24-03-2025
More book bans? Florida bill could define classics as pornography. What is SB 1692?
Two years ago, Florida passed a law that made it easier for concerned parents to get books they considered objectionable removed from school libraries and classroom shelves but allowed challenged books to be judged for their literary, artistic or scientific value.
Not anymore, if a new bill moving through the Florida Legislature passes.
Under SB 1692, if a challenged work contains nudity or sexual material it would be considered by definition harmful to minors and school boards would be restricted from considering any other value of the work, potentially risking the removal or restriction of some of the world's classic literature.
Last year, six major book publishers and several prominent authors sued the state over "unconstitutional book banning" after they said the 2023 bill (HB 1069) allowed books to be removed from schools "with no consideration of the educational value of the work as a whole."
The bill sponsored by Sen. Stan McClain, R-Ocala, the man who led the 2023 bill, seeks to clarify what "harmful to minors" means.
'I think that we're bifurcating here, so it's more clear as to what we're actually talking about so that school districts can make a decision," McClain said. "If it is in violation of the proposed law, if it's that, then it's considered pornographic and it's considered harmful to minors.' A companion bill, HB 1539, was filed by Rep. Doug Benson, R-Apopka.
Critics say that the bill would expand the number of books that will be challenged and result in important works being removed from students' sight.
'The impact here is that book bans are going to get worse, censorship is going to be worse, censorship of actually the classics, which we've seen across the state of Florida, because Florida is now Number One in the country for banning books in our public schools,' Sen. Carlos Guillermo Smith, D-Orlando said.
In 2023, House Bill 2069 declared sex an immutable binary biological trait, banned nicknames or genders if they didn't apply to the student's or school employee's biological sex, made it easier for a parent or resident to challenge books, and added "depicts or describes sexual conduct" to the list of pornographic material, among other things.
The 2025 bill further defines "harmful to minors" as:
"Any reproduction, imitation, characterization, description, exhibition, presentation, or representation, of whatever kind or form, depicting nudity, sexual conduct, or sexual excitement when it:
a. Predominantly appeals to prurient, shameful, or morbid interest; and
b. Is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community as a whole with respect to what is suitable material or conduct for minors
Material authorized as part of health education or authorized by the Florida Board of Education "for specific educational purposes" would still be allowed and could not be challenged by parents or guardians.
Noncompliance may lead to the state withholding funds to the school district.
In 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court developed a three-prong test, called the Miller test, to define obscene speech. According to the Miller test, speech is obscene if:
The average person, applying contemporary community standards would find that the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;
The work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law; and
The work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value
However, an analysis of the bill says that courts have found the state has a 'compelling interest in protecting the physical and psychological well-being of minors" which "extends to shielding minors from the influence of literature that is not obscene by adult standards."
SB 1692 completely removes the third prong of the Miller test.
In a report on the 2023-2024 school year, Florida saw more than 4,500 instances of book banning in public schools according to national free speech group PEN America, a dramatic jump up from 1,406 the year before. That's nearly half of all the 10,000 book bans recorded across the country, the report said.
The state maintains that no books have been banned in Florida schools.
'Once again, far left activists are pushing the book ban hoax on Floridians. The better question is why do these activists continue to fight to expose children to sexually explicit materials,' spokesperson Sydney Booker told The Guardian.
However, PEN America considers any book made unavailable to students as banned and lists books that were removed from school libraries and classroom shelves by districts without a formal challenge, books that were pulled pending a review, and books restricted to students based on grade or parent's permission. Under HB 2069, any book challenged must be removed from within five school days and remain unavailable to students "until the objection is resolved."
Last year the legislature restricted book ban challenges from Floridians who are not parents or guardians of a "student with access to school district materials" from filing more than one book challenge a month after reports that the bulk of challenges were coming from a very small number of people, some of whom did not have children in schools. Most of the objections were to books written by or about LGBTQ+ people or people of color.
'Let us live': LGBTQ advocates march to Florida Capitol for trans rights, protest anti-DEI bills
None of the legislation concerning book challenges offers a way for parents, guardians or residents to challenge a decision to remove a book from a school.
Last week, the state's new Department of Education workgroup tasked with redeveloping a training program for school librarians and media specialists on how to select and remove books met for the first time. Half of them were members of Moms for Liberty, the conservative group started in Florida that has been one of the driving forces behind the flood of book challenges in the state and across the country.
If passed by the Florida Legislature and signed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, the bill would take effect on July 1, 2025.
This article originally appeared on Sarasota Herald-Tribune: Florida bill defines nudity, sexual content as 'harmful to minors'
