Latest news with #Entitlement
Epoch Times
26-05-2025
- Business
- Epoch Times
It's Time to Have a Guns Versus Butter Debate
Commentary As Congress debates President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' the members of both the House of Representative and the Senate should also have a long overdue 'guns versus butter' debate. At a time when the United States spends 80 percent of federal revenue ($4 trillion) on entitlement programs and the other 20 ($880 billion) percent on debt repayment, all while borrowing $2 trillion (30 percent of federal spending) to pay for defense and other government operations, it is time to have the conversation everyone is avoiding. With China, North Korea, and Russia attempting to topple the international order built by the United States, members of Congress must finally come clean on their profligate spending and its implications for the future security of this country. When President Donald Trump took office on Jan. 20, 2025, he did so promising Americans he would President Trump is In 2010, then–Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Admiral Michael Mullen In short, Related Stories 5/19/2025 5/17/2025 There is a State and local governments spend an estimated 50 percent of their budgets on entitlement programs, which adds another $2 trillion to the entitlement behemoth that exists in this country. Many Americans may not know that the United States actually Some may argue that increasing taxes, particularly those on high income earners, is the solution to addressing annual deficits and the need to increase defense spending. Again, the consensus in the academic literature suggests that increasing income taxes, particularly on high income earners, With the top one percent of income earners already With the Welfare and entitlement spending are In the first fifty years of the Great Society, which created the modern welfare state, American taxpayers Some readers may have a negative reaction to an article that challenges the welfare state, but there is a simple truth that is inescapable, the United States cannot effectively counter China, North Korea, and Russia while entitlement spending is crowding out defense spending. This is a simple reality that the national security community does not seem to want to talk about. Instead, national security insiders advocate for the programs they value, all while knowing that the piggy bank is empty. This is largely the result of a desire to avoid having this very discussion. Now, however, as the United States faces its greatest threat since 1941 as three nuclear armed adversaries seek to topple the international system built by the United States. There is a reluctance to turn off the seemingly endless supply of free money that is so useful to members of Congress in buying votes. Even conservative stalwarts like Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO), when discussing potential cuts to the single largest welfare program in the federal budget, Medicaid, Entitlement programs That would require the defense budget increase from $847 billion to about $1.5 trillion just to spend 5 percent of GDP on defense. Absent dramatic cuts to entitlement programs and a balancing of the budget, the United States will not field conventional and nuclear forces of sufficient size and capability to effectively deter or defeat Chinese, North Korean, and/or Russian aggression. Welfare and entitlement spending buys votes, but no nation ever grew its economy or increased its military strength because politicians redistributed the paychecks of workers. It is time for a guns versus butter debate. Without one, the United States may fade into the middling power China so desperately wants. Americans should never allow that to happen. From Views expressed in this article are opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of The Epoch Times.
Hindustan Times
20-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Hindustan Times
Entitlement review: Money-minded madness makes Rumaan Alam's latest go round
Money, race, familial bonds and the bustle of New York City have been at the heart of author Rumaan Alam's work from the get go. These themes feature as heavily in his 2016 debut novel Rich and Pretty and his runaway hit Leave the World Behind, as they do in his latest. Entitlement follows a young woman in the glitzy New York of 2014 - one where Instagram hasn't yet fully taken over, but still draws lines in the sand between the haves and the have-nots. We meet the protagonist, Brooke (described by one character as 'Black, gorgeous, serious, [and] passionate') in the middle of her commute to a swanky new job. At first, we get the sense that she's driven and optimistic about potentially being given the chance to do some good in the world. But as the story progresses, we find that it is a facade - she is in fact just a bored thirty-something who feels adrift. But an undeniable fact quickly comes to the fore: she is a striver. Working with Arthur Jaffee, her 80-year-old billionaire boss who wants to give away all his wealth, Brooke gets a taste of what incredible amounts of money can get you. Once she decides she deserves more in life, ethics and morals get tossed out of the question almost immediately. Categorised as psychological fiction, Entitlement succeeds in putting the reader in the protagonist's shoes. The narration, however, jumps between different characters' perspectives in the middle of most scenes. It's a bold writing choice, one that makes the experience either deeply insightful or deeply frustrating for the reader. The last few chapters read like a full-blown thriller as Brooke's mental decline snowballs from burning bridges to remorseless corporate fraud. But one can't help but wish we knew more about the characters apart from their opinions of Brooke and her derision towards their lack of ambition. The writing is sharp throughout (a plot hole or two notwithstanding) and incisive social commentary is where Alam shines and he's got a point to make with this book. The author uses a biased narrator to put into sharp relief for the reader disparities in the world that the characters can't (or refuse to) see. Surprisingly enough, it's the unlikeable characters that make this book work. Despite staggering greed and increasingly unhinged actions, we can't help but sympathise with Brooke. Even with sprinklings of corporate jargon, Entitlement humanises its heroes without sanitising or glorifying them, which is exactly why it stays with you, long after you turn the last page. Title: Entitlement Author: Rumaan Alam Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Price: ₹596
Associated Press
31-01-2025
- Entertainment
- Associated Press
Tell us a New York story: Finalists announced for $50,000 Gotham Book Prize
NEW YORK (AP) — Rumaan Alam's 'Entitlement,' Ian Frazier's 'Paradise Bronx' and Lisa Ko's 'Memory Piece' are among 13 finalists for the Gotham Book Prize, a $50,000 award for outstanding fiction or nonfiction writing about New York City. The prize was established in 2020 by businessman-philanthropist Bradley Tusk and political strategist Howard Wolfson, who said at the time that the pandemic gave them a heightened sense of the importance of literature. Other nominees announced Friday include Xochitl Gonzalez's 'Anita de Monte Laughs Last,' Prithi Kanakamedala's 'Brooklynites,' Guy Trebay's 'Do Something,' Joél Leon's 'Everything and Nothing at Once,' Muriel Leung's 'How to Fall in Love in a Time of Unnameable Disaster' and Nicole Gelinas' 'Movement.' Karen Valby's 'Swans of Harlem,' Tricia Romano's 'The Freaks Come Out to Write,' Anna Akbari's 'There Is No Ethan' and Andrew Boryga's 'Victim' also were named as finalists. The winner will be announced in the spring. 'Each of these 13 finalists have captured a compelling and unique slice of the New York City story,' Tusk and Wolfson said in a statement. 'Whether fiction or nonfiction, set in decades past or even the future, these books reflect the vibrancy, complexity, and resilience that define New York.' Previous winners include Colson Whitehead's 'Crook Manifesto' and Andrea Elliott's nonfiction 'Invisible Child.'
