Latest news with #HMPDrakeHall
Epoch Times
21-05-2025
- Politics
- Epoch Times
Lucy Connolly Loses Appeal Over Controversial Social Media Post
The Court of Appeal has upheld the 31-month jail sentence handed to Lucy Connolly, the wife of a former Conservative councillor, for a social media post made on the day of the Southport child murders. Connolly, 48, from Northampton, was sentenced in October 2024 after pleading guilty to inciting racial hatred. She had posted a message on X calling for 'mass deportation' and suggesting asylum hotels be set on fire. Her legal challenge against the sentence was rejected by senior judges, who found 'no arguable basis' for reducing it. The post was made on July 29, 2024, just hours after the fatal stabbing of three girls at a holiday club in Southport by 17-year-old Axel Rudakubana. Connolly wrote, 'Mass deportation now. Set fire to all the [expletive] hotels full of the [expletive] for all I care… if that makes me racist, so be it.' It was viewed over 310,000 times in under four hours before being deleted. Connolly was arrested on Aug. 6. Related Stories 5/8/2025 8/4/2024 She was sentenced at Birmingham Crown Court after pleading guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred. Appeal Dismissed In a He added that the appeal was 'substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected.' Mr. Justice Goss and Mr. Justice Sheldon concurred. During an appeal hearing last week, Connolly gave evidence via video link from HMP Drake Hall. She said she had been 'angry and distressed' by the Southport killings and that the deaths had resurfaced grief over her own son, who died 14 years ago. Her barrister, Adam King, argued that she did not intend to incite violence and deleted the post voluntarily. He said Connolly misunderstood the implications of her guilty plea, believing it did not require her to admit intent. FSU, Family Reaction Connolly's case has drawn the backing of the Free Speech Union (FSU), which In a statement, the FSU said, 'Two-and-a-half years for a single tweet is grossly disproportionate and it should trouble anyone who believes the law must be applied evenly, without fear or favour. 'Lucy should be at home with her family — not locked up in jail while her husband, Ray, battles bone marrow failure and her 12-year-old daughter is struggling to cope without her mother,' the FSU added. The group highlighted sentencing comparisons, including a 28-month term handed to a man involved in a racially motivated attack on a mosque during the unrest following the Southport attacks. FSU General Secretary Lord Toby Young added: 'This is terribly disappointing. How can it be right for Lucy to have been condemned to spend more than two-and-a-half years in jail for a single tweet when members of grooming gangs who plead guilty to the sexual exploitation of children get lower sentences?' Conservative councillor Raymond Connolly outside the Royal Courts of Justice in London in an undated file photo. Yui Mok/PA Raymond Connolly, Lucy's husband and a former West Northamptonshire councillor, said he was 'heartbroken' by the appeal outcome. 'My wife has paid a very high price for making a mistake and today the court has shown her no mercy,' he said. In his statement, he said his wife was the victim of 'two-tier justice.' 'Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood says she will release 40,000 prisoners, some of them dangerous men on tag. Lucy has not been allowed out on tag and she has been denied leave to see our child who is struggling. Today, the Court had the opportunity to reduce her cruelly long and disproportionate sentence, but they refused. That feels like two-tier justice,' he added. Southport Tragedy and National Unrest Rudakubana, a British-born teenager of Rwandan descent, was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 52 years for the murder of Bebe King, Elsie Dot Stancombe, and Alice da Silva Aguiar. Ten others were injured in the July attack. The killings sparked unrest across multiple cities including Southport, Leeds, Liverpool, Manchester, and London. A Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer labelled the riots 'far-right thuggery,' while HMICFRS warned against oversimplifying the motivations behind the disorder. PA Media contributed to this report.
