Latest news with #IFCN
1News
12-05-2025
- Politics
- 1News
The Russian 'fact check' network waging war on truth
Russia has launched a purported fact-checking organisation that lists a controversial Australian academic among its contributors. The Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), launched in April by Russian state news agency TASS, presented itself as an international hub for unbiased verification in the "fight against fake news". However, experts warn the site is intentionally trying to mirror the work of the 179 active member organisations of the US-based Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The IFCN, of which AAP FactCheck is a member, was widely recognised as the global standard for non-partisan fact-checking. Signatories to its code of principles are required to meet strict transparency, independence and methodology standards. At the time of writing, the GFCN listed 26 "experts" on its participants page, many of them prominent Kremlin-aligned commentators. Among the list was Australian academic Dr Tim Anderson, a political economist formerly with the University of Sydney. nderson was freed from prison in 1991, one year into a 14-year sentence after his conviction for killing three men in a bombing outside Sydney's Hilton Hotel in 1978 was quashed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He was dismissed from his university role in 2019 for presenting a graphic in lectures that overlaid the Israeli flag with a swastika. Three years later, a judge found the university was wrong to terminate his employment. AAP contacted Anderson for comment about his purported involvement with the GFCN but did not receive a response. His LinkedIn profile said he ran the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, a website that published his writing alongside material from outlets critical of the West and Israel, and supportive of several authoritarian regimes. Anderson's byline did not appear on any articles on the GFCN website. Experts said the Russian network represented a co-ordinated and ambitious attempt to erode trust in independent verification. Dr Emma Briant, a disinformation expert at the University of Notre Dame, said governments had long sought to launder propaganda through entities that appeared neutral. "This is typical of the Russian efforts to create independent-looking networks of ideologically biased 'experts' to launder approved information and generate credibility for biased narratives on international events," she told AAP. Briant said the GFCN could also target domestic political debates in Australia. She noted Kremlin-backed campaigns had previously spread divisive content among Australian audiences on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the Indigenous voice referendum. "Should GFCN shift focus onto Australia, I imagine we would see similar themes seeking to amplify distrust in mainstream politicians," she said. The network was not the Kremlin's first attempt to weaponise the fact-checking format, Briant added. Following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia promoted the "War on Fakes" website, which pushed pro-Kremlin narratives under the guise of fact-checking. Sascha-Dominik Dov Bachmann, an information warfare expert from the University of Canberra, said the GFCN marked a shift from traditional disinformation to a more dangerous structure. "It's surprising it took them this long," Professor Bachmann said, agreeing that the Russian network was clearly mimicking the IFCN to "borrow its legitimacy" and steal its credibility. "IFCN relies on accreditation, mentorship and journalistic standards; it's a robust, professional network," he said. "GFCN has none of that. You just sign up and push Kremlin lines."
The Advertiser
11-05-2025
- Politics
- The Advertiser
The 'fact check' network waging a war on truth
Russia has launched a purported fact-checking organisation that lists a controversial Australian academic among its contributors. The Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), launched in April by Russian state news agency TASS, presents itself as an international hub for unbiased verification in the "fight against fake news". However, experts warn the site is intentionally trying to mirror the work of the 179 active member organisations of the US-based Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The IFCN, of which AAP FactCheck is a member, is widely recognised as the global standard for non-partisan fact-checking. Signatories to its code of principles are required to meet strict transparency, independence and methodology standards. At the time of writing, the GFCN listed 26 "experts" on its participants page, many of whom are prominent Kremlin-aligned commentators. Among the list is Australian academic Tim Anderson, a political economist formerly with the University of Sydney. Dr Anderson was freed from prison in 1991, one year into a 14-year sentence after his conviction for killing three men in a bombing outside Sydney's Hilton Hotel in 1978 was quashed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He was dismissed from his university role in 2019 for presenting a graphic in lectures that overlaid the Israeli flag with a swastika. Three years later, a judge found the university was wrong to terminate his employment. AAP contacted Dr Anderson for comment about his purported involvement with the GFCN but did not receive a response. His LinkedIn profile says he runs the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, a website that publishes his writing alongside material from outlets critical of the West and Israel, and supportive of several authoritarian regimes. Dr Anderson's byline does not appear on any articles on the GFCN website. Experts say the Russian network represents a co-ordinated and ambitious attempt to erode trust in independent verification. Emma Briant, a disinformation expert at the University of Notre Dame, said governments had long sought to launder propaganda through entities that appeared neutral. "This is typical of the Russian efforts to create independent-looking networks of ideologically biased 'experts' to