logo
#

Latest news with #CladdaghRings

Orders freezing Claddagh Rings' brother's assets are extended by High Court
Orders freezing Claddagh Rings' brother's assets are extended by High Court

Irish Times

time23-05-2025

  • Business
  • Irish Times

Orders freezing Claddagh Rings' brother's assets are extended by High Court

A co-owner of the company at the centre of the long-running Claddagh Rings business dispute has had High Court orders restraining him from reducing his and his family's assets below €969,000 pending determination of a dispute over ownership of a villa in Spain extended. Mr Justice Brian Cregan earlier this month granted interim orders freezing the assets of Andrew Fried, his wife Felicity Fried, their children Isabella and Ruben, and a Spanish company, Villas Adelfa SL. Philip Fried, a shareholder with Andrew in Claddagh Jewellers Ltd, had brought the proceedings over what the court heard was 'a new front' in a long-running dispute between the brothers – a row over ownership of a Spanish villa called Villa la Joya in Benalmadena, Malaga, worth €969,000. The brothers had settled a High Court dispute over the Claddagh business in December 2020. READ MORE As part of that settlement, Philip Fried said, the parties agreed to transfer to their mother, Janis, ownership of Villa la Joya where the brothers' parents had lived since 1975. The Spanish firm, Villas Adelfa, owned the property with the two brothers each holding half the shares in the company. It subsequently emerged that Andrew Fried, unbeknown to his brother or other parties to the settlement, had unlawfully transferred in June 2020 his shares in the company to his two minor children, Isabella and Ruben. This purportedly prevented the transfer of the property to their mother, Philip Fried said in an affidavit. Separately, eviction proceedings, at the behest of Andrew Fried, were issued in Spain requiring their parents to leave the villa, it was claimed. A Spanish judge dismissed the application last September and made explicit reference to the December 2020 settlement agreement. An appeal has been lodged against that decision in Spain. The asset-freezing application was brought by Philip Fried, along with his parents Janis and Laszlo Fried, Claddagh Jewellers Ltd, Claddagh Ring Ltd and Irony Galway Properties Unlimited Co. On Friday, Jarlath Ryan SC, for Philip Fried, said there had been no response or meaningful response to the interim orders from Andrew Fried and counsel was now seeking a suite of orders that should remain in place pending trial of the full action. Counsel said Felicity Fried had been in touch to say she did not hold any shares in the Spanish company and was willing to undertake not to evict the Fried parents. However, counsel said this did not go far enough because Mrs Fried is the guardian of the children to whom the shares in the Spanish company had been transferred which means she could transfer the shares if she wanted. Mr Justice Cregan said he was satisfied to grant the orders sought by Mr Ryan pending trial of the full case. He continued the order restraining the defendants from reducing their assets below €969,000. He also ordered that the assets in the Fried companies should not be reduced in accordance with the 2020 settlement. He further restrained, pending further order, the transfer of company assets, including assets held on trust for the defendants' minor children. He ordered the defendants to disclose to the plaintiffs all worldwide bank accounts in which they have a beneficial or legal interest.

Claddagh Jewellers brother fails to respond to asset freezing order
Claddagh Jewellers brother fails to respond to asset freezing order

