logo
#

Latest news with #DamianCarrington

Geoengineering: what is it and why is the UK funding trials
Geoengineering: what is it and why is the UK funding trials

RNZ News

time8 hours ago

  • Science
  • RNZ News

Geoengineering: what is it and why is the UK funding trials

The UK is putting tens of millions of dollars into trials for the technique known as geoengineering - intervening in nature in an attempt to slow climate change. The funding will support trials in marine cloud brightening and stratospheric aerosol injection, which aim to reflect sunlight or absorb carbon dioxide to cool the planet. Officials say the move is out of concern that emission reduction efforts may not be enough to avert dangerous climate tipping points. However, critics warn that geoengineering could have unpredictable side effects, potentially altering weather patterns and diverting attention from emissions cuts. Damian Carrington is The Guardian's environment editor. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

Chicken bones and distorting timelines
Chicken bones and distorting timelines

The Guardian

time28-02-2025

  • Science
  • The Guardian

Chicken bones and distorting timelines

With regard to the article by Damian Carrington ('Technofossils': how humanity's eternal testament will be plastic bags, cheap clothes and chicken bones, 22 February), the geologists Sarah Gabbott and Jan Zalasiewicz are right to point to the extraordinary stratigraphic legacy of technofossils like plastics, textiles and concrete, and associated biological matter such as the billions of factory-farmed chicken bones in landfill. But they are wrong to link the increasing size and abundance of chicken bones in strata with a precisely defined 'start' of the Anthropocene. As with plastics and concrete, the signal of chicken bones, while clearly an intensifying one, is manifestly spread out through time and space, and cannot be pinned down to a single date. One can agree with Gabbott and Zalasiewicz on the massive and often toxic legacy of these and other technofossil materials accumulating in ground and oceans in recent times, and the need to tackle the situation, without accepting the imposition of a 1950 timeline, which distorts understanding. Surely it is time to start thinking about such matters outside the limiting frame of the geological timescale, which can only grasp human-induced Earth system change in terms of a sudden transition from one time unit to another. This leads to an undue concern with specifying an exact moment of EdgeworthBedford Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store