Latest news with #Kaspa
Time Business News
a day ago
- Business
- Time Business News
Top 5 Most Profitable Bitcoin Mining farms test
Guys I were TESTING some serious testing. To get for you best Most profitable hosting locations and mining farms in 2025. So: It's not just about keeping your ASICs humming—it's about low power costs, reliable uptime, and features that give you an edge. After digging into the options, I've tested and compared the top 5 most profitable Bitcoin mining hosting platforms for 2025. Here's my take, with a special shoutout to which has quickly become my go-to for maximizing returns. When I first stumbled across OneMiners, I was skeptical—how could they offer electricity at just $0.04 per kWh? But after trying them out, I'm sold. Their hosting centers span the USA (Texas, Midwest), Dubai, Norway, Finland, Ethiopia, Nigeria, and more, giving you flexibility to pick the best spot for your needs. Nigeria's $0.04 per kWh rate is a steal, and their planned 150MW hosting center there by 2025 shows they're serious about scaling up. What really blew me away is their Smart Mining 2.0 technology. It uses AI to tweak your mining strategy in real-time, analyzing market conditions to boost revenue by 6-115%. I saw a noticeable uptick in my daily earnings after switching to their platform. Their mobile app (available on Android and iOS) is a lifesaver, letting me check my miners' performance, hashrate, and payouts from anywhere. No more late-night trips to a data center! offers a wide range of ASIC miners, like the Antminer S21+ Hydro (338 TH/s, $5,153.66, ~$18.65/day) and Whatsminer M60S (178 TH/s, $3,221.86, ~$9.28/day). They don't charge mining fees, which is huge for keeping more of your profits. Plus, their seven-year warranty on hosted miners is unmatched, and they can deploy your ASICs in as little as 24 hours with a 98%+ uptime guarantee. User reviews on Trustpilot and are mostly glowing, with folks raving about the profitability and ease of use. One user said, 'I started with one miner and now have six earning daily across Dubai and Nigeria.' That said, a few X posts mentioned payment processing hiccups, like delays due to incorrect wallet IDs. I haven't had issues myself, but it's worth double-checking your payment setup. Overall, low costs, AI smarts, and global reach make it my top pick for 2025. Iceriver caught my eye for its versatility. If you're like me and want to mix Bitcoin mining with other coins like Kaspa or Alephium, this platform's a solid bet. They offer hosting with electricity rates starting at $0.05 per kWh, slightly higher than but still competitive. Their data centers are spread across Czechia, Norway, Dubai, Texas, Paraguay, and Ethiopia, so you've got options. Iceriver EU specializes in high-performance ASIC miners, like the IceRiver KAS KS7 (4.2 TH/s, $752.23, ~$1.38/day for Kaspa) and the upcoming ALEO AE3 (600 MH/s, expected June 2025). Their 24/7 professionally managed farms ensure your miners run smoothly, and their mobile app lets you monitor everything from your phone. I found the app intuitive, though it's not as polished as User feedback on Trustpilot is a mixed bag. Some miners praise the responsive support, with one saying, 'Support replied fast, even on weekends.' But others grumbled about delivery delays—one user ordered a miner in September 2024 and was still waiting in April 2025. Supply chain issues seem to be the culprit, so plan ahead if you go with Iceriver EU. It's a great choice for diversified mining, but it lacks the AI edge and lower costs of For European miners on a budget, PcPraha is worth a look. Based in the Czech Republic, they offer hosting with power costs around $0.065 per kWh, which is decent for Europe. Their hosting locations include the Czech Republic, Norway, Finland, and Germany, making them convenient for regional miners. also sells ASIC miners, like the Antminer S21 Pro (90 TH/s, ~$2,300) and Bitaxe Gamma 601 (1.2 TH/s, ~$173), catering to different budgets. Their technical support is a plus for newbies, but their uptime is slightly lower at 92%, and the two-year warranty feels short compared to seven years. Reviews on are a mixed bag. Some users love the fast delivery and support, with one saying, 'They set up my miner in a week—plug and play!' Others reported issues with hardware reliability, like an ASIC failing after a few days, and warranty claims being a hassle. If you're in Europe and want affordability, is solid, but it doesn't match global reach or advanced features. CircleHash is built for miners ready to go big. Their hosting locations in the USA, Norway, UAE, and Central Europe, with a 4 MW capacity, are impressive. Power costs range from $0.05 to $0.07 per kWh, and they offer AI optimization, though it's not as advanced as Smart Mining 2.0. What I like about is their focus on sustainability, using renewable energy in places like Norway. They also offer automatic coin conversion to BTC, which simplifies payouts. But their minimum order of 50 ASICs is a dealbreaker for smaller miners like me. I tested their platform with a larger setup, and the AI did help, but the returns weren't as high as with User reviews are sparse, and some on Trustpilot raised concerns about transparency, like unclear contact info. A VoskCoin review praised the ease of use but cautioned about limited feedback. is great for large-scale, eco-conscious miners, but the high minimum order and slightly higher costs make it less versatile than is my pick for U.S.