Latest news with #FrancisCrick
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
25-04-2025
- Science
- First Post
History Today: When a 7.8-magnitude earthquake shook Mt Everest, killing nearly 9,000 in Nepal
In 2015, a 7.8 earthquake hit Nepal, killing nearly 9,000 and injuring thousands. The earthquake resulted in losses exceeding $5 billion, roughly one-quarter of Nepal's GDP at the time. In 1953, American biologist James Watson and English physicist Francis Crick described DNA's double helix structure for the first time read more On April 25, 2015, Nepal was shaken by one of the deadliest earthquakes. File image/Reuters April 25 has been a day of devastation for Nepal. It was on this day 10 years ago when the nation was shaken by one of the deadliest earthquakes. The powerful 7.8-magnitude temblor killed nearly 9,000 and left thousands injured. It was also the day in 1953, when scientists James Watson and Francis Crick first described the structure of DNA, unlocking the code of life and changing the course of biology forever. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Here's a closer look at the moments that made history on April 25 in Firstpost Explainers' ongoing series, History Today. Powerful earthquake devastates Nepal At 11:56 am on April 25, 2015, a powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 7.8 struck Nepal. Its epicentre was near Barpak in the Gorkha District, approximately 80 kilometres northwest of Kathmandu. The quake was the most powerful to hit the country since 1934. The damage was extensive. Nearly 9,000 people lost their lives, and over 22,000 were injured. More than 600,000 structures were either damaged or reduced to rubble. Among them were several UNESCO World Heritage Sites, including the Durbar Squares in Kathmandu, Bhaktapur, and Patan, as well as significant religious sites such as the Swayambhunath and Boudhanath stupas, and the Pashupatinath and Changu Narayan temples. Several historic sites, including several UNESCO World Heritage sites, were either destroyed or reduced to rubble. File image. Reuters One of the most widely reported consequences of the quake was the avalanche it triggered on Mount Everest. At the time, many climbers were gathered at the Everest Base Camp during the peak of expedition season. The avalanche claimed at least 22 lives and injured more than 60 others. It was the deadliest incident on the mountain in recorded history. Beyond the capital and tourist areas, rural communities were also severely affected. Entire villages in remote regions were flattened, and access to these areas was made difficult by landslides and damaged roads. Rescue operations were further hindered by ongoing aftershocks. One of the most widely reported consequences of the quake was the avalanche it triggered on Mount Everest. The avalanche claimed at least 22 lives and injured more than 60 others. It was the deadliest incident on the mountain in recorded history. File image/ Reuters The economic impact was also significant, with estimated losses exceeding $5 billion, roughly one-quarter of Nepal's GDP at the time. In response, the Nepalese government declared a state of emergency and mobilised the army for search and rescue operations. International support came swiftly. Countries around the world, along with various humanitarian organisations and the United Nations, contributed aid, personnel, and resources. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When DNA structure was described for the first time On April 25, 1953, scientists James Watson and Francis Crick published a seminal paper in the journal Nature, proposing the double helix structure of DNA. This discovery provided critical insights into how genetic information is stored and transmitted in living organisms. Their model described DNA as two strands forming a helical structure, with complementary base pairs—adenine pairing with thymine, and guanine with cytosine—held together by hydrogen bonds. This arrangement explained the mechanism. This arrangement explained how DNA replicates and transmits genetic information. On April 25, 1953, scientists James Watson and Francis Crick published a seminal paper in the journal The breakthrough was made possible by the X-ray diffraction images, particularly 'Photo 51', produced by Rosalind Franklin, whose work was instrumental in revealing the helical nature of DNA. However, Franklin did not receive the same recognition as her male counterparts during her lifetime. In 1962, Watson, Crick, and Maurice Wilkins were awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for their contributions to understanding the molecular structure of nucleic acids. The elucidation of DNA's structure marked the beginning of modern molecular biology, paving the way for advancements in genetics, biotechnology, and medicine. This day, That year 1859: Construction of the Suez Canal officially began. 1901: New York became the first US state to mandate license plates 1990: Violeta Barrios de Chamorro became Central America's first female president as she was sworn into office in Nicaragua. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 1990: The Hubble Space Telescope was sent into orbit 2021: Chinese filmmaker Chloé Zhao became the first person of colour to win the Academy Award for best director for Nomadland (2020) With input from agencies
New York Times
09-04-2025
- Science
- New York Times
Scientists Map Miles of Wiring in a Speck of Mouse Brain