North Wales Chronicle
20-05-2025
- North Wales Chronicle
Tory councillor ‘heartbroken' wife lost bid to appeal hate tweet sentence
Raymond Connolly said the court had shown Lucy Connolly 'no mercy', and she had paid a 'very high price' for her post on X, formerly Twitter, which followed the Southport attacks. Mrs Connolly was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year for the July 29 post that said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.' On Tuesday Lord Justice Holroyde, Mr Justice Goss and Mr Justice Sheldon refused her application to appeal. In a statement issued by a spokesperson, Mr Connolly said the decision to dismiss his wife Lucy's appeal was 'shocking and unfair'. He continued: 'The 284 days of separation have been very hard, particularly on our 12-year-old girl. 'Lucy posted one nasty tweet when she was upset and angry about three little girls who were brutally murdered in Southport. 'She realised the tweet was wrong and deleted it within four hours.' He added: 'My wife Lucy is a good person and not a racist. 'As a childminder she took care of small children of African and Asian heritage; they loved Lucy as she loved them. 'My wife has paid a very high price for making a mistake and today the court has shown her no mercy. 'Lucy got more time in jail for one tweet than some paedophiles and domestic abusers get. 'I think the system wanted to make an example of Lucy so other people would be scared to say things about immigration. This is not the British way.' Connolly's post on X came shortly after three girls were stabbed and killed at a holiday club in Southport on the same date, sparking nationwide unrest. It was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before Connolly deleted it. In a written judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde, said: 'There is no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed by the judge was manifestly excessive. 'The application for leave to appeal against sentence therefore fails and is refused.' He added that the principle ground of appeal 'was substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected'. Giving evidence from HMP Drake Hall in Eccleshall in Staffordshire last week, Connolly said that when she initially wrote the post she was 'really angry, really upset' and 'distressed that those children had died' but did not intend to incite violence. The court in London heard that Connolly's son died tragically around 14-years-ago, and that news of the murders of the children in Southport had caused a resurgence of her anxiety around this. In his written judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde continued: 'Here, we of course have every sympathy with the applicant over the death of her son, and we can understand why she remains angry about the circumstances of his death. 'We can therefore accept that the shocking events in Southport had an impact on her which went beyond that felt by many others. 'But as the judge rightly said, she did not post a message of support and sympathy to the victims of the Southport attack and the bereaved.' He added that she also did not direct her comments towards the Southport attacker, Axel Rudakubana, and instead chose 'to incite serious violence against large numbers of persons'. 'The applicant's personal history cannot significantly reduce her culpability for that serious offence,' Lord Justice Holroyde said. Connolly told the court that during discussions with her barrister at the crown court she did not understand that by pleading guilty she was accepting that she intended to incite violence. Lord Justice Holroyde said that in her evidence at the Court of Appeal, the judges found Connolly to be 'intelligent and articulate', and they were 'unable' to accept that she 'entered her guilty plea with no understanding of what it entailed'. Connolly, of Northampton, was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages which included further racist remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. Mr Connolly had been a Tory West Northamptonshire district councillor, but lost his seat in May. He remains on the town council. A statement on X, by the Free Speech Union (FSU), which funded Connolly's appeal bid, said: 'This is a deeply disappointing judgment. 'No one disputes the tweet was offensive but the sentence of more than two-and-a-half years was plainly disproportionate.' It continued: 'Two-and-a-half years for a single tweet is grossly disproportionate and it should trouble anyone who believes the law must be applied evenly, without fear or favour.'
