Latest news with #EfW
New Statesman
24-04-2025
- Business
- New Statesman
Wayne Robertson: 'The science is clear on the need for carbon capture'
Image: enfinium Wayne Robertson is chief commercial and strategy officer at enfinium, one of the UK's largest energy from waste operators. How is enfinium's work contributing to global climate goals? Today, enfinium is one of the UK's leading energy from waste (EfW) operators. This means we are already playing a significant and often under-appreciated role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Our core function is to prevent unrecyclable waste from going to landfill, which results in significant emissions savings. There are several reasons for this, including the avoidance of methane emissions, a very potent greenhouse gas, as well as displacing virgin emissions and other useful products we recover from material that would otherwise be thrown away into environmentally damaging landfill. In 2023 this meant that, net, we prevented over 450,000 tonnes of CO2e from entering the atmosphere as a business. As a sector, our objective to end the routine use of landfill is on the horizon. At enfinium, we are now looking at what we can do next to address emissions from the waste sector. This is where carbon capture and storage (CCS) comes in. Last year we announced our Net Zero Transition Plan, setting out our intention to invest £1.7bn to install CCS technology across all our six facilities in England and Wales. Crucially, not only will installing CCS fully decarbonise our operations, but it will see enfinium generate 1.2 million tonnes of high-quality, durable carbon removals every year by 2039. This is because half of the unrecyclable waste we process is biogenic material – such as food waste or contaminated card or paper – which has recently absorbed CO2 from the atmosphere in its lifetime. By capturing this carbon at our facilities and permanently storing this, we prevent it from returning to the atmosphere and contributing to global warming. Carbon dioxide removals (CDR) are not a nice to have, but a necessity to achieve net zero – this is according to the Climate Change Committee. In its latest advice ahead of the UK's seventh carbon budget, the CCC made clear that the UK needs over 35 million tonnes of engineered CDRs each year in order to reach net zero. This is where energy from waste can play a significant role in UK-wide decarbonisation efforts. Once one of the UK's largest sources of territorial greenhouse gas emissions in the late 1990s, the waste sector can become one of the largest sources of negative emissions in the 2030s. At enfinium we are already making progress on our plans at pace. Our Parc Adfer facility in North Wales has been put forward to the government to become a Track-1 project as part of the HyNet carbon transport and storage network and will, if successful, be online by 2030. Last year, we also deployed the UK's first carbon capture pilot plant on an EfW at our Ferrybridge 1 facility, capturing 1 tonne of CO2 per day and providing valuable data that will help in designing our full-scale capture plants. Which innovations will have the biggest impact in growing the sector? A common misconception is that CCS technology is new – but it has been around for nearly a century and there are many examples of commercial plants currently in operation. What is new is what we want to use it for. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Historically, carbon capture has been used by the oil and gas industry for what is known as enhanced oil has used amine-based solutions to capture carbon, which is then injected into depleted reservoirs to extract further oil. What we want to do is capture carbon and permanently store it to remove it from the atmosphere and prevent it from contributing to global warming. The technology is the same, but the purpose is very different. This means we need greater scale, and we also need to find ways to make this cheaper and thus more commercially viable. One part of this will be finding new ways to capture carbon that are more energy efficient, which will be achieved both through new technologies and greater scale. This includes installing a further pilot at our Ferrybridge facility, which will test what is known as metallic-organic framework technology – a different method of capture that we hope will be less energy intensive and more sustainable. This is just one example of many now taking place across the sector as industry seeks to innovate in this exciting and vital new space. What are the biggest challenges the CCS sector faces? The first challenge is one of infrastructure. Installing a carbon capture plant at one of our facilities is one thing, but then transporting and storing the captured CO2 requires significant shared infrastructure. Developing this infrastructure is where government can play a role – and the UK government is doing just that through its cluster programme. There will be many more emitters that would invest in CCS with the reassurance that they could get access to this infrastructure. There is also a financial challenge. CCS is expensive to build and operate. When we look at the current uses of captured carbon, such as enhanced oil recovery, or utilisation