Latest news with #HB2724
Yahoo
08-02-2025
- Yahoo
Virginia judge rules Flock camera lawsuit may proceed
NORFOLK, Va. (WAVY) — A judge ruled Wednesday that a lawsuit about Norfolk's use of license plate readers, known as Flock cameras, will go forward. With more than 172 cameras in Norfolk, the city tried to get the lawsuit dismissed. The Flock cameras don't just read and capture your car's license plate. They also take details of your car's make, model and color, including if your car has a roof rack, bumper sticker or any damage. These images are then stored for 30 days. Gastonia Police plan to add additional cameras to real-time crime center The lawsuit was filed last October by a Norfolk resident. Lee Schmidt and Portsmouth resident Crystal Arrington both are represented by the Institute for Justice. The two say these cameras violate their privacy. 'Our lawsuit alleges that that violates people's Fourth Amendment right to be secure in their persons against unreasonable searches. You have an expectation of privacy in the whole of your movements,' said Institute for Justice attorney Michael Soyfer. The judge rejected the city's motion to dismiss the lawsuit, citing the United States Supreme Court case Carpenter v. United States, a case that states that using cell phone location to track someone's movement is a search that requires a warrant under the Fourth Amendment. These cameras do not take video or get drivers for speeding or traffic violations. But in 2023, Norfolk Police Chief Mark Talbot stated it has been used to help crime, as This also comes as 24-year-old Andrew Sharrold Williams was sentenced to a year-and-a-half for stealing an SUV that police found using flock cameras in Norfolk. Soyfer said each camera should be thought of as a police officer. 'When you think about it, under current Supreme Court precedent, the court asks, 'What is society's expectation of privacy?' And we can look at history to try to evaluate that,' Soyfer said. 'Historically, no one thought that police would be posted at 172 locations to write down everyone who went by for 30 days at a time.' 10 On Your Side reached out to Norfolk for a statement. It reads: In ruling not to dismiss this case on the pleadings, the court did not address the merits of the plaintiffs' claims. The court's decision affords the opportunity to establish through discovery that the plaintiffs' challenge to the city's use of Flock cameras is not grounded in the facts or the law. In Virginia, Flock cameras are not regulated. The House of Delegates passed HB2724 in hopes of changing that in its 2025 regular session. Virginia lawmakers looking to put guardrails on use of automatic license plate readers HB2724 limits the use of Flock cameras by law enforcement agencies to the following: Part of a criminal investigation where there is a reasonable suspicion that a crime was committed Part of an active investigation that relates to a missing or endangered person, human trafficking, receiving notifications related to a missing person, a person with an outstanding warrant, a person associated with human trafficking, a stolen vehicle or a stolen license plate. But Soyfer said that is still not enough. 'The ultimate goal is to stop the operation of this unconstitutional dragnet surveillance system,' Soyfer said. Soyfer said they are now in the discovery phase to get all their facts. They have a pretrial conference set for Feb. 20, which will set the case schedule. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
07-02-2025
- Yahoo
Flock camera lawsuit to proceed in Norfolk
NORFOLK, Va. (WAVY) — A judge ruled Wednesday that a lawsuit about Norfolk's use of license plate readers, known as Flock cameras, will go forward. With more than 172 cameras in Norfolk, the city tried to get the lawsuit dismissed. The Flock cameras don't just read and capture your car's license plate. They also take details of your car's make, model and color, including if your car has a roof rack, bumper sticker or any damage. These images are then stored for 30 days. The lawsuit was filed last October by a Norfolk resident. Lee Schmidt and Portsmouth resident Crystal Arrington both are represented by the Institute for Justice. The two say these cameras violate their privacy. | 'Our lawsuit alleges that that violates people's Fourth Amendment right to be secure in their persons against unreasonable searches. You have an expectation of privacy in the whole of your movements,' said Institute for Justice attorney Michael Soyfer. The judge rejected the city's motion to dismiss the lawsuit, citing the United States Supreme Court case Carpenter v. United States, a case that states that using cell phone location to track someone's movement is a search that requires a warrant under the Fourth Amendment. These cameras do not take video or get drivers for speeding or traffic violations. But in 2023, Norfolk Police Chief Mark Talbot stated it has been used to help crime, as This also comes as 24-year-old Andrew Sharrold Williams was sentenced to a year-and-a-half for stealing an SUV that police found using flock cameras in Norfolk. Soyfer said each camera should be thought of as a police officer. 'When you think about it, under current Supreme Court precedent, the court asks, 'What is society's expectation of privacy?' And we can look at history to try to evaluate that,' Soyfer said. 'Historically, no one thought that police would be posted at 172 locations to write down everyone who went by for 30 days at a time.' 10 On Your Side reached out to Norfolk for a statement. It reads: In ruling not to dismiss this case on the pleadings, the court did not address the merits of the plaintiffs' claims. The court's decision affords the opportunity to establish through discovery that the plaintiffs' challenge to the city's use of Flock cameras is not grounded in the facts or the law. In Virginia, Flock cameras are not regulated. The House of Delegates passed HB2724 in hopes of changing that in its 2025 regular session. Virginia lawmakers looking to put guardrails on use of automatic license plate readers HB2724 limits the use of Flock cameras by law enforcement agencies to the following: Part of a criminal investigation where there is a reasonable suspicion that a crime was committed Part of an active investigation that relates to a missing or endangered person, human trafficking, receiving notifications related to a missing person, a person with an outstanding warrant, a person associated with human trafficking, a stolen vehicle or a stolen license plate. But Soyfer said that is still not enough. 'The ultimate goal is to stop the operation of this unconstitutional dragnet surveillance system,' Soyfer said. Soyfer said they are now in the discovery phase to get all their facts. They have a pretrial conference set for Feb. 20, which will set the case schedule. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
