Latest news with #ConnecticutTrustAct
Yahoo
21-05-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
CT lawmakers vote to expand immigrant protections amid Trump deportation campaign
With federal agents arresting immigrants nationwide on a constant basis, Connecticut lawmakers voted Wednesday to strengthen the current law to maintain the independence of state and municipal police. The controversial Connecticut Trust Act blocks local police from making an arrest that is based only on a request by federal agents in the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. After five hours of debate, the state House of Representatives voted 96 to 51 on largely party lines to expand the existing Trust Act. The only three House Democrats to vote with the Republicans and against the bill were Rep. Chris Poulos of Southington, Rep. Patrick Boyd of Pomfret, and Rep. Michael DiGiovancarlo, a law-and-order lawmaker with a longtime background as a police officer in Waterbury. The measure still requires approval by the state Senate, which is controlled 25-11 by Democrats. Gov. Ned Lamont supports the bill, his spokesman said Wednesday. State officials maintain that ICE agents can still do their jobs, while the local police can separately perform their own duties in law enforcement. 'We're not impeding any federal ability to come in and do what they have the right to do by law, but we're putting protections on it,' said House Speaker Matt Ritter, a Hartford Democrat. 'Do I think people should be going into courtrooms and grabbing people? No. That's not fair to the judges. It's not fair to the individuals, the prosecutors, the jurors. That's not what a courthouse is for. When you walk down the courthouse steps, that's a different ballgame — and that's federal law that governs that.' Ritter added, 'The parameters we can set are, to the extent that the state has control over state employees or judicial employees, we can limit what information they share on a voluntary basis. They can't call up ICE and say, 'Someone was jaywalking. We have them, and I believe they are here undocumented.' What we can't do is tell ICE that they don't have the right to come into anywhere in the state, unfortunately, and do what they have to do.' But Republicans blasted the bill, saying that Democrats were taking the existing law and making it worse. State Rep. Craig Fishbein, the ranking House Republican on the legislature's judiciary committee, criticized the bill on multiple levels. 'I think our federal officials should know what is going on today,' Fishbein said, adding that the legislature is 'not only violating the Constitution, but it is doubling down.' He added, 'It is giving more rights to illegal aliens than lawful citizens. … That is very troubling.' Among the key issues of contention is the bill would allow those arrested to file civil lawsuits against municipalities for injunctive relief and declaratory judgements. In addition, if they won their case, they would be entitled to legal fees. Democrats strongly defended the expansion of the current law, saying it would help those who have been wronged. 'They may have already been deported,' said Rep. Steve Stafstrom, a Bridgeport attorney who co-chairs the judiciary committee. 'They may have already suffered some harm.' Unlike the underlying bill, a Republican amendment called for either side to receive attorney's fees, depending if they won the case. In addition, lawmakers said that those filing the lawsuits could 'jump the line' and have their cases heard more quickly as they would be given higher priority. The Republican amendment on attorney's fees failed on a party line vote of 97-48 with six members absent. Rep. Doug Dubitsky, a Republican attorney, condemned the legislation in its entirety. 'The Trust Act is a travesty. It is an insult to the people of this state,' Dubitsky said. 'The very purpose of the Trust Act is to prevent criminals from being taken and arrested by federal law enforcement for federal crimes. … We don't want them here. We don't want them in our cities. We want them caught, and we want them to be deported. Why would we want to make it harder for federal law enforcement to do just that?' Dubitsky added, 'The entire Trust Act should be balled up into a little ball and thrown into the garbage. … I support the amendment, and I hate the Trust Act.' Republicans charged that the bill lowered the penalties for failing to appear in court on a first offense, but Democrats said it was related to relatively minor incidents. 'It's dealing with misdemeanor charges,' said Stafstrom. 'Maybe someone got sick in the family or maybe they forgot they had a court date that day.' Later, Stafstrom said that due process rights are highly important, citing key differences between criminals who are convicted and those whose charges are still pending. 'Those who are merely accused are treated different,' Stafstrom said. In his wrap-up remarks, House Majority Leader Jason Rojas, an East Hartford Democrat, said the bill was needed 'to protect the dignity of individuals' living in Connecticut. 'They are our neighbors,' Rojas told his House colleagues. 'Their children sit next to our children, right across the river in East Hartford and Manchester. .. These people are humans. We should reject referring to them as illegal. … There are legitimate concerns that have been raised about crime. … Immigrants commit crimes less frequently than the general population. I would prefer that our federal government do their job and fix our broken immigration system.' After more than four hours of debate, state Rep. Farley Santos stood up on the House floor and said that he is likely the only formerly undocumented person currently serving in the legislature. Born in Brazil, he said that his parents moved to the United States and paid into Social Security throughout their working lives but never collected any money from the program. 'I urge my colleagues to have some compassion,' said Santos, a Danbury Democrat. 'I urge you to have compassion in your heart. The vast majority of immigrants are not doing harm in their community.' Nationally, immigration gained widespread attention last year during the presidential election campaign when President Donald J. Trump promised to target immigrants and deliver widespread deportations. Since taking office, he has issued an executive order that would allow ICE to make arrests in churches and schools, which was traditionally not done in the past. While he initially said deportation efforts would focus on violent criminals, ICE has reportedly targeted legal immigrants, notably those who have protested for Palestinian rights, and undocumented people with no criminal history as well. Lawmakers have been working behind the scenes this year at the state Capitol to upgrade the Trust Act that was originally passed in Connecticut in 2013 on a unanimous basis during the tenure of then-President Barack Obama. About 15 states have similar laws, and Connecticut is generally deemed as liberal on the issue. In the bill, lawmakers listed a series of felony crimes in which local police could communicate with ICE. The immigrant could be detained if they had been convicted of the crimes, including strangulation, possessing child sexual abuse material in the second degree, commercial sexual exploitation of a minor, and criminal violation of a protective order. 