Latest news with #EducationNotDiscrimination
Daily Mail
a day ago
- Politics
- Daily Mail
School fees blow as judges reject challenge to Labour tax - even though they say it's discriminatory
Private school families lost their challenge to Labour 's tax on fees yesterday – but judges still branded the measure 'discriminatory'. The judgment by the High Court said the 20 per cent VAT would have a 'disproportionately prejudicial effect' on pupils with special needs. However, it also ruled Parliament still had the right to impose such a decision. Yesterday, the Boarding Schools Association said it was a 'sad day' for vulnerable pupils, adding: 'There are no winners here.' At least one of the claimants now plans to appeal. Paul Conrathe, solicitor at SinclairsLaw which represented a group of special educational needs parents, Education Not Discrimination, said 'the Government should hang its head in shame'. There was anger over the Government's insistence during the case that the tax would benefit state schools. This week it suggested that the money will now pay for housing. VAT on school fees was introduced on January 1, having been pledged in Labour's manifesto. The claim against it was brought by three groups of families and some private schools. They aimed to have the tax declared 'incompatible' with human rights laws. Yesterday's judgment, by Dame Victoria Sharp, Lord Justice Newey and Mr Justice Chamberlain, agreed that the tax was 'discriminatory' against pupils with special educational needs. It also interfered with their right to an education under the European Convention on Human Rights, they said. 'If the imposition of VAT makes the fees unaffordable, there is a significant risk that the state school to which they transfer will not provide adequately for their needs,' they added. 'The measure will have a disproportionately prejudicial effect on them.' However, they concluded Parliament had a 'broad margin of discretion in deciding how to balance the interests of those adversely affected against the interests of others who may gain from public provision funded by the money it will raise'. Many parents of special educational needs children pay fees because private schools offer better pastoral care. The Government said the court had confirmed its legislation was 'compatible with its human rights obligations'.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
How the fight against Labour's cruel child VAT raid continues
Those hoping for immediate relief from the courts in relation to the Government's imposition of VAT on school fees yesterday had their short-term hopes dashed. But if you read the judgment and examine what is going on in schools, the Government now has a right mess on its hands. The High Court rightly found that, for the 100,000 or so children in private schools with special education needs who are forced to move into the state sector because they have closed or their parents can no longer afford the fees, their fundamental rights have indeed been interfered with. However, it said that Parliament was entitled to do this because it has very broad powers when it comes to raising new taxes. In this case, what was being sought by the claimants was a 'declaratory remedy' which would have sent the legislation back to Parliament to resolve. So, what happens now? The Chancellor Rachel Reeves and beleaguered Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson are no doubt delighted that they have apparently won. But the truth is, like special needs children themselves, they are not out of the woods. They won by a nose and could yet lose in subsequent contests. The first thing to say is that the special needs system is in total chaos. Since the pandemic, there is a huge backlog of children who do not have 'statements', in other words official education health and care plans, who are in a queue or appealing at tribunals hoping to get one. Local authorities are understandably reluctant to award them, in part because of a questionable previous court ruling, which said they have to pay for taxis for special needs children to get to their school. If you talk to a taxi driver, many of them make a fortune providing this service which, in general terms, seems excessive and incredibly costly. Yet now, parents who previously were paying for their own children's school fees and indeed transport, have had it confirmed that their children have a fundamental right to an appropriate education and their legal claims against local education authorities have now been given additional force. It would have been cheaper and simpler if VAT had not been imposed on school fees and they stayed where they were. Second, thousands of parents were waiting for this judgement, having either given provisional notice to leave private schools or waiting to decide whether to embark on that costly journey in the first place next term. So far, 11,000 children have left private schools because of this measure. My guess is that twice that number, will now not turn up next term. Put all this together and the new taxes on education will raise very little money and might even lose revenue. The reality is that Labour have created a giant and costly mess. An appeal is likely. There is no tax on education in any civilised country and, sooner or later, we must hope that a future government will reverse this cruel and costly measure. George Trefgarne is a parent and supporter of the 'Education Not Discrimination' group Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
