Latest news with #JohnBoozman
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Politics
- Yahoo
‘Wake-up call': Ukraine drone strike exposes dangers to US aircraft
Ukraine's stunning drone strikes on Russian airfields are intensifying calls from military leaders and lawmakers in both parties to address gaping vulnerabilities in U.S. air bases. Kyiv this week launched more than 100 drones inside Russia using artificial intelligence, a daring move that eviscerated five military bases and damaged more than 40 aircraft. Footage of Russian bombers and fighters erupting in flames while parked on open tarmacs rippled across the internet — and Washington. While it was a significant blow struck by a U.S. ally, the attacks also laid bare how easily and cheaply uncrewed systems can cripple sophisticated air forces. Officials' concerns are particularly acute in the Pacific, where the U.S. is seeking to beef up its presence. Ukraine's success underscored how swiftly an adversary can destroy airpower with drones. 'It has to make you much more aware of how vulnerable we as a nation are,' said Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.), chair of the Appropriations subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, said in an interview. 'The Ukrainians defeated the Russian navy without owning any ships, and now they've decimated their air force with virtually no air force of their own.' Lawmakers and military officials say U.S. aircraft are particularly vulnerable since they sit out in the open without protective cover. The strike could force a reassessment of the American military's defensive posture and spending priorities, including whether to invest in more counter-drone technologies, hardened aircraft shelters or camouflage. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin called the Ukrainian offensive a 'wake-up moment' and suggested it would impact defense budget conversations unfolding in Washington. 'Seemingly impenetrable locations, maybe, are not,' he said Tuesday at a Center for a New American Security event, noting the damage of $7 billion was eyebrow-raising. 'We need to pay more attention to that.' The Air Force, in a statement, said its forces 'maintain a high state of readiness to defend against a range of threats,' including swarms of drones. The service is also developing capabilities to ward against future threats, the statement said, and investing in 'layered air and missile defense technologies, early warning systems, and rapid response protocols designed to detect, track and neutralize airborne threats.' President Donald Trump is aware of the military's vulnerabilities and taking steps to fix them, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday during a press conference. Plans for a massive Golden Dome missile shield were launched with this kind of threat in mind, she said. Trump 'has a full understanding … about the future of warfare and how drones are a big part of that.' That is one of the reasons Trump 'wants the one big beautiful bill to be passed,' Leavitt said, referring to Republicans' tax and spending package that would pump $150 billion into Pentagon coffers. The issue could reverberate through Congress' consideration of that megabill. Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) noted the bill includes more money for counter-drone defenses as demand for those capabilities skyrockets. The military has considered the threat drones present to grounded aircraft long before the Ukrainian attack, he said. But the episode could focus public attention on concerns posed by cheap uncrewed technology. "There's no doubt that we have a myriad of aircraft …. stored in facilities, really, that are designed to protect them from the weather and are not resistant to explosives like the ones the Ukrainians used,' Wicker said Wednesday during a Defense Writers Group event with reporters. 'It should be a wake-up call to the public. I'm not sure that it is much of a surprise to our military strategists." The alarm is especially high in the Pacific, where U.S. bases sit within range of China's growing missile arsenal. A Hudson Institute report by Thomas Shugart and Timothy Walton found that China has built more than 400 hardened aircraft shelters — protective concrete bunkers designed to shield warplanes from missile and drone attacks — over the past decade. The U.S. has added just 22 in the region. 'Large numbers of American bombers sit open on the tarmac, just like the ones we saw in those videos,' Shugart, a former Navy officer, said.'There needs to be more robust measures than appear to be happening at this time.' The worry is crossing partisan lines. Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), the top Democrat on the Senate Defense Appropriations subcommittee, said the drone attack shows Ukraine is 'really in this fight' and validates a 'pressing concern' that the U.S. doesn't have enough counter-drone capabilities at home and overseas. 'I have been raising this and pressing this in every meeting with every senior military leader, how to speed up procurement, speed up deployment,' Coons said in an interview. 'This makes it clear that we face genuine risks from sophisticated drone attacks almost everywhere in the world.' The attack is receiving particular attention in Virginia, a state with a heavy military presence. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the strikes a 'case study in battlefield innovation' that should prompt a reevaluation of the safety of U.S. bases. 'We have to do an awful lot to protect our infrastructure at home,' he said. 'I don't think we've figured out all the policies we need or the resources to implement them.' Fellow Virginian and the Senate Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, Sen. Mark Warner, said a national security professional sent him satellite images of American bases after the Ukraine attack with U.S. military aircraft sitting exposed. 'The Ukrainians are redefining warfare,' he said. 'We have to learn from this.' Jack Detsch contributed to this report.
