logo
#

Latest news with #JusticeGavai-ledBench

Amended Waqf law will protect tribal lands: Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai
Amended Waqf law will protect tribal lands: Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai

The Hindu

time05-05-2025

  • Politics
  • The Hindu

Amended Waqf law will protect tribal lands: Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai

Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai has said the Waqf (Amendment) Act will not only benefit the deprived people belonging to the Muslim community but also protect the interests of tribal communities in the State by preventing land grabbing. Waqf Act SC hearing: Pleas listed before Justice Gavai-led Bench on May 15 He also hit out at the Congress accusing it of failing to introduce caste census despite being in power for 60 years. 'Waqf board was introduced with the objective of upliftment of economically backward and downtrodden women from the Muslim community and Pasmanda Muslim. However, it did not happen. "The influential people from the Muslim community took the Waqf properties on lease and set up big malls. The rich kept on becoming richer but the poor did not get any benefit,' Mr. Sai said in an interview to PTI Videos. He said that amending the Waqf law was one of the bold decisions of the Prime Minister. "We would like to thank Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji, who has been taking many bold decisions. This is also one of them. With the introduction of the Act, their arbitrariness will definitely stop and the Waqf Board will work for the upliftment of the Pasmanda Muslims, the poor and the women,' he said. 'Chhattisgarh is a tribal-dominated State and the land of the tribals will also be protected here with this Amendment Act. The Waqf boards will not be able to cast their eyes on their [tribals'] land either,' he added. About the Congress claims that the government is eyeing political gains with its move to include the caste survey in the next census, Mr. Sai called the Opposition party a "sinking ship" and said it has nothing to speak of. 'There is a huge difference between what Congress says and what it does. They have been demanding caste-based census since the Nehruvian era, but did nothing despite being in power for 55-60 years,' he said. Praising PM Modi for the decision to include caste enumeration in the census, he said, 'The country is fortunate to have such a visionary PM who considers all 140 crore Indians as family and works day and night for their happiness and sorrows'. With the motto of 'Sabka Saath, Sabka Vishwas, Sabka Prayas' and 'Ek Bharat, Shreshtha Bharat', he has been working for everyone's development and winning everyone's trust, he said, adding that the country will benefit from caste census. On April 30, the Centre announced that caste enumeration will be included in the next census exercise.

SC agrees to hear next week plea for removal of derogatory social media posts against judiciary
SC agrees to hear next week plea for removal of derogatory social media posts against judiciary

Hans India

time22-04-2025

  • Politics
  • Hans India

SC agrees to hear next week plea for removal of derogatory social media posts against judiciary

The Supreme Court on Tuesday agreed to list next week a plea seeking removal of derogatory social media posts directed towards the judiciary after BJP Lok Sabha member Nishikant Dubey made deplorable remarks regarding the top court and the Chief Justice of India (CJI). The petitioner's counsel mentioned the matter before a Bench headed by Justice B.R. Gavai for an urgent hearing. The lawyer said that after the legislator made comments targeting the top court, social media platforms were flooded with derogatory and contemptuous posts against the judiciary. He said, 'Letters were sent to the Attorney General and Solicitor General for giving consent to initiate criminal contempt proceedings against the MP (Nishikant Dubey). No action is being taken by the government. Please give direction to social media platforms to remove videos, etc.' After hearing the submission, the Justice Gavai-led Bench agreed to list the plea for hearing next week. A day before, the Justice Gavai-led Bench told a lawyer that consent of the Attorney General (AG) of India, the highest law officer of the Centre, would be needed to initiate contempt proceedings against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey. "Make a case before the AG. He will give permission. You file it (criminal contempt plea). For filing, you don't require our permission," it remarked. Under Section 15 (1) (b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the Supreme Court may initiate criminal contempt on a motion made by a private complainant only after obtaining the written consent of the Attorney General or the Solicitor General. Amid ongoing hearings on the constitutionality of the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, Dubey questioned the judiciary's role in legislative matters, suggesting that if courts assume the task of lawmaking, the existence of Parliament becomes redundant. Dubey's comments targeting the Supreme Court have drawn significant attention, particularly, the word 'anarchy'' which he has used and "inciting religious wars". The controversy has sparked political debate, with Opposition parties like the Congress accusing the BJP of attempting to undermine the judiciary. During the hearings, the Central government assured the Supreme Court that it would not de-notify provisions related to 'Waqf-by-user' or include non-Muslim members in the Waqf Board. This assurance followed the top court's indication that it might consider staying certain parts of the law. Meanwhile, the BJP has disassociated itself from the remarks made by two of its Members of Parliament (MPs) -- Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma – clarifying that these statements were 'personal opinions' and do not reflect the party's stance. In a post on X, BJP chief J.P. Nadda distanced the party from the comments by the MPs. "The BJP has nothing to do with the statements made by BJP MPs Nishikant Dubey and Dinesh Sharma on the judiciary and the Chief Justice of the country. These are their personal statements, but the BJP neither agrees with such statements nor does it ever support such statements. The BJP completely rejects these statements," J.P. Nadda said. The party reiterated its commitment to accepting judicial orders and suggestions and has instructed its members to refrain from making such statements in the future.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store