Irish Times

time16-05-2025

  • Business
  • Irish Times

Claddagh Jewellers brother fails to respond to asset freezing order

A co-owner of the company at the centre of the long running Claddagh Rings business dispute has not yet responded to a High Court order freezing his assets, a judge was told on Friday. Mr Justice Brian Cregan said he would give Andrew Fried until next Friday to respond to the freezing order proceedings brought against him by his brother Philip Fried and if he did not do so further orders may be made against him in his absence. Last week, the judge granted an interim injunction preventing Andrew, his wife Felicity Fried, their children Isabella and Ruben, and a Spanish company, Villas Adelfa SL, from reducing their assets below €969,000. It followed a one-side only application by Philip, a co-shareholder with Andrew in Claddagh Jewellers Ltd, when the court was told a long-running dispute between the brothers had 'opened up on a new front' in a row over ownership of a Spanish villa worth €969,000. READ MORE The brothers had settled a High Court dispute over the business in December 2020. As part of that settlement, Philip said, the parties agreed to transfer to their mother Janis ownership of Villa la Joya in Benalmadena, Malaga, where their parents lived since 1975. The Spanish firm, Villas Adelfa, owned the property with the two brothers each holding half the shares in the company. However, it subsequently emerged that Andrew, unbeknown to Philip or other parties to the settlement, had unlawfully transferred the previous June his shares in the company to his two minor children, Isabella and Ruben. This purportedly prevented the transfer of the property to their mother, Philip said in an affidavit. Separately, eviction proceedings, at the behest of Andrew, were issued in Spain requiring their parents to leave the villa, it was claimed. A Spanish judge dismissed the application last September and made explicit reference to the December 2020 settlement agreement. An appeal has however been lodged against that decision in Spain. The asset freezing application was brought last week by Philip, along with his parents Janis and Laszlo Fried, Claddagh Jewellers Ltd, Claddagh Ring Ltd, and Irony Galway Properties Unlimited Co. It was adjourned for a week. On Friday, Jarlath Ryan SC, for Philip, said Andrew's wife Felicity had agreed not to divest any shares in the company pending further order and not to take any steps to evict the parents from the villa. However, there had been no communication from what Mr Ryan said was the 'main protagonist Andrew Fried'. Counsel said his side would give him until Tuesday to respond after which they will seek a 'full suite of orders' against him. Mr Justice Cregan adjourned it for another week and in the absence of any replying affidavit from Andrew, he would hear any application from Mr Ryan for further orders against him.

Spanish villa at centre of new legal row between Claddagh ring brothers
Spanish villa at centre of new legal row between Claddagh ring brothers

Irish Times

time09-05-2025

  • Business
  • Irish Times

Spanish villa at centre of new legal row between Claddagh ring brothers

A bitter dispute between two brothers from the family behind the business which makes world famous Claddagh Rings has flared up again in a new row over ownership of a Spanish villa worth €969,000, the High Court heard. Philip and Andrew Fried, who were shareholders of Claddagh Jewellers Ltd, settled a High Court dispute over the business in December 2020. However, an application for an asset freezing order was made to the court on Friday by Philip's barrister, Jarlath Ryan SC who said a 'new front' had opened up in the long running dispute. Mr Justice Brian Cregan granted him an interim injunction preventing Andrew Fried, his wife Felicity Fried, their children Isabella and Ruben, and a Spanish company, Villas Adelfa SL, from reducing their assets below €969,000. READ MORE The application, in the names of Philip, his parents Janis and Laszlo Fried, Claddagh Jewellers Ltd, Claddagh Ring Ltd, and Irony Galway Properties Unlimited Co, was made on an ex parte (one side only represented) basis. As part of the 2020 settlement, Philip said, the parties agreed to transfer to their mother Janis ownership of Villa la Joya in Benalmadena, Malaga, where their parents lived since 1975. The Spanish firm, Villas Adelfa, owned the property with the two brothers each holding half the shares in the company. However, it subsequently emerged that Andrew, unbeknown to Philip or other parties to the settlement, had unlawfully transferred the previous June his shares in the company to his two minor children, Isabella and Ruben. This purportedly prevented the transfer of the property to their mother, Philip said in an affidavit. He said Andrew made 'explicit representations' for the December 2020 settlement agreement that he was capable of complying with its terms. As a result of finding out about the transfer to his children, he believes those representations constitute a fraudulent misrepresentation. Philip said that over a long period of time Andrew had 'carried out various unlawful transactions and made certain fraudulent and unconscionable manoeuvres' in relation to shares in the Spanish company in order to maintain control of it and to impede his obligations under the settlement agreement. He also said eviction proceedings, at the behest of Andrew, were issued in Spain requiring their parents to leave the villa. A Spanish judge dismissed the application last September and made explicit reference to the December 2020 settlement agreement. An appeal has however been lodged against that decision in Spain. He believes Andrew has, for at least the last 12 or 13 years, acted in a 'fraudulent, harmful, destructive and pernicious manner' which has been detrimental to him (Philip), the Fried companies and to their parents. Andrew had last December also issued a demand for the payment of some €4.9 million to him for what he describes as 'outstanding loans, money, land and shares stolen from me and my family' since 2005. This was in direct contradiction of the settlement agreement and evidence that Andrew never had any intention of being bound by it, he said. Last June, Philip said he obtained a High Court injunction, pending further determination, preventing Andrew and his wife from taking any steps to prosecute the eviction proceedings in Spain. Philip said the plaintiffs have clear and justified concerns that the defendants may misapply and/or dissipate corporate and/or personal assets which may be used to meet any judgment against them arising out of these proceedings. As a result he was seeking the freezing order. Mr Justice Cregan granted the interim orders sought and adjourned the case for a week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store