Politico
2 days ago
- Politics
- Politico
‘Wake-up call': Ukraine drone strike exposes dangers to US aircraft
Ukraine's stunning drone strikes on Russian airfields are intensifying calls from military leaders and lawmakers in both parties to address gaping vulnerabilities in U.S. air bases. Kyiv this week launched more than 100 drones inside Russia using artificial intelligence, a daring move that eviscerated five military bases and damaged more than 40 aircraft. Footage of Russian bombers and fighters erupting in flames while parked on open tarmacs rippled across the internet — and Washington. While it was a significant blow struck by a U.S. ally, the attacks also laid bare how easily and cheaply uncrewed systems can cripple sophisticated air forces. Officials' concerns are particularly acute in the Pacific, where the U.S. is seeking to beef up its presence. Ukraine's success underscored how swiftly an adversary can destroy airpower with drones. 'It has to make you much more aware of how vulnerable we as a nation are,' said Sen. John Boozman (R-Ark.), chair of the Appropriations subcommittee on Military Construction and Veterans Affairs, said in an interview. 'The Ukrainians defeated the Russian navy without owning any ships, and now they've decimated their air force with virtually no air force of their own.' Lawmakers and military officials say U.S. aircraft are particularly vulnerable since they sit out in the open without protective cover. The strike could force a reassessment of the American military's defensive posture and spending priorities, including whether to invest in more counter-drone technologies, hardened aircraft shelters or camouflage. Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Allvin called the Ukrainian offensive a 'wake-up moment' and suggested it would impact defense budget conversations unfolding in Washington. 'Seemingly impenetrable locations, maybe, are not,' he said Tuesday at a Center for a New American Security event, noting the damage of $7 billion was eyebrow-raising. 'We need to pay more attention to that.' The Air Force, in a statement, said its forces 'maintain a high state of readiness to defend against a range of threats,' including swarms of drones. The service is also developing capabilities to ward against future threats, the statement said, and investing in 'layered air and missile defense technologies, early warning systems, and rapid response protocols designed to detect, track and neutralize airborne threats.' President Donald Trump is aware of the military's vulnerabilities and taking steps to fix them, White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday during a press conference. Plans for a massive Golden Dome missile shield were launched with this kind of threat in mind, she said. Trump 'has a full understanding … about the future of warfare and how drones are a big part of that.' That is one of the reasons Trump 'wants the one big beautiful bill to be passed,' Leavitt said, referring to Republicans' tax and spending package that would pump $150 billion into Pentagon coffers. The issue could reverberate through Congress' consideration of that megabill. Senate Armed Services Chair Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) noted the bill includes more money for counter-drone defenses as demand for those capabilities skyrockets. The military has considered the threat drones present to grounded aircraft long before the Ukrainian attack, he said. But the episode could focus public attention on concerns posed by cheap uncrewed technology. 'There's no doubt that we have a myriad of aircraft …. stored in facilities, really, that are designed to protect them from the weather and are not resistant to explosives like the ones the Ukrainians used,' Wicker said Wednesday during a Defense Writers Group event with reporters. 'It should be a wake-up call to the public. I'm not sure that it is much of a surprise to our military strategists.' The alarm is especially high in the Pacific, where U.S. bases sit within range of China's growing missile arsenal. A Hudson Institute report by Thomas Shugart and Timothy Walton found that China has built more than 400 hardened aircraft shelters — protective concrete bunkers designed to shield warplanes from missile and drone attacks — over the past decade. The U.S. has added just 22 in the region. 'Large numbers of American bombers sit open on the tarmac, just like the ones we saw in those videos,' Shugart, a former Navy officer, said.'There needs to be more robust measures than appear to be happening at this time.' The worry is crossing partisan lines. Sen. Chris Coons (D-Del.), the top Democrat on the Senate Defense Appropriations subcommittee, said the drone attack shows Ukraine is 'really in this fight' and validates a 'pressing concern' that the U.S. doesn't have enough counter-drone capabilities at home and overseas. 'I have been raising this and pressing this in every meeting with every senior military leader, how to speed up procurement, speed up deployment,' Coons said in an interview. 