The human brain is so complex that scientific brains have a hard time making sense of it. A piece of neural tissue the size of a grain of sand might be packed with hundreds of thousands of cells linked together by miles of wiring. In 1979, Francis Crick, the Nobel-prize-winning scientist, concluded that the anatomy and activity in just a cubic millimeter of brain matter would forever exceed our understanding. 'It is no use asking for the impossible,' Dr. Crick wrote. Forty-six years later, a team of more than 100 scientists has achieved that impossible, by recording the cellular activity and mapping the structure in a cubic millimeter of a mouse's brain — less than one percent of its full volume. In accomplishing this feat, they amassed 1.6 petabytes of data — the equivalent of 22 years of nonstop high-definition video. 'This is a milestone,' said Davi Bock, a neuroscientist at the University of Vermont who was not involved in the study, which was published Wednesday in the journal Nature. Dr. Bock said that the advances that made it possible to chart a cubic millimeter of brain boded well for a new goal: mapping the wiring of the entire brain of a mouse. 'It's totally doable, and I think it's worth doing,' he said. More than 130 years have passed since the Spanish neuroscientist Santiago Ramón y Cajal first spied individual neurons under a microscope, making out their peculiar branched shapes. Later generations of scientists worked out many of the details of how a neuron sends a spike of voltage down a long arm, called an axon. Each axon makes contact with tiny branches, or dendrites, of neighboring neurons. Some neurons excite their neighbors into firing voltage spikes of their own. Some quiet other neurons. Human thought somehow emerges from this mix of excitation and inhibition. But how that happens has remained a tremendous mystery, largely because scientists have been able to study only a few neurons at a time. In recent decades, technological advances have allowed scientists to start mapping brains in their entirety. In 1986, British researchers published the circuitry of a tiny worm, made up of 302 neurons. In subsequent years, researchers charted bigger brains, such as the 140,000 neurons in the brain of a fly. Could Dr. Crick's impossible dream be possible after all? In 2016, the American government began a $100 million effort to scan a cubic millimeter of a mouse brain. The project — called Machine Intelligence from Cortical Networks, or MICrONS — was led by scientists at the Allen Institute for Brain Science, Princeton University and Baylor College of Medicine. The researchers zeroed in on a portion of the mouse brain that receives signals from the eyes and reconstructs what the animal sees. In the first stage of the research, the team recorded the activity of neurons in that region as it showed a mouse videos of different landscapes. The researchers then dissected the mouse brain and doused the cubic millimeter with hardening chemicals. Then they shaved off 28,000 slices from the block of tissue, capturing an image of each one. Computers were trained to recognize the outlines of cells in each slice and link the slices together into three-dimensional shapes. All told, the team charted 200,000 neurons and other types of brain cells, along with 523 million neural connections. For Nuno da Costa, a biologist at the Allen Institute and one of the leaders of the project, just watching the cells take shape on his computer screen was breathtaking. 'These neurons are absolutely stunning — it gives me pleasure,' he said. To understand how this mesh of neurons functioned, Dr. da Costa and his colleagues mapped the activity that had been recorded when the mouse looked at videos. 'Imagine that you come to a party that has 80,000 people, and you can be aware of every conversation, but you don't know who is talking to whom,' Dr. da Costa said. 'And now imagine that you have a way to know who is talking to whom, but you have no idea what they're saying. If you have these two things, you can tell a better story about what's happening at the party.' Analyzing the data, the researchers discovered patterns in the wiring of the brain that had escaped notice until now. They identified distinct kinds of inhibitory neurons, for instance, that link only to certain other types of neurons. 'When you go into studying the brain, it seems kind of hopeless — there are just so many connections and so much complexity,' said Mariela Petkova, a biophysicist at Harvard who was not involved in the MICrONS project. 'Finding wiring rules is a win. The brain is a lot less messy than people thought,' she said. Many of the MICrONS researchers are now pitching in on a bigger project: mapping an entire mouse's brain. With a volume of 500 cubic millimeters, a full brain would take decades or centuries to chart with current methods. The scientists will have to find additional tricks in order to finish the project in a decade. 'What they've already had to do to get here is heroic,' said Gregory Jefferis, a neuroscientist at the University of Cambridge who was not involved in the MICrONS project. 'But we've still got a mountain to climb.' Forrest Collman, a member of the MICrONS project at the Allen Institute, is optimistic. He and his colleagues recently discovered how to make microscopically thin sections from an entire mouse brain. 'Some of these barriers are starting to fall,' Dr. Collman said. But our own brain, which is about a thousand times bigger than a mouse's, presents a much bigger challenge, he added. 'The human brain right now feels like outside the range of what is possible,' he said. 'We are not going there anytime soon.' But Sebastian Seung, a neuroscientist at Princeton and a member of the MICrONS project, noted that mouse brains and human brains are similar enough that researchers might glean clues that could help them find medications to effectively treat psychological disorders without causing harmful side effects. 'Our current methods of manipulating the nervous system are incredibly blunt instruments,' Dr. Seung said. 'You put in a drug, and it goes everywhere,' he added. 'But being able to actually reach in and manipulate a cell type — that's precision.' The efforts to map a whole mouse brain are supported by funding from a long-running National Institutes of Health program called the BRAIN initiative. But the future of the endeavor is uncertain. Last year, Congress cut funding to the BRAIN initiative by 40 percent, and last month President Trump signed a bill cutting support by another 20 percent. Dr. Bock noted that brain-mapping efforts like MICrONS take years, partly because they require the invention of new technologies and software along the way. 'We need consistency and predictability of science funding to realize these long-term goals,' Dr. Bock said.
