04-04-2025
Delinquent teens need a faster justice system
The Trial Court told the editorial board, in response to a public records request, that in fiscal 2024, just 40 percent of juvenile delinquency cases were cleared on time (similar to 42.4 percent in fiscal 2023 and 37.5 percent in fiscal 2022).
Get The Gavel
A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'Since coming out of COVID, there have been delays,' Duci Goncalves, deputy chief counsel for the Youth Advocacy Division of the Committee for Public Counsel Services, told the editorial board. Goncalves said delays are particularly problematic in smaller courts that may have only one or two judges to hear both delinquency cases and care and protection cases, which involve custody of children who were abused or neglected. (While delinquency cases can be postponed due to emergency custody hearings, custody hearings are also often delayed,
Advertisement
When a case drags on, a teenager may be held in a detention facility away from their school and family. They may be subjected to pretrial conditions like GPS monitoring or home confinement, which can severely limit their activities, including healthy behaviors like exercising or seeing friends.
Advertisement
There are legitimate reasons cases can be delayed to ensure due process. Evidence might need scientific testing. Witnesses, victims, or interpreters may be unavailable. Attorneys might be seeking therapeutic services for clients. Motion hearings take time. Because the state's 2018 criminal justice reform law limited prosecution for less serious cases, more Juvenile Court cases now involve felonies.
But one way to reduce unnecessary administrative delays is to hire more judges. According to
While working to reduce delays, attorneys and judges should also seek ways to make the pretrial period less onerous. This could mean sending more teens to rehabilitation-focused diversion programs that keep them out of court.
Once a teen enters the system, Melissa Threadgill, senior director of policy and implementation for the Office of the Child Advocate, which chairs the JJPAD board, said conditions should be individualized and relate to the alleged offense. For example, drug testing may only make sense for drug-related offenses.
The
Advertisement
Additionally, JJPAD's annual report
Limiting detention to cases when there is a public safety or flight risk would let more teens stay in school and maintain community ties while awaiting trial. Notably, in fiscal 2024, 87 percent of youth detained pretrial weren't committed to the juvenile justice system after their case was resolved — suggesting they could safely live in the community.
Policy makers often consider issues by thinking about adults' needs — the time it takes to file a motion or balance a judge's schedule. But in kid time, the difference between having a case pending for six months or nine months can be the difference between missing part of one school year or part of two. As Threadgill says, 'We really have to think about what impact does this have on kids.'
Advertisement
Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us
