Latest news with #Hiss'
Yahoo
20-05-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Megan Thee Stallion Blasts 'Demon' Tory Lanez Over New Shooting Claims
Megan Thee Stallion has clearly had enough of the ever-changing narratives surrounding the 2020 shooting that involved Tory Lanez, Kelsey Harris, and the driver present that night. After Tory's legal team resurfaced with new claims that could 'prove his innocence,' Megan took to TikTok with a fiery, no-holds-barred message — doubling down on exactly who she says pulled the trigger. Despite Lanez being convicted in 2023 for 'assault with a firearm, discharge of a firearm with gross negligence,' and 'having a concealed firearm in a vehicle,' he and his legal team have continued to push for an appeal. 'At what point are y'all gonna stop making me have to relive being shot BY TORY?' the Houston rapper asked in a lengthy post. 'At what point are Tory and y'all fans gonna stop lying? Like how much is the check to keep harassing me? Why is this happening EVERY DAY? One minute him/y'all said I was never shot — now y'all letting him play in y'all face again and say I was shot but it wasn't him? Oh okay…?!' The 'Hiss' spitter added, 'I'm sick of this sh*t LEAVE ME TF ALONE!!!!' She then reminded everyone that Lanez, real name Daystar Peterson, didn't take the stand during the trial. 'HE AIN'T DARE GET ON THAT STAND AND DENY HE SHOT ME AND THAT WAS HIS CHOICE BECAUSE HE KNOWS HE DID THAT SH*T! WHY IN TF WOULD ME … MEGAN THEE STALLION HAVE TO LIE ON THE MF ABT SHOOTING ME! How ya' mad at the person that got shot????' And as for the 'new evidence,' Megan shut the narrative down with a quickness. 'FACTS ARE FACTS, he did it, it was PROVEN IN COURT! TORY YOU SHOT ME!! Ain't no new f**king evidence — y'all been saying the same sh*t for years.' She ended her IG Story by calling the Chixtape rapper a 'f**king demon.' Lanez's team recently claimed they were approached by a man named Bradley James, who allegedly worked as a bodyguard for Megan's former friend Kelsey Harris — a key witness in the case. According to Lanez's team, James said he overheard Harris admitting to being the one who pulled the trigger, not the 31-year-old star. James, however, didn't testify in court, speak at the press conference, and hasn't said a word publicly. Take a look at Megan Thee Stallion's post above. More from Megan Thee Stallion Talks Vulnerability And Rebuilding: 'People Think I'm This Evil Person' Adin Ross Claims He Lost Millions In Brand Deals After Dissing Megan Thee Stallion, Doechii Megan Thee Stallion Addresses Rumored Met Gala Ban
Forbes
26-04-2025
- Entertainment
- Forbes
Megan Thee Stallion Drops New Single ‘Whenever'
Megan Thee Stallion Megan Thee Stallion has never been one to take her foot off the gas. The Grammy-winning rapper earned her first solo number-one hit on the Billboard Hot 100 last year with the single 'Hiss' from her third studio album Megan; the deluxe reissue Megan: Act II arrived last fall alongside her vulnerable documentary Megan Thee Stallion: In Her Words. In recent months, the rapper-turned-business mogul has been busy taking her talents beyond the studio by building up her new Chicas Divertidas tequila brand now available for purchase across the country. She didn't take too much time away from the mic, however. The Houston-bred MC is back with a new single, 'Whenever,' signaling that she has no intentions of taking a step back from music while focusing on other ventures. 'Hangin' with opps, you a chop / Do your thing, but that ain't how I rock / You h**s don't appreciate loyalty / I don't act funny, b***h, I act accordingly,' she raps on the track. 'It's whenever, b***h, it's whatever, h** / It's whenever, b***h, it's whatever, h** / It's whenever, b***h, it's whatever, h** / We can do it right now, we can take it out the door.' After splitting with 1501 Certified Entertainment in 2023, Megan has been able to fully take the reins of her creative output, including how often she releases new music. 'I have the freedom to say whatever I want to say and put something out whenever I feel like it,' she told Vogue last year. 'That's why I was able to even put out two projects in one year… I literally can just wake up and decide to do it again tomorrow.' But being in charge of your whole career doesn't come easy. 'The other side is that I really am now my own boss, so I have to worry about the business side and the artist side,' she admitted. 'I'm still kind of navigating my way through [that]
Black America Web
