Latest news with #DarknessatNoon
The Hill
11 hours ago
- Politics
- The Hill
Why are we still talking about Biden's presidency?
On June 4, President Trump issued a memorandum directing the White House Counsel and the Attorney General to investigate former President Biden and his aides to see if they 'abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden's cognitive decline and assert Article II authority.' 'This conspiracy,' the order says, 'marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history.' Democratic politics invites citizens and political leaders to leave the past alone, except in extreme cases like genocide or apartheid. It requires victorious parties not to try to rewrite it to suit the fancies and fantasies of the moment. However, Trump seems unable to resist casting his eye backward to denigrate and impugn his predecessor. His memorandum called 'Reviewing Certain Executive Actions' is just the latest example. The president's Joe Biden-focused memorandum comes from the same place as his election-denialism. He wants to discredit everything Biden touched and sweep the last four years into the dustbin of history. Readers of literature may recognize this impulse. George Orwell's classic novel, 1984, offers a startling and imaginative rendition. In that book, Orwell describes a political party bent on securing its power and dominating the society that it ruled. The party creates a Ministry of Truth and charges it to change narratives of the past to suit the whims of the Leader. It seeks, to quote from the book, to create a world where 'nothing exists except an endless present in which the Party is always right.' Eerie. Recall the moment in February when Trump passed out 'TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING' hats to members of the press, and his Commerce Secretary, Howard Lutnick, intoned the administration's mantra, 'Always say yes to the president.' Another literary classic, Arthur Koestler's Darkness at Noon, conjured another fictive regime intent on revising the past to suit its purposes. In its version of history, 'The party,' one of Koestler's characters says, 'was always right, even when it was wrong.' Later, he says, 'The liquidation of the past is the precondition for the acceptance of the future.' This seems an apt description of Trump's worldview. As the Organization of American Historians explains, the Trump Administration proposes 'to rewrite history.' That impulse animates last week's presidential memorandum. There, the president asserts that 'For years, President Biden suffered from serious cognitive decline. … Biden's cognitive issues and apparent mental decline during his presidency were even 'worse' in private, and those closest to him 'tried to hide it' from the public.' 'Notwithstanding these well-documented issues,' the memorandum continues, 'the White House issued over 1,200 Presidential documents, appointed 235 judges to the federal bench, and issued more pardons and commutations than any administration in United States history. Although the authority to take these executive actions, along with many others,' it continues, 'is constitutionally committed to the President, there are serious doubts as to the decision-making process and even the degree of Biden's awareness of these actions being taken in his name.' Note the impersonal construction: 'There are serious doubts.' It is left unspecified who is experiencing or entertaining those doubts. It might help, however, to recall Lutnick's admonition to his colleagues in the administration: 'Always say yes to the president.' Driving home its point, the president's memorandum offers this insinuation: 'If his advisors secretly used the mechanical signature pen to conceal this incapacity … that would constitute an unconstitutional wielding of the power of the presidency, a circumstance that would have implications for the legality and validity of numerous executive actions undertaken in Biden's name.' As I noted in March, when Trump first raised a question about the Biden Administration's use of an autopen, there is nothing to this. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel issued a 2005 opinion that presidents can validly sign bills by directing subordinates to 'affix the President's signature to it.' That should settle the matter. Biden's judicial appointments, grants of clemency, and other official acts are not going anywhere. But that is not the point of Trump's fixation on Biden and his directive. It is instead another sign of a president hoping to dismantle the legacy that his predecessor left behind, or, if he can't do that, to use his power to tarnish it. The comedian Jon Stewart was on to something last August when he said of Trump's obsession with all things Biden, 'It's all he knows. He misses (Biden) so much … He would give everything for just one more moment with 'crooked Joe.'' Whatever the psychological roots of Trump's Biden fixation are, it does this country a great disservice. It stokes grievance, resentment, and division. It invites the kind of corrosive cynicism and disrespect that makes it hard for partisans to take a breath and agree on a shared version of history. Trump is entitled to conjure conspiracy theories about Biden and his advisors, but Americans would be well advised not to join him. Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College.
Express Tribune
12-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Express Tribune
Inside the machinery of thought control
After the invigorating success of a crippling pandemic, fate now offers our generation its next best creation: the spectre of war. And in a time where war is not just waged on borders but on the black mirrors that run our lives, reading political fiction becomes less pastime, more an act of resistance. Books that expose media power, herd mentality, and the quiet suffocation of dissent feel urgently alive amid India's current war-mongering, where image eclipses reality and emotion trumps truth. These four novels remind us that control often begins not with remotely manoeuvred war machinery, but with what we are told to forget, who we are taught to fear, and the truths we're told to stop questioning. 'The Memory Police' Set on an unnamed island where objects, and eventually memories, disappear by authoritarian decree, The Memory Police by Yōko Ogawa captures the chilling ease with which societies accept erasure. Ogawa's prose is spare, haunting. People forget perfume, then birds, then novels. The horror lies not in what vanishes but in how unbothered the public becomes. The novel is a meditation on complicity, media silence, and the serenity of mass forgetfulness. If you've felt the numbness of watching public memory be scrubbed clean, this book will rattle you awake. 'The Power' What happens when power changes hands, but not its structure? The Power by Naomi Alderman imagines a world where women develop the ability to emit deadly shocks. The balance shifts overnight, but the systems of dominance remain. Alderman dissects how power corrupts, regardless of who holds it. Through news clippings, oral histories, and a fictional framing device, she mimics the fractured lens of media: unreliable, constructed, always spinning. It's a sharp, cinematic punch that asks: if we could remake the world, would we rebuild the same machinery? 'Darkness at Noon' The most powerful thing in the world is an idea. This is both good and bad news. Written in 1940 but devastatingly contemporary, Arthur Koestler's Darkness at Noon explores the psychological violence of ideology. Through the interrogation of Rubashov, a once-loyal revolutionary turned dissenter, we see how totalitarian regimes rewrite logic until betrayal looks like duty. In India's current socio-political climate, where dissent is branded as sedition, Darkness at Noon feels less like historical fiction, more like a mirror. 'Amatka' In this surreal Swedish gem by Karin Tidbeck, language holds literal power: stop naming an object, and it dissolves. Bureaucracy is religion, and words are weaponised. Tidbeck's precise, uncanny prose indicts state propaganda and reminds us of the quiet danger in letting others narrate our reality. Truth, sometimes, is just a few mindful words away. Have something to add to the story? Share it in the comments below.
