Latest news with #Gibbs


Time of India
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Time of India
Untamed ending explained: How did Lucy die and what happened to Shane?
Untamed ending explained: Netflix's limited series Untamed has captured viewers' attention with its gripping plot and powerful conclusion. Blending themes of betrayal, and survival, the show delivers a rollercoaster of emotions but it's the dramatic ending that has sparked the most discussion. With lingering questions about Lucy's heartbreaking fate and Shane's final moments, fans are searching for clarity. If you're looking to make sense of it all, here's an in-depth look at Untamed's ending and its deeper significance. What is Untamed on Netflix about? Untamed is a tense and gripping mystery thriller that follows Kyle Turner, a special agent in a top-tier unit of the National Parks Service responsible for enforcing law in the wildest corners of nature. When a brutal death shatters the peace, Turner finds himself drawn into a tangled investigation, one that reveals dark secrets lurking in the park and forces him to confront haunting truths from his own past. (Spoilers ahead, you know what to do) Untamed ending explained How did Lucy die? By the end of Untamed, it's revealed that Lucy Cook died by suicide, not murder. The end of the limited series tells us that Lucy had escaped from Gibbs and returned to Yosemite as a teenager. Around a year before her body was found, Paul had offered to help her find housing. He later tells Kyle that Lucy had been blackmailing him for money, threatening to reveal he was her biological father. Paul admits to shooting Lucy in the leg, claiming he just wanted to stop her so they could talk. He insists he was "protecting his family," to which Kyle pointedly reminds him that Lucy was part of that family. Consumed by guilt and unable to face the collapse of his reputation, Paul ultimately dies by suicide, choosing not to kill Kyle to keep him silent. Meanwhile, Kyle uncovers a video on Lucy's phone in episode 5, showing Shane assaulting her. It's also revealed that Shane had drawn Lucy into the park's underground drug operation. What happened to Shane? Despite being shot in the abdomen, Kyle managed to get away from Shane temporarily. However, since Kyle was badly wounded and Shane was uninjured, Shane eventually caught up and was ready to kill him. Naya shot Shane once to stop him, but when he turned to attack her, she shot him in the chest, killing him. Kyle was rushed to the hospital in critical condition but survived. Paul, the chief park ranger and Kyle's friend, and Naya were relieved. Naya informed Kyle that the drugs, weapons, and cash found at Shane's camp, along with the video of him attacking Lucy, suggested he and Lucy may have had a deal that turned sour, potentially leading to her death. Meanwhile, Paul called Jill, asking to meet, but she chose to stay home and confess the truth to her husband, Scott, about Shane's involvement in her and Kyle's past. Years ago, a man named Sean had abducted and killed Caleb. Shane's motion-activated wildlife cameras had caught Sean in the act, which led to his arrest. By confessing everything to Scott, Jill finally stopped pretending she was okay. She gave him the choice to leave her, as Kyle once had. The series doesn't clarify Scott's decision, but Jill's words to Kyle at the hospital suggest Scott chose to stay. In their final conversation, Jill reassures Kyle she'll be fine, likely acknowledging Scott's support. She may also be apologising for bringing Shane into their lives for the sake of revenge. That emotional closure is what ultimately leads Kyle to lie to Esther, the lawyer investigating Sean's disappearance. Though Kyle ended his marriage because Jill had Sean killed, he chooses not to expose her or Shane, allowing Sean's family to remain in the dark. While controversial, Kyle saw Jill was already living with guilt and believed justice wouldn't bring peace to anyone. You can stream Untamed on Netflix.

Hypebeast
3 days ago
- Entertainment
- Hypebeast
Freddie Gibbs x The Alchemist's 'Alfredo: The Movie' Is Dropping Tomorrow
Summary After dropping crumbs of their forthcoming collaborative project for a few weeks now,Freddie GibbsandThe Alchemisthave shared a proper update on the new album – sort of. After sharing cover art yesterday, the producer/rapper pair has revealed a trailer for what appears to be the anticipated album's companion film,Alfredo: The Movie. Both Gibbs and Alc shared the trailer for the project on Instagram, describing it as 'A Tokyo Crime Saga.' They both star in the film – unconfirmed whether it's a full-length or short film – with Nicholas Walker handling the direction. 'Life is like pouring sake. Pour it faithfully. Nothing will spill,' begins the off-screen narrator in Japanese, the English translation showing in yellow subtitles across the bottom of the screen. 'Lose ever a sliver of focus, you will stain your own clothes. Do you understand?' the narrator continues. As the trailer wraps with a clip of Gibbs doing pull-ups and a Japanese title card that readsAlfredo, the narrator says, 'There is still work that needs to be done,' the message also running across the screen. Watch the full trailer in the Instagram post below. Earlier this month, a pre-save link toAlfredo 2began circulating the internet. Showcasing the follow-up album's supposed new cover art, the link was shortly deactivated and led to an error page. The originalAlfredoalbum dropped on May 29, 2020. The top line of the trailer's closing credits reads: 'Softspot presents Alfredo II.' Whether a predecessor to the project or theAlfredo 2project itself, only time will tell whenAlfredo: The Moviehits YouTube this Thursday, July 17, at 9 a.m. PST.

