Latest news with #Coinalyze
Business Mayor
26-05-2025
- Business
- Business Mayor
Breaking down VIRTUAL's 13% daily surge: Is $2.44 next?
VIRTUAL surged 13.25%, hitting a four-month high. Virtuals protocol makes a bullish crossover from two fronts as momentum strengthens. After reaching $2.24 three days ago, Virtuals Protocol [VIRTUAL] faced strong rejection. The altcoin retraced to a low of $1.83. However, over the past day, VIRTUAL has successfully retested $1.8 support and rebounded to hit a 4-month high of $2.25. In fact, as of this writing, VIRTUAL was trading at $2.24. This marked a 13.26% increase over the past 24 hours. Over the same period, the altcoin's volume has surged by 69.16% to reach $329.34 million while the market cap was up $13.18%, hitting $1.44 billion. A surge in price alongside volume and market cap signals strong demand for an asset. As such, VIRTUAL was experiencing significant demand across all market participants in both spot and futures markets. Source: Coinalyze For starters, d emand in the spot market remains strong, with buyers dominating over the past day. VIRTUAL buyers have accumulated 5.18 million in volume, creating a positive market imbalance of 403K compared to sellers. The same trend extends to the Futures market, where VIRTUAL's Open Interest has surged 18.83% to $237 million, according to CoinGlass data. This sharp increase suggests that investors are heavily favoring futures contracts. Source: CoinGlass VIRTUAL's long and short data reveal that most Futures investors are favoring long positions. At press time, longs accounted for over 50% of all futures contracts, with the Long-to-Short Ratio exceeding 1, while shorts held 49% of total Futures. This preference for long positions is further supported by VIRTUAL's Funding Rate remaining positive across major exchanges. When longs dominate the market, it signals widespread bullish sentiment, with investors expecting prices to climb further in the near term. Source: Coinalyze Is VIRTUAL set for a sustained uptrend? According to AMBCrypto's analysis, the coin was currently experiencing a strong upward momentum amid rising demand. This strong upward momentum is evidenced by the fact that VIRTUAL has made bullish crossovers across two fronts. Over the past day, the altcoin's Stoch RSI made a bullish crossover, rising to 50. A crossover here suggests that the momentum to the upside is strong and is very likely to continue. Source: TradingView This upside momentum was further confirmed by another bullish crossover that emerged on VIRTUAL's RSI. A move to the upside here suggests that buyers have taken control of the market, thus displacing sellers in the market. RSI has surged to 66 with its MA sitting at 62. These crossovers pointed out that demand has strengthened the uptrend, and VIRTUALl could make more gains. Therefore, based on the above observation, if the trend continues with bullish sentiments persisting, the altcoin will find the next significant resistance around $2.44. Conversely, if the attempt by Bulls fails with sellers starting to realize a profit, a pullback will see VIRTUAL drop to $1.92.
Yahoo
22-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Why Are Bitcoin Traders Aggressively Shorting as BTC Hits New Record High?
Bitcoin {BTC} galloped to a new record high above $110,000 on Thursday, liquidating around $500 million worth of derivatives positions in its wake, but some traders aren't buying into the bullish sentiment. Trading volume jumped by 74% in the past 24 hours as traders attempted to position themselves, however the majority of these traders are opting to go short -- or bet on bitcoin moving downwards. Coinalyze data shows that the long/short ratio is at its lowest point since September 2022, which was the midst of crypto winter. This trend began on April 21 as traders aggressively shorted the breakout above $85,000, seemingly under the impression that bitcoin had already formed its cycle high and that any subsequent move would form a double top. However, despite a lack of retail participation, bitcoin continued to grind higher, taking out levels of resistance at $97,000 and $105,000 on its path. The move can be attributed to a number of factors; a recovery in U.S. equities as tariff concerns cooled, a rise in institutional activity on exchanges, like the CME, and crucially a wealth of short positions to squeeze and force prices higher. While these short positions might be considered bearish in terms of market structure, they are actually fanning the flame to the upside as it gives bullish traders areas to target and conduct stop-loss hunts like we saw earlier this week. Shorting an asset's record high is not necessarily a bad strategy; a trader will often opt to enter a short position at a level of resistance, whether that be technical or psychological, and layer stop losses above where the thesis of a short trade would be invalidated. In this case, if a trader shorted $105,000 on each of BTCs three tests of that area, they could have closed their position in profit on three occasions at $102,000, meaning that even if they were stopped out of the trade at $109,000, it would be a profitable week. Alongside the continued rise in short positions we have seen open interest jump disproportionately to BTC. Over the past 24 hours BTC is up 4.8% while open interest is up by 17% despite hundreds of million being liquidated. This indicates that the record high break is driven by leverage and might be less sustainable that the initial drives above $100,000 in December and January. It remains to be seen whether interest in short positions continues to rise if BTC rolls on with its momentous move above $111,000, but there is certainly a minefield of short positions to squeeze if it needs some ammunition.
Yahoo
30-04-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
How $330M BTC Hacker May Have Doubled Down on Monero Derivatives
There's something that stands out about Monday's suspicious transfer of more than 3,520 BTC ($330.7 million) to privacy coin monero (XMR), a conversion that blockchain sleuth ZachXBT said was probably linked to a hack: coordinated activity in the derivatives market. Monero, which obscures the sender's and recipient's addresses to provide an untraceable currency, has limited liquidity on exchanges, which makes it harder for users to transact without affecting the market and exposes them to slippage, the chance of the price changing for the worse before the deal is finalized. The decision to go through an illiquid cryptocurrency is unusual. Tether's USDT or ether (ETH) would have provided an easier, less-slippage-prone way of moving the funds about, and mixers such as Tornado Cash could help obscure the transaction path. Of course, stablecoins like USDT are also easier to intercept and freeze. Trading data, however, suggests there was more going on than a simple case of someone trying to launder stolen funds. The possible hacker very likely did encounter slippage during the transaction. Combined market depth, which measures order book liquidity over a given price range, was relatively low at around $1 million per 2% on both sides of the book. XRM surged by 45% due to the limited liquidity on exchanges, meaning they could have lost as much as 20% — $66 million — by purchasing XMR rather than a more-liquid token. For a more complete picture, take a look at derivative markets. While monero was surging, open interest — the number of outstanding futures and options contracts — in XMR on the main centralized exchanges more than doubled to $35.1 million, according to Coinalyze. A 45% rise in XMR's price should have boosted open interest only to $24.2 million instead of the figure it ended up at. Taking into account the $1 million in liquidations, someone, or some people, were already long on XMR to the tune of $11 million. While the price increase on that holding wouldn't have compensated for the full amount of slippage, it would help soften the blow. Moreover the figure doesn't take into account any positions that might have existed in decentralized exchanges, and let's not forget the funds were probably stolen in the first place, so the (assumed) perpetrators are still a couple of million dollars ahead. This is not the first time bad actors have flooded spot purchases to move the derivative needle. Last month a trader manipulated JELLY prices on decentralized exchange HyperLiquid. They bought JELLY on illiquid exchanges, tricking the pricing oracle to feed an inaccurate price to HyperLiquid and thus generating profit for holders of long positions. Both cases draw similarities to the $114 million exploit on Mango Markets in 2022, which involved a trader named Avi Eisenberg manipulating MNGO prices by borrowing assets using ill-gotten gains as collateral. Eisenberg was found guilty by a jury in 2024 and faces 20 years in prison. Sign in to access your portfolio
