Latest news with #HertfordFamily
Telegraph
19-05-2025
- Business
- Telegraph
Earl loses legal battle with family over £85m ancestral estate
The Earl of Yarmouth, William Seymour, has lost a legal battle over his parents' £85 million ancestral estate. Lord Yarmouth brought the case after asking his father to hand over control of 400-year-old Ragley Hall, near Alcester in Warwickshire, when he turned 30 in 2023. But the Seymour family, who are indirect descendants of Jane Seymour, Henry VIII's third wife, suffered a public falling-out after the Marquess and Marchioness of Hertford refused to do so. Lord Hertford, 66, previously told the High Court the couple's relationship with their eldest son 'deteriorated very sharply' after he made the request in the run-up to his wedding to Kelsey Wells, a former Goldman Sachs banker, in 2018. In a judgment released on Monday, Master James Brightwell, a High Court judge, dismissed Lord Yarmouth's claim and said the estate's trustees had acted within their duties. He added: 'There is no reason to suppose that they will act improperly towards the claimant or his family, either on a personal level or in the administration of the trusts.' The court previously heard that Lord Yarmouth's Brazilian-born mother, Lady Hertford, sent an email to her son in 2018 which said there were 'no funds available for supporting two generations at the same time' and that there were 'no obligations as to when or what is handed over'. She added: 'Nowadays, retirement happens later and people live longer. Our concern is you don't seem to be taking it all in – as if you were somehow expecting Ragley to fit within your needs.' The court heard the Earl sent what his parents described as 'hostile and inflammatory' emails to Lady Hertford, now 65, which were said to have been 'questioning' of his father's 'mental capacity', which the older couple said caused them 'enormous upset and anger'. Lord Yarmouth, now 31, claimed the 'trauma' of being told that he would not be able to take over the 400-year-old estate at the age of 30 'upended' his life. He told the court that he needed 'professional help and counselling to deal with trauma as a consequence'. Lord Yarmouth, who runs St Maur, a craft elderflower liquor distillery, with his wife, sought legal action to remove the trustees overseeing the family estate, whom he claimed had sided with his parents. He also wanted to replace them with 'independent professional trustees'. However, lawyers for Lord and Lady Hertford and Lord Yarmouth's three siblings – Lady Gabriella Seymour, Lord Edward Seymour and Lady Antonia Seymour – said they wanted the trusts left undisturbed and argued that Lord Yarmouth had behaved in an 'unreasonable and vindictive' manner. The companies running the family trusts – the Ragley Trust Company Ltd and Seymour Trust Company Ltd – denied being biased. Earl accused mother of 'gaslighting' him Among other claims, Lord Yarmouth and his wife said the trusts refused to release money for their two children's private school fees, though the trustees' lawyers insisted they needed more information from the couple in order to do so. They also said they were kicked out of their cottage home on the Ragley Estate with just a few days' notice and that clashes had taken place with trustees over the fees dispute. At a hearing earlier this year, Paul Burton, Lord Yarmouth's barrister, said the trustees had contributed to the family strife and misdirected the estate. He told the court: 'I can't say that the trustees did this or that and so caused the family breakdown – I can say that the trustees are a problem and have exacerbated it and fuelled it.' He later added: 'That the relationship of trust and confidence between the claimant and the trustees has irretrievably broken down is beyond argument. 'There is no prospect of these outstanding matters being resolved while the trustees are in office.' The court also previously heard how Lord Yarmouth had accused his mother of 'gaslighting him'. In his first witness statement submitted to the court, he wrote of how his parents responded after he told them he would be marrying Lady Yarmouth. He said: 'My experience from the way they behaved was that they were far from delighted... 