Latest news with #GeorgeLRussellIII
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
Trump administration sues all 15 Maryland federal judges over order blocking removal of immigrants
The Trump administration on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against all 15 federal judges in Maryland over an order blocking the immediate deportation of migrants challenging their removals, ratcheting up a fight with the federal judiciary over President Donald Trump's executive powers. The remarkable action lays bare the administration's determination to exert its will over immigration enforcement as well as a growing exasperation with federal judges who have time and again turned aside executive branch actions they see as lawless and without legal merit. 'It's extraordinary," Laurie Levenson, a professor at Loyola Law School, said of the Justice Department's lawsuit. 'And it's escalating DOJ's effort to challenge federal judges.' At issue is an order signed by Chief Judge George L. Russell III and filed in May blocking the administration from immediately removing from the U.S. any immigrants who file paperwork with the Maryland district court seeking a review of their detention. The order blocks the removal until 4 p.m. on the second business day after the habeas corpus petition is filed. The administration says the automatic pause on removals violates a Supreme Court ruling and impedes the president's authority to enforce immigration laws. The Republican administration has been locked for weeks in a growing showdown with the federal judiciary amid a barrage of legal challenges to the president's efforts to carry out key priorities around immigration and other matters. The Justice Department has grown increasingly frustrated by rulings blocking the president's agenda, accusing judges of improperly impeding the president's powers. "President Trump's executive authority has been undermined since the first hours of his presidency by an endless barrage of injunctions designed to halt his agenda,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement Wednesday. 'The American people elected President Trump to carry out his policy agenda: this pattern of judicial overreach undermines the democratic process and cannot be allowed to stand.' A spokesman for the Maryland district court declined to comment. Trump has railed against unfavorable judicial rulings, and in one case called for the impeachment of a federal judge in Washington who ordered planeloads of deported immigrants to be turned around. That led to an extraordinary statement from Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, who said 'impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision.' Among the judges named in the lawsuit is Paula Xinis, who has called the administration's deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador illegal. Attorneys for Abrego Garcia have asked Xinis to impose fines against the administration for contempt, arguing that it ignored court orders for weeks to return him to the U.S. The order signed by Russell says it aims to maintain existing conditions and the potential jurisdiction of the court, ensure immigrant petitioners are able to participate in court proceedings and access attorneys and give the government 'fulsome opportunity to brief and present arguments in its defense.' In an amended order, Russell said the court had received an influx of habeas petitions after hours that "resulted in hurried and frustrating hearings in that obtaining clear and concrete information about the location and status of the petitioners is elusive.' The Trump administration has asked the Maryland judges to recuse themselves from the case. It wants a clerk to have a federal judge from another state hear it. James Sample, a constitutional law professor at Hofstra University, described the lawsuit as further part of the erosion of legal norms by the administration. Normally when parties are on the losing side of an injunction, they appeal the order — not sue the court or judges, he said. On one hand, he said, the Justice Department has a point that injunctions should be considered extraordinary relief; it's unusual for them to be granted automatically in an entire class of cases. But, he added, it's the administration's own actions in repeatedly moving detainees to prevent them from obtaining writs of habeas corpus that prompted the court to issue the order. 'The judges here didn't ask to be put in this unenviable position,' Sample said. 'Faced with imperfect options, they have made an entirely reasonable, cautious choice to modestly check an executive branch that is determined to circumvent any semblance of impartial process.' ___ Associated Press reporters Gene Johnson in Seattle and Eric Tucker and Alanna Durkin Richer in Washington contributed to this report.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
15 judges, 1 target: Trump escalates war on the judiciary
The Trump administration launched its latest attack on judges, targeting all 15 judges on the Maryland federal bench, continuing the ongoing feud between the executive and judicial branches that has persisted since President Donald Trump began his second term. The U.S. Department of Justice filed its complaint earlier this week in response to the Maryland court's habeas corpus filed last month by its Chief Judge George L. Russell III. In what the Justice Department called an 'egregious example of judicial overreach,' the brief order requires every apparent illegal immigration case be granted a temporary injunction 'upon its filing, and its terms shall remain in effect until 4 p.m. on the second business day following the filing of the Petition, unless the terms of this Order are further extended by the presiding judge,' per the order. The Trump administration viewed the order as the work of district court judges who 'have used and abused their equitable powers' to undermine Trump's immigration policy enforcement. 'President Trump's executive authority has been undermined since the first hours of his presidency by an endless barrage of injunctions designed to halt his agenda,' Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. 'The American people elected President Trump to carry out his policy agenda: this pattern of judicial overreach undermines the democratic process and cannot be allowed to stand.' Although filed in the Maryland court where they are suing the judges, the Justice Department requested that every judge recuse themselves and allow the issue to be heard before an outside judge who can take over or transfer the case to a different court district. Among the judges included in the lawsuit is Paul Xinis, who is overseeing the high-profile deportation case of Salvadorian national Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Accused of being an MS-13 gang member, Abrego Garcia was deported and sent to the Terrorism Confinement Center, a megaprison in El Salvador, last March. He gained national attention as part of the Trump administration's efforts to deport suspected immigrant gang members living illegally in the U.S. — painted as a hardened criminal by the administration and as a victim by Trump's opponents.
New York Times
2 days ago
- Politics
- New York Times
Trump Administration Sues Federal Bench in Maryland, Escalating Fight With Judiciary
In late May, as two high-stakes deportation cases were playing out in federal courthouses in Maryland, the district's chief judge, George L. Russell III, issued an unusual new standing rule. Moving forward, Judge Russell said, any immigrant who sought to challenge their removal from the country by filing what is known as a habeas petition would be automatically granted a temporary order stopping the government from expelling them for at least one day. On Tuesday evening, the Trump administration took an even more unusual step to kill Judge Russell's unusual move: It filed a lawsuit against him and the other 14 federal judges who serve on the bench in Maryland, seeking a court order that would block the standing rule. In a 22-page complaint, lawyers for the Justice Department noted — as many administration officials have in recent weeks — that courts across the country have issued an avalanche of injunctions against various parts President Trump's agenda almost from the moment that he returned to office. The lawyers sought to set their suit against Judge Russell and his colleagues in that context, saying that the new standing rule intruded on the White House's inherent powers to 'enforce the nation's immigration laws.' 'This lawsuit involves yet another regrettable example of the unlawful use of equitable powers to restrain the executive,' the lawyers wrote. 'Specifically, defendants have instituted an avowedly automatic injunction against the federal government, issued outside the context of any particular case or controversy.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
