logo
#

Latest news with #JohnRayClemmons

State lawmakers react to ICE activity in South Nashville
State lawmakers react to ICE activity in South Nashville

Yahoo

time06-05-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

State lawmakers react to ICE activity in South Nashville

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — After multiple traffic stops involving Immigration and Customs Enforcement happened in South Nashville this weekend, News 2 has worked to get responses from Tennessee lawmakers. The Tennessee Highway Patrol conducted a 'public safety operation' with federal authorities this weekend. Rep. John Ray Clemmons (D-Nashville) said that he and other Democrats sent a letter to the THP to see if the operation was done at the request of the federal government or the state government. 'It's cruel; it's an abuse of power': Community leaders address rising fears and concerns about ICE 'Children were left abandoned. Personal property has been left abandoned. People are without their family members. Right now, there appears to be no due process whatsoever. We know of no subpoenas that were issued or served involved in this raid,' Clemmons said. '…Every Tennessean should be concerned. There is nothing limiting the federal government right now from coming and picking anyone of us up off the road for any reason whatsoever apparently and detaining us with no excuse whatsoever.' The letter, written by the Davidson County Legislative Delegation, is addressed to Commissioner Jeff Long with the Department of Homeland Security and Colonel Matt Perry with the THP. The letter seeks 'to better understand the State's involvement' in the operation. A spokesperson told News 2 that a Republican legislator would speak on the matter later this week. 'They just separated us': Woman details traffic stop after she and fiancé were allegedly pulled over by ICE News 2 also reached out to Governor Bill Lee's office for comment on the safety operation. A spokesperson said in a statement: 'Tennessee has a long track record of stepping up to secure our Nation's borders and strengthening public safety. President Trump made it clear that states would play a major role in enforcing immigration laws and removing the most violent offenders, and Americans overwhelmingly elected him to do so. In partnership with the General Assembly, Gov. Lee established the Centralized Immigration Enforcement Division to strengthen the state's ability to identify and address the presence of individuals in Tennessee who are subject to final orders of removal or who are violent criminal offenders in the country unlawfully. Questions regarding law enforcement operations and the Centralized Immigration Enforcement Division should be referred to the Department of Safety.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Bill could eliminate grocery tax on fruits, vegetables in Tennessee
Bill could eliminate grocery tax on fruits, vegetables in Tennessee

Yahoo

time11-03-2025

  • Business
  • Yahoo

Bill could eliminate grocery tax on fruits, vegetables in Tennessee

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (WKRN) — Healthy eating could come with a smaller price tag in Tennessee if a bill to cut the state's grocery tax on fruits and vegetables passes. The bill, sponsored by Sen. Raumesh Akbari (D-Memphis) and Rep. John Ray Clemmons (D-Nashville) would eliminate the 4% grocery tax on fresh, frozen, and canned fruits and vegetables. 'The bottom line is this: people are already struggling to make ends meet,' Sen Akbari said. 'They're trying their best, they're working, a lot of them are members of the working poor, and they face constant increases on healthcare, housing, gas, and even food. The basic necessities folks need to survive.' RELATED: More states want to stop taxing groceries The bill was supposed to be debated in its first House subcommittee Tuesday, but it was deferred to next week. Both Democrats and Republicans also have their own bills to cut the grocery tax on all items, but the Speaker of the House, Cameron Sexton (R-Crossville) told journalists he doesn't believe an entire cut would pass. 'If you want to look at milk and eggs and butter and bread, let's have a conversation, but to say we're going to repeal the whole grocery tax and we want to give someone a tax break for someone for buying a Snickers bar over here or a frozen pizza, yeah, I don't foresee that,' Speaker Sexton said. WATCH: Bill proposes ban on 'SNAP' junk food purchases Grocery shoppers told News 2 any kind of grocery tax cut would help. 'I think it'll go a long way on helping folks who are struggling right now with inflation and everything that's happening in the world,' Richard Donnell, who lives in Nashville, said. 'I would be saving a great cost,' Neva Garnerharding, who lives in Nashville, said. 'I'd be saving about $200 to $300.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

A bill to preempt Metro Council by a Nashville Democrat raises eyebrows
A bill to preempt Metro Council by a Nashville Democrat raises eyebrows