'This makes it clear that we face genuine risks from sophisticated drone attacks almost everywhere in the world.' The attack is receiving particular attention in Virginia, a state with a heavy military presence. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.), a senior member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, called the strikes a 'case study in battlefield innovation' that should prompt a reevaluation of the safety of U.S. bases. 'We have to do an awful lot to protect our infrastructure at home,' he said. 'I don't think we've figured out all the policies we need or the resources to implement them.' Fellow Virginian and the Senate Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, Sen. Mark Warner, said a national security professional sent him satellite images of American bases after the Ukraine attack with U.S. military aircraft sitting exposed. 'The Ukrainians are redefining warfare,' he said. 'We have to learn from this.' Jack Detsch contributed to this report.
Yahoo
26-05-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
House GOP's SNAP proposal sparks concern from Senate Republicans
A House GOP-backed proposal that would cut billions in federal dollars from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation's largest food assistance program, is drawing concerns from Republicans in the upper chamber. The proposal, included in House Republicans' recently passed package to enact President Trump's tax priorities and spending cuts, would require states to cover a share of SNAP benefits costs, which are currently completely funded by the federal government. 'That's something that I heard some members voice concern about,' Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) said Thursday. 'So, we'll need to address that.' While Boozman said Senate Republicans aren't drawing a red line around the plan just yet, members 'want to look specifically at how those particular policies will affect their individual states.' 'Some of that we know, some of it we don't.' The House bill calls for the federal share of the cost of SNAP to go from 100 percent in the next two fiscal years to 95 percent starting fiscal 2028. It also includes language that would increase states' shares of the costs in fiscal 2028 depending on their payment error rates. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 15 percent and 25 percent. 'That's in the we'll see category. I'm not sure what's going to happen with that,' Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) told The Hill on Thursday when asked about the idea. 'We're going to talk to committee members who can talk to our caucus as a whole,' he said, but he noted that the House's cost-share pitch for states goes 'beyond' what some senators had been looking at for 'accountability' efforts. Republicans defending the proposal say the measure would hold states accountable for billions of dollars in erroneous payments to participants annually, providing an incentive for states to keep their payment error rates down. 'We've seen that when states actually focus on error rates, they can bring them down very quickly, and obviously that's what we want, but we don't want people who are not eligible for the program receiving payments,' Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) said. 'These error rates are far too high.' In fiscal 2023, data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture showed that the national payment error rate was 11.68 percent. The vast majority of states on the list have payment error rates, which factors in a state's overpayments and underpayments, above 6 percent. But Democrats have sharply criticized the proposal, which they argue could lead to states cutting benefits on their own. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the SNAP proposal would reduce direct spending by more than $128 billion from 2028 to 2034 — accounting for a chunk of the minimum $230 billion in savings the House Agriculture Committee was instructed to find as part of the lower chamber's first stab at crafting Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Other proposals in the bill would tighten eligibility requirements for the program, seek to block the federal government from being able to increase monthly benefits in the future, and increase states' share of costs to administer SNAP. Democrats are seizing on an analysis they requested from CBO on the potential effects of the plan, which estimated about 1.3 million people could see their benefits reduced or eliminated in an average month between 2025 and 2034 if lawmakers take the approach to require states to cover some benefit costs. While the CBO noted 'there would be a variety of state responses to the new requirement,' it said it expects 'that some states would maintain current benefits and eligibility and others would modify benefits or eligibility or possibly leave the program altogether because of the increased costs.' 