23-05-2025
Potsdam property owners continue objections to town-wide reval
May 22—POTSDAM — Several property owners once again attended the Town Council meeting in May to voice their objections to their new assessments under the recent townwide property revaluation.
Last year, the town contracted GAR Associates, a firm based in Clifton Park, for $385,000 to perform a comprehensive revaluation of all assessed properties. The town had not conducted such a revaluation in 12 years, and officials hoped it would create a fairer and more up-to-date system of tax valuations.
However, for some residents, the reassessment resulted in property values increasing by as much as 50% to 100% compared to the previous year.
Although the assessments themselves do not automatically translate to higher tax bills, roughly a third of the town's parcels saw increased values from the GAR-led revaluation. These increases are expected to result in higher tax payments for many property owners when the town sets its new tax rate.
Potsdam's Grievance Day is scheduled for May 27, with three sessions: 10 a.m. to noon, 1 to 4 p.m., and 5 to 8 p.m. Property owners who wish to formally contest their new valuations can attend any of the sessions and can bring photographs or appraisals to support their case.
At the May 13 Town Board meeting, several residents criticized what they saw as poor work by GAR.
Fred Stone, who lives at the corner of May and Reagan Road, argued that GAR appeared to have based its assessment of his property almost entirely on square footage. His 65-year-old raised ranch was valued at $335,000, just $10,000 less than a nearby newly built ranch home, despite being only 36 square feet smaller.
Stone noted that, even accounting for the town's equalization rate rising to 100% this year, his property's assessment still increased by 59%. He questioned how his older, less modernized home could be appraised so closely to a newer one.
"There are a lot of errors in this assessment. And it's affecting people across this township and in the village. GAR did a poor job," Stone said.
John Burke, a county legislator and local property owner, echoed Stone's frustrations, particularly criticizing GAR's use of dissimilar properties as comparables in assessing his lot.
Other residents also challenged the accuracy of GAR's appraisals, saying the listed conditions of their properties did not reflect reality.
Property owner Eric Backus emphasized the need for transparency in GAR's methodology.
"One of the biggest challenges with the assessment at this point is that the consultant that was hired did not provide a clear and open understanding of the process in which they were using to do the reassessment. And I think that disclosure is required. It's not something that's optional," Backus said.
"If the board takes the assessment as is without clarity on that I believe that there are going to be, and I will already say to you, in addition to petitions, there are probably going to be legal activities," he added. "And I don't think it's worth the value of the time or the money of the town to be in the litigation over these issues."
Tracey Haggett-Sloan was sharply critical of the decision to hire GAR at all, arguing that the town could have used the same funds to hire a dozen assessors and performed the work internally.
"What you have done here by making this decision to hire this company is a disgrace. This was an improper, lazy and, dare I say, illegitimate process of a reevaluation. We relied on a company that I compared to being a parasite that lays in wait, latching on to any municipality that happens to fall below a certain level of assessment. Then they get their $385,000 from this township and they walk away scot-free," Haggett-Sloan said.
"What did we get? Not much. They did most of this process by satellite imagery drones or drive-by photos. Many of the people that have come to me have said, there's no data available. And I've looked and there's not one thing there," she said.