Yahoo

time24-02-2025

  • Politics
  • Yahoo

A bill to preempt Metro Council by a Nashville Democrat raises eyebrows

(Photo: Metro Nashville Police) The recent introduction — and rapid withdrawal — of legislation to eliminate local authority over police surveillance cameras by a Democratic lawmaker in the state legislature has raised eyebrows in Nashville. State Rep. John Ray Clemmons, a Nashville Democrat, introduced a bill that would effectively gut local oversight of controversial surveillance technology like license plate readers (LPRs) — automated cameras that capture and analyze images of vehicle license plates. Nashville's Metro Council spent nearly two years debating LPR regulations. The prolonged debate, which included a series of community meetings and a six-month pilot program in 2023, resulted in a regulatory framework limiting local police use of the cameras and requiring the department to delete all data after 10 days. LPRs remain a divisive issue in the city. The Metro Nashville Police Department has yet to present any vendor contracts for the council's approval, the last step that's needed to deploy the cameras countywide. I don't know where Clemmons lives, but I'd have to assume it's somewhere under a rock. That's where you'd have to be to have missed the intense public debate the city has had over this very issue. To think bypassing your own damn city's governing body on this hyperlocal, incredibly emotionally fraught debate is a good idea? But writing about the bill became unexpectedly complicated. I reached out to Clemmons, asked for comment on why he introduced the bill and why he was walking it back. Clemmons at first called the bill a 'non-issue' via text message, then, through his spokesperson, said he'd have a call with me. A couple of days later, Clemmons changed his mind. Since Clemmons planned to withdraw the bill, his spokesperson said, he wouldn't be fielding questions about it. But no one else would talk either, not even people who appeared to be instrumental in talking to Clemmons about the wisdom of pulling the bill. Not even a 'no comment.' Just crickets. Local Democrats and anti-surveillance activists see the non-bill as worthy of discussion. The seven or eight people who did talk to me — off the record — maintain that the story is worth telling, lest another state lawmaker get any bright ideas about trampling all over Nashville's efforts to direct the ways and reasons for which the police are authorized to use surveillance technology. Councilmember Rollin Horton said he was surprised to see a Nashville lawmaker file a bill to preempt a local measure, especially in such sweeping fashion. In addition to preempting Nashville's existing regulations of surveillance technology, the bill would have allowed the police to bypass local procurement requirements and enter into contracts without the Metro Council's approval. 'How can we condemn state preemption on other issues when this bill is, in fact, state preemption,' said Horton. Clemmons' bill or any similar effort by a local Democrat in the future could set a 'dangerous precedent' and 'silence our city's discussions and concerns,' Horton added. Anti-surveillance activist Lydia Yousief, who runs the Elmahaba Center in Nashville, said Clemmons' withdrawal of the bill is not cause for celebration. How can we condemn state preemption on other issues when this bill is, in fact, state preemption? – Metro Nashville Councilmember Rollin Horton 'You can't slap somebody in the face and say, 'Oh, my bad,' without a full discussion as to why you thought this was appropriate,' said Yousief. 'It doesn't necessarily matter that the bill doesn't exist anymore. What is concerning is the lack of transparency about why you think these are good ideas.' Democrats in the state legislature have, for years, bemoaned the Republican supermajority's efforts to preempt local control over all manner of issues, from short-term rentals to school vouchers. Given this history, local Democrats were surprised to see one of their own looking to preempt Nashville's rules governing police use of surveillance technology. Nashville Democrats wouldn't have been surprised if the bill had come from a Republican lawmaker; in 2022, two Republicans filed, but ultimately withdrew, a preemption bill similar to the one Clemmons proposed last month. Nashville Metro Council passes controversial license plate readers In his 'prebuttal' to the governor's state of the state address this year, Clemmons spoke about Democrats' focus on strengthening public safety 'by addressing the root causes of crime — poverty, lack of health services, unsafe housing, and easy access to illegal guns.' Conspicuously missing from that list: allowing local police to bypass the local governing body to unilaterally implement a massive surveillance network free of any oversight or accountability. But that's just what Clemmons was looking to do, and withdrawing the bill – or refusing to talk about it — won't make the issue go away. Clemmons ended his prebuttal with a call to action: 'We can get our state back on track…But we need your voice. Demand better.' On this, I'll agree: we should demand better. But those demands shouldn't be limited to the Republicans in the room. Democrats shouldn't get a pass just because they don't want to turn Guantanamo Bay into a glorified concentration camp for undocumented immigrants. If you want to claim the moral high ground, you've got to be willing to acknowledge when you've lost it. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store