'We're trying to strike the right balance,' Stafstrom told his colleagues on the House floor. 'This bill expands the list of exemptions, expands the list on which our state and local police can hold someone.' State Rep. Greg Howard, a Stonington Republican who has worked as a police officer for more than two decades, listed a series of felony crimes that would not be mentioned by local officers to ICE, including stealing a firearm, criminal possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, and damaging public transportation for terrorism purposes. 'We're handicapping our own municipalities with this legislation,' Howard said. 'I don't want criminals in my state. News flash. … I'm not going to apologize for that today or ever. … I don't care what your status is in this country. I don't. … If you get convicted of these felonies, in my experience, you have a limited regard for life. That makes you a danger.' While the House was still debating, Senate Republicans called for Gov. Ned Lamont to veto the bill. 'As ICE is effectively getting violent illegal aliens off of Connecticut's streets, the Democrat-controlled legislature at our state Capitol is seeking to pass a bill shielding them from federal authorities,' said Senate Republican leader Stephen Harding and fellow colleagues. 'That bill is an expansion of the Trust Act, which already limits when law enforcement can work with federal immigration agents.' The Republicans added, 'The governor should publicly announce he will veto it if it hits his desk. Stop projecting weakness and stand up to your party, governor.' Lamont's chief spokesman, Rob Blanchard, said Lamont views the legislation favorably. 'The governor was proud to sign legislation in 2019 that updated the Trust Act and strengthened the relationship between local law enforcement and their communities, without burdening them with the responsibilities of the federal government,' Blanchard said. 'His priority has always been making sure people feel safe in our schools, churches, and elsewhere and that regardless of status, criminals are kept off our streets. The changes under discussion today, which the governor would support, help in that mission.' Christopher Keating can be reached at ckeating@
Yahoo
09-04-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
State Democrats pushing to expand Trust Act
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — With President Trump cracking down on illegal immigration across the country, Connecticut lawmakers are weighing changes to state law. The Democrat-led judiciary committee advanced a bill Tuesday which would further limit how and when local authorities are allowed to cooperate with ICE. Lamont, Bysiewicz hold roundtable discussion about expanding pre-K access in Connecticut Democrats want to expand the Connecticut Trust Act to bar all state employees, not just police, from cooperating with federal deportation efforts. Under the revised Trust Act, authorities would still be able to hand over criminals to ICE after they've been convicted of serious felonies. But Republicans take issue with that, too, saying, in practice, the act unnecessarily bars local cops from cooperating with ICE in the same way they work with all other federal agencies. 'it's a cute name for a bad bill,' said State Rep. Pat Callahan (R-108th), who sits on the judiciary committee. 'When the Trust Act was implemented in Connecticut about 10 years ago, now you can no longer talk to one federal agency — which is ICE — that's the problem.' The Democrats who back the expansion of the trust act said that President Trump's sweeping immigration crackdown is threatening due process. 'This is what our constitution and our right to due process exists for,' said State Rep. Matt Blumenthal (D-147th), who also sits on the judiciary committee. 'Otherwise the government can just disappear you like it was Argentina in the 1970s.' In addition to opposing the Democrats' expansion of the trust act, the GOP has also called for the original act to be clawed back, saying the requirement that a person be convicted of a class A or B felony before local police can hand them over to the feds leaves too many public safety threats. 'In the court system, there's plea bargaining,' Callahan said. 'So, if someone's arrested for an A or B felony, it may be subbed down to a C or a D felony so then they wouldn't be subjected to cooperation with this one federal agency: ICE.' Republicans like Callahan, a former probation officer, want to see contact with the feds initiated when a person is charged, not convicted, of a class A, B, or C felony. That's a change Democrats have said could amount to deputizing local cops as agents of ICE. 'They're not ICE agents,' said State Sen. Herron Gaston (D-23rd) of the judiciary committee. 'They're here to protect and serve and to foster cooperation and to ensure that people regardless of their immigration status are being protected under the law.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
04-03-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
Advocates rally in Hartford to strengthen the Connecticut Trust Act
HARTFORD, Conn. (WTNH) — A hundred people rallied on the steps of Hartford City Hall on Monday, calling to strengthen the Connecticut Trust Act. 'We are here today to say that Connecticut, in the very least, should not be assisting ICE in its efforts,' Rev. Josh Pawelek at the Unitarian Universalist Society said. New Haven officials join the community for 'Know Your Rights' immigration training Bishop John Selders at Moral Monday Connecticut said that it's important to show strength and community. Mayor Arunan Arulampalam said that he's proud of the rally on the steps of City Hall where everyone is welcome. 'Welcoming city for everybody, I am an immigrant myself, a son of refugees, it is important to us, that the city is welcoming, it's frankly what makes a safe, building trust between our community and the city,' Arulampalam said. Democratic lawmakers agree and say that trust is the core of policing. 'If you talk to the police chiefs in the state of Connecticut, and we have in the past, they have been very clear, you cannot breach the trust of the community and if you do, you cannot be able to be effective in the policing,' Sen. Saud Anwar (D) South Windsor said. 'If you are here illegally, and you want to stay, don't commit a crime.' Watch the full video in the player above. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