Daily Mail
20-05-2025
- Politics
- Daily Mail
Mother Lucy Connolly jailed over 'racist' Southport tweet loses her appeal and faces another two YEARS left on her prison sentence
Former childminder Lucy Connolly has lost her appeal over her 31-month sentence for posting an online rant about migrants on the day of the Southport murders. Connolly told the Court of Appeal in London she 'never' intended to incite violence and did not realise pleading guilty would mean she accepted that she had. But the Appeal Court rejected her argument. Her husband has condemned the decision to dismiss her appeal today as 'shocking and unfair' – saying his wife is 'not a right-wing thug'. Ray Connolly said: 'My wife Lucy is a good person and not a racist', adding: 'Lucy got more time in jail for one tweet than some paedophiles and domestic abusers get.' Connolly, who is locked up at HMP Drake Hall, Staffordshire, had claimed to the Appeal Court last week that she had no idea what she was admitting to when she pleaded guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred. But today three judges rejected her argument, meaning she faces serving another eight months behind bars. Conservative councillor Mr Connolly said he was 'heartbroken' his wife's appeal bid was dismissed, adding: 'My wife has paid a very high price for making a mistake and today the court has shown her no mercy.' She was given the 31-month sentence in October after admitting making the post on X, formerly known as Twitter. The post, which she later deleted, said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it.' Connolly was jailed over a social media post where she said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care...' The sickening comments were made just hours after killer Axel Rudakubana murdered three young girls and attempted to murder ten others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29, sparking nationwide unrest. Last week Connolly told the Court of Appeal in London she 'never' intended to incite violence and did not realise pleading guilty would mean she accepted that she had. But today Lord Justice Holroyde, Mr Justice Goss and Mr Justice Sheldon refused her application to appeal. Afterwards her devastated husband said the decision was 'shocking and unfair', and told of the toll on her family of her months behind bars. Mr Connolly said: 'The 284 days of separation have been very hard, particularly on our 12-year-old girl. Lucy posted one nasty tweet when she was upset and angry about three little girls who were brutally murdered in Southport. 'She realised the tweet was wrong and deleted it within four hours. That did not mean Lucy was a "far right thug" as Prime Minister Keir Starmer claimed. 'My wife Lucy is a good person and not a racist. As a childminder she took care of small children of African and Asian heritage; they loved Lucy as she loved them. My wife has paid a very high price for making a mistake and today the court has shown her no mercy. 'Lucy got more time in jail for one tweet than some paedophiles and domestic abusers get. I think the system wanted to make an example of Lucy so other people would be scared to say things about immigration. This is not the British way.' A statement on X by the Free Speech Union (FSU), which had funded Connolly's appeal bid, said: 'This is a deeply disappointing judgment. 'No one disputes the tweet was offensive but the sentence of more than two-and-a-half years was plainly disproportionate.' It continued: 'Two-and-a-half years for a single tweet is grossly disproportionate and it should trouble anyone who believes the law must be applied evenly, without fear or favour.' Toby Young, the general secretary of the FSU, added: 'This is terribly disappointing. How can it be right for Lucy to have been condemned to spend more than two-and-a-half years in jail for a single tweet when members of grooming gangs who plead guilty to the sexual exploitation of children get lower sentences? 'Lucy should be at home with her 12 year-old daughter and husband, not rotting in jail.' In a written judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde, said: 'There is no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed by the judge was manifestly excessive. 'The application for leave to appeal against sentence therefore fails and is refused.' He added that the principal ground of appeal 'was substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected'. Connolly had argued she had been 'really angry' after the Southport attacks, but hours after posting the rant on X realised it was not an acceptable thing to say, so deleted it. No arguable basis for saying the sentence was manifestly excessive In his statement, Mr Connolly claimed his wife Lucy was the victim of 'two-tier justice'. He said: 'Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood says she will release 40,000 prisoners, some of them dangerous men on tag. Lucy has not been allowed out on tag and she has been denied leave to see our child who is struggling. Today, the court had the opportunity to reduce her cruelly long and disproportionate sentence, but they refused. That feels like two-tier justice. 'The British people know all this is not right. They have given an amazing £81,000 so far to Lucy's crowd-funder. Despite today's upsetting setback, Lucy gets courage from everyone's kind support. 