'In CBO's view, state responses would vary; thus, CBO estimated state responses in the aggregate using a probabilistic approach to account for a range of possible outcomes,' it said in a letter Thursday. The CBO estimated that such reductions or eliminations in benefits would lead to a roughly $30 billion decrease in direct spending from 2028 to 2034. It also estimated 'subsidies provided through child nutrition programs would decrease for about 420,000 children in an average month, reducing direct spending by about $700 million over the 2028–2034 period.' The CBO noted that the analysis does 'not account for interactions among provisions,' explaining that the sum of effects to separately enact each measure would differ from the effects of enacting multiple proposed SNAP reforms at once due to the overlap in affected populations. In a statement on Thursday, Rep. Angie Craig (Minn.), top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, accused Republicans of waging an 'attack on working Americans that takes food away from families.' 'The Republicans' budget will make America hungrier, poorer and sicker. Parents struggling to afford groceries for their families and seniors living on fixed incomes will have their food taken away if this bill becomes law,' she said. SNAP work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents would also expand under the plan, which calls for increasing the age threshold at which such adults must continue to work to qualify from up to 54 to 64 years of age. While many of the proposals are supported by Republicans of various factions in both chambers, some voted for the plan this week with the expectation that the Senate would eventually make some changes. Rep. Don Bacon (D-Neb.), a key moderate, said he's open to states fronting a portion of SNAP benefit costs, but he wasn't entirely in favor of the 5 percent to 25 percent cost-sharing range for states. 'I really didn't like it, but I don't mind a small mark, because, really, they execute it, and if they're not executing them well, this gives them skin in the game,' Bacon told The Hill. But he added that 25 percent 'seems a little high.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
26-05-2025
- Business
- The Hill
House GOP's SNAP proposal sparks concern from Senate Republicans
A House GOP-backed proposal that would cut billions in federal dollars from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the nation's largest food assistance program, is drawing concerns from Republicans in the upper chamber. The proposal, included in House Republicans' recently-passed package to enact President Trump's tax priorities and spending cuts, would require states to cover a share of SNAP benefits costs, which are currently completely funded by the federal government. 'That's something that I heard some members voice concern about,' Senate Agriculture Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) said Thursday. 'So, we'll need to address that.' While Boozman said Senate Republicans aren't drawing a red line around the plan just yet, members 'want to look specifically at how those particular policies will affect their individual states.' 'Some of that we know, some of it we don't.' The House bill calls for the federal share of the cost of SNAP to go from 100 percent in the next two fiscal years to 95 percent starting fiscal year 2028. It also includes language that would increase states' shares of the costs in fiscal 2028 depending on their payment error rates. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 15 percent and 25 percent. 'That's in the we'll see category. I'm not sure what's going to happen with that,' Sen. John Hoeven (R-N.D.) told The Hill on Thursday when asked about the idea. 'We're going to talk to committee members who can talk to our caucus as a whole,' he said, but he noted that the House's cost-share pitch for states goes 'beyond' what some senators had been looking at for 'accountability' efforts. Republicans defending the proposal say the measure would hold states accountable for billions of dollars in erroneous payments to participants annually, providing an incentive for states to keep their payment error rates down. 'We've seen that when states actually focus on error rates, they can bring them down very quickly, and obviously that's what we want, but we don't want people who are not eligible for the program receiving payments,' Rep. Dusty Johnson (R-S.D.) said this week. 'These error rates are far too high.' In fiscal year 2023, data from the Agriculture Department (USDA) showed that the national payment error rate was 11.68 percent. The vast majority of states on the list have payment error rates, which factors in a state's overpayments and underpayments, above 6 percent. But Democrats have sharply criticized the proposal, which they argue could lead to states cutting benefits on their own. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated this week that the SNAP proposal would reduce direct spending by more than $128 billion from 2028 to 2034 – accounting for a chunk of the minimum $230 billion in savings the House Agriculture Committee was instructed to find as part of the lower chamber's first stab at crafting Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Other proposals in the bill would tighten eligibility requirements for the program, seek to block the federal government from being able to increase monthly benefits in the future, and increase states' share of costs to administer SNAP. Democrats are seizing on an analysis they requested from CBO on the potential effects of the plan, which estimated about 1.3 million people could see their benefits reduced or eliminated in an average month between 2025 and 2034 if lawmakers take the approach to require states to cover some benefit costs. While the CBO noted 'there would be a variety of state responses to the new requirement,' it said it expects 'that some states would maintain current benefits and eligibility and others would modify benefits or eligibility or possibly leave the program altogether because of the increased costs.' 'In CBO's view, state responses would vary; thus, CBO estimated state responses in the aggregate using a probabilistic approach to account for a range of possible outcomes,' it said in a letter on Thursday. The CBO estimated that such reductions or eliminations in benefits would lead to a roughly $30 billion decrease in direct spending from 2028 to 2034. It also estimated 'subsidies provided through child nutrition programs would decrease for about 420,000 children in an average month, reducing direct spending by about $700 million over the 2028–2034 period.' The CBO noted that the analysis does 'not account for interactions among provisions,' explaining that the sum of effects to separately enact each measure would differ from the effects of enacting multiple proposed SNAP reforms at once due to the overlap in affected populations. In a statement on Thursday, Rep. Angie Craig (Minn.), top Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, accused Republicans of waging an 'attack on working Americans that takes food away from families.' 'The Republicans' budget will make America hungrier, poorer and sicker. Parents struggling to afford groceries for their families and seniors living on fixed incomes will have their food taken away if this bill becomes law,' she said. SNAP work requirements for able bodied adults without dependents would also expand under the plan, which calls for increasing the age threshold at which such adults must continue to work to qualify from up to 54 to 64 years of age. While many of the proposals are supported by Republicans of various factions in both chambers, some voted for the plan this week with the expectation that the Senate would eventually make some changes in the House. Rep. Don Bacon (D-Neb.), a key moderate, said he's open to states fronting a portion of SNAP benefit costs, but wasn't entirely in favor of the 5-25 percent cost-sharing range for states. 'I really didn't like it, but I don't mind a small mark, because, really, they execute it, and if they're not executing them well, this gives them skin in the game,' Bacon told The Hill. But he added that 25 percent 'seems a little high.'
Associated Press
21-05-2025
- Business
- Associated Press
Arkansas Leaders Urge Pentagon to Immediately Purchase Vanadium for the National Defense Stockpile
Arkansas' two U.S. Senators and two Arkansas Congressmen are urging Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth to support expansion of vanadium production in the U.S. HOT SPRINGS, AR, UNITED STATES, May 21, 2025 / / -- Arkansas' two U.S. Senators and two Arkansas Congressmen are urging Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth to support expansion of vanadium production in the U.S. in order to counter the current effective control of vanadium supply chains by Russia and China. In two separate letters to Secretary Hegseth, Arkansas Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR) and John Boozman (R-AR) and Arkansas Representatives Bruce Westerman (R-AR) and French Hill (R-AR) urged Secretary Hegseth to direct the National Defense Stockpile to purchase and store at least 1 year's supply of vanadium in order to better insulate the U.S. military and commercial manufacturers from potential supply chain disruptions because of Russia's and China's control of 75% of global vanadium supply chains. U.S. Reps. Troy Balderson (R-OH), Rich McCormick (R-GA), Mike Kelly (R-PA) and Randy Weber (R-TX) also joined in urging action by Secretary Hegseth. Arkansas-based U.S. Vanadium is the leading producer of high-purity vanadium oxide in the U.S. and praised the Senators and Congressman for their leadership in raising this issue and promoting more domestic production of vanadium, which is a U.S. Government-designated critical mineral. 'We applaud the strong leadership of Senators Cotton and Boozman and Congressmen Westerman and Hill for alerting the Pentagon and the Trump Administration to the strategic vanadium vulnerability facing the U.S., and to take action to mitigate this threat by stockpiling vanadium and encouraging greater domestic production of this strategic material,' said US Vanadium Executive Chairman Mark Smith. 