logo
#

Latest news with #EricTarr

WV teacher pay raises would be contingent on area's home values, according to Senate bill
WV teacher pay raises would be contingent on area's home values, according to Senate bill

Yahoo

time18-03-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

WV teacher pay raises would be contingent on area's home values, according to Senate bill

Sen. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, speaks on March 18, 2025, on his bill that would raise certain teachers' salaries based on median home prices in an effort to attract and retain educators. (Will Price | West Virginia Legislative Photography) Teacher pay raises would be determined by median home prices in their county, according to a bill being considered by the West Virginia Senate. Some educators in wealthier counties could see a massive pay bump, like in Jefferson County, where a teacher's salary could double to more than $101,000. Only 25 counties would qualify for a potential salary enhancement, according to the state's board of education, leaving out teachers in poorer counties. West Virginia has the lowest teacher pay in the nation, and the state doesn't have enough certified teachers. Sen. Craig Hart, R-Mingo, a public school teacher, said, 'I have very mixed feelings about this bill.' It wouldn't help the teachers in impoverished counties like his own, he said. The average home price in Mingo County is $64,000. 'The poorer just get poorer,' he said Tuesday in the Senate Education Committee, which advanced the measure. 'I don't want to see rich counties not have teachers, but I thought the rich counties might have the money to pay their teachers.' The state needs to attract and retain teachers in order to address its nearly bottom ranking in education outcomes, according to bill sponsor Sen. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam. His measure, Senate Bill 506, would implement a market-based pay rate that would be based off of the area's median home prices. The state board of education would create a formula for calculating the raises. 'Let's see if we can get the way we pay our state employees more consistent with what the market requires in order to retain these employees and attract them,' Tarr said. 'You've seen the challenges we've had educating our kids, and I want teachers first.' The pay raises, which would take effect in 2026, would cost the state an estimated $183 million. Senate Education Committee members acknowledged that the price tag could halt the bill. Lawmakers are grappling with Gov. Patrick Morrisey's proposed budget that looks to close a $400 million budget hole. Five years of modest pay raises for state employees under previous Gov. Jim Justice — as public employee health insurance prices climbed — haven't moved the needle for teacher pay disparity. Morrisey called for teacher pay raises in his inaugural State of the State address, but the Republican governor didn't request any bills that could implement the raise. Border counties, particularly in the Eastern Panhandle, have struggled to retain teachers. 'It's definitely skewed in the Eastern Panhandle because of their locality to the D.C. area and the home prices there,' said state schools Deputy Superintendent Sonya White. Sen. Scott Fuller, R-Wayne, said the bill is necessary to maintain the teacher workforce in West Virginia. Wayne and Cabell counties have lost teachers to nearby Ohio and Kentucky, he said. 'It's going to require a fairly substantial bump in pay,' Fuller said. 'We have fantastic teachers … we just don't have enough of them. Then the ones we do, we lose a handful or more because of the payscale. I support this bill 100%.' Tarr said that, based on the proposed salary calculator, some of the salaries may be above what is required for a teacher. The bill will go to the Senate Finance committee for consideration. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Instead of helping West Virginians, some GOP lawmakers seem intent on passing bills to harm
Instead of helping West Virginians, some GOP lawmakers seem intent on passing bills to harm

Yahoo

time11-03-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

Instead of helping West Virginians, some GOP lawmakers seem intent on passing bills to harm

The Lincoln Walks at Midnight Statue sits in front of the West Virginia state Capitol building in Charleston, (Lexi Browning | West Virginia Watch) We're almost at the halfway point of the legislative session, so let's take a little look at what our legislators have been doing. Sen. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, is proposing with Senate Bill 109 to incentivize residents to report drug activity to police by offering reward money. The money from the Narc on Your Neighbor for Money Act — whoops, I mean the Neighborhood Assistance and Rejuvenation Compact Act — would come from a new excise tax on naloxone and drug testing strips. Tarr has said the state could market the program by posting mugshots of people convicted of drug crimes to billboards in areas with high drug activity. He said his inspiration came after watching the news and seeing 'bodies hanging off of bridges' in a report on cartels in Mexico. Please don't let this guy watch 'The Handmaid's Tale.' Taxing products designed to prevent people from dying does not seem like the answer here. Narcan, one of the brand names for naloxone, is already prohibitively expensive for some people. And while there are groups that provide both naloxone and drug testing strips for free, why would we want to make it more expensive for them to help people? Instead of shaming people convicted of drug crimes and asking their neighbors to spy and tattle on them, maybe the state should consider not banning harm reduction programs? Helping people instead of shaming seems like the more humane option. Another bill that seems designed to make life harder for West Virginians is House Bill 3016. The state passed a voter ID law in 2016 and when it went into effect two years later, residents could prove who they were with more than a dozen different forms of identification other than a driver's license, including a hunting or fishing license, a utility bill or their Social Security card. HB 3016 would do away with most of those forms of identification and whittles it down to six — all of which require a photo: driver's license, state ID, passport, employee ID, student ID and military ID. The lead sponsor on this bill is Del. Erica Moore, R-Roane. The bill also adds text that a valid voter registration card 'that includes the voter's photograph issued by a county clerk in the State of West Virginia or the Secretary of State' will work. Of course, lawmakers also said during a meeting that this isn't required, and would be up to each county clerk if they wanted to create and issue voter registration cards with photos. This will just add another layer to confusion to voting. Am I registered? Where is my polling place? Is my registration active? What ID do I need? What kind of voter registration card does my county have? Absentee ballots aren't safe either. House Bill 2117 would make it illegal for anyone — including an election official — to mail or deliver absentee ballot applications unless it's been specifically requested by the voter or their family/caregiver. Six Republicans thought this was such a great idea, they sponsored the bill: Doug Smith (Mercer), Mike Hornby (Berkeley), Geno Chiarelli (Monongalia), Chris Phillips (Barbour), Michael Hite (Berkeley) and Kathie Hess Crouse (Putnam). Why is an application for an absentee ballot something that should require consent? Do they not want us to vote? Another head scratcher comes from Sen. Mike Stuart, R-Kanawha. His bill would reinstate the death penalty in West Virginia for people convicted of killing a law-enforcement officer or first responder. It has a price tag of $26 million to implement. In the last 45 years, only 21 people would have been eligible for the death penalty. It's odd to me that Stuart, who says he is 'unapologetically pro-life' wants the state to spend about $1.2 million per state-sanctioned killing. But at least, he knows the monetary cost of his bill. That's more than we can say for House Bill 2515, which would require counties to create alternative learning centers for chronically disruptive students. The bill from lead sponsor Del. Joe Ellington, R-Mercer, has advanced to the Senate, but it has no proposed funding to build the centers or staff them. Details, details. Today is day 28 of 60. Will the Legislature do better during the second half of the session? For West Virginians' sake, I hope so. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Bill creating monetary reward for those who tip off police on drug activity advances in WV Senate
Bill creating monetary reward for those who tip off police on drug activity advances in WV Senate

