Latest news with #FAIRplan
Forbes
5 days ago
- Business
- Forbes
How Wildfires Are Torching The Home Insurance Industry
What happens when the models tell you the world is on fire, and the market listens? In California's most extreme wildfire zones, one in five homes has lost its insurance coverage since 2019 according to a recent wildfire research report. In some ZIP codes, premiums have skyrocketed over 40%. More than 150,000 households are now uninsured—not because they want to be, but because they're uninsurable. And this isn't a future problem. Wildfire season has barely begun, and already over 200 blazes rage across Canada, many completely out of control. This isn't just a climate story. It's a markets story. A systems story. A story of how the first real stress test of climate adaptation is happening—not in the halls of Congress or Parliament, but in your homeowner's insurance renewal letter. Insurers have one job: predict risk, price it, and spread it. And they're good at it—until they're not. When Los Angeles was engulfed in flames in January, insurance companies paid out more than $44 billion in claims. State Farm alone lost $7.6 billion. California's state-subsidized FAIR plan took a $4.8 billion hit. That plan, by the way, is supposed to be the insurer of last resort. It's now the only option left for hundreds of thousands of homeowners—and it's buckling. Insurers saw it coming. Their catastrophe models—backed by more granular data and better forecasting than most public agencies can afford—warned them. They raised premiums, cut policies, and eventually fled entire markets. Since 2018, over 30,000 households in California's high-risk fire zones have had their policies simply not renewed. Many never got a replacement. This isn't a tale of irrational panic. It's a rational response to a mathematically unsustainable situation. You can't underwrite homes in areas where the probability of destruction is not only high—but increasing. You can't make the numbers work when wildfire seasons are longer, fires more intense, and the climate system more volatile. It gets worse. Homeowners who lose private insurance are turning to FAIR plans—state-backed programs originally designed as temporary backstops. In California alone, enrolment has more than doubled since 2020. FAIR plans offer less coverage, higher deductibles, and few protections for personal property. They're expensive, incomplete, and dangerously overstretched. But they're all that's left. And because FAIR plans are funded by assessments on private insurers, every loss they take feeds back into the same system that's already retreating. It's a vicious cycle: more risk, more exits, more burden on the few insurers who remain, which leads to… more exits. Add in one more ingredient: population growth. Incredibly, the number of people moving into high-risk areas is growing faster than those leaving. The share of uninsured households is rising even as more homes are being built in harm's way. The implications for housing markets are profound. Without insurance, homes can't get mortgages. Without mortgages, property values collapse. And when homes burn without coverage—as many will—someone pays. Usually, taxpayers. Governments will step in to purchase destroyed properties or prevent rebuilding in zones now understood as climate sacrifice zones. What we're witnessing is the first collapse of a financial market under the weight of climate risk. Not in theory. In real time. The story in California is now echoing across the continent. FAIR plan enrolments are up 54% in Texas and 39% in Oregon. In the U.S. Southwest, drought has pushed fire risk to ten-year highs across Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas. In Mexico and Canada, spring fire risk is breaking records. Manitoba has already declared a state of emergency as two people have died, with thousands more evacuated. And it's only June. Behind it all is a term climate scientists now use with chilling precision: hydroclimate whiplash. It's a swinging pendulum weather phenomenon of too-much-then-too-little water. Years of heavy rainfall grow dense vegetation. A sudden drought turns that growth into kindling. Add record temperatures, early snowmelt, and wind—and the landscape becomes a fuse waiting for a spark. The data backs it up. Fire Weather Index anomalies across North America show levels of risk unseen in over a decade. More fires will come. More homes will burn. More markets will break. Here's the deeper problem: fires don't just destroy property, they also emit carbon into the atmosphere. In 2023, Canadian wildfires released more carbon than oil & gas, transportation, buildings, or heavy industry. That carbon accelerates climate change. Which raises temperatures. Which increases drought. Which drives more fires. Which, yes, releases more carbon. That's the feedback loop we've entered. And yet, our policies remain reactive, not preventative. Our markets—home insurance, housing, municipal bonds—are starting to price climate risk faster than our politics can respond. We used to think climate change would hit slowly. But wildfire insurance isn't disappearing slowly. It's collapsing now. And it's showing us a hard truth: markets can adapt faster than governments—but not without consequences. When markets exit, people get left behind. What the wildfire crisis reveals is not just the cost of climate change—but the cost of delay. The systems we rely on—insurance, housing, public finance—weren't built for this. And they're beginning to fail. What comes next will depend on whether we treat this collapse as a warning, or as a preview. Disclaimer: I work for Deep Sky, a carbon removals project developer.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Business
- Yahoo
State lawmakers considering policy changes after L.A. wildfires
