Latest news with #Hoenig
Perth Now
3 days ago
- Politics
- Perth Now
Bombshell inquiry into Dural ‘terror' caravan referred to ethics committee
An inquiry into the relationship between the Dural 'terror' caravan incident and the passing of controversial anti-hate laws in NSW is an 'incursion upon the privilege' of parliament that 'breaches one of the fundamental bedrocks of parliamentary democracy', a Labor MP has claimed. Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig slammed the Legislative Council inquiry during question time on Thursday morning as the government seeks to refer the terms of reference of the inquiry, established in March, to the Standing Committee on Parliamentary Privilege and Ethics. The Legislative Council inquiry, chaired by independent MLC Rod Roberts, was established earlier this year following criticism over the passage of sweeping anti-hate and anti-protest laws in February after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks in Greater Sydney over the summer. Camera Icon NSW Premier Chris Minns expressed concerns about parliamentary privilege. NewsWire/ Gaye Gerard Credit: News Corp Australia In January, police discovered an explosives-laden caravan in Sydney's northwest that Premier Chris Minns claimed could have resulted in a 'mass casualty event'. The Australian Federal Police later determined it to be part of a criminal conspiracy, sparking questions about who knew what and when. Mr Minns last week expressed concerns that the parliamentary privilege of the Legislative Assembly, where he spoke about the caravan on March 18, might be infringed, including by the calling of key staffers as well as the 'observance of comity' between the two houses. In his address, Mr Hoenig claimed the probe – launched by the Legislative Council, not the Legislative Assembly – 'breaches one of the bedrock of parliamentary democracy', which was the ability of either house of parliament to have exclusive control over its own members and debate. 'Broadly, what happens within parliament is a matter for control by parliament alone,' Mr Hoenig said. Camera Icon Cabinet Office secretary Kate Boyd (left), Premier's Department secretary Simon Draper, and deputy secretary Kate Meagher gave evidence to the inquiry last week. NewsWire / Monique Harmer Credit: News Corp Australia 'The prerogative of this House to set out the rules, conduct, and regulate its own affairs – its exclusive cognisance has not been disputed. 'That is why the resolution of the Legislative Council was so egregious. 'It expressly seeks to scrutinise the discourse of the House, the conduct of its members, be it backbencher or a member of the executive government, while undertaking the primary function entrusted upon them by their constituents which is to legislate.' Mr Hoenig also warned that 'courts will never sit by idly and allow powers to be unconstrained if abused' but admitted 'certain principles have become diminished over time' that 'may well be as a result of the disagreements we have with the other place (Legislative Council)'. The motion to refer the inquiry passed following a division 47 to 27. Inquiry changes 'don't go far enough': Labor On Wednesday night, Mr Roberts, moved amendments to the inquiry to 'narrow the focus on the passage of bills concerned through the Legislative Council', which Mr Hoenig said 'dismisses the very fundamental issue I have raised'. Noting the amendments, Mr Hoenig said it was the House of Representatives 'and this House alone that will be arbiter of its actions and that of its members, whether they also be members of the executive or not' and Mr Roberts' amendments 'did not go far enough'. Wahroonga Liberal MP Alister Henskens said the opposition was concerned about issues of privilege but would not support the motion following the amendments and instead claimed it was 'a transparent attempt to frustrate and delay the upper house inquiry'. Camera Icon The Dural property where the caravan containing explosives was relocated to before the discovery. Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia Mr Henskens also noted that the only remaining witnesses were executive employees, including ministerial staff. 'The terms of reference were intentionally changed to exclude any infringement upon the privileges of this House by reason of the terms of reference, and I think that's a very important matter which was not highlighted to members of this place in the address,' Mr Henskens said. 'So, the inquiry in the other place is essentially directed towards a very narrow scope. There's been no public submissions invited, and the scope of the inquiry is simply whom knew that the Dural caravan incident was not a mass casualty event and when did they not?' Greens MP Jenny Leong did not say whether the party would support the referral but noted that if they did it would be 'critical' that the Legislative Council was not 'prevented from doing their work' and that the issues of privilege were 'probably dealt with by the amendments'. If there was an 'unreasonable delay' to the inquiry, Ms Leong warned that 'it would raise further concerns and questions about whether this is being used as a way for the Premier and the executive to avoid and subvert the ability of the council to inquire into these matters'. Speaker Greg Piper said the change of the terms of reference was 'not done on the basis of a change of view' but to advance an 'important inquiry' and agreed with the Greens that the inquiry would not be referred as a way of obstructing its progression. 'I say to the members of this House, this is an opportunity for us to actually examine the issue, the rights and privilege, the exclusive cognisance of the Legislative Assembly. And if we do not do it now, then we will no doubt be doing it again,' Mr Piper said. 'This is an opportunity to actually examine this and to make a stand as to the rights and privilege of the assembly.' Mr Piper said he stood by his advice to Mr Minns when he was advised about the potential breach. Last week, the inquiry heard evidence from key staffers behind the scenes at Mr Minns' office and at cabinet. NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb and Deputy Commissioner David Hudson also gave evidence during preliminary hearings earlier this year.