24-04-2025
- Entertainment
- Black America Web
The Hotties Absolutely Loved Watching Megan The Stallion Trying Escargot With Queen Latifah & Her Wife
Black America Web Featured Video CLOSE Source: Kevin Mazur / Getty / Megan Thee Stallion / Queen Latifah Megan Thee Stallion is gearing up for another hot girl summer, kicking things off with her Coachella performance these past two weekends. During night one, living legend Queen Latifah was one of her many guests during her headlining set, and the two linked up offstage. The Houston megastar delivered a phenomenal Coachella performance, which also featured appearances from Ciara and Victoria Monet, who elicited the most enthusiastic reactions from the fans. 'Thank you to everyone who came out to watch my team show out at @coachella ! Thank you to all my dancers and JaQuel ' wrote in the caption of her Instagram post. 'yall are so amazing and are always so supportive and I appreciate yall for pushing me and motivating me ! Thank you to all my ladies @queenlatifah @courtneylaplante @ciara @victoriamonet that came out and shared the stage with me YALL ARE ICONS and made this experience so much more amazing for me thank you 1000 times !!! Love you hotties.' After ripping the stage together, Megan Thee Stallion joined Queen Latifah and her wife, Eboni Nichols, and they decided to enjoy some fine dining, including escargot, also known as snails. 'So me, Queen, and Eb is at dinner and b***h, and we're about to try some sh*t we ain't never ate before,' the 'Hiss' crafter begins in the video. Before embarking on their escargot journey, Thee Stallion boasted about her oyster seasoning skills after a friendly competition between herself and Nichols, saying they will battle for the title of 'Best Oyster Maker.' Next on the menu for Supreme Hot Girl was caviar with bread which seemed to be hit based on her joyful reaction. The final treat was steamed escargot paired with bread. 'I don't know about this,' she said as she picked up the delicacy with her fork. To top things off, she also got a lesson on how to eat mussels from the Queen herself, who warned her that if the shell doesn't open by itself, don't eat it. The Hotties loved the candid moment between Megan Thee Stallion and Queen Latifah. 'I love this. Meg deserves to be surrounded by vets in the game who will uplift her and build solid healthy friendship/peer mentorship. A lot of the OG Women rappers like Queen, Missy, Brat, Eve and Kim have solid friendships with one another, 'one post on X, formerly Twitter read. Another post read, 'A group I didn't know I needed lol.' Same sis, same. You can see more reactions in the gallery below. The Hotties Absolutely Loved Watching Megan The Stallion Trying Escargot With Queen Latifah & Her Wife was originally published on
Yahoo
16-02-2025
- Entertainment
- Yahoo
Hot Girl Turns 30: Megan Thee Stallion's Decade of Dominance
Today, February 15, 2025, marks the 30th birthday of Megan Thee Stallion, a multifaceted artist whose influence has reshaped the music industry and beyond. From her early days in Houston to international acclaim, Megan's journey is a testament to talent, resilience, and unyielding determination. Born Megan Jovon Ruth Pete in San Antonio, Texas, and raised in Houston, Megan's passion for music was evident from a young age. She first garnered attention through viral freestyle videos on social media platforms, showcasing her sharp lyrical prowess and charismatic presence. These early displays of talent led to her signing with 1501 Certified Entertainment in 2018, marking the beginning of a meteoric rise in the hip-hop scene. Megan's discography is a collection of powerful anthems and chart-topping hits. Her debut studio album, Good News (2020), featured the viral sensation 'Body,' which dominated airwaves and social media platforms. In 2024, she released her self-titled third album, Megan, introducing groundbreaking singles like 'Hiss' and 'Mamushi.' These tracks not only topped charts but also sparked widespread acclaim for their bold themes and innovative sound. Her talent has been recognized with numerous awards, including three Grammy Awards, two Billboard Music Awards, six BET Awards, five BET Hip Hop Awards, and four MTV Video Music Awards. Notably, she made history as the second female rapper to win Best New Artist at the Grammys. Beyond her musical endeavors, Megan has showcased her business acumen by leading her own label, Hot Girl Productions. This platform has empowered her to maintain creative control over