20-05-2025
'If AI can... what's left for us?' Hotmail's Sabeer Bhatia has a candid reality check for the future
Sabeer Bhatia, the mind behind Hotmail, has reignited debate with a sharp tweet questioning humanity's role in the age of AI. As machines outperform us in routine tasks, he argues the future belongs to thinkers, not doers. Drawing from personal and national experiences, Bhatia critiques education systems that reward compliance over creativity. His message? The real revolution must start in our minds.
Sabeer Bhatia, the mind behind Hotmail, has reignited debate with a sharp tweet questioning humanity's role in the age of AI. As machines outperform us in routine tasks, he argues the future belongs to thinkers, not doers.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Why Bhatia's Words Deserve Your Attention
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Originality Is the Last Frontier
A System That Trains Workers, Not Thinkers
Even the Best Minds Are Playing It Safe
A Future Not Written in Code, But Thought
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
In a single sharp tweet, Sabeer Bhatia , co-founder of Hotmail, has sparked a debate that extends far beyond Silicon Valley. Posting on X (formerly Twitter), Bhatia wrote:'If AI can write essays, code, and analyze data—what's left for us? Original thought . Judgment. Perspective. The future belongs to those who know how to think, not just what to know.'In a world brimming with admiration for AI's growing capabilities, this tweet lands like a jolt to the human conscience. It's not just a philosophical musing from a tech veteran—it's a brutally honest challenge. If artificial intelligence can now perform many of the tasks once considered distinctly human, where does that leave us?This isn't just a nostalgic technologist worried about the future. Bhatia is the same entrepreneur who, in 1996, gave the world Hotmail—one of the first free web-based email services, launched on the symbolic date of American Independence Day to signify liberation from ISP-bound someone who helped democratize communication in the early days of the internet, his concerns about the future aren't just technological—they're deeply human. Bhatia's warning isn't about losing jobs to AI. It's about losing the heart of his statement is a clear distinction: machines can process, but they can't truly imagine. AI may outperform humans in execution, but it still lacks creativity, intuition, and moral judgment—the pillars of original thought. Bhatia reminds us that these are the last strongholds of human intelligence, and they're not being nurtured the way they should urging us to rethink what we value. In an age where success is often measured in test scores, technical skills, or algorithmic precision, are we forgetting to train the mind to question, interpret, and create?In a podcast appearance that followed his tweet, Bhatia doubled down on his critique—this time pointing the finger squarely at India's education system. He called it a "conformist machine" that builds an 'army of useless kids,' not independent a young age, students are conditioned to follow instructions, chase marks, and memorise rather than challenge. Contrast this with the approach his own children experience in the U.S., where the emphasis is on storytelling, imagination, and expressing thought—even if it comes with spelling errors.'In India, we teach kids to avoid mistakes. In the West, they're taught to explore,' Bhatia pointed troubled Bhatia most was that even India's brightest minds—those who clear the ultra-competitive IIT-JEE exams—aren't innovating. 'Even IIT toppers are chasing jobs at JP Morgan,' he remarked in disbelief. The irony is bitter: a nation full of potential ends up producing excellent employees for foreign corporations rather than risk-taking entrepreneurs or groundbreaking to Bhatia, real education should foster problem-solving, not just fact reproduction. 'You're never asked to write a paper. You're asked to memorise 13 chapters and regurgitate them. That is not education,' he tweet encapsulates more than just frustration—it's a rallying cry. As AI continues to evolve, the gap between doing and thinking becomes crucial. The machines will inevitably master more tasks. But the question is whether we, as humans, are preparing ourselves for the next evolution—not of technology, but of a landscape where machines can already beat us at calculations, pattern recognition, and even creative mimicry, our edge lies not in what we can do, but how we think. Critical reasoning, ethical judgment, vision—these are not just soft skills. They're survival skills in the age of artificial if we don't invest in them now, Bhatia warns, the future may not leave us much to do at all.