launder approved information and generate credibility for biased narratives on international events," she told AAP. Dr Briant said the GFCN could also target domestic political debates in Australia. She noted Kremlin-backed campaigns had previously spread divisive content among Australian audiences on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the Indigenous voice referendum. "Should GFCN shift focus onto Australia, I imagine we would see similar themes seeking to amplify distrust in mainstream politicians," she said. The network was not the Kremlin's first attempt to weaponise the fact-checking format, Dr Briant added. Following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia promoted the "War on Fakes" website, which pushed pro-Kremlin narratives under the guise of fact-checking. Sascha-Dominik Dov Bachmann, an information warfare expert from the University of Canberra, said the GFCN marked a shift from traditional disinformation to a more dangerous structure. "It's surprising it took them this long," Professor Bachmann said, agreeing that the Russian network was clearly mimicking the IFCN to "borrow its legitimacy" and steal its credibility. "IFCN relies on accreditation, mentorship and journalistic standards; it's a robust, professional network," he said. "GFCN has none of that. You just sign up and push Kremlin lines." Russia has launched a purported fact-checking organisation that lists a controversial Australian academic among its contributors. The Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), launched in April by Russian state news agency TASS, presents itself as an international hub for unbiased verification in the "fight against fake news". However, experts warn the site is intentionally trying to mirror the work of the 179 active member organisations of the US-based Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The IFCN, of which AAP FactCheck is a member, is widely recognised as the global standard for non-partisan fact-checking. Signatories to its code of principles are required to meet strict transparency, independence and methodology standards. At the time of writing, the GFCN listed 26 "experts" on its participants page, many of whom are prominent Kremlin-aligned commentators. Among the list is Australian academic Tim Anderson, a political economist formerly with the University of Sydney. Dr Anderson was freed from prison in 1991, one year into a 14-year sentence after his conviction for killing three men in a bombing outside Sydney's Hilton Hotel in 1978 was quashed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He was dismissed from his university role in 2019 for presenting a graphic in lectures that overlaid the Israeli flag with a swastika. Three years later, a judge found the university was wrong to terminate his employment. AAP contacted Dr Anderson for comment about his purported involvement with the GFCN but did not receive a response. His LinkedIn profile says he runs the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, a website that publishes his writing alongside material from outlets critical of the West and Israel, and supportive of several authoritarian regimes. Dr Anderson's byline does not appear on any articles on the GFCN website. Experts say the Russian network represents a co-ordinated and ambitious attempt to erode trust in independent verification. Emma Briant, a disinformation expert at the University of Notre Dame, said governments had long sought to launder propaganda through entities that appeared neutral. "This is typical of the Russian efforts to create independent-looking networks of ideologically biased 'experts' to launder approved information and generate credibility for biased narratives on international events," she told AAP. Dr Briant said the GFCN could also target domestic political debates in Australia. She noted Kremlin-backed campaigns had previously spread divisive content among Australian audiences on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the Indigenous voice referendum. "Should GFCN shift focus onto Australia, I imagine we would see similar themes seeking to amplify distrust in mainstream politicians," she said. The network was not the Kremlin's first attempt to weaponise the fact-checking format, Dr Briant added. Following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia promoted the "War on Fakes" website, which pushed pro-Kremlin narratives under the guise of fact-checking. Sascha-Dominik Dov Bachmann, an information warfare expert from the University of Canberra, said the GFCN marked a shift from traditional disinformation to a more dangerous structure. "It's surprising it took them this long," Professor Bachmann said, agreeing that the Russian network was clearly mimicking the IFCN to "borrow its legitimacy" and steal its credibility. "IFCN relies on accreditation, mentorship and journalistic standards; it's a robust, professional network," he said. "GFCN has none of that. You just sign up and push Kremlin lines." Russia has launched a purported fact-checking organisation that lists a controversial Australian academic among its contributors. The Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), launched in April by Russian state news agency TASS, presents itself as an international hub for unbiased verification in the "fight against fake news". However, experts warn the site is intentionally trying to mirror the work of the 179 active member organisations of the US-based Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The IFCN, of which AAP FactCheck is a member, is widely recognised as the global standard for non-partisan fact-checking. Signatories to its code of principles are required to meet strict transparency, independence and methodology standards. At the time of writing, the GFCN listed 26 "experts" on its participants page, many of whom are prominent Kremlin-aligned commentators. Among the list is Australian academic Tim Anderson, a political economist formerly with the University of Sydney. Dr Anderson was freed from prison in 1991, one year into a 14-year sentence after his conviction for killing three men in a bombing outside