Miami Herald
3 days ago
- Business
- Miami Herald
Taco Bell launches a brand new limited-edition menu
In a time where people are pulling back on nonessential purchases as tariff threats loom and everything feels more expensive than ever, businesses face a unique challenge. That challenge is finding a way to keep customers interested enough to buy at a price point that doesn't feel scary to them, at a time when spending money feels scary in general. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter Any business can sling out a value menu, for instance, and it may be serviceable. But to come up with value options that actually excite loyal customers and make them want to try what's new - well, that's the kind of magic very few fast-food retailers know how to invent. Related: Taco Bell to add three popular desserts to permanent menu Taco Bell (YUM) is known for tirelessly inventing one amazing thing after another, from the classic Mexican Pizza so many fans fought so hard to bring back to newer, wilder innovations like the Cheez-It Tostada. Now it's dropping a slate of new goodies all at one time, and if you live in the right area, you may be able to try them starting today. Starting on July 16, Taco Bell debuts a completely new menu for those who live in the Indianapolis area. Called the Luxe Value Menu, this new limited-edition slate of items features five debut eats, including a Mini Taco Salad, a Chipotle Ranch Chicken Stacker, a Beefy Potato Loaded Griller, a Chips & Nacho Supreme Dip, and a dessert called Salted Caramel Churros. These five new items join already-cheap favorites on the value menu, which currently includes the Cheesy Roll Up, Spicy Potato Soft Taco, Cheesy Bean & Rice Burrito, Three-Cheese Chicken Flatbread, and the Cheesy Double Beef Burrito. Related: Taco Bell embraces something no other major chain offers The items in this test lineup each cost $3 or less, adding to Taco Bell's rotation of affordable options. As with all test menu items, if customer response is positive, they may be rolled out to all Taco Bells nationwide. If you're feeling frustrated that you don't live in Indianapolis to try this out, know that the Bell thought of that and came up with a solution to spice up your next visit. The chain also debuts a limited edition Sweet Chipotle BBQ sauce July 16, which comes as an addition to Crispy Chicken Tacos and Burritos. But since the app allows you to customize your order, you can add it to just about anything you want. In its April earnings call, Yum Brands CEO David Gibbs gave a special shout-out to Taco Bell for its standout accomplishments. "I'm incredibly proud of our teams' ability to stay nimble and deliver industry-leading results in a complex consumer environment," Gibbs said. "Our twin growth engines led the way, with Taco Bell U.S. reporting a remarkable 9% same-store sales growth and KFC International accelerating same-store sales growth while generating 7% unit growth year-over-year." Taco Bell also celebrated its second Live Mas Live event this year in Brooklyn, which it calls the "ultimate Taco Bell fan experience." The event featured live entertainment, new menu drops, and test kitchen items such as a Mexican Pizza Empanada, Salted Toffee Cream Empanada Bites, and the mini-bite-sized taco salad that's on the new Luxe Value menu. Taco Bell also live-streamed the event and invited loyal fans of the brand to attend, successfully drumming up interest and keeping the 63-year-old chain feeling as fresh as ever. Related: Taco Bell teams up for impressive celebrity collaboration The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.