'Lucy and me are so grateful to our fantastic legal team, led by Adam King.' He added: 'We will continue to pursue every possible avenue to seek justice and to bring Lucy home to us.' At her appeal case, Mr King, representing Connolly, asked if she had intended for anyone to set fire to asylum hotels or 'murder any politicians'. She replied: 'Absolutely not.' Naeem Valli, for the prosecution, told the court the post was a reflection of her attitude towards immigrants. He added: 'At the time of creating the post, the applicant clearly intended the racial hatred would be stirred up and also intended to incite serious violence.' Earlier, he had asked Connolly if she believed the country was being 'invaded' by immigrants. She replied: 'I believe that we have a massive number of people in the country that are unchecked, coming into the country and I believe that is a national security risk.' She added that it would be 'absolutely incorrect' to say she did not want immigrants in the country. Connolly, of Northampton, was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages which included further racist remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. The former childminder was sentenced at Birmingham Crown Court in October after pleading guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred. Mr Connolly had been a Tory West Northamptonshire district councillor but lost his seat in May. He remains on the town council. The Southport atrocity sparked nationwide unrest, with several people - including Connolly - jailed as a result. Her tweet was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. She later pleaded guilty to distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred at Birmingham Crown Court and was sentenced to 31 months in prison in October. But she told the Court of Appeal that she had no idea the full extent of what she was admitting, and that her solicitor Liam Muir had not properly explained what 'inciting violence' meant in the context of her tweet. Indeed it was only when the judge was speaking at her sentencing hearing that it fully dawned on her, she said today when applying to have her prison term reduced. Lord Justice Holroyde and his fellow judges said in their ruling it was important not to lose sight of the fact Connolly 'had willingly pleaded guilty'. She had claimed her lawyer had not explained it properly, but the Appeal Court found he was 'a conscientious defence lawyer with a clear grasp of the relevant law, practice and procedure and a realistic appraisal of the issues in the case'. And the three judges were scathing about Connolly's claims. They said she was 'intelligent and articulate, with strong views ' but they found her evidence to be 'incredible'. They said any reference to a prison sentence, by her lawyer, 'must have caused her great anxiety', and therefore 'in those circumstances, we are quite unable to accept that she signed [the endorsement form] without any understanding'. They said the evidence showed she 'was well aware of what she was admitting'. The judges expressed sympathy for Connolly's personal circumstances – including over the death of her son - adding: 'We can therefore accept that the shocking events in Southport had an impact on her which went beyond that felt by many others. 'But as the [trial] judge rightly said, she did not post a message of support and sympathy to the victims of the Southport attack and the bereaved. 'Nor, we would add, did she post a message of hostility confined to the perpetrator of the Southport attack. She chose instead to incite serious violence against large numbers of persons. The applicant's personal history cannot significantly reduce her culpability for that serious offence. 'The sentence of 31 months' imprisonment imposed by the judge therefore remains as before.' Connolly appeared via videolink from HMP Drake Hall in Stafford for last week's hearing. Giving evidence, Connolly said she initially sent the offensive tweet after getting 'really angry and really upset' upon learning about the Southport massacre, and that children were among the victims. 'Distraught' Connolly said the death of her 19-month-old son in 2011 after a medical blunder had heightened her sensitivity to what happened last July. She told the Court of Appeal hearing: 'Those parents still have to live a life of grief. It sends me into a state of anxiety and I worry about my children. 'I already know how they feel (about child loss) and I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.' She told her lawyer Adam King she then sent her tweet. But she said it was 'absolutely not' her intention for it to incite anyone to 'set fire to asylum hotels' or to 'murder any politicians'. She subsequently walked the dog and decided to delete the tweet. She told the court: 'By that point I had calmed myself down and I knew it was not an acceptable thing to say, I had time to gather myself and take it down.' She subsequently issued an apology, saying she was 'acting on information that I now know to be false and malicious'. Connolly was arrested a week after she posted the rant. Mr Connolly had been a Tory West Northamptonshire district councillor, but lost his seat in May. He remains on the town council.