Sydney's Hilton Hotel in 1978 was quashed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He was dismissed from his university role in 2019 for presenting a graphic in lectures that overlaid the Israeli flag with a swastika. Three years later, a judge found the university was wrong to terminate his employment. AAP contacted Dr Anderson for comment about his purported involvement with the GFCN but did not receive a response. His LinkedIn profile says he runs the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, a website that publishes his writing alongside material from outlets critical of the West and Israel, and supportive of several authoritarian regimes. Dr Anderson's byline does not appear on any articles on the GFCN website. Experts say the Russian network represents a co-ordinated and ambitious attempt to erode trust in independent verification. Emma Briant, a disinformation expert at the University of Notre Dame, said governments had long sought to launder propaganda through entities that appeared neutral. "This is typical of the Russian efforts to create independent-looking networks of ideologically biased 'experts' to launder approved information and generate credibility for biased narratives on international events," she told AAP. Dr Briant said the GFCN could also target domestic political debates in Australia. She noted Kremlin-backed campaigns had previously spread divisive content among Australian audiences on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the Indigenous voice referendum. "Should GFCN shift focus onto Australia, I imagine we would see similar themes seeking to amplify distrust in mainstream politicians," she said. The network was not the Kremlin's first attempt to weaponise the fact-checking format, Dr Briant added. Following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia promoted the "War on Fakes" website, which pushed pro-Kremlin narratives under the guise of fact-checking. Sascha-Dominik Dov Bachmann, an information warfare expert from the University of Canberra, said the GFCN marked a shift from traditional disinformation to a more dangerous structure. "It's surprising it took them this long," Professor Bachmann said, agreeing that the Russian network was clearly mimicking the IFCN to "borrow its legitimacy" and steal its credibility. "IFCN relies on accreditation, mentorship and journalistic standards; it's a robust, professional network," he said. "GFCN has none of that. You just sign up and push Kremlin lines." Russia has launched a purported fact-checking organisation that lists a controversial Australian academic among its contributors. The Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), launched in April by Russian state news agency TASS, presents itself as an international hub for unbiased verification in the "fight against fake news". However, experts warn the site is intentionally trying to mirror the work of the 179 active member organisations of the US-based Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The IFCN, of which AAP FactCheck is a member, is widely recognised as the global standard for non-partisan fact-checking. Signatories to its code of principles are required to meet strict transparency, independence and methodology standards. At the time of writing, the GFCN listed 26 "experts" on its participants page, many of whom are prominent Kremlin-aligned commentators. Among the list is Australian academic Tim Anderson, a political economist formerly with the University of Sydney. Dr Anderson was freed from prison in 1991, one year into a 14-year sentence after his conviction for killing three men in a bombing outside Sydney's Hilton Hotel in 1978 was quashed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He was dismissed from his university role in 2019 for presenting a graphic in lectures that overlaid the Israeli flag with a swastika. Three years later, a judge found the university was wrong to terminate his employment. AAP contacted Dr Anderson for comment about his purported involvement with the GFCN but did not receive a response. His LinkedIn profile says he runs the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, a website that publishes his writing alongside material from outlets critical of the West and Israel, and supportive of several authoritarian regimes. Dr Anderson's byline does not appear on any articles on the GFCN website. Experts say the Russian network represents a co-ordinated and ambitious attempt to erode trust in independent verification. Emma Briant, a disinformation expert at the University of Notre Dame, said governments had long sought to launder propaganda through entities that appeared neutral. "This is typical of the Russian efforts to create independent-looking networks of ideologically biased 'experts' to launder approved information and generate credibility for biased narratives on international events," she told AAP. Dr Briant said the GFCN could also target domestic political debates in Australia. She noted Kremlin-backed campaigns had previously spread divisive content among Australian audiences on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the Indigenous voice referendum. "Should GFCN shift focus onto Australia, I imagine we would see similar themes seeking to amplify distrust in mainstream politicians," she said. The network was not the Kremlin's first attempt to weaponise the fact-checking format, Dr Briant added. Following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia promoted the "War on Fakes" website, which pushed pro-Kremlin narratives under the guise of fact-checking. Sascha-Dominik Dov Bachmann, an information warfare expert from the University of Canberra, said the GFCN marked a shift from traditional disinformation to a more dangerous structure. "It's surprising it took them this long," Professor Bachmann said, agreeing that the Russian network was clearly mimicking the IFCN to "borrow its legitimacy" and steal its credibility. "IFCN relies on accreditation, mentorship and journalistic standards; it's a robust, professional network," he said. "GFCN has none of that. You just sign up and push Kremlin lines."