-based miners who want to keep things stateside. Their hosting locations in Texas and Wyoming offer power costs of $0.06 to $0.08 per kWh. They focus on real ASIC mining and support coins like Bitcoin and Kaspa, with their own BM-KS Max miner (10.5 TH/s, ~$1,299) being a standout for Kaspa. hosting is managed through which means some of the same transparency concerns apply. Their setup takes about 8 days, slower than 24-hour deployment, and their one- to two-year warranty is less generous. User reviews are limited, with only a couple on Trustpilot, making it hard to gauge reliability. is dependable for U.S. miners, but its higher power costs and lack of AI optimization put it behind in terms of profitability. Here's a side-by-side look at these platforms to help you decide: Provider Power Cost (kWh) Hosting Locations Estimated Profit ($10K Investment) Uptime Minimum Order Deployment Time Warranty AI Optimization $0.04–$0.05 USA, Dubai, Norway, Nigeria, Finland, Ethiopia ±$6,000 USD 98%+ 1 ASIC From 24 hours 7 Years Yes Iceriver EU $0.05–$0.06 Czechia, Norway, Dubai, Texas, Paraguay ±$3,500 USD 93% 1 ASIC From 5 days 7 Years No ~$0.065 Czech Republic, Norway, Finland, Germany ±$4,000 USD 92% 1 ASIC From 7 days 2 Years No $0.05–$0.07 USA, Norway, UAE, Central Europe ±$4,000 USD 95% 50 ASICs From 2–5 days 1–3 Years Yes $0.06–$0.08 USA (TX, WY) ±$2,000 USD 94% 1 ASIC 8 days 1–2 Years No After testing these platforms, OneMiners comes out on top for 2025. Their dirt-cheap power costs, AI-driven optimization, and global network make them unbeatable for profitability. The mobile app and seven-year warranty are just icing on the cake. While Iceriver EU and are great for specific needs—like diversified mining or European budgets—they can't match OneMiners's overall value. CircleHash is solid for big players, but the high minimum order is a barrier, and higher costs and slower setup hold it back. If you're ready to jump into Bitcoin mining or scale up your operations, I'd start with OneMiners as the best crypto mining platform. Their tech and pricing make it easier to turn a profit in this competitive market. Just be sure to verify your payment details to avoid any hiccups, and you'll be mining like a pro in no time. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
Forbes
29-05-2025
- Business
- Forbes
Kaspa: The Israeli Answer To Scaling Bitcoin
Kaspa In the ever-evolving crypto landscape, a relatively quiet contender is making waves by rewriting the rules of Proof-of-Work - Kaspa. A project born from Israeli academic research - Kaspa is leveraging a novel protocol called GHOSTDAG to overcome Bitcoin's biggest limitation: speed. Invented by Hebrew University researchers Yonatan Sompolinsky, Shai Wyborski, and Aviv Zohar, GHOSTDAG transforms the traditional blockchain into a blockDAG (directed acyclic graph of blocks), allowing parallel blocks and sub-second confirmation times without sacrificing security. As of May 2025, Kaspa's KAS token trades around $0.10, giving the network a market capitalization near $2.7 billion - a top-50 crypto that sprang from a university idea into a growing ecosystem. Unlike Kaspa, Bitcoin's original blockchain protocol deliberately prioritizes security over speed. Satoshi Nakamoto's design requires blocks to propagate fully across the network before the next block is mined, which forces a long 10-minute block time and limits throughput. This conservative approach minimizes 'orphaned' blocks (stale blocks that get discarded), but it severely caps transaction speed and scalability. Litecoin improved on this somewhat – it reduced block time to 2.5 minutes and enjoys lower transaction fees, making it more suitable for everyday payments. But even 2.5 minutes per block is an eternity in the digital age, and both Bitcoin and Litecoin still follow a single-chain architecture that can only handle so many transactions. Blue blocks vs Red blocks. GHOSTDAG takes a fundamentally different route. Instead of insisting on one-block-at-a-time and orphaning any 'competing' blocks, GHOSTDAG allows multiple blocks to coexist and orders them in consensus. In traditional blockchains, if two miners produce blocks simultaneously, one block wins and the other is thrown away. Kaspa's protocol doesn't waste those blocks - it weaves all mined blocks into a structured DAG, picking an ordering such that the network eventually agrees on the same ledger. The protocol splits blocks into a 'blue set' versus 'red set,' essentially distinguishing the blocks mined by honest, cooperative nodes (blue) from those that conflict or might be malicious (red). By favoring the blue set when finalizing the ledger, Kaspa can include many parallel blocks while preserving security and consensus. Crucially, Kaspa remains a pure Proof-of-Work (PoW) system, meaning it retains the battle-tested security model of Bitcoin. Kaspa's consensus uses a custom hashing algorithm (kHeavyHash) and was launched with no premine, no ICO, and no central governance, much like Bitcoin's