'Even at the church on my wedding day, as I awaited the arrival of my bride, my father, Lord Hertford made a point of urging me to call off my marriage, and told me: 'You can still call it off and we'll send everyone home, just say no'. (An extraordinary thing for a father to say to his son on his wedding day.)' Lord 'disappointed at son's lack of achievement' However, while Lord Hertford acknowledged that 'William not inheriting Ragley Hall' at the age of 30 coincided with his marriage, he said his son's wife was 'not the main reason' and that his son's behaviour 'started to change before his marriage'. He added: 'It was like he had promised Kelsey that they would be moving into Ragley Hall, he was persistent.' The court heard how Lord Yarmouth had already received capital distributions from the trusts of around £4.2 million by the time he turned 21. His father also expressed disappointment in his son's lack of qualifications. Lord Yarmouth attended Cirencester Agricultural College, although he 'dropped out after a year,' said a barrister for the family and the two trusts. Lord Hertford said in his evidence: 'I am disappointed at William's lack of achievement. I am proud of the fact that he went to college but made a mistake at university and didn't graduate. 'William has not followed a profession or obtained qualifications or experience to take over the running of Ragley Hall.' 'Considerable emotional and financial toll' In his judgment, Master Brightwell said: 'Even though the claimant maintains that this is not a family dispute or a claim about a breakdown in family relations, the claim is on any view brought against a backdrop of such a breakdown, details of which feature heavily in the evidence before the court.' The judge added: 'I do not consider that the nature of the relationship between the claimant and his parents and siblings, which I accept is poor, can itself justify the removal of the trustees.' Following the ruling, Lord and Lady Hertford, Lady Gabriella, Lord Edward and Lady Antonia said in a joint statement: 'This has always been a family matter. Nevertheless, by bringing the trustees to court, we felt obliged to respond and to stand for what we believe is best for future generations and the Ragley Estate. 'All five of us are pleased to see that Master Brightwell has recognised the good work of the trustees in his judgment. We are also relieved and grateful that these unfortunate proceedings have been brought to a close.' They added: 'Sadly, this has taken a considerable emotional and financial toll. These proceedings have not only been stressful but have also placed a significant demand on our resources. It is regrettable that William's unsubstantiated claims ever escalated to this extent.' Earl 'open to reconciliation' The Earl of Yarmouth said in a statement: 'I thank Master Brightwell and the court for providing this judgment. We will study the judge's findings and take those into consideration as we determine our way forward. 'Naturally, I am disappointed with elements of this judgment. The claim I brought was narrow and specific. It concerned the trustees of three of the trusts associated with the Ragley Estate. 'My purpose has been to seek to ensure the protection of my family's interests in the trusts and, in particular, the welfare of my children as Beneficiaries.' He added: 'As much as it is painful for both sides, my wife Kelsey and I remain open to reconciliation with my parents. 'Privately, we have made this clear to Lord and Lady Hertford.'
Daily Mail
19-05-2025
- Business
- Daily Mail
Earl of Yarmouth, 31, loses court fight which pitted him against his own family over £85million estate but says he is 'open to reconciliation' with his parents despite his 'trauma' from feud
The Earl of Yarmouth has lost a bitter court fight which pitted him against his aristocratic family over the running of their £85million estate. William Seymour, 31, has been involved in a messy spat with his parents, the Marquess and Marchioness of Hertford, since 2018, when they objected to his wedding to Kelsey Wells – now Lady Yarmouth – a former director at Goldman Sachs. The family displayed such 'deep antagonism' towards Lady Yarmouth, 39, that on their wedding day Lord Hertford told his son that 'you can still call it off and we'll send everyone home, just say no,' Lord Yarmouth claimed in evidence to the High Court. The court heard that Lord Yarmouth expected to inherit the family's Ragley estate in Warwickshire, including the 110-room Palladian stately mansion his parents call home, when he turned 30. By the age of just 21 he had already received more than £4.2million in land and property. However Lord Hertford, 66, decided to disinherit his son as their animosity deepened, saying this decision 'coincided with his marriage, but Kelsey is not the main reason.' 'William's behaviour started to change before his marriage,' he said in a witness statement. 