her work and mentor emerging artists, fostering a new generation of talent in the industry. Her entrepreneurial spirit extends to various brand collaborations, including a notable partnership with Nike for the 'Hot Girl Systems' collection in 2024. Megan's commitment to her community is evident through her philanthropic efforts. In 2022, she was honored with the key to the city of Houston and had May 2 declared as 'Megan Thee Stallion Day,' recognizing her contributions to the city. She has also been an advocate for women's rights and education, using her platform to raise awareness and drive change. Megan's influence transcends music. In 2020, she was featured in TIME's 100 Most Influential People, underscoring her significant impact on culture and society. Her dynamic presence and unapologetic authenticity have inspired countless individuals, solidifying her status as a cultural icon. The year 2024 was monumental for Megan. She hosted the MTV Video Music Awards, delivered memorable performances, and released her album Megan, which featured viral hits like 'Mamushi.' She also premiered her documentary, In Her Words, on Prime Video, offering fans an intimate look into her life and career. Looking ahead, Megan is set to perform at Coachella in 2025, promising more groundbreaking projects and collaborations. As Megan Thee Stallion celebrates her 30th birthday, her journey serves as an inspiration, exemplifying the power of authenticity, talent, and resilience. Here's to a decade of dominance and many more to come. The post Hot Girl Turns 30: Megan Thee Stallion's Decade of Dominance appeared first on Where Is The Buzz | Breaking News, Entertainment, Exclusive Interviews & More.
Yahoo
06-02-2025
- Politics
- Yahoo
The Downside to Purging ‘Disloyal' Government Workers
On Jan. 22, 1953, his first day as secretary of state, John Foster Dulles addressed a group of diplomats at his department's still-new headquarters in Washington's Foggy Bottom neighborhood. For years, the State Department had come under fire from Republicans and conservative activists as a haven for Communist spies and sympathizers — and not without reason, since one of its rising stars, Alger Hiss, had been convicted of perjury in January 1950 for lying about giving secret government documents to a Soviet spy. The failure to find more Hisses, and the fact that Hiss' actions had taken place over a decade in the past, did nothing to appease men like Sen. Joseph McCarthy, who shot to national prominence just weeks after Hiss' conviction with his claim to have a list of hundreds of spies within the State Department. By the time Dulles arrived that morning, public faith in the department, and morale within it, had cratered. With his opening speech to his new employees, Dulles made clear that while he was their boss, he was not on their side. 'Dulles's words were as cold and raw as the weather' that day, wrote the diplomat Charles Bohlen. Dulles announced that starting that day, he expected not just loyalty but 'positive loyalty' from his charges, making clear that he would fire anyone whose commitment to anti-communism was less than zealous. 'It was a declaration by the Secretary of State that the department was indeed suspect,' Bohlen wrote. 'The remark disgusted some Foreign Service officers, infuriated others, and displeased even those who were looking forward to the new administration.' So began what — until now — was the largest purge of 'disloyal' government workers in U.S. history. Similar scenes soon played out across the federal government under the new administration of Dwight D. Eisenhower, the first Republican elected president in two decades. Though the State Department was ground zero for the anti-communist purges, FBI agents scoured the files of thousands of employees across the federal government. In April 1953, Eisenhower issued Executive Order 10450, which opened an energetic campaign to investigate thousands of potential security threats throughout the government. 