West Australian
3 days ago
- Politics
- West Australian
Bombshell inquiry into Dural ‘terror' caravan referred to ethics committee
An inquiry into the relationship between the Dural 'terror' caravan incident and the passing of controversial anti-hate laws in NSW is an 'incursion upon the privilege' of parliament that 'breaches one of the fundamental bedrocks of parliamentary democracy', a Labor MP has claimed. Local Government Minister Ron Hoenig slammed the Legislative Council inquiry during question time on Thursday morning as the government seeks to refer the terms of reference of the inquiry, established in March, to the Standing Committee on Parliamentary Privilege and Ethics. The Legislative Council inquiry, chaired by independent MLC Rod Roberts, was established earlier this year following criticism over the passage of sweeping anti-hate and anti-protest laws in February after a spate of anti-Semitic attacks in Greater Sydney over the summer. In January, police discovered an explosives-laden caravan in Sydney's northwest that Premier Chris Minns claimed could have resulted in a 'mass casualty event'. The Australian Federal Police later determined it to be part of a criminal conspiracy, sparking questions about who knew what and when. Mr Minns last week expressed concerns that the parliamentary privilege of the Legislative Assembly, where he spoke about the caravan on March 18, might be infringed, including by the calling of key staffers as well as the 'observance of comity' between the two houses. In his address, Mr Hoenig claimed the probe – launched by the Legislative Council, not the Legislative Assembly – 'breaches one of the bedrock of parliamentary democracy', which was the ability of either house of parliament to have exclusive control over its own members and debate. 'Broadly, what happens within parliament is a matter for control by parliament alone,' Mr Hoenig said. 'The prerogative of this House to set out the rules, conduct, and regulate its own affairs – its exclusive cognisance has not been disputed. 'That is why the resolution of the Legislative Council was so egregious. 'It expressly seeks to scrutinise the discourse of the House, the conduct of its members, be it backbencher or a member of the executive government, while undertaking the primary function entrusted upon them by their constituents which is to legislate.' Mr Hoenig also warned that 'courts will never sit by idly and allow powers to be unconstrained if abused' but admitted 'certain principles have become diminished over time' that 'may well be as a result of the disagreements we have with the other place (Legislative Council)'. The motion to refer the inquiry passed following a division 47 to 27. Inquiry changes 'don't go far enough': Labor On Wednesday night, Mr Roberts, moved amendments to the inquiry to 'narrow the focus on the passage of bills concerned through the Legislative Council', which Mr Hoenig said 'dismisses the very fundamental issue I have raised'. Noting the amendments, Mr Hoenig said it was the House of Representatives 'and this House alone that will be arbiter of its actions and that of its members, whether they also be members of the executive or not' and Mr Roberts' amendments 'did not go far enough'. Wahroonga Liberal MP Alister Henskens said the opposition was concerned about issues of privilege but would not support the motion following the amendments and instead claimed it was 'a transparent attempt to frustrate and delay the upper house inquiry'. Mr Henskens also noted that the only remaining witnesses were executive employees, including ministerial staff. 'The terms of reference were intentionally changed to exclude any infringement upon the privileges of this House by reason of the terms of reference, and I think that's a very important matter which was not highlighted to members of this place in the address,' Mr Henskens said. 'So, the inquiry in the other place is essentially directed towards a very narrow scope. There's been no public submissions invited, and the scope of the inquiry is simply whom knew that the Dural caravan incident was not a mass casualty event and when did they not?' Greens MP Jenny Leong did not say whether the party would support the referral but noted that if they did it would be 'critical' that the Legislative Council was not 'prevented from doing their work' and that the issues of privilege were 'probably dealt with by the amendments'. If there was an 'unreasonable delay' to the inquiry, Ms Leong warned that 'it would raise further concerns and questions about whether this is being used as a way for the Premier and the executive to avoid and subvert the ability of the council to inquire into these matters'. Speaker Greg Piper said the change of the terms of reference was 'not done on the basis of a change of view' but to advance an 'important inquiry' and agreed with the Greens that the inquiry would not be referred as a way of obstructing its progression. 'I say to the members of this House, this is an opportunity for us to actually examine the issue, the rights and privilege, the exclusive cognisance of the Legislative Assembly. And if we do not do it now, then we will no doubt be doing it again,' Mr Piper said. 'This is an opportunity to actually examine this and to make a stand as to the rights and privilege of the assembly.' Mr Piper said he stood by his advice to Mr Minns when he was advised about the potential breach. Last week, the inquiry heard evidence from key staffers behind the scenes at Mr Minns' office and at cabinet. NSW Police Commissioner Karen Webb and Deputy Commissioner David Hudson also gave evidence during preliminary hearings earlier this year.
