01-04-2025
Gov. Landry blames Soros, 'far-left liberals' for voters rejecting March 29 ballot amendments
On March 29, four proposed constitutional amendments were on Louisiana ballots for residents to vote upon.
These amendments, relating to crime, courts and finances, were highly supported by Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry.
However, by a 60% margin, Louisiana voters rejected each amendment, according to preliminary results released by the Louisiana Secretary of State after voting ended.
After the four amendments that Governor Landry advocated for failed to pass, he released a statement via the newsroom from the Office of the Governor expressing his contempt for the March 29 election results.
"Unfortunately, Soros and far left liberals poured millions into Louisiana with propaganda and outright lies about Amendment 2,' said Landry in the statement released after the March 29 election results.
In his statement, Landry goes on to say that positive change within the state is still the end-goal, despite the fact that such changes may be difficult.
'Although we are disappointed in tonight's results, we do not see this as a failure. We realize how hard positive change can be to implement in a State that is conditioned for failure," reads Landry's statement.
To finish his statement, Landry says he will continue to work towards a better future for Louisiana.
We will continue working to give our citizens more opportunities to keep more of their hard-earned money and provide a better future for Louisianians. This is not the end for us, and we will continue to fight to make the generational changes for Louisiana to succeed," concludes Landry's statement.
Constitutional amendment 1 outlines disciplinary actions for out-of-state attorneys, and creation of courts of specialized jurisdiction.
If this amendment had passed, the Louisiana Supreme Court would be allowed to discipline out-of-state attorneys, as well as authorize the legislature to create specialty courts at a regional or state level, according to Council for a Better Louisiana.
Constitutional amendment 2 proposes an entire rewrite of Article VII of the Louisiana Constitution, which lays forth state and local tax, as well as fiscal, policy.
This amendment, if it had passed, would have primarily focused on five changes to Article VII of the state constitution.
Such changes include creating new constitutional protections, limitations or requirements regarding taxes, expenditures and revenues. As well as removing certain items from the constitution and placing them instead in statute, according to Council for a Better Louisiana.
Additionally, significant changes would have been made to existing trust finds or "savings accounts" in the constitution. Also, a one-time cash incentive would have been created for local governments to eliminate, or phase out, the local business inventory tax.
Lastly, the amendment would have required a substantial payment to the Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) in the Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana in an effort to make a year-to-year stipend permanent, says Council for a Better Louisiana.
Constitutional amendment 3 is regarding the legislative authority to determine the crimes for which juveniles can be tried as adults.
If the amendment had passed, legislature would be allowed to decide by statute the crimes for which a juvenile can be tried as an adult on behalf of the limited list of crimes that are enumerated within the state constitution, says Council for a Better Louisiana.
Constitutional amendment 4 is a proposal for election dates for filling judicial vacancies.
This amendment would have required that, when there is a judicial vacancy or a new judgeship is created, the position be filled by calling a special election at the earliest election date available, according to Council for a Better Louisiana.
Presley Bo Tyler is a reporter for the Louisiana Deep South Connect Team for Gannett/USA Today. Find her on X @PresleyTyler02 and email at PTyler@
This article originally appeared on Shreveport Times: What was Gov. Jeff Landry's response to amendment rejection? What he said