in products like the food industry, the economic model is clear – there is a product to sell at the end. What we want to do now, however, is capture carbon to keep it out of the atmosphere – is that a product people want to pay for? This leads to the third challenge, public perception. Yes, there are some who are sceptical about the role of CCS, but the science is clear on its need – particularly the need for engineered removals at scale, which our sector can provide. How important are public-private partnerships? There is already a lot of collaboration between the public and private sector on CCS, for example the cluster programme – which has the potential to deliver the first at-scale clusters in the world, this decade. In the waste sector there are other policy areas that will require collaboration between public and private bodies to navigate the complex challenge that is decarbonising society's unrecyclable waste. The Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) is being expanded to include the waste sector from 2028 (which will attach a new cost to fossil-derived emissions from EfWs). It is vital this is delivered in a way that can meaningfully drive decarbonisation while recognising the challenges in doing so. The ETS offers a real opportunity to support the roll out of CCS in the UK, but only if this is implemented in the right way. The public and private sectors share a vision of a UK CCS industry which will not only contribute to the UK achieving its climate goals but also to driving economic growth. The UK's natural offshore geology presents one of the best locations in the world for storing captured CO2, with the potential to unlock billions of pounds of investment and create tens of thousands of high-skilled jobs in the decades to come. This is an opportunity that we at enfinium are committed to help realise. This article first appeared in our Spotlight Energy and Climate Change supplement of 24 April 2025. Related
Yahoo
05-04-2025
- Science
- Yahoo
Experts raise red flag over widely used energy source powering major cities: 'Its expansion must be carefully balanced'
Some countries are looking to ease the burden on their landfills by converting non-recyclable waste into energy. While this sounds like a fantastic plan, experts warn that it may be doing more harm than good. Energy-from-waste (EfW) is a process that essentially takes garbage and converts it into fuel, electricity, or heat energy through various methods. Countries like Australia and China are using EfW to keep their already-packed landfills from overflowing. However, new research shows that the pollution produced by EfW plants can top that of coal-burning power plants. While they may still be addressing the landfill problems of the countries that utilize them, EfW plants producing that level of pollution may be defeating their own purpose. The study found that one of the main reasons for these heavy emissions is an increasing amount of plastic waste. Researchers suggest that circumventing the issue may require better waste classification and recycling programs. "To ensure EfW remains a sustainable part of urbanization in major cities worldwide, its expansion must be carefully balanced with clean energy goals to prevent merely substituting one high-emission source for another," China's Deputy Head of the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Professor Victor Chang, said, according to Tech Xplore. The amount of non-recyclable waste produced every single day is so great that it's difficult to comprehend — and it continues to grow. In 2020, an estimated 2.13 billion metric tons of municipal solid waste was generated. That number is projected to reach nearly 3.8 billion by 2050. Landfills are already packed and releasing planet-warming gases into the atmosphere. EfW plants offer the two-fold solution of reducing landfill waste and providing energy. They're clearly a work in progress, but continuing that work is critical for the protection of the planet. This recent study shows that we're working to improve the efficiency and emission output of EfW plants. That's not the only approach being taken, either. In New York City, a 15-year restoration project on a Staten Island landfill has found great success. The Fresh Kills landfill, which once contained decades worth of trash, was transformed into a 21-acre park. Should the government be able to control how we heat our homes? Definitely Only if it saves money I'm not sure No way Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. In Bali, a new facility was opened that has reduced the amount of waste sent to dumps by up to 45%. These conservation efforts have not only helped protect the environment, but they also bring income to local communities and boost an ailing tourism industry. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Yahoo
03-04-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
Demonstration against waste incinerator plans