Yahoo
02-04-2025
- Health
- Yahoo
Health department layoffs mean that data on drug use and mental health could sit unused
Most teenagers don't use drugs. There's data to show that because of a 50-year-old government survey that may now be in jeopardy. The entire 17-member U.S. government team responsible for the National Survey on Drug Use and Health received layoff notices Tuesday, as part of the overhaul of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It's not clear whether there is an alternative plan to analyze the data, which local and state governments use to develop prevention measures and treatment services. The federal government distributes grant money to fight the opioid addiction crisis based on it. Researchers use it to study trends in depression, alcoholism and tobacco use. An HHS spokesman did not immediately respond to a question about the survey's future. The nationally representative survey is conducted in person by an independent research group with about 70,000 people each year. It provides a more complete picture than trends in overdose deaths, which capture only a small segment of the problem, said Lindsey Vuolo of the Partnership to End Addiction. 'We use its findings on a near daily basis in our research, educational programming and resources, and communication materials,' Vuolo said of the survey. Before the layoffs, the government team was preparing to analyze 2024 data, the first year where trends would be reliable again since the pandemic disrupted data collection, said Jennifer Hoenig, the laid-off director of the Office of Population Surveys. The data could now sit on the shelf without experienced analysts to untangle it, she said. 'Every person working on it was let go,' Hoenig said, noting that the data collection is mandated by Congress. The office is part of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, which would be absorbed into a new Administration for a Healthy America under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s plan. 'My team and I care so much about this data that we want people to understand what is being lost in our country if we don't have it,' Hoenig said. In recent years, the survey has found: — Seven out of 10 adolescents did not use illicit drugs or drink alcohol in 2023. — Men 60 and older were more likely than women in the same age group to have a substance use disorder, but women were more likely than men to have had a major depressive episode in 2021 and 2022. — Lesbian, gay and bisexual young people were about twice as likely as straight young people to have had a substance use disorder in 2023. — People who report using cannabis in the past year nearly doubled over two decades, from 11% in 2002 to 21.9% in 2022. 'In attempting to solve any public health problem, data is critical," said Andrew Kessler of Slingshot Solutions, a consulting firm that specializes in addiction and mental health issues. 'It allows us to advocate for and establish policies that fill very large gaps in treatment, thus saving lives in the process." ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Science and Educational Media Group and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.
Associated Press
02-04-2025
- Health
- Associated Press
Health department layoffs mean that data on drug use and mental health could sit unused
Most teenagers don't use drugs. There's data to show that because of a 50-year-old government survey that may now be in jeopardy. The entire 17-member U.S. government team responsible for the National Survey on Drug Use and Health received layoff notices Tuesday, as part of the overhaul of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. It's not clear whether there is an alternative plan to analyze the data, which local and state governments use to develop prevention measures and treatment services. The federal government distributes grant money to fight the opioid addiction crisis based on it. Researchers use it to study trends in depression, alcoholism and tobacco use. An HHS spokesman did not immediately respond to a question about the survey's future. The nationally representative survey is conducted in person by an independent research group with about 70,000 people each year. It provides a more complete picture than trends in overdose deaths, which capture only a small segment of the problem, said Lindsey Vuolo of the Partnership to End Addiction. 'We use its findings on a near daily basis in our research, educational programming and resources, and communication materials,' Vuolo said of the survey. Before the layoffs, the government team was preparing to analyze 2024 data, the first year where trends would be reliable again since the pandemic disrupted data collection, said Jennifer Hoenig, the laid-off director of the Office of Population Surveys. The data could now sit on the shelf without experienced analysts to untangle it, she said. 'Every person working on it was let go,' Hoenig said, noting that the data collection is mandated by Congress. The office is part of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, which would be absorbed into a new Administration for a Healthy America under Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s plan. 'My team and I care so much about this data that we want people to understand what is being lost in our country if we don't have it,' Hoenig said. In recent years, the survey has found: — Seven out of 10 adolescents did not use illicit drugs or drink alcohol in 2023. — Men 60 and older were more likely than women in the same age group to have a substance use disorder, but women were more likely than men to have had a major depressive episode in 2021 and 2022. — Lesbian, gay and bisexual young people were about twice as likely as straight young people to have had a substance use disorder in 2023. — People who report using cannabis in the past year nearly doubled over two decades, from 11% in 2002 to 21.9% in 2022. 'In attempting to solve any public health problem, data is critical,' said Andrew Kessler of Slingshot Solutions, a consulting firm that specializes in addiction and mental health issues. 'It allows us to advocate for and establish policies that fill very large gaps in treatment, thus saving lives in the process.' ___