Perth Now
11-05-2025
- Politics
- Perth Now
The 'fact check' network waging a war on truth
Russia has launched a purported fact-checking organisation that lists a controversial Australian academic among its contributors. The Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), launched in April by Russian state news agency TASS, presents itself as an international hub for unbiased verification in the "fight against fake news". However, experts warn the site is intentionally trying to mirror the work of the 179 active member organisations of the US-based Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The IFCN, of which AAP FactCheck is a member, is widely recognised as the global standard for non-partisan fact-checking. Signatories to its code of principles are required to meet strict transparency, independence and methodology standards. At the time of writing, the GFCN listed 26 "experts" on its participants page, many of whom are prominent Kremlin-aligned commentators. Among the list is Australian academic Tim Anderson, a political economist formerly with the University of Sydney. Dr Anderson was freed from prison in 1991, one year into a 14-year sentence after his conviction for killing three men in a bombing outside Sydney's Hilton Hotel in 1978 was quashed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He was dismissed from his university role in 2019 for presenting a graphic in lectures that overlaid the Israeli flag with a swastika. Three years later, a judge found the university was wrong to terminate his employment. AAP contacted Dr Anderson for comment about his purported involvement with the GFCN but did not receive a response. His LinkedIn profile says he runs the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, a website that publishes his writing alongside material from outlets critical of the West and Israel, and supportive of several authoritarian regimes. Dr Anderson's byline does not appear on any articles on the GFCN website. Experts say the Russian network represents a co-ordinated and ambitious attempt to erode trust in independent verification. Emma Briant, a disinformation expert at the University of Notre Dame, said governments had long sought to launder propaganda through entities that appeared neutral. "This is typical of the Russian efforts to create independent-looking networks of ideologically biased 'experts' to launder approved information and generate credibility for biased narratives on international events," she told AAP. Dr Briant said the GFCN could also target domestic political debates in Australia. She noted Kremlin-backed campaigns had previously spread divisive content among Australian audiences on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the Indigenous voice referendum. "Should GFCN shift focus onto Australia, I imagine we would see similar themes seeking to amplify distrust in mainstream politicians," she said. The network was not the Kremlin's first attempt to weaponise the fact-checking format, Dr Briant added. Following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia promoted the "War on Fakes" website, which pushed pro-Kremlin narratives under the guise of fact-checking. Sascha-Dominik Dov Bachmann, an information warfare expert from the University of Canberra, said the GFCN marked a shift from traditional disinformation to a more dangerous structure. "It's surprising it took them this long," Professor Bachmann said, agreeing that the Russian network was clearly mimicking the IFCN to "borrow its legitimacy" and steal its credibility. "IFCN relies on accreditation, mentorship and journalistic standards; it's a robust, professional network," he said. "GFCN has none of that. You just sign up and push Kremlin lines."