Yahoo

time06-03-2025

  • Health
  • Yahoo

Bill creating monetary reward for those who tip off police on drug activity advances in WV Senate

Sen. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, the lone sponsor of Senate Bill 109, speaks on the Senate floor on Wednesday, March 5, 2025, in Charleston, (Will Price | West Virginia Legislative Photography) The Senate Committee on Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health advanced a bill Wednesday that, if adopted, will incentivize residents to report drug activity to law enforcement with monetary rewards funded by a new excise tax on harm reduction tools. The excise tax would add one cent to all purchases of naloxone and drug testing strips — two life saving interventions that help prevent fatal overdoses in people who use drugs — in West Virginia. Under a committee substitute adopted by the substance use disorder committee, nonprofits would be exempt from paying the excise tax. Sen. Eric Tarr, R-Putnam, is the lone sponsor of Senate Bill 109, which he named the Neighborhood Assistance and Rejuvenation Compact Act. He said that while he would like to see a permanent, state-backed funding source for the new fund, a tax on naloxone and other overdose mitigation tools was appropriate for the time being. It remained unclear how much money, however, could actually be raised by such a tax since nonprofits largely distribute naloxone free of charge and receive it often through federal and state grant dollars. Sen. Tom Takubo, R-Kanawha, said he worried that placing the tax on proven intervention strategies could send the 'wrong message' as the state attempts to target higher level dealers and traffickers instead of low level offenders. Tarr, however, alleged that drug traffickers have incentive to use and purchase naloxone and testing strips to prove the potency of the drugs they sell. 'The reason that we went after Narcan and test strips was because the people — both traffickers and [drug] users — are the reason we have to do this in the first place,' Tarr said. Many people who use or overdose on fentanyl are unaware that the drug is present in what they're using and fentanyl test strips, according to experts, allow them to use more safely. Naloxone is an effective opioid overdose reversal drug proven to dramatically lower the risk of fatal overdose, according to countless peer-reviewed studies. The money raised by the excise tax would be put in a special revenue account overseen by the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security. Ten percent of anything raised would go to administering the new program while the rest of the money could be used for marketing and payments to people whose tips to police successfully help with getting someone convicted for a drug crime. The bill tasked the Homeland Security and the police with creating an anonymous tip line that could be used to submit tips. Payments to individuals would only be levied if a tip proves useful in securing a drug conviction against someone. Confidential informants and those who work for law enforcement would not be eligible for the reward. Marketing for the program, Tarr said, could include buying and posting billboards in areas known to have high drug activity. Those billboards would show mugshots of people convicted of drug crimes and the sentence they received for such crimes in an attempt to deter others from violating the law. Tarr said his inspiration for the billboards came after watching the news one night and seeing 'bodies hanging off of bridges' in a report on cartels in Mexico. The actions, he said, were meant to show what would happen if someone crossed the cartel. 'That's pretty difficult to fight,' Tarr said. 'It's that kind of intimidation — how do you go and have that kind of intimidation and fight back?' After speaking to people in law enforcement, he said he learned that it would be helpful if they could find a way to 'put a price on [drug dealers'] heads.' Tarr clarified that he did not mean to kill them, but to show what the price — i.e. prison sentence — would be for dealing and trafficking drugs in the state of West Virginia. SB 109 passed the Senate Committee on Substance Use Disorder and Mental Health via voice vote. It will now advance to the Senate Finance Committee. Lawmakers on the committee were also considering a bill Wednesday to prohibit opioid treatment programs in the state of West Virginia. Action, however, was not taken on that bill by publication time. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store