'We like to think we are plugging the entries but opening the exits,' said White House press secretary James Hagerty. Over the next four months, 1,456 federal employees were fired, despite the fact that no one was ever found to be involved in espionage. Many were removed simply for being gay, which the order had explicitly defined as a security risk. Air Force Lt. Milo Radulovich was forced to resign his commission simply because his sister was a suspected communist. Others, like cartographer Abraham Chasanow, were pushed out on the basis on flimsy rumors of suspicious political beliefs. The widespread political purges of the early 1950s echo clearly today. Seventy years ago, the reasonable pretext of hunting Soviet agents opened the way to a yearslong, paranoid campaign, motivated by outlandish conspiracy theories, that destroyed countless careers but did nothing to improve America's security. Today, a stated desire to check the excesses of diversity, equity and inclusion programs has already been used to justify whirlwind firings and closures of entire federal offices. So it may be wise to consider the consequences of that previous era of purges, part of what came to be known as the 'Red Scare.' At a time of intense geopolitical competition, the United States kneecapped itself, removing thousands of valuable employees and forcing those who remained into unhappy conformity. It is hard not to see the same mistake being repeated today. The hunt for disloyal public servants did not begin with Eisenhower and Dulles. Following the 1946 midterm elections, in which Republicans took control of both the House and the Senate with a campaign built on anti-communist attacks, President Harry S. Truman signed Executive Order 9835. It ordered the Civil Service Commission to screen the background of every current and new federal employee, well over a million people, for evidence of 'disloyalty,' a term that was left ominously undefined. The screening drew on files from across the government, as well as police departments, former employers, even college transcripts. Truman also instructed his attorney general, Tom Clark, to devise a list of 'subversive' organizations; current or former membership in just one would constitute a bright red flag. If something suspicious came up in the initial screen, even the smallest doubt, the FBI would conduct a full field investigation, digging into every corner of a person's life. Any derogatory information went into a file. It was then up to the department or agency involved to decide what to do with the employee. In theory, it might mean discipline or reassignment, though in practice most people who reached that point lost their job. The flaws were apparent to anyone who took the time to read the order itself. Writing in The New York Times, a quartet of Harvard Law professors worried the program would 'miss genuine culprits, victimize innocent persons, discourage entry into the public service and leave both the government and the American people with a hangover sense of futility and indignity.' And that is what happened. The loyalty program's first director, Seth Richardson, insisted that the government had a complete right to discharge employees, 'without extending to such employee any hearing whatsoever.' In one case, James Kutcher, who lost both his legs in World War II, was fired from the Veterans Administration because, a decade earlier, he had been a member of the Socialist Workers Party, an anti-Stalinist organization that Clark had nevertheless added to his subversives list. Dozens of Black employees were subjected to harassing, invasive investigations because, outside of work, they were involved in civil rights activity, which was considered potentially subversive. The same happened to pro-labor employees. During its five and a half years in operation, Truman's loyalty program conducted 4.76 million background checks, including 2 million current employees and 500,000 new hires each year. The screens resulted in 26,236 FBI investigations. Of those, 6,828 people resigned or withdrew their applications, and 560 were fired. Not a single spy was ever discovered by the program. Its defenders argued that it succeeded by deterring potential subversives. But it also likely deterred many bright, talented people from applying in the first place, especially if they had dabbled in progressive politics in college. The same went for then-current federal employees: The order put a premium on submission and raised the price for individual expression. In his memoirs, Truman defended the rationale behind the program but admitted that it was deeply flawed in practice. He called the program the best he could do 'under the climate of opinion that then existed.' To friends he admitted, 'Yes, it was terrible.' Among Truman's targets were gay and lesbian employees of the government, especially in the State Department. In the retrograde spirit of the immediate postwar era, homosexuality was associated with weakness, femininity and progressivism. One writer, warning of the 'sisterhood