Daily Mail
20-05-2025
- Politics
- Daily Mail
'Lucy is not a far-right thug': 'Heartbroken' husband's fury after wife loses appeal against 31-month sentence for 'racist' Southport tweet
A Tory councillor has said he is 'heartbroken' after his wife's appeal bid against her 31-month sentence over a 'racist' tweet she sent in the wake of the Southport killings was dismissed by judges. Raymond Connolly's partner Lucy told the Court of Appeal she 'never' intended to incite violence and did not realise pleading guilty would mean she accepted that she had. But they rejected her argument. Today, he condemned her appeal being dismissed as 'shocking and unfair' – insisting his wife is 'not a right-wing thug'. Mr Connolly said: 'My wife Lucy is a good person and not a racist', adding: 'Lucy got more time in jail for one tweet than some paedophiles and domestic abusers get. 'My wife has paid a very high price for making a mistake and today the court has shown her no mercy'. Connolly, who is locked up at HMP Drake Hall, Staffordshire, had claimed to the Appeal Court last week that she had no idea what she was admitting to when she pleading guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred. But today three judges rejected her argument, meaning she faces serving another eight months behind bars. The former childminder was given a 31-month sentence last October after admitting making the post on X, formerly known as Twitter. The post, which she later deleted, said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care... if that makes me racist so be it.' The sickening comments were made just hours after killer Axel Rudakubana murdered three young girls and attempted to murder 10 others at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class on July 29, sparking nationwide unrest. Following her legal loss today, her husband Mr Connolly said: 'The 284 days of separation have been very hard, particularly on our 12-year-old girl. Lucy posted one nasty tweet when she was upset and angry about three little girls who were brutally murdered in Southport. 'She realised the tweet was wrong and deleted it within four hours. That did not mean Lucy was a ''far right thug'' as Prime Minister Keir Starmer claimed. 'My wife Lucy is a good person and not a racist. As a childminder she took care of small children of African and Asian heritage; they loved Lucy as she loved them. My wife has paid a very high price for making a mistake and today the court has shown her no mercy. 'Lucy got more time in jail for one tweet than some paedophiles and domestic abusers get. I think the system wanted to make an example of Lucy so other people would be scared to say things about immigration. This is not the British way.' A statement on X by the Free Speech Union (FSU), which had funded Connolly's appeal bid, said: 'This is a deeply disappointing judgment. 'No one disputes the tweet was offensive but the sentence of more than two-and-a-half years was plainly disproportionate.' It continued: 'Two-and-a-half years for a single tweet is grossly disproportionate and it should trouble anyone who believes the law must be applied evenly, without fear or favour.' Toby Young, the general secretary of the Free Speech Union, added: 'This is terribly disappointing. How can it be right for Lucy to have been condemned to spend more than two-and-a-half years in jail for a single tweet when members of grooming gangs who plead guilty to the sexual exploitation of children get lower sentences? 'Lucy should be at home with her 12 year-old daughter and husband, not rotting in jail.' In a written judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde, said: 'There is no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed by the judge was manifestly excessive. 'The application for leave to appeal against sentence therefore fails and is refused.' He added that the principal ground of appeal 'was substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected'. Connolly had argued she had been 'really angry' after the Southport attacks, but hours after posting the rant on X realised it was not an acceptable thing to say, so deleted it. No arguable basis for saying the sentence was manifestly excessive In his statement, Mr Connolly claimed his wife Lucy was the victim of 'two-tier justice'. He said: 'Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood says she will release 40,000 prisoners, some of them dangerous men on tag. Lucy has not been allowed out on tag and she has been denied leave to see our child who is struggling. Today, the Court had the opportunity to reduce her cruelly long and disproportionate sentence, but they refused. That feels like two-tier justice. 'The British people know all this is not right. They have given an amazing £81,000 so far to Lucy's crowd-funder. Despite today's upsetting setback, Lucy gets courage from everyone's kind support.' 