'We also greatly appreciate the continuing strong support provided to our company by the entire Arkansas congressional delegation and for their ongoing efforts to support economic growth and job creation in Arkansas.' 'US Vanadium's high-purity vanadium processing facilities in Arkansas are quite unique in the extremely high quality of product we are able to produce and the fact that our feedstock comes from post-industrial waste streams. This business model provides very attractive circular economics while also bolstering America's domestic production of this defense-critical mineral,' added US Vanadium CEO Darryll Castle. 'There is very strong industrial and national security logic behind having the U.S. National Defense Stockpile begin purchasing and storing significant amounts of US-produced vanadium products to better insulate the country from the risks associated with current global vanadium supply chains that are dominated by nations that don't necessarily have US interests at heart.' Arkansas' representatives in Washington are very influential on national security and critical minerals supply chain issues. Senator Cotton is Chairman of the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee and also serves on the Senate Armed Services Committee; Senator Boozman serves on the powerful Senate Appropriations Committee and is Chairman of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry Committee. Congressman Westerman chairs the House Natural Resources Committee, and Congressman Hill chairs the House Financial Services Committee and serves on the House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence. The Senators wrote: 'Vanadium is an official USGS Critical Mineral required for ballistic missiles, jet engines and airframes, night vision, armor steel, body armor, combat vehicles, and other weapons systems critical to national defense. China and Russia control 75% of the global vanadium supply, leaving the Department of Defense open to significant disruption in its weapons supply chain. 'Vanadium compounds such as high purity vanadium pentoxide and ferrovanadium are critical to applications where steel and titanium are used, meaning they are a key element of US defense and essential civilian technologies. The United States consumed 14,000 metric tons of vanadium in 2024, with domestic production only accounting for 3,800 metric tons. The United States imports high purity vanadium pentoxide from Brazil and South Africa, but market conditions threaten those supply chains. Ferrovanadium supply chains rely on material converted in-part from Russian and Chinese material. Currently, no substitute materials exist. 'The United States risks being left without viable resources of this critical mineral if the Department and Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) do not take decisive action. We request DLA immediately begin to stockpile at least one year of military and essential civilian uses of both ferrovanadium and aerospace grade vanadium pentoxide in the National Defense Stockpile (NDS). We also request the Department work with the rest of the United States government to prioritize domestic production of vanadium compounds, to include reviewing environmental and other regulations that stifle domestic production.' The Congressmen reiterated the need for action on vanadium: 'When President Trump addressed the joint session of Congress on March 4, 2025, the President reiterated his support of dramatically expanding production of critical minerals and rare earth elements in America. Therefore, we ask your office to direct the DLA (Defense Logistics Agency) to stockpile at least one year of military and essential civilian uses of ferrovanadium and aerospace grade vanadium pentoxide. As our country reviews critical supply chains that are central to our competitiveness in the face of rising global threats, we urge you to consider the importance of vanadium and the concerning global supply chain of the industry.' More information on U.S. Vanadium, and vanadium technologies in general, can be seen on U.S. Vanadium's website: Contact: Jim Sims, [email protected], +1 (303) 503-6203 About U.S. Vanadium LLC U.S. Vanadium produces and sells a range of specialty vanadium chemicals, including the highest-purity vanadium pentoxide ('V2O5') and vanadium trioxide ('V2O3') in the world and ultra-high-purity electrolyte for vanadium flow batteries from its flagship facility in Hot Springs, Arkansas USA. The company is comprised of global leaders and investors in specialty chemicals and strategic materials, including in the mining, processing, purification, and sales and distribution of vanadium specialty chemicals. For more information, please go Jim Sims US Vanadium LLC +1 303-503-6203 [email protected] Legal Disclaimer: EIN Presswire provides this news content 'as is' without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