West Australian
11-05-2025
- Politics
- West Australian
The 'fact check' network waging a war on truth
Russia has launched a purported fact-checking organisation that lists a controversial Australian academic among its contributors. The Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN), launched in April by Russian state news agency TASS, presents itself as an international hub for unbiased verification in the "fight against fake news". However, experts warn the site is intentionally trying to mirror the work of the 179 active member organisations of the US-based Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN). The IFCN, of which AAP FactCheck is a member, is widely recognised as the global standard for non-partisan fact-checking. Signatories to its code of principles are required to meet strict transparency, independence and methodology standards. At the time of writing, the GFCN listed 26 "experts" on its participants page, many of whom are prominent Kremlin-aligned commentators. Among the list is Australian academic Tim Anderson, a political economist formerly with the University of Sydney. Dr Anderson was freed from prison in 1991, one year into a 14-year sentence after his conviction for killing three men in a bombing outside Sydney's Hilton Hotel in 1978 was quashed by the NSW Court of Criminal Appeal. He was dismissed from his university role in 2019 for presenting a graphic in lectures that overlaid the Israeli flag with a swastika. Three years later, a judge found the university was wrong to terminate his employment. AAP contacted Dr Anderson for comment about his purported involvement with the GFCN but did not receive a response. His LinkedIn profile says he runs the Centre for Counter Hegemonic Studies, a website that publishes his writing alongside material from outlets critical of the West and Israel, and supportive of several authoritarian regimes. Dr Anderson's byline does not appear on any articles on the GFCN website. Experts say the Russian network represents a co-ordinated and ambitious attempt to erode trust in independent verification. Emma Briant, a disinformation expert at the University of Notre Dame, said governments had long sought to launder propaganda through entities that appeared neutral. "This is typical of the Russian efforts to create independent-looking networks of ideologically biased 'experts' to launder approved information and generate credibility for biased narratives on international events," she told AAP. Dr Briant said the GFCN could also target domestic political debates in Australia. She noted Kremlin-backed campaigns had previously spread divisive content among Australian audiences on the Israel-Palestine conflict and the Indigenous voice referendum. "Should GFCN shift focus onto Australia, I imagine we would see similar themes seeking to amplify distrust in mainstream politicians," she said. The network was not the Kremlin's first attempt to weaponise the fact-checking format, Dr Briant added. Following its invasion of Ukraine, Russia promoted the "War on Fakes" website, which pushed pro-Kremlin narratives under the guise of fact-checking. Sascha-Dominik Dov Bachmann, an information warfare expert from the University of Canberra, said the GFCN marked a shift from traditional disinformation to a more dangerous structure. "It's surprising it took them this long," Professor Bachmann said, agreeing that the Russian network was clearly mimicking the IFCN to "borrow its legitimacy" and steal its credibility. "IFCN relies on accreditation, mentorship and journalistic standards; it's a robust, professional network," he said. "GFCN has none of that. You just sign up and push Kremlin lines."
Associated Press
02-04-2025
- Politics
- Associated Press
Celebrating fact-checking around the globe
It's International Fact-Checking Day, an event to highlight the work of fact-checkers around the world. In a message marking the day, Angie Drobnic Holan, director of the the International Fact-Checking Network, noted the recent challenges faced by fact-checkers, including a loss of funding and attacks on fact-checkers and their organizations. 'This is indeed a crisis for fact-checkers, but it's even worse for the general public,' Holan said Wednesday. 'Disinformation hurts people. It has real-world consequences. Without fact-checking, more grandparents will fall victim to financial scams. Adults will refuse to vaccinate children against proven killers like measles. Teens will read faked reports of current events with no way to tell them apart from the real thing.' The IFCN launched in 2015, started the event in 2016 and has more than 170 members around the world. Each signatory has been vetted and approved by independent assessors. They are required to show a commitment to nonpartisanship and transparency, about both sources and funding. AP Fact Check is a member of the IFCN, a unit of the Poynter Institute. Getting the facts right has been core to AP's mission since our founding in 1846. When a public figure says something questionable, it is our job to investigate it and offer the facts. It appears the AP's first stand-alone political fact check was written Nov. 9, 1993, around a debate between Vice President Al Gore and businessman Ross Perot on the merits of the North American Free Trade Agreement, often referred to as NAFTA. From there it has grown from fact-checking politicians' speech to checking for false and misleading information that gains widespread traction online. You can find those stories here. We also do live fact-checking around events like presidential addresses, political debates and campaign events. As with all AP staff, AP fact checkers must adhere to the company's Statement of News Values, which states: 'AP employees must avoid behavior or activities — political, social or financial — that create a conflict of interest or compromise our ability to report the news fairly and accurately, uninfluenced by any person or action.'
