trial. The financial terms were not disclosed, but Dahlquist characterized the monthly amount as an "enormous sum."U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta previously ruled that Google's exclusive agreements with device makers to be the default search engine helped maintain its Turley, OpenAI's product head for rival AI app ChatGPT, was expected to take the stand on lawyer, John Schmidtlein, said in his opening statement that the DOJ's proposals amount to "a wishlist for competitors looking to get the benefits of Google's extraordinary innovations."AI competitors "would like handouts as well even though they are competing just fine," he argues that its AI products are outside the scope of the case, which focused on search engines. Adopting the proposed remedies "would hold back American innovation at a critical juncture," Google executive Lee-Anne Mulholland said in a blog post on company has said it will appeal once a final judgment is entered. Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store