2 days ago
California's February bar exam mess is costing millions to clean up
June 6 (Reuters) - The State Bar of California said on Thursday that it has hired a consulting firm to review the scoring of its February bar exam, adding to the millions the organization has spent to clean up mess from the botched test rollout.
State bar trustees approved a $185,000 contract with the Human Resources Research Organization to look at how the February exam was scored and investigate whether test takers with disabilities received their approved accommodations such as extra time on the exam or a private testing room.
While the contract amount is relatively small, it is part of the more than $6 million the organization is spending for February's exam problems and to ensure the upcoming July exam goes smoothly.
The state bar did not immediately provide comment on Friday about the growing costs, but it has said that it will do all that it can to address February's problems.
The February exam — the debut of California's hybrid remote and in-person exam that did not include any components of the national bar exam the state had used for decades — was marred by technological and logistical problems.
The investigation is a 'critical step to independently assess scoring and accommodation concerns raised by applicants,' said State Bar Board of Trustees Chair Brandon Stallings in a prepared statement.
The state bar launched the development of its own test in 2024, after its fund for administering the exam was projected to reach insolvency in 2026. Using its own exam was expected to save the state bar up to $3.8 million annually because it would not have to rent out large conference spaces.
Instead, the new exam has become a financial drain. The California Supreme Court has ordered the state to return to in-person testing in July and restore use of the Multistate Bar Exam — the 200 multiple-choice section of the national bar exam designed by the National Conference of Bar Examiners.
The state bar, which has an $8 million budget this year to cover its costs for administering the exam and the admissions process for lawyers seeking to practice in California, said it will cost about $720,000 to return to the MBE, $1.7 million to rent out July testing locations, and more than $1 million to hire proctors. The state bar has also approved $4.9 million in fee waivers that will enable those who withdrew from or failed the February exam to retake the bar at no additional cost.
State Bar Executive Director Leah Wilson said in May that she will step down in July, citing the bungled rollout of the new exam. The state bar has also sued the company that provided the testing platform for the February test over the many tech problems.
Human Resources Research Organization is expected to complete its scoring review prior to the July bar exam, according to a state bar memo. The investigation into the delivery of testing accommodations is expected to be completed by September 30.
February examinees have repeatedly raised concerns over how the exams were scored and the lack of promised testing accommodations in public comments during state bar meetings. And 13 test takers went from failing to passing after the state bar uncovered scoring mistakes. Another 230 are expected to move to passing after the bar enacted a grading change on May 30.
Read more:
More California bar examinees wrongly told they failed, state bar says
Hundreds of California bar exam-takers move from fail to pass with new scoring