Fox Sports
3 days ago
- Sport
- Fox Sports
Should NASCAR Enact New Rules To Avoid Car, Crew Contact After Sonoma Incident?
The Ty Gibbs pit road incident with Brad Keselowski's crew at Sonoma has been compared to brushback pitch, as Gibbs hit a tire being carried by a member of Keselowski's crew when coming in for his pit stop. Except when a race car is involved, even if the concept is the same, the optics are worse and the consequences have a higher percentage of resulting in injury. Gibbs drove through the Keselowski pit box, as he is allowed to do since Keselowski wasn't in his pit. A driver can drive through three empty pit boxes on the way to their own pit stall. The tire carrier, Telvin McClurkin, was carrying two tires and standing in his pit box, which he is allowed to do. Anyone carrying two tires or one tire plus a jack or pit gun is considered a dual-purpose crew member. The rule reads: "The dual-purpose crew member must be positioned close to the pit wall until the vehicle is one pit box away from its assigned pit box." There is no definition of what close means. That's ultimately a NASCAR judgment call. And my guess is that if you got 10 people in a room and asked them to draw a line of where close is, there would be more than a few lines. So McClurkin didn't do anything wrong. Did he hug the wall? No. Was he as far out as other tire carriers have been on stops? Not by a long shot. But there is also a rule on interference: "Any crew member, equipment or tire/wheel interfering with another crew's pit stop, causing the other team to incur a penalty or not, may incur a penalty." Did McClurkin interfere with Gibbs? Did Gibbs interfere with McClurkin, considering Keselowski was about to come in? They both, according to the rules, pretty much had a right to be where they were. NASCAR didn't call any penalties. It isn't rare for tire carriers and tire changers to do what they can to mess up another driver's stop, whether it is swinging wide and daring the driver to hit them or the tire they are carrying. And it isn't rare for a driver who feels a pit crew member is trying to take up too much space to get as close as possible to them. Drivers have an incredible responsibility. But crew members also know that cars are coming. And when they do a pit stop with their own cars, they are instructed that they had better be out of the way when the driver is told to go or else they will get run over. It appears both sides could have given a little more room. Did they have to? No. "There's a lot of gamesmanship in how things work," three-time Cup champion Joey Logano said. "I can only talk from my personal experiences. You don't want to put someone in danger of hurting you. With that said, [I'm] guilty, been there. We've all made mistakes. "We've all done maybe the wrong thing at times, but I think when you look at these pit crew guys, it's not only their life but it's their livelihood on top of that. It's how they make money for their family and the last thing you want to do is hurt one of them. Everyone's got to work together a little bit on pit road, especially when it's tight scenarios like that." Maybe there is a simple answer. There are lines on the track to which a driver must adhere if there is a car in the box so they don't hit any crew members. Should there be a line that limits how far a dual-purpose crew member can go beyond the wall before their car comes into the pit? Except that isn't a simple answer. If there's a line, it would have to be officiated by the pit road camera system. And would that line be for feet or for any equipment/tires the crew member has? And is that line only in play if there is a car coming in to pit using their box as one of the three boxes on the way to their stall? This is one area where NASCAR likely hopes the teams and crew members can police themselves. Which has been fine and will be fine ... until a crew member gets hurt and NASCAR is forced into action. Bob Pockrass covers NASCAR and INDYCAR for FOX Sports. He has spent decades covering motorsports, including over 30 Daytona 500s, with stints at ESPN, Sporting News, NASCAR Scene magazine and The (Daytona Beach) News-Journal. Follow him on Twitter @bobpockrass. recommended Item 1 of 1 Get more from the NASCAR Cup Series Follow your favorites to get information about games, news and more


NDTV
4 days ago
- Sport
- NDTV
Jasprit Bumrah Slammed For 'Lack Of Intent' After Lord's Test Loss: 'Where Was That...'
Former South Africa cricket team batter Herschelle Gibbs took aim at the Indian cricket team and said that 'lack of intent' resulted in their loss in the third Test encounter against England at Lord's. Chasing 193, the Indian top-order batters did not perform well and although Ravindra Jadeja did score a gritty half-century to take his side close to the target, the visitors fell short by 22 runs. Gibbs took to social media to give his honest review of India's performance and made a brutal 'intent' remark on the batters. 'Came close in the end but lack of intent cost India the game,' he wrote on X (formerly Twitter). Although a number of social media users thought that the comment was aimed towards Jadeja, Gibbs clarified in response to an user that he was talking about Jasprit Bumrah. 'Bumrah has the most runs in an over for a batsman in test cricket.. .. where was that intent today?' Gibbs said while replying to the user. Gibbs was talking about Bumrah's record of scoring the most runs in an over during a Test match as he slammed England pacer Stuart Broad for 35. However, he failed to repeat the heroics on Sunday. Meanwhile, Shubman Gill, expressed disappointment and frustration after the team's narrow defeat in the third Test at Lord's, falling just 22 runs short of victory. Gill reflected on the team's performance, expressed pride in his team's performance despite missing out on a chase of 193 runs. Following his side's narrow 22-run loss to England in the third Lord's Test, Indian skipper Shubman Gill expressed pride in his team's performance despite missing out on a chase of 193 runs and explained how they could have applied themselves better with the bat on the final session of day four. India experienced one of their most heartbreaking losses in Test cricket despite a resilient half-century by Ravindra Jadeja and a solid supporting act played by tailenders Jasprit Bumrah and Mohammed Siraj. Team India missed out on a 193-run chase, falling short by 22 runs after a brilliant fight from a troublesome situation of 82/7. Speaking in the post-match presentation, the Indian skipper said that he was confident of a successful run-chase, and a couple of 50-run partnerships from the top order could have done the job.