in our State Department,' wrote that 'in American statecraft, where you need desperately a man of iron, you often get a nance.' In what later became known as the Lavender Scare, Congress ordered government agencies — from State to the American Battlefield Monuments Commission — to investigate any employee suspected of being homosexual, an ill-defined category that might mean anything from middle-age bachelorhood to, paradoxically, 'Don Juanism,' or an energetic sex drive. Yet another target were the so-called China Hands, a loose collection of academics and Foreign Service officers with deep experience in China. As the pro-Western Nationalists lost ground to the Communists under Mao Zedong during the Chinese Civil War following World War II, despite massive American support, the China Hands recommended caution, arguing that Mao's victory was inevitable, and that U.S. policy could exploit cracks between him and Moscow. In retrospect, it was wise advice — but following Mao's victory in 1949, it was taken as evidence that the China Hands had not only been 'soft on communism,' but had been the core of a pro-communist conspiracy within the State Department. One by one, the China Hands fell: Esteemed diplomats like John Stewart Service, John Paton Davies and O. Edmund Clubb were drummed out of the Foreign Service, some under Truman, others under Eisenhower. John F. Melby was dismissed simply because he had an affair with Lillian Hellman, a progressive playwright who had refused to 'name names' before the House Un-American Activities Committee. The China Hands were relatively few in number, but the decimation of their ranks sent a clear signal to the rest of the foreign-policy establishment: Dissent at your own risk; retribution will be swift. While it is impossible to quantify a counterfactual, the cost of the anti-communist purges of the 1950s was clearly enormous and played out not just over the subsequent years but over decades. For instance, had expertise not been purged and dissent not been punished so severely across the government during the early 1950s, wiser heads might well have raised the right objections to America's short-sighted anti-communism in East Asia, above all its rush to intervene in Vietnam. Does the Trump administration run the same risk of short-sightedness today? Aside from historical parallels, there is another insight connecting then and now. The Red Scare eventually ended. Journalist Edward R. Murrow helped turn the tide, including with a long news report on the case of Lt. Radulovich. The Supreme Court in 1956 put limits on Eisenhower's executive order. By the mid-1950s, voters, happy with the conservative stability wrought by Eisenhower, stopped backing candidates who ran on hardcore red-baiting platforms. Joseph McCarthy, who had captured the American political imagination for years, saw his support collapse in 1954 during his televised, and ill-advised, confrontation with the U.S. Army over an allegedly subversive military dentist. And Eisenhower, despite — or because of — his earlier efforts, was able to push out the hardcore anti-communist conspiracists who had, for a brief moment, captured the American imagination. But they did not go quietly. Men like Alfred Kohlberg, a textile magnate and a key supporter of McCarthy, and Robert Welch Jr., the founder of the John Birch Society, saw Eisenhower as a prisoner of the communist cabal they had hoped to defeat. If they remained on the fringe of American politics, it was still a sizable swatch: 'None Dare Call It Treason,' John Stormer's 1964 book alleging the continuation of a pro-communist cabal at the top of the U.S. government, sold millions of copies. Over time the belief that the liberal wing of American politics and the federal bureaucracy were controlled by an 'enemy within' became a litmus test for hard-right demagogues, linking the Red Scare era through the Pat Buchanan insurgency of the 1990s to today. When President Trump declared a moratorium on federal spending to root out 'Marxist' elements in the government, he was drawing on a 75-year-old obsession. It can be tempting to say that just as the Red Scare petered out, so too will the current hunt for 'disloyal' elements. But for all the parallels, there's an important difference: Loyalty then meant loyalty to the United States; today Trump demands loyalty to himself and his agenda. Once the public realizes the destructiveness of the purges conducted in Trump's name, will he halt them? That remains an unsettlingly open question.