Demonstrators gathered outside a council meeting to protest against plans for a waste incinerator. Campaigners claimed the Tees Valley Energy Recovery Facility (TVERF), which would be built at Teesworks in Grangetown, Redcar, was "unfair and dangerous". Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council is one of seven across north-east England that would use the facility, burning up to 450,000 tonnes of waste per year to generate energy, according to plans. Protestor Dr Matthew Keegan said he believed it would directly impact on the community's health. Developers said it would be safe and sustainable. As well as Redcar and Cleveland, the incinerator would take waste from homes in the Newcastle, Durham, Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough and Stockton council areas. Redcar and Cleveland Council was due to vote on the plans but a decision is yet to be made. Ray Casey, from Stop Incineration North East, said councillors needed to "pause" and have a "rethink". He said: "We don't need an incinerator right now. "We are not advocating landfill either, what we are advocating is more modern material recovery facilities. "Recycle all of this material without landfilling it, without burning it". Independent councillor Tristan Learoyd, who brought the motion against TVERF, said: "There is nowhere in the world where there is a higher density of incineration than here in Teesside. "The massive carbon output from this incinerator will be larger than the whole of Redcar and Cleveland combined." Grangetown has the highest death rates from respiratory disease, and lowest average healthy life expectancy in England, according to a report on Left Behind Neighbourhoods by The Local Trust, a charity that funds community projects. Dr Keegan said there was a correlation to lung disease and development issues from outputs generated by incinerators, such as nitrous oxide. The price of living next to a 'monster' incinerator 'No alternative' to incinerator, council says Project partners from TVERF said facilities like the planned Energy from Waste (EfW) incinerator were a "reliable and safe technology" which have been subject to "intense regulatory and academic scrutiny over decades of operation". "The project represents the safest, most reliable and most sustainable way to manage our region's residual waste," they said. "Facilities are subject to constant monitoring throughout their operational life to ensure adherence to strict environmental permit conditions." Backers of the plan claimed it was "a continuation of practices that have taken place in Teesside for many decades without incident or concern". Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram. Burning your rubbish: The UK's big polluter Hazardous waste treatment plant plans denied Incinerator plan sparks health fears protest 'No alternative' to incinerator, council says TVERF Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
BBC News
03-04-2025
- Health
- BBC News
Redcar incinerator council meeting demonstration
Demonstrators gathered outside a council meeting to protest against plans for a waste claimed the Tees Valley Energy Recovery Facility (TVERF), which would be built at Teesworks in Grangetown, Redcar, was "unfair and dangerous".Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council is one of seven across north-east England that would use the facility, burning up to 450,000 tonnes of waste per year to generate energy, according to Dr Matthew Keegan said he believed it would directly impact on the community's health. Developers said it would be safe and sustainable. As well as Redcar and Cleveland, the incinerator would take waste from homes in the Newcastle, Durham, Darlington, Hartlepool, Middlesbrough and Stockton council and Cleveland Council was due to vote on the plans but a decision is yet to be made. Ray Casey, from Stop Incineration North East, said councillors needed to "pause" and have a "rethink".He said: "We don't need an incinerator right now. "We are not advocating landfill either, what we are advocating is more modern material recovery facilities."Recycle all of this material without landfilling it, without burning it". Independent councillor Tristan Learoyd, who brought the motion against TVERF, said: "There is nowhere in the world where there is a higher density of incineration than here in Teesside. "The massive carbon output from this incinerator will be larger than the whole of Redcar and Cleveland combined." Grangetown has the highest death rates from respiratory disease, and lowest average healthy life expectancy in England, according to a report on Left Behind Neighbourhoods by The Local Trust, a charity that funds community Keegan said there was a correlation to lung disease and development issues from outputs generated by incinerators, such as nitrous oxide. Project partners from TVERF said facilities like the planned Energy from Waste (EfW) incinerator were a "reliable and safe technology" which have been subject to "intense regulatory and academic scrutiny over decades of operation". "The project represents the safest, most reliable and most sustainable way to manage our region's residual waste," they said."Facilities are subject to constant monitoring throughout their operational life to ensure adherence to strict environmental permit conditions."Backers of the plan claimed it was "a continuation of practices that have taken place in Teesside for many decades without incident or concern". Follow BBC Tees on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.