Nearly six months after a firestorm ravaged communities across Los Angeles, California lawmakers are crafting legislation to try to protect the state insurance program for high-risk homes from financial collapse. A bill, AB 226, sponsored by Assemblymembers Lisa Calderon (D-Whittier) and David A. Alvarez (D-San Diego), would make the state's insurer of last resort, the FAIR Plan, eligible for loans and bonds from the state-backed California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank to avoid running out of money after a disaster. Alvarez proposed the measure last year but it failed to pass. Despite receiving unanimous support in the Assembly, the bill never reached the Senate floor for a vote before the end of the 2024 legislative session. If the measure had passed last year and been signed into law by the governor, the FAIR Plan would have had more flexibility to weather the massive number of claims filed after the January firestorms, Alvarez said. Instead, the FAIR plan was forced to imposed an extra $1 billion in total assessments on insurers that provide homeowners policies in California. To recoup those expenses, insurance companies are expected to hike rates on homeowners through monthly surcharges. "Had they had this option available to them ... they would not be having to hit consumers with price increases on the private market now," Alvarez said. AB 226 is one of many wildfire-related bills still winding their way through the slow legislative process. If passed into law, the measures would protect homeowners from price gouging after disasters, streamline the process for filing claims for lost property and offer financial protections for disaster victims. Lawmakers and Gov. Gavin Newsom in January approved $2.5 billion in wildfire aid after the Palisades and Eaton fires killed more than two dozen people and became the second and third most destructive fires in state history. Legislative leaders at the time signaled for a swift, bipartisan approach to the disaster. 'Tens of thousands of our neighbors, our families and friends, they need help. This means that we need to be able to move with urgency, put aside our differences, and be laser-focused on delivering the financial resources, delivering the boots on the ground that are needed and the policy relief that is needed to get neighborhoods cleaned up and communities rebuilt," Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire (D-Healdsburg) said after it passed. California's last-ditch home insurer, the FAIR Plan, is meant as a backup for properties deemed high-risk and uninsurable by private companies. A Times analysis found that within the Eaton and Palisades fire zones, the number of homes on the plan nearly doubled between 2020 and 2024 and the plan has become one of the state's largest insurers. Amid lawsuits alleging collusion between private insurers and the FAIR Plan and policyholders raising concerns about delays in payments and smoke damage investigations, lawmakers and insurance advocates have repeatedly called for better safety nets — like the one proposed in AB 226 — to keep the insurer solvent in emergencies and viable as a long-term solution to the state's home insurance problem. Read more: Insurer of last resort kept growing. Then L.A. fire victims paid the price This year, Alvarez was joined on the bill by Calderon, chair of the Assembly's insurance committee. It passed through the Assembly at the beginning of March but has not yet seen its first Senate committee. Alvarez celebrated the bill's swift passage through the Assembly and hopes the Senate will work to do the same, "God forbid, if it has to be used because of a devastating fire this summer," he said. Other major wildfire bills being considered by lawmakers include: AB 493, which would require lenders to pay policyholders interest on disaster insurance payouts that are held in escrow. The measure, authored by Assemblymember John Harabedian (D-Pasadena) would close a loophole in existing law, which already requires interest payments on other escrowed funds. AB 597, also introduced by Harabedian, which would keep public insurance adjusters from gouging homeowners, especially after a natural disaster or state of emergency. SB 495, which would prevent insurers from requiring an itemized list of personal property losses from policyholders during a state of emergency, and would require insurers to provide extensions where reconstruction is delayed. The bill, introduced by state Sen. Benjamin Allen — who represents the Pacific Palisades and Santa Monica areas — passed a Senate floor vote on Tuesday and is headed to the Assembly. Read more: Did insurers collude to force homeowners onto state insurance plan? What to know from two blockbuster lawsuits Most of the pending legislation won't directly support survivors of the Palisades and Eaton fires but are still important to the rebuilding process, said Maryam Zar, president emeritus of the Pacific Palisades Community Council and founder of the Palisades Recovery Coalition. The new laws would help prevent and prepare for future fires, she said, and are a show of goodwill to the communities that are suffering still. Some other fire relief measures focus on easing the permit process for rebuilding, while others extend provisions set by Newsom during the state of emergency — easing tenancy rights for people staying in temporary housing for longer than 30 days, shortening the permit approval timeline and securing mortgage forbearance for destroyed properties for up to a year after the disaster. Others look to address staffing issues for the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection as fire season turns into a year-round threat. 'Wildfire survivors continue to face housing insecurity, financial strain, and emotional trauma long after the immediate danger has passed," Los Angeles County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath said in a statement. "These State bills represent a commitment to meeting people where they are — actively in recovery, rebuilding their lives, and in need of our long-term support.' Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