'Lucy and me are so grateful to our fantastic legal team, led by Adam King. He added: 'We will continue to pursue every possible avenue to seek justice and to bring Lucy home to us.' At her appeal case, Adam King, representing Connolly, asked if she had intended for anyone to set fire to asylum hotels or 'murder any politicians'. She replied: 'Absolutely not.' Naeem Valli, for the prosecution, told the court the post was a reflection of her attitude towards immigrants. He added: 'At the time of creating the post, the applicant clearly intended the racial hatred would be stirred up and also intended to incite serious violence.' Earlier, he had asked Connolly if she believed the country was being 'invaded' by immigrants. She replied: 'I believe that we have a massive number of people in the country that are unchecked, coming into the country and I believe that is a national security risk.' She added that it would be 'absolutely incorrect' to say she did not want immigrants in the country. Connolly, of Northampton, was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages which included further racist remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. The former childminder, who is married to Raymond Connolly, was sentenced at Birmingham Crown Court last October after pleading guilty to a charge of inciting racial hatred. Axel Rudakubana, 18, whose horror attack on schoolgirls at a Taylor Swift dance class sickened the nation and led to widespread rioting Mr Connolly had been a Tory West Northamptonshire district councillor but lost his seat in May. He remains on the town council. Lord Justice Holroyde, Mr Justice Goss and Mr Justice Sheldon are expected to give their judgment on the appeal today. The Southport atrocity sparked nationwide unrest, with several people - including Connolly - jailed as a result. Her tweet was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before she deleted it. She later pleaded guilty to distributing material with the intention of stirring up racial hatred at Birmingham Crown Court and was sentenced to 31 months in prison in October last year. But she told the Court of Appeal in London that she had no idea the full extent of what she was admitting, and that her solicitor Liam Muir had not properly explained what 'inciting violence' meant in the context of her tweet. Indeed it was only when the judge was speaking at her sentencing hearing that it fully dawned on her, she said today when applying to have her prison term reduced. Lord Justice Holroyde and his fellow judges said in their ruling it was important not to lose sight of the fact Connolly 'had willingly pleaded guilty'. She had claimed her lawyer had not explained it properly, but the Appeal Court found he was 'a conscientious defence lawyer with a clear grasp of the relevant law, practice and procedure and a realistic appraisal of the issues in the case'. And the three judges were scathing about Connolly's claims. They said she was 'intelligent and articulate, with strong views ' but they found her evidence to be 'incredible'. They said any reference to a prison sentence, by her lawyer, 'must have caused her great anxiety', and therefore 'in those circumstances, we are quite unable to accept that she signed [the endorsement form] without any understanding'. They said the evidence showed she 'was well aware of what she was admitting'. The judges expressed sympathy for Connolly's personal circumstances – including over the death of her son - adding: 'We can therefore accept that the shocking events in Southport had an impact on her which went beyond that felt by many others. 'But as the [trial] judge rightly said, she did not post a message of support and sympathy to the victims of the Southport attack and the bereaved. 'Nor, we would add, did she post a message of hostility confined to the perpetrator of the Southport attack. She chose instead to incite serious violence against large numbers of persons. The applicant's personal history cannot significantly reduce her culpability for that serious offence. 'The sentence of 31 months' imprisonment imposed by the judge therefore remains as before.' Connolly appeared via videolink from HMP Drake Hall in Stafford for last week's hearing. Giving evidence, Connolly said she initially sent the offensive tweet after getting 'really angry and really upset' upon learning about the Southport massacre, and that children were among the victims. 'Distraught' Connolly said the death of her 19-month-old son in 2011 after a medical blunder had heightened her sensitivity to what happened last July. She told the Court of Appeal hearing: 'Those parents still have to live a life of grief. It sends me into a state of anxiety and I worry about my children. 'I already know how they feel (about child loss) and I wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy.' She told her lawyer Adam King she then sent her tweet. But she said it was 'absolutely not' her intention for it to incite anyone to 'set fire to asylum hotels' or to 'murder any politicians'. She subsequently walked the dog and decided to delete the tweet. She told the court: 'By that point I had calmed myself down and I knew it was not an acceptable thing to say, I had time to gather myself and take it down.' She subsequently issued an apology, saying she was 'acting on information that I now know to be false and malicious'. Connolly was arrested a week after she posted the rant. Mr Connolly had been a Tory West Northamptonshire district councillor, but lost his seat in May.