'William asked me to confirm that I would hand over Ragley Hall to him on turning 30. It was like he had promised Kelsey that they would be moving into Ragley Hall, he was persistent. 'I am disappointed at William's lack of achievement. I am proud of the fact that he went to college but made a mistake at university and didn't graduate. William has not followed a profession or obtained qualifications or experience to take over the running of Ragley Hall.' He added: 'The tipping point in my deliberations of passing the running of Ragley Hall to William at age 30 was a letter received from him to my wife, Lady Hertford dated 25 July 2018 questioning my mental ability to continue running Ragley Hall. 'I do not consider William to be an appropriate person to take over the running of Ragley Hall. He has not done anything to make me change my mind.' Lord Yarmouth then launched legal action in an attempt to remove the trustees in charge of the running of the estate – including a cousin of his father and a long-standing family friend – who he felt were on the side of his parents and had 'closed ranks' against him. To assist his case, he even surreptitiously recorded meetings with his father, trustees and other relatives and claimed he was planning a 'hostile takeover.' But in a judgement handed down today, Master James Brightwell dismissed his claim, ruling that the trustees had 'acted professionally throughout and are capable of continuing to do so.' Master Brightwell added that, in recording meetings, Lord Yarmouth was 'looking for ammunition for a dispute' and questioning his father's mental ability was a 'casus belli' – an act or situation provoking or justifying war. Despite losing the court case and having his family woes aired in public, in a statement released following the court's verdict today, Lord Yarmouth said he was 'disappointed' but also 'open to reconciliation' with his parents. 'My purpose has been to seek to ensure the protection of my family's interests in the trusts, and in particular the welfare of my children as beneficiaries,' he said. 'I came to the court with the sincere hope of finding a fair and lasting resolution to a fraught situation. 'As much as it is painful for both sides, my wife Kelsey and I remain open to reconciliation with my parents. Privately we have made this clear to Lord and Lady Hertford.' He had previously told the court how the family feud had left him needing 'professional help and counselling to deal with trauma as a consequence'. The family can trace its roots back to Henry VIII's third wife, Jayne Seymour. Ragley Hall, in Alcester, was built in the 1680s and sits within 450 acres of landscaped gardens, 4,500 acres of farmland and 1,000 acres of woodland. It has been occupied permanently by the Marquess and Marchioness of Hertford when Lord Hertford's father moved there in the 1960s. The court heard it was previously the intention of Lord Hertford to allow Lord Yarmouth, his eldest son, to inherit the estate when he turned 30. However, from the time of his marriage to Lady Yarmouth, relations deteriorated to the extent that Lord Yarmouth is also now estranged from his three siblings, who also opposed his court battle to remove the trustees. Lord and Lady Hertford have also never met their young grandsons, Clement, five, and three-year-old Jocelyn. As part of his claim, Lord Yarmouth claimed that when he sought a more central role to the running of the estate in 2018, one employee suggested that he should start by 'cleaning the lavatories.' The court heard that Earl Yarmouth had also fallen out with his younger brother, Lord Edward Seymour. He said: 'Our relationship started to go downhill however when William went to Cirencester Royal Agricultural University as William met some individuals who brought out the worst in him – William became pompous and showed signs of entitlement. Flaws that have been further exacerbated since his marriage to Kelsey.' The family feud goes further. After being invited to Lord Yarmouth's wedding, his aunt, Lady Carolyn, the Marquess' sister, replied calling him: 'Little Lord Fauntleroy '. The letter was signed off: 'You pompous a**/t**/p***k – take your pick… Your ever-so loving aunt'. Lord Yarmouth now runs a business selling an award-winning elderflower liqeur called St Maur. Responding to claims that he was an entitled 'toff', in an interview with The Telegraph in March, Lord Yarmouth said: 'If I am such a useless grifter then how have we made what is considered to be the world's best floral liqueur?'
