11-03-2025
Ten Commandments monument resolution heading to Senate
A joint resolution in Frankfort that would require a monument to the Ten Commandments be returned to the state capitol in Frankfort is heading to the full Senate for consideration.
House Joint Resolution 15 would require the Historic Properties Advisory Commission to bring the Ten Commandments monument back to the capitol and place it in Monument Park. The resolution's primary sponsor is Rep. Shane Baker, a Somerset Republican.
The resolution was approved by the Senate State and Local Government committee Monday, setting it up for a vote in the Senate. The resolution has already passed the House.
The monument is currently in possession of the Fraternal Order of Eagles Aerie 3423. The Eagles originally donated the monument to the state in 1971. According to the resolution, the monument was displayed at the capitol until sometime in the 1980s, when it was put in storage due to a construction project.
The monument was ordered to return to the capitol in 2000, but the joint resolution was ruled unconstitutional. However, in 2005, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled similar Ten Commandments monument could be displayed at the Texas capitol did not violate the Establishment Clause, because the display was not religious, but a display of a document that played a role in the foundations of U.S. law. The Establishment Clause is more commonly known as separation of church and state.
Eric Schmidt, a professor of legal studies and political science at Kentucky Wesleyan College, said the Ten Commandments does have a place in both the formation of English law, and in the legal thinking of the early English settlers in America.
'The colonists themselves referred to Judeo-Christian law' and to the Ten Commandments in their legal thinking, Schmidt said. 'It also had a profound effect on the development of English common law, generally.'
The Ten Commandments were one document of many used to create English common law, Schmidt said. Supporters of placing the Ten Commandments at the capitol have an argument, 'especially if (they're) saying the Ten Commandments represent the tradition of law in the United States,' Schmidt said.
The monument would have be 'contextualized properly,' in a way that didn't indicate lawmakers were endorsing a religion.
'The question is, when the intent is (to display) the Ten Commandments — especially if it's going to be in isolation — (whether) it's going to meet the requirements of the Establishment Clause,' Schmidt said. The government can't display the Ten Commandments as a way 'to wink at religion,' Schmidt said.
At Monday's committee hearing, Baker was asked what the legislature would do to give other religions a place on the capitol grounds.
'This is not about religious display,' Baker said.
The committee approved sending the resolution to the full Senate on a vote of 8-1, with one member abstaining from voting.
Sen. Robby Mills, a Henderson Republican and the senate's majority caucus chair, said he agreed with returning the monument to the capitol.
'I think the Ten Commandments are a historical document,' Mills said. 'It has almost become a secular code of conduct.'
