5 days ago
Greens hail NGT order setting guidelines for tree felling
Bhopal: Environmental activists have welcomed the
National Green Tribunal
(NGT), Central Bench, order laying down stringent guidelines for allowing large-scale felling of trees for construction or infrastructure projects.
However, they said that execution would be key to making them effective.
They further pointed out that the green watchdog should have given a timeline for the implementation of the order so that compliance within a definite time frame could be ensured.
The Bhopal-based Central Bench of NGT, while hearing a petition against the proposed felling of 700 trees for the construction of roads and a stadium at Barkheda Nathu in the Neelbad area, in a significant judgement, asked the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest (PCCF) to constitute a Centrally Empowered Committee (CEC) to decide on permission for tree felling in any project involving the cutting of 25 or more trees.
The tribunal further asked for geo-tagging of all trees in the state, a tree census across MP, and 10 to 100 times afforestation in ratio to felled trees in the same area where the trees are cut.
Advocate Harpreet Singh Gupta, who appeared in the case for the petitioner Nitin Saxena, described the NGT judgement as a 'landmark' judgement. However, he said that there are three major lacunas in the order: there is no timeframe for any of the measures mandated by the tribunal.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Gelsenkirchen: Gutes Hören sucht 700 Testhörer für Hörgeräte ohne Zuzahlung
Gutes Hören
Undo
"It's an open-ended order in a way with no time frame for the constitution of the CEC. There is no reference as to who will provide funds for the committee and logistic support like office space, staff, etc.
Besides, the NGT in several generic orders has said 'Vrikshon Ka Parirakshan Adhiniyam' but there is no clarity on how the green watchdog wants it to be done. If you look at sections 4, 5, and 6 of the Act, you will see that the tree officer is an important figure, who should be the municipal commissioner himself.
He can't delegate this responsibility to anyone. The state govt can, but the municipal commissioner himself delegates the responsibility to an assistant commissioner or someone else, and the law becomes ineffective." Gupta said that he would be moving a separate application pointing out the lacunas in the order and praying the judges to give clarity on the issues raised.
Environmental activist Subhash C Pandey also said that the decision could have a huge impact if its implementation is ensured.
He also raised the issue of the timeline and said the tribunal should have given a clear time frame for the execution of everything that it has ordered. "If there is a CEC, we hope permission to get trees felled would be difficult. I don't think members of a high-level committee will be as irresponsible as the municipal corporation.
The NGT should also have laid down a time limit for the CEC to give or refuse the permission.
It could be 15 days or 30 days. Then, it should also have been laid down by when the tree census or geo-tagging of trees will be done. It's possible that the govt and its agencies take years to do it if a time frame is not decided by the NGT."
Environmental activist Rashid Noor Khan, however, appeared to be disappointed with the NGT's inability to remedy the issues of grave environmental concern. "I have been fighting for years to see that blatant disregard of environmental laws in Kaliyasot and Kerwa areas stops, the forests in the twin localities are saved, but nothing happens. Unless and until NGT gets strict with the govt agencies and departments concerned, any judgement, howsoever pathbreaking, could not have the desired impact," he said.