CBC
28-01-2025
- Entertainment
- CBC
Rumaan Alam's latest novel steps into a world of wealth — and questions who's entitled to it
How would you spend an inconceivable amount of money? That's one of the questions Rumaan Alam explores in his latest novel, Entitlement. Entitlement tells the story of Brooke, a woman in her thirties who gets a new job helping an elderly billionaire who wants to give away large parts of his fortune before he dies. This proximity to wealth is dizzying and intoxicating — yet it pushes Brooke closer and closer to sliding into madness. " Entitlement explores the influence of money: who has it, who needs it, and how it shapes thinking around class privilege and power," said Mattea Roach in the introduction to their conversation with Alam on Bookends. " Entitlement asks a lot of questions while challenging readers to come up with their own answers." Alam is the Brooklyn author of the novel Leave the World Behind, which was a finalist for the National Book Award and was adapted into a major movie. His other books include novels Rich and Pretty and That Kind of Mother and his writing has appeared in The New York Times, the Wall Street Journal and The New Yorker. He joined Roach to discuss the meaning behind his book's title, why his protagonist feels so untethered and the secret wealth that nobody talks about. Mattea Roach: I want to start by asking about the title of this new book, Entitlement, which I think is also really the theme of the novel in many respects. It certainly makes a statement, and there are multiple ways you could interpret the title. I'm wondering what inspired this title and what inspired you to write this book at this moment? Rumaan Alam: The title of this novel was extremely hard to arrive at. Actually, I had the whole novel written before I sort of landed on Entitlement as kind of the single word that was able to distill what the book is talking about. What I like about it as a title though, is the word's elasticity. Entitlement sounds one way to the reader. It sounds like the novel is going to engage in a conversation that I think is one we're having in a lot of corners of the culture right now about privilege and about the attitude of the individual. Entitlement in the West, though, also has this other connotation of social welfare. Welfare programs, state welfare programs are often sort of talked about in policy language as entitlement programs, which I think is so interesting because it is as though the state is acknowledging there is a human entitlement to shelter and food, for example. But those entitlements to shelter and food are not actually enshrined in law. All you need to do is visit any major metropolitan area in which houses cost about $1 million. You will see people, citizens of that state, who are not availed of the human entitlement to shelter, let alone food. Entitlement has this kind of funny breadth where it seems like it's talking about the individual attitude, but it's also talking about something bigger. That is what I liked about it. And it feels a bit like a litmus test to me for the reader. MR: I want to talk about the main character of Entitlement, Brooke. She's a Black woman in her 30s who seems lost in life. She doesn't really have a vocation in her career. She's had a privileged upbringing, but privileged in the sense that she can't just not work and skate off of her parents wealth. Who is she at the start of the book? RA: Even in your introduction or to this person you pointed out that she's lost hold of a sense of self because she doesn't have a fixed vocation, which is so interesting to me because in so much of contemporary life, the identity is so closely associated with the profession. You are what you do. If you don't do, then who are you? That is part of Brooke's problem. She's had a kind of abortive career working as an educator. She has great privilege in the way that I have great privilege. She's educated, she has her health. She's a solidly middle-class person. It's not the kind of cartoonish wealth that would allow her an adulthood of being a dilettante. She can't just collect art and go shopping all day. She has to have a profession. In part, it's because of the imperatives of money, right? You have to have a job to pay your rent. But in part, it's because you need to have a sense of who you are and that is how you define who you are in our culture — by what you do. That eludes Brooke and that creates the conditions in which she realizes, over the course of the book, how little she understands precisely who she is. MR: I'm wondering where this fascination with these secret layers of money, the idea that a lot of people have wealth that isn't always apparent, comes from and whether that's maybe tied to some of these experiences living in New York and kind of having this outsider's view almost when you first arrived. RA: It probably is a kind of narrow personal interest: my attention or awareness of money and its stealth power in the lives of people who are my peers. But this is extant, I think, in so much of life. You're part of a community and you sort of think of all members of that community as being like you. You go to your kid's friend's birthday party and you can tell by going into the home that this family has a lot more money than you. Or can tell by going into the home that the family has old money, which is also a different kind of meaning and a different kind of power. We understand what it means when we see it and yet we know it is not to be said. - Rumaan Alam I don't know why I'm interested in that, but I think it's so counter to the American mythology of all of us being created equally. It's impolite to talk about. I'm interested in that. I'm interested in the ways in which it's impolite to acknowledge the function of money in our own lives and in the lives of our peers. And yet we become attuned to reading it. We understand what it means when we see it and yet we know it is not to be said.