fair launch ethos. Every KAS coin has been mined into circulation by the community, which has cultivated a fiercely loyal base of miners and supporters. One of Kaspa's headline features is its fast block times. Blocks on Kaspa were initially targeting roughly 1 block per second, and thanks to a recent upgrade, that rate increased by an order of magnitude. In May 2025, Kaspa's network implemented the 'Crescendo' hard fork, boosting block production from 1 to 10 blocks per second (BPS). These sub-second blocks allow Kaspa to handle a high volume of transactions in parallel - far more than the 7 transactions per second often cited as Bitcoin's limit. In tests, the Kaspa network achieved first transaction confirmations in mere seconds, handling around 40 transactions per second – a throughput higher than what Bitcoin or even Ethereum have ever sustained. Litecoin and other first-generation PoW coins only modestly improved throughput by tweaking parameters (Litecoin's 4× faster blocks, slightly bigger block size, etc.), but they could not break the fundamental bottleneck: any significant speed-up in a single-chain PoW system tends to cause more forks and threaten consensus stability. Kaspa's multi-block DAG approach side-steps this issue by absorbing orphaned blocks into the ledger rather than fighting them. As a result, Kaspa can safely push the block time down to seconds or less - and the successful 10 BPS upgrade demonstrates the network's confidence in handling that scale. This suggests that the security and decentralization of Proof-of-Work don't inherently require the slowness and low throughput we see in Bitcoin. Scaling via blockDAG could allow PoW networks to compete with or exceed the speed of newer Proof-of-Stake chains, all while leveraging PoW's simplicity and robustness. Kaspa's journey from academic concept to a multi-billion-dollar network has been largely community-driven. There was no flashy VC-marketed token sale to kick it off; instead, early development was funded by an $8 million investment into DAGLabs, a startup co-founded by Sompolinsky to commercialize blockDAG research. After Kaspa's mainnet launch in November 2021, DAGLabs was dissolved and the project handed over to the open-source community. A bottom-up marketing approach has kept Kaspa in the conversation without the 'influencer pumps' or paid hype that many crypto projects rely on. The result is an authentic, technically literate following that genuinely believes in the tech. Fred Thiel, chairman and chief executive officer of Marathon Digital Holdings. Photographer: Valerie ... More Plesch/Bloomberg That ethos has attracted not just armchair supporters, but serious miners. In mid-2024, Marathon Digital Holdings, one of North America's largest Bitcoin miners, revealed it had mined $16 million worth of KAS to diversify its revenue. Even though Marathon emphasized it wasn't pivoting away from Bitcoin - Kaspa would be only a small fraction of its total hashpower - the move was telling. It signaled that Kaspa had entered the big leagues of Proof-of-Work. According to data from June 2024, Kaspa was already the fifth-largest PoW cryptocurrency by market cap, trailing only Bitcoin, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash, and Dogecoin. Today, Kaspa's network security is secured by thousands of GPUs and ASICs around the world, and its community continues to push development forward. Recent upgrades have expanded Kaspa's functionality – for instance, the KRC-20 token standard (akin to Ethereum's ERC-20) was introduced to lay groundwork for future smart contracts. The project's roadmap hints at plans for DeFi and dApps, either through native smart contracts or layer-2 integrations. Kaspa's rise poses an intriguing question for the crypto world: Can Proof-of-Work be scaled up for the modern era? For years, the narrative has been that if you want fast, scalable blockchains, you abandon PoW (as Ethereum did) or compromise on decentralization. Kaspa offers a counterpoint - an existence proof that PoW networks can significantly increase throughput and remain decentralized. By inventing new consensus algorithms like GHOSTDAG, researchers in Jerusalem have opened a path to turbocharge Nakamoto's invention without breaking it. To be sure, Kaspa is still young and faces plenty of challenges. It must prove that its blockDAG can handle real-world usage at scale, fend off any potential exploits, and attract a broader user base beyond die-hard enthusiasts. Competition is also fierce, with many alternative Layer-1 blockchains trying to be the next big thing. For the broader crypto audience, the takeaway is clear. Kaspa's GHOSTDAG is a reminder that blockchain technology is far from done evolving, even in the Proof-of-Work arena. By blending academic theory with open-source execution, this Israeli-born project has cracked a piece of the scalability puzzle. Whether Kaspa becomes a dominant network or not, its approach will likely influence how future protocols are designed. It's a development worth watching - not just for what it is today, but for what it might enable tomorrow. P.S. This article is not investment advice. The author does not hold KAS tokens or have any financial interest in the Kaspa project.
