logo
#

Latest news with #DanMcGuire

House passes bill to impose automatic budget caps on school districts
House passes bill to impose automatic budget caps on school districts

Yahoo

time14-03-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

House passes bill to impose automatic budget caps on school districts

House Bill 675 would require that all school districts cap their spending according to a specific formula. (Photo by) The New Hampshire House passed a bill that would set automatic budget caps for all New Hampshire school districts, sparking intense debate over local control and local property taxes. House Bill 675, which passed 190-185, would require that all school districts cap their spending according to a specific formula. If residents wanted to override that spending cap, they would need to do so with a two-thirds majority vote. Under the bill, for the first two years of implementation — from July 1, 2025, to June 30, 2027 — school districts would have their budgets capped at the previous year's spending level multiplied by the average inflation rate of the previous five years. Then, after June 30, 2027, districts would have to set their budgets at either the average budget level of the previous five years or the previous year's budget level multiplied by the average percentage change in the number of students over the past five years — whichever is greater. That formula means if a district lost students from one year to the next, it could still set its budget at similar levels to the past five years, but if the district gained students over a five-year period, it could increase its budget. Proponents said the legislation would help address rising property taxes. 'School budgets, and thus property taxes, have been growing way out of proportion,' wrote Rep. Dan McGuire, an Epsom Republican, in an explanation in the House calendar. McGuire also argued that there is 'no correlation' between school spending and student outcomes. But Democrats and other opponents countered that the bill would erode local control over budgets. Rep. Hope Damon, a Croydon Democrat, called it an 'arbitrary sledgehammer' that would cause 'irreparable harm.' 'Along with completely overriding local school districts' control over their budgets, this legislation perpetuates the existing and very significant funding inequities between districts,' Damon said. And they pointed out that voters in school districts already have a mechanism to put a budget cap in place: Under a bill that passed in 2024, voters may vote at town meeting to install a cap, but must do so by a three-fifths majority to be successful. This week, residents in seven towns attempted to set such budget caps at town meetings; all seven measures failed, according to NHPR. Democrats pointed to those failures as evidence that voters do not want the budget caps, and said the Legislature should not force school districts to adopt them. The bill has moved on to the House Finance Committee for further review; it must pass the full House again before moving on to the Senate.

GOP bill to slash public education requirements in N.H. draws strong opposition
GOP bill to slash public education requirements in N.H. draws strong opposition

Boston Globe

time11-02-2025

  • Politics
  • Boston Globe

GOP bill to slash public education requirements in N.H. draws strong opposition

Of the 11 areas mandated, the proposal would leave six intact: English/language arts and reading, mathematics, science, social studies, health and wellness, and physical education. During a hearing Monday, Republican Dan McGuire, an Epsom Republican, said he sponsored House Bill 283 because he believes New Hampshire students are underperforming on tests in key areas like math, reading, and science. On the latest Nation's Report Card released last month, New Hampshire students made some gains in reading and math, scoring above the national average after suffering learning loss related to the pandemic. Get N.H. Morning Report A weekday newsletter delivering the N.H. news you need to know right to your inbox. Enter Email Sign Up The more subjects students are required to learn by state law, McGuire reasoned, the less time is dedicated to the subjects he views as most important. Advertisement 'I think more practice, more work, will get you a better math score,' he said during Monday's hearing. 'That's the ultimate premise of this bill.' 'You can have a fine life and not know French,' he said. 'But you can't have a good life and not be able to deal with numbers, because people will cheat you. You won't be able to estimate. You won't be able to deal with taxes and money.' An overwhelming number of people including students, teachers, and parents disagree with the legislation. As of Tuesday morning, 30,106 people had indicated their opposition on the legislature's website, while just 71 supported it. 'The state of our education system is under threat,' Kaylen Arsenault wrote in her testimony opposing the bill. Arsenault said she is a high school teacher. 'In essence, this bill will disadvantage students making them even more ill equipped for the future,' wrote Bruce Berk of Pittsfield. Advertisement And Kaia Meredith, 21, who said she was a college student at the University of New Hampshire, added her opposition to the bill, which she believes would stifle students' curiosity and creativity. Megan Tuttle, the president of NEA-NH, a teacher's union, testified that the bill would degrade education in New Hampshire and leave students without pathways to higher education, which often require students to take foreign languages, for example. Tuttle said low-income and rural students who rely on public education would suffer the most, since wealthier students would still have access to arts, languages, and technology education through private school or extracurriculars. House Democratic Leader Alexis Simpson of Exeter released a statement called the outpouring of opposition 'unprecedented.' 'Arbitrarily removing subject areas like computer science, economics, history, and personal finance from the definition of an adequate education is extremely shortsighted and will set our students back as they prepare to enter the twenty-first century workforce,' she said. 'I am particularly concerned that this bill was filed by one of the top budget writers in Republican leadership,' she said. Some who opposed the bill suggested it was an attempt to reduce education costs, ahead of a difficult budget year and as the N.H. Supreme Court weighs a lower court's order requiring the state to pay significantly more in education funding. For his part, McGuire insisted his motives were 'pure.' This story first appeared in Globe NH | Morning Report, our free newsletter focused on the news you need to know about New Hampshire, including great coverage from the Boston Globe and links to interesting articles from other places. If you'd like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday, Advertisement Amanda Gokee can be reached at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store