Powys County Times
20-05-2025
- Politics
- Powys County Times
Tory councillor ‘heartbroken' wife lost bid to appeal hate tweet sentence
A Conservative councillor said he is 'heartbroken' that his wife's appeal bid against her 31-month sentence for inciting racial hatred has been dismissed at the Court of Appeal. Raymond Connolly said the court had shown Lucy Connolly 'no mercy', and she had paid a 'very high price' for her post on X, formerly Twitter, which followed the Southport attacks. Mrs Connolly was jailed at Birmingham Crown Court in October last year for the July 29 post that said: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the b******* for all I care… if that makes me racist so be it.' On Tuesday Lord Justice Holroyde, Mr Justice Goss and Mr Justice Sheldon refused her application to appeal. In a statement issued by a spokesperson, Mr Connolly said the decision to dismiss his wife Lucy's appeal was 'shocking and unfair'. He continued: 'The 284 days of separation have been very hard, particularly on our 12-year-old girl. 'Lucy posted one nasty tweet when she was upset and angry about three little girls who were brutally murdered in Southport. 'She realised the tweet was wrong and deleted it within four hours.' He added: 'My wife Lucy is a good person and not a racist. 'As a childminder she took care of small children of African and Asian heritage; they loved Lucy as she loved them. 'My wife has paid a very high price for making a mistake and today the court has shown her no mercy. 'Lucy got more time in jail for one tweet than some paedophiles and domestic abusers get. 'I think the system wanted to make an example of Lucy so other people would be scared to say things about immigration. This is not the British way.' Connolly's post on X came shortly after three girls were stabbed and killed at a holiday club in Southport on the same date, sparking nationwide unrest. It was viewed 310,000 times in three-and-a-half hours before Connolly deleted it. In a written judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde, said: 'There is no arguable basis on which it could be said that the sentence imposed by the judge was manifestly excessive. 'The application for leave to appeal against sentence therefore fails and is refused.' He added that the principle ground of appeal 'was substantially based on a version of events put forward by the applicant which we have rejected'. Giving evidence from HMP Drake Hall in Eccleshall in Staffordshire last week, Connolly said that when she initially wrote the post she was 'really angry, really upset' and 'distressed that those children had died' but did not intend to incite violence. The court in London heard that Connolly's son died tragically around 14-years-ago, and that news of the murders of the children in Southport had caused a resurgence of her anxiety around this. In his written judgment, Lord Justice Holroyde continued: 'Here, we of course have every sympathy with the applicant over the death of her son, and we can understand why she remains angry about the circumstances of his death. 'We can therefore accept that the shocking events in Southport had an impact on her which went beyond that felt by many others. 'But as the judge rightly said, she did not post a message of support and sympathy to the victims of the Southport attack and the bereaved.' He added that she also did not direct her comments towards the Southport attacker, Axel Rudakubana, and instead chose 'to incite serious violence against large numbers of persons'. 'The applicant's personal history cannot significantly reduce her culpability for that serious offence,' Lord Justice Holroyde said. Connolly told the court that during discussions with her barrister at the crown court she did not understand that by pleading guilty she was accepting that she intended to incite violence. Lord Justice Holroyde said that in her evidence at the Court of Appeal, the judges found Connolly to be 'intelligent and articulate', and they were 'unable' to accept that she 'entered her guilty plea with no understanding of what it entailed'. Connolly, of Northampton, was arrested on August 6, by which point she had deleted her social media account, but other messages which included further racist remarks were uncovered by officers who seized her phone. Mr Connolly had been a Tory West Northamptonshire district councillor, but lost his seat in May. He remains on the town council. A statement on X, by the Free Speech Union (FSU), which funded Connolly's appeal bid, said: 'This is a deeply disappointing judgment. 'No one disputes the tweet was offensive but the sentence of more than two-and-a-